Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
Ann Surg ; 277(4): e948-e954, 2023 04 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35166263

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to study the association of perioperative administration of renin angiotensin system inhibitors (RASi) and clinical outcomes of patients with heart failure (HF) undergoing cardiac surgery. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: It is controversial whether the perioperative RASi should be administered in HF patients undergoing cardiac surgery. METHODS: A total of 2338 patients with HF and undergoing CABG and/or valve surgeries at multiple hospitals from 2001 to 2015 were identified from STS database. After adjustment using propensity score and instrumental variable, logistic regression was conducted to analyze the influence of preoperative continuation of RASi (PreRASi) on short-term in-hospital outcomes. Independent risk factors of 30-day mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), and renal failure were analyzed by use of stepwise logistic regression. The effects of pre- and postoperative use of RASi (PostRASi) on long-term mortality were analyzed using survival analyses. Stepwise Cox regression was conducted to analyze the independent risk factors of 6-year mortality. The relationships of HF status and surgery type with perioperative RASi, as well as PreRASi-PostRASi, were also evaluated by subgroup analyses. RESULTS: PreRASi was associated with lower incidences of 30-day mortality [ P < 0.0001, odds ratio (OR): 0.556, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.405-0.763], stroke ( P =0.035, OR: 0.585, 95% CI: 0.355-0.962), renal failure ( P =0.007, OR: 0.663, 95% CI: 0.493-0.894). Both PreRASi ( P =0.0137) and PostRASi ( P =0.007) reduced 6-year mortality compared with the No-RASi groups. CONCLUSIONS: Pre- and postoperative use of RASi was associated with better outcomes for the patients who have HF and undergo CABG and/or valve surgeries. Preoperative continuation and postoperative restoration are warranted in these patients.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos , Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Insuficiencia Renal , Humanos , Sistema Renina-Angiotensina , Estudios de Cohortes , Inhibidores de la Enzima Convertidora de Angiotensina/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de la Enzima Convertidora de Angiotensina/farmacología , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/cirugía
2.
Nat Commun ; 10(1): 4202, 2019 09 13.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31519895

RESUMEN

It remains disputable about perioperative use of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASi) and their outcome effects. This multicenter retrospective cohort study examines association between use of perioperative RASi and outcomes in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft and/or valve surgery. After the exclusion, the patients are divided into 2 groups with or without preoperative RASi (PreRASi, n = 8581), or 2 groups with or without postoperative RASi (PostRASi, n = 8130). With using of propensity scores matching to reduce treatment selection bias, the study shows that PreRASi is associated with a significant reduction in postoperative 30-day mortality compared with without one (3.41% vs. 5.02%); PostRASi is associated with reduced long-term mortality rate compared with without one (6.62% vs. 7.70% at 2-year; 17.09% vs. 19.95% at 6-year). The results suggest that perioperative use of RASi has a significant benefit for the postoperative and long-term survival among patients undergoing cardiac surgery.


Asunto(s)
Antagonistas de Receptores de Angiotensina/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de la Enzima Convertidora de Angiotensina/uso terapéutico , Atención Perioperativa , Sistema Renina-Angiotensina/efectos de los fármacos , Anciano , Antagonistas de Receptores de Angiotensina/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de la Enzima Convertidora de Angiotensina/efectos adversos , Puente de Arteria Coronaria , Femenino , Válvulas Cardíacas/cirugía , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
5.
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth ; 31(5): 1618-1623, 2017 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28826848

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Preoperative aspirin has been studied in patients undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass graft surgery. However, there is a paucity of clinical data available evaluating perioperative aspirin in other cardiac surgical procedures. This study was designed to investigate the effects of aspirin on bleeding and transfusion in patients undergoing non-emergent, isolated, heart valve repair or replacement. DESIGN: Retrospective, cohort study. SETTING: Academic medical center. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 694 consecutive patients having non-emergent, isolated, valve repair or replacement surgery at an academic medical center were identified. INTERVENTIONS: Of the 488 patients who met inclusion criteria, 2 groups were defined based on their preoperative use of aspirin: those taking (n = 282), and those not taking (n = 206) aspirin within 5 days of surgery. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Binary logistic regression was used to examine relationships among demographic and clinical variables. No significant difference was found between the aspirin and non-aspirin groups with respect to the percentage receiving red blood cell (RBC) transfusion, mean RBC units transfused in those who required transfusion, massive transfusion of RBC, or amounts of fresh frozen plasma, cryoprecipitate, or platelets. Aspirin was not associated with an increase in the rate of re-exploration for bleeding (5.3% v 6.3%, p = 0.478). Major adverse cardiocerebral events (MACE), 30-day mortality, and 30-day readmission rates were not statistically different between the aspirin-and non-aspirin-treated groups. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative aspirin therapy in elective, isolated, valve surgery did not result in an increase in transfusion or reoperation for bleeding and was not associated with reduced readmission rate, MACE, or 30-day mortality.


Asunto(s)
Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/administración & dosificación , Aspirina/administración & dosificación , Transfusión Sanguínea/tendencias , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/tendencias , Cuidados Preoperatorios/tendencias , Reoperación/tendencias , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/efectos adversos , Aspirina/efectos adversos , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/efectos adversos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Hemorragia Posoperatoria/inducido químicamente , Hemorragia Posoperatoria/etiología , Cuidados Preoperatorios/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos
6.
PLoS One ; 10(7): e0134670, 2015.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26230605

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Despite evidence that preoperative aspirin improves outcomes in cardiac surgery, recommendations for aspirin use are inconsistent due to aspirin's anti-platelet effect and concern for bleeding. The purpose of this study was to investigate preoperative aspirin use and its effect on bleeding and transfusion in cardiac surgery. METHODS: This retrospective study involved consecutive patients (n=1571) who underwent CABG, valve, or combined CABG and valve surgery at a single center between March 2007 and July 2012. Of all patients, 728 met the inclusion criteria and were divided into two groups: those using (n=603) or not using (n=125) aspirin within 5 days of surgery. Data were collected on chest tube drainage, re-operation for bleeding, and transfusion of red blood cells (RBCs), fresh frozen plasma (FFP), and platelets. RESULTS: No significant difference was observed between the two groups in chest tube drainage or re-operation for bleeding. An increase in patients transfused with RBCs was observed in the aspirin group (61.9 vs 51.2%, adjusted OR 1.77, p=0.027); however, among those transfused RBCs, no significant difference in mean units transfused or massive transfusion was observed. No significant difference was seen in transfusion requirement of FFP or platelets. CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing CABG, valve, or combined CABG/valve surgery, preoperative aspirin, within 5 days of surgery, was associated with an increased probability of receiving an RBC transfusion. Preoperative aspirin was not associated with an increase in chest tube drainage, re-operation for bleeding complications, or transfusion of FFP or platelets.


Asunto(s)
Aspirina/efectos adversos , Transfusión Sanguínea , Puente de Arteria Coronaria , Hemorragia/inducido químicamente , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA