Surgical scar endometriosis.

Endometriosis is a common disorder in females of reproductive age. Surgical scar endometrioma after cesarean section develops in 1-2% of patients, and usually presents as a tender and painful abdominal wall mass. The diagnosis is suggested by pre or perimenstrual pelvic pain and is often established only by histology. In this retrospective observational cohort study, we reviewed the medical records of five patients with a histopathological diagnosis of scar endometriosis. A scar mass was found on a previous Pfannenstiel incision in four patients and in a median cesarean section in one patient. The mean age at diagnosis (38.6 years, median 38) was older than reported elsewhere. A histological examination of the surgical specimen confirmed the diagnosis of endometriosis in all cases. During the follow-up period (mean 34.6 months), local recurrence (n = 1) and pelvic recurrence (n = 1) were treated surgically. Surgery is the treatment of choice for surgical scar endometriosis. Excision with histologically proven free surgical margins of 1 cm is mandatory to prevent recurrence. As scar endometriosis may be associated with pelvic localization, explorative abdominal laparoscopy may be indicated to exclude the intraperitoneal spread of the disease in symptomatic patients.

10-year follow-up of laparoscopic vertical banded gastroplasty: good results in selected patients.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the long-term results of laparoscopic vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG) for morbid obesity. BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic VBG, a safe and straightforward bariatric procedure characterized by good short-term results, has been progressively replaced by other more complex procedures on the basis of a presumed high rate of long-term failure. Nevertheless, some authors have recently reported long-term efficacy in selected patients. METHODS: All patients who underwent laparoscopic VBG were included in a prospective database. Patients reaching 10-year follow-up received a complete evaluation including clinical, endoscopic, and biochemical examinations. RESULTS: Between January 1996 and March 1999, 266 morbidly obese patients underwent bariatric procedures. Among them, 213 were selected for laparoscopic VBG; exclusion criteria were as follows: contraindications to pneumoperitoneum, gastroesophageal reflux disease, and psychological contraindications to restrictive procedures. Mean age, preoperative weight, and body mass index were 36