The Pediatric Palliative Care Quality Network: Palliative Care Consultation and Patient Outcomes.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Quality benchmarking in pediatric palliative care (PPC) helps identify gaps in care and guides quality improvement. Our study objective was to characterize inpatient PPC referral processes, interdisciplinary PPC delivery, and patient outcomes from a multisite PPC data repository. METHODS: Cross-sectional, administrative data analysis of 1587 PPC inpatient encounters at 5 US hospitals enrolled in the Pediatric Palliative Care Quality Network (2016-2022). PPC clinicians submitted data to a national repository for key quality indicators. Program and referral characteristics, care processes, and outcomes were examined descriptively. Time to referral, time on PPC service, and total hospital length of stay were compared by discharge disposition (alive or dead). RESULTS: Programs were in service for 13 (range 6-17) years on average. Most encounters involved children >1 year old (77%). Common diagnoses were solid tumor cancer (29%) and congenital or chromosomal conditions (14%). Care was often provided by ≤2 PPC team members (53%) until discharge (median = 7d, interquartile range 2-23). There were often multiple reasons for PPC referral, including psychosocial support (78%), goals of care discussions/advance care planning (42%), management of non-pain symptoms (34%), and pain (21%). Moderate-severe symptoms improved by second assessment for pain (71%), dyspnea (51%), fatigue (46%), and feeding issues (39%). CONCLUSIONS: Referrals to PPC were made early during hospitalization for psychosocial and physical symptom management. Moderate-severe symptom distress scores at initial assessment often improved. Findings highlight the need to ensure interdisciplinary PPC team staffing to meet the complex care needs of seriously ill children.

Barriers to Pediatric Palliative Care: Trainee and Faculty Perspectives Across Two Academic Centers.

Objective: Barriers to palliative care for children with serious illness include system constraints and vastly different training and attitudes toward palliative care. This study aimed to explore trainee and faculty physician perceptions of barriers to palliative care across two pediatric centers to (1) examine differences between trainees and faculty and (2) compare these data with previous studies. Methods: A mixed-methods study was conducted in fall 2021 among pediatric trainees and faculty physicians at three pediatric hospitals in two pediatric centers in the western United States. Surveys were distributed through hospital listservs and analyzed descriptively and through inductive thematic analysis. Results: There were a total of 268 participants: 50 trainees and 218 faculty physicians. Of the trainees, 46% (23) were fellows and 54% (27) were pediatric residents. Trainees and faculty reported the same four most common barriers, which were consistent with previous studies: family not ready to acknowledge an incurable condition (64% trainees and 45% faculty); family preference for more life-sustaining therapies than staff (52% and 39%); uncertain prognosis (48% and 38%); and parent discomfort with possibility of hastening death (44% and 30%). Other barriers commonly reported included time constraints, staff shortages, and conflict among family about treatment goals. Language barriers and cultural differences were also cited. Conclusions: This study examining palliative care across two pediatric centers suggests that providers' perceptions of family preferences and understanding of illness persist as barriers to the delivery of pediatric palliative care services. Future research should examine family-centered and culturally mindful interventions to better elucidate family perspectives on their child's illness to align care.

Goals of Care Among Parents of Children Receiving Palliative Care.

Importance: While knowing the goals of care (GOCs) for children receiving pediatric palliative care (PPC) are crucial for guiding the care they receive, how parents prioritize these goals and how their priorities may change over time is not known. Objective: To determine parental prioritization of GOCs and patterns of change over time for parents of children receiving palliative care. Design, Setting, and Participants: A Pediatric Palliative Care Research Network's Shared Data and Research cohort study with data collected at 0, 2, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months in hospital, outpatient, or home settings from April 10, 2017, to February 15, 2022, at 7 PPC programs based at children's hospitals across the US. Participants included parents of patients, birth to 30 years of age, who received PPC services. Exposures: Analyses were adjusted for demographic characteristics, number of complex chronic conditions, and time enrolled in PPC. Main Outcomes: Parents' importance scores, as measured using a discrete choice experiment, of 5 preselected GOCs: seeking quality of life (QOL), health, comfort, disease modification, or life extension. Importance scores for the 5 GOCs summed to 100. Results: A total of 680 parents of 603 patients reported on GOCs. Median patient age was 4.4 (IQR, 0.8-13.2) years and 320 patients were male (53.1%). At baseline, parents scored QOL as the most important goal (mean score, 31.5 [SD, 8.4]), followed by health (26.3 [SD, 7.5]), comfort (22.4 [SD, 11.7]), disease modification (10.9 [SD, 9.2]), and life extension (8.9 [SD, 9.9]). Importantly, parents varied substantially in their baseline scores for each goal (IQRs more than 9.4), but across patients in different complex chronic conditions categories, the mean scores varied only slightly (means differ 8.7 or less). For each additional study month since PPC initiation, QOL was scored higher by 0.06 (95% CI, 0.04-0.08) and comfort scored higher by 0.3 (95% CI, 0-0.06), while the importance score for life extension decreased by 0.07 (95% CI, 0.04-0.09) and disease modification by 0.02 (95% CI, 0-0.04); health scores did not significantly differ from PPC initiation. Conclusions and Relevance: Parents of children receiving PPC placed the highest value on QOL, but with considerable individual-level variation and substantial change over time. These findings emphasize the importance of reassessing GOCs with parents to guide appropriate clinical intervention.

Allowing Relationships to Unfold: Consult Reason and Topics Discussed in Initial and Subsequent Palliative Care Visits Among Children Who Died From Relapsed/Refractory Cancer.

Background: Children with relapsed/refractory cancer have a myriad of palliative care needs. While pediatric oncology clinicians meet many of these needs, studies suggest that these children often have distressing symptoms and that families feel unprepared for their child's end-of-life (EOL). Oncology clinicians cite barriers to pediatric palliative care (PPC) consultation, including concerns that PPC teams will upset families with EOL discussions. This study evaluated topics addressed by PPC teams over the course of their relationship with children who died from cancer. Methods: Retrospective chart review of children who were diagnosed with relapsed/refractory cancer, received PPC consultation at an academic children's hospital, and died between January 2008 and January 2017. Information was extracted regarding the child's treatment, EOL care, and the content of PPC consultation over the course of the team's relationship with the child/family. Results: Fifty-six children were included in the analysis. The most frequent reasons for the initial consult were pain (n = 31, 55%) and non-pain symptom management (n = 18, 32%). At the initial consult, the PPC team most often discussed symptom management and psychosocial support. Prognosis was not discussed in any initial consult. Over subsequent visits, the PPC team expanded their scope of discussion to include goals of care, advance care planning, and hospice. Discussion: Concerns from oncology clinicians that PPC teams will extend beyond the reasons for initial consult into prognostic/EOL discussions at the first visit may be unfounded. Greater familiarity with PPC team practices may facilitate more timely consultation of PPC and its complementary set of services.

Measuring Pediatric Palliative Care Quality: Challenges and Opportunities.

Pediatric palliative care (PPC) programs vary widely in structure, staffing, funding, and patient census, resulting in inconsistency in service provision. Improving the quality of palliative care for children living with serious illness and their families requires measuring care quality, ensuring that quality measurement is embedded into day-to-day clinical practice, and aligning quality measurement with healthcare policy priorities. Yet, numerous challenges exist in measuring PPC quality. This paper provides an overview of PPC quality measurement, including challenges, current initiatives, and future opportunities. While important strides toward addressing quality measurement challenges in PPC have been made, including ongoing quality measurement initiatives like the Cambia Metrics Project, the PPC What Matters Most study, and collaborative learning networks, more work remains. Providing high-quality PPC to all children and families will require a multi-pronged approach. In this paper, we suggest several strategies for advancing high-quality PPC, which includes 1) considering how and by whom success is defined, 2) evaluating, adapting, and developing PPC measures, including those that address care disparities within PPC for historically marginalized and excluded communities, 3) improving the infrastructure with which to routinely and prospectively measure, monitor, and report clinical and administrative quality measures, 4) increasing endorsement of PPC quality measures by prominent quality organizations to facilitate accountability and possible reimbursement, and 5) integrating PPC-specific quality measures into the administrative, funding, and policy landscape of pediatric healthcare.

Development of Primary Palliative Care End-of-Life Quality Measures: A Modified Delphi Process.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Children with complex chronic conditions (CCCs) and their families deserve high-quality pediatric palliative care (PPC) throughout their illness trajectory, including at end of life (EOL). Standard EOL quality measures (QM) have only recently been proposed, require surveys and/or manual chart review, and focus on children with cancer. Therefore, we aimed to develop expert-endorsed, hospital-based, primary PPC quality measures for EOL care for all children with CCCs that could be automatically abstracted from the electronic health record (EHR). METHODS: We followed a modified Delphi approach for expert opinion gathering, including: (1) a comprehensive literature review of existing adult and pediatric measures (>200 measures); (2) formation of a multidisciplinary expert panel (n = 9); (3) development of a list of candidate measures (20 measures); (4) national survey to assess each QM's importance and abstraction feasibility and propose new measures (respondents = 95); and (5) final expert panel endorsement. RESULTS: Seventeen EHR-abstractable QM were endorsed in 5 domains: (1) health care utilization: 4 measures (eg, <2 emergency department visits in the last 30 days of life); (2) interprofessional services: 4 measures (eg, PPC in the last 30 days of life); (3) medical intensity: 5 measures (eg, death outside the ICU); (4) symptom management: 2 measures (eg, documented pain score within 24 hours of admission); and (5) communication: 2 measures (eg, code status documentation). CONCLUSIONS: This study developed a list of EHR-abstractable, hospital-based primary PPC EOL QM, providing a foundation for quality improvement initiatives and further measure development in the future.

Relationships and Resources Supporting Children With Serious Illness and Their Parents.

OBJECTIVE: Children with complex chronic conditions (CCCs) and their parents benefit from supportive serious illness care when their conditions are severe and impact their quality of life and stress. This includes not only expert medical care but also effective relationships with the clinical team. Existing data suggest that there are opportunities for improvement. This study's aim was to explore important aspects of the relationships and resources that facilitate supportive serious illness care among children with CCCs and their parents. METHODS: We conducted semistructured interviews with adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with CCCs (aged 13-35 years), and parents of children with CCCs across 2 academic pediatric centers in the United States from December 2018 to April 2019. Transcripts were iteratively coded and analyzed by a team that included a sociologist, pediatric intensivist, and palliative care researcher by using inductive and deductive thematic analysis. RESULTS: Seven AYAs with CCCs and 9 parents participated (16 total; 1 AYA-parent dyad). Two key categories were identified around relationships with the clinical team: trust and fostering collaboration. Three key categories related to resources are information needs, making sense of life with illness, and supportive community. Many of the key categories and themes identified by participants had both tangible and intangible components and revealed the distinct yet interconnected nature of these aspects of care. CONCLUSIONS: Awareness and cultivation of relationship and resource support through innovative interventions and attention to those with increased needs in these areas may improve the serious illness care provided to children with CCCs and their parents.

Survey of Pediatric Palliative Care Quality Improvement Training, Activities, and Barriers.

CONTEXT: Children with serious illness deserve high-quality pediatric palliative care (PPC). With expansion of PPC provision, it is important to understand the quality improvement (QI) activities of PPC clinicians and programs. OBJECTIVES: To describe the 1) background, education/training, and activities in QI and 2) perceived barriers to QI efforts among PPC clinicians and programs nationally. METHODS: An electronic survey was sent to members of the Pediatric Palliative Improvement Network, the National Coalition for Hospice and Palliative Care Pediatric Task Force, and the PPC Research Network as part of a study to develop hospital-based, primary PPC quality measures. Surveys queried participants' background, education/training, individual/team QI efforts, and barriers to QI work. Results were summarized descriptively. RESULTS: Of the 95 respondents; most were female (84 [88%]) and/or white (84 [88%]). The majority (57 [54%]) were physicians, although participants represented a variety of clinical disciplines, researchers (10 [9%]), and administrators (6 [6%]). One-quarter (25 [26%]) reported having <10 hours total of training in QI, yet two-third (63 [66%]) participated in QI work. About one-third (35 [37%]) reported that their program had no dedicated staff for QI activities, yet over half (56 [59%]) of participants reported that their team participated in QI work. Participants reported that lack of personnel/time, standardized measures/tools, education/training/mentoring in QI, systems to promote QI work, and financing/grants were barriers. CONCLUSION: Over half of PPC participants in this study reported involvement in QI activities despite limited staffing/time, QI training, and standardized measures, which presents challenges to this work.

Grief Trajectories of Bereaved Parents of Adolescents and Young Adults With Advanced Cancer: A Qualitative Analysis Using Phenomenology.

Different parents grieve differently. However, research directed at understanding the important contextual or individual factors that influence the path each bereaved parent takes is lacking. In this qualitative analysis we seek to understand the array of bereaved parent experiences more completely. By deeply diving into one parent dyad using interpretive phenomenology analysis and situating that story within the conventional content analysis of 13 other bereaved parents of adolescents and young adults (AYAs) who died from advanced cancer, we illustrate the roles of religion/spirituality, maintaining a connection, and fulfilling parental roles as elements of grief processing. Clinicians and investigators should consider similar individualized approaches to understanding and supporting the grief experiences of bereaved parents before and after the death of a child.

The Impact of Caring for Children With Severe Neurological Impairment on Clinicians.

Clinicians face many challenges in caring for children with severe neurological impairment (SNI). This study aimed to understand expert clinician perspectives on the personal impact of caring for children with SNI to highlight the challenges and potential solutions by underscoring the aspects of care that can be sustaining. Twenty-five clinicians participated including physicians (n = 8, 32%), social workers (n = 5, 20%), nurses/nurse practitioners (n = 5, 20%), case managers (n = 3, 12%), developmental therapists (n = 2, 8%), and other psychosocial clinicians (n = 2, 8%). Clinicians represented a variety of specialties including complex care/hospitalists (n = 10, 19%), palliative care (n = 7, 13%), and critical care (n = 6, 12%). Thematic content analysis revealed 3 major themes: (1) worries and challenges; (2) positive impact from being present; and (3) personal growth and meaning-making. Many clinicians described the ways listening, examining biases, learning about family perspectives, and normalizing the need for emotional processing helped them to understand their patients, families, and themselves more deeply.

Pediatric Hospice and Palliative Care Services and Needs Across the Northwest United States.

CONTEXT: Given workforce and funding constraints, pediatric hospice and palliative care clinicians often find challenges providing services for seriously ill children and families, particularly in low resource and rural/remote areas. OBJECTIVES: To describe the services, training, and education needs of pediatric hospice and palliative care programs across the Northwest United States as part of the formation of a new regional coalition. METHODS: Electronic surveys were sent to pediatric hospice and palliative care clinicians through state organizations as part of an email invitation to join the Northwest Pediatric Palliative Care Coalition. Data were analyzed descriptively using univariate analysis. RESULTS: Sixty-four participants representing 37 unique programs responded from seven states, including Washington (41%, n=27), Oregon (38%, n=25), Idaho (11%, n=7), Alaska (5%, n=3), Montana (3%, n=2), Colorado (2%, n=1), and Nevada (2%, n=1). Programs provided pediatric hospice care (42%, n=33/78) and palliative care services (30%, n=26/86). Although 26% (n=15/58) had been providing pediatric hospice and palliative care for >20 years, 40% (n=21/53) reported only serving <5 pediatric patients per year. Specific services provided included pediatric bereavement support (16%, n=37/231), telehealth (14%, n=33/231), and respite (10%, n=23/231). Barriers occurring always, often, or sometimes included lack of trained staff (84%), financial support (59%), and access to home infusions (48%). From the coalition, participants prioritized education on parent/caregiver psychosocial support (40%, n=19/48), goals of care communication (44%, n=21/48), and symptom management (45%, n=21/47). CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric hospice and palliative care clinicians face numerous barriers and may benefit from a coalition that provides networking and tailored education.

From Monochromatic to Technicolor: Parent Perspectives on Challenges and Approaches to Seeing Children with Severe Neurological Impairment Holistically.

Background: Children with severe neurological impairment (SNI) commonly receive care in the hospital setting necessitating frequent interactions with clinicians. Yet, parents report that clinicians often have a limited understanding of their child's unique needs and abilities which hinders their care. Objectives: This study aimed to understand the challenges and suggested approaches parents identified to seeing their child holistically. Design: Cross-sectional qualitative study. Setting/Subjects: Parents/legal guardians of children with SNI at a tertiary pediatric academic center in the United States completed 1:1 interviews between August 2019 and February 2020. Measurements: Qualitative researchers with expertise in care for children with SNI, palliative care, and bioethics used thematic content analysis to inductively analyze data for relevant themes. Results: Twenty-five parents/legal guardians of 23 children with SNI participated. Sixty-eight percent were mothers and 24% were fathers; and 68% were white. Thirty-two percent were from other racial and/or ethnic backgrounds. Children predominantly had congenital/chromosomal (n = 15, 65%) and central nervous system static (n = 6, 26%) SNI diagnoses. Four themes emerged regarding both challenges and approaches to understanding children with SNI holistically. These included uniqueness, interdependency, complexity, and universality. Parents felt that by eliciting and incorporating their perspective on these sometimes contrasting but inherently necessary aspects of their child's care, clinicians would understand their children more fully. Conclusion: By viewing the child through the prismed lens of parents, participants described how clinicians could transition from a monochromatic to a technicolor view of their child-including the inherent contrasting needs required for their comprehensive care.

Parents Are the Experts: A Qualitative Study of the Experiences of Parents of Children With Severe Neurological Impairment During Decision-Making.

CONTEXT: Parents of children with severe neurologic impairment (SNI) often face high-stakes medical decisions when their child is hospitalized. These decisions involve technology and/or surgery, goals of care and/or advance care planning, or transitions of care. OBJECTIVES: This study describes the experiences of parents of children with SNI during decision-making. METHODS: Eligible participants were parents facing a decision for a child with SNI admitted to acute or intensive care units at a single tertiary pediatric center. Parents completed 1:1 semi-structured interviews and brief surveys between August 2019 and February 2020. Demographic information was extracted from the child's electronic health record. A team of palliative and complex care researchers with expertise in qualitative methods used thematic content analysis to formulate results. RESULTS: 25 parents participated. The majority had children with congenital/chromosomal SNI conditions (n = 13, 65%), >5 subspecialists (n = 14, 61%), and chronic technology assistance (n = 25, 100%). 68% (n = 17) were mothers and 100% identified as being their child's primary decision-maker. Responses from parents included 3 major themes: 1) our roles and actions; 2) our stresses and challenges; and 3) our meaning and purpose. Responses highlighted the pervasiveness of parental decision-making efforts and parents' advocacy and vigilance regarding their child's needs. Despite this, parents often felt unheard and undervalued in the hospital. CONCLUSION: During hospitalizations, when parents of children with SNI often face high-stakes medical decisions, interventions are needed to support parents and ensure they feel heard and valued as they navigate their child's medical needs and system challenges.

"It's My Job to Love Him": Parenting Adolescents and Young Adults With Advanced Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Parents of adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with serious illness experience enormous stress as they navigate their child's illness. In this study, we aimed to elucidate AYA parental perspectives on the advanced cancer experience, including what parents find challenging and their sources of strength. METHODS: Parents of AYAs aged 14 to 24 years old being treated for recurrent or refractory advanced cancer at a large academic center completed demographic surveys and 1:1 semi-structured interviews between December 2017 and July 2018. Conventional content analysis was used by 2 coders to analyze transcriptions, with a third reviewer adjudicating. Thematic networks analysis was then used to extrapolate basic and organizing themes. RESULTS: A total of 22 parents participated. The majority were female, non-Hispanic, and married; 23% (n = 5) were from racial minority groups. We identified 3 organizing themes related to navigating parents' experiences: (1) what we do to love our child, (2) what challenges us, and (3) how we keep our heart focused on what matters most. Despite substantial uncertainty about their child's future, parents endorsed growth and gratitude as they focused on the ways they showed love for their child during this difficult time. CONCLUSIONS: Parents of AYAs with advanced cancer experience many parenting challenges, elucidating some of the vulnerabilities and magnifying the sources of strength among parents of children transitioning to adulthood during serious illness. This research has important implications for how we build programs that support and sustain parents' well-being during their child's serious illness.

Comparing Health Care Provider-Perceived Barriers to Pediatric Palliative Care Fifteen Years Ago and Today.

OBJECTIVE: This study examines health care provider perspectives about barriers to pediatric palliative care for seriously ill children 15 years after an initial study within the same academic health system. METHODS: Anonymous validated surveys were sent electronically to inpatient nursing unit distribution lists (n = 1315). Reminders were sent through e-mail twice over a two-month data collection period. RESULTS: Response rate was 20.9% (275/1315) with 45.2% of responses from critical care units and 21.6% from hematology/oncology units. Of the participants, 58.2% (n = 160) had ≥10 years nursing experience, 58.5% (n = 161) had one to five patients die in the past 12 months, and 50.2% (n = 138) had one to five patients receiving subspecialty pediatric palliative care in the past year. Approximately one-half of the participants reported 3 of 26 barriers listed on the study survey as frequently or almost always occurring, including (1) family preference for more life-sustaining treatment than staff (n = 177, 64.8%), (2) family not ready to acknowledge incurable condition (n = 175, 64.1%), and (3) parent discomfort with possibility of hastening death (n = 146, 53.7%). Study findings were similar between 2002 and 2017, particularly in the extremes of the most and least commonly cited barriers. CONCLUSIONS: Barriers to palliative care for hospitalized children persist and commonly include perceptions that families deny, prefer, or have discomfort with forgoing life-sustaining treatments. Increasingly, studies have shown that families can be simultaneously hopeful and aware of their child's worsening health. Further palliative care education and research about these barriers and their impacts are necessary to support seriously ill children and their families.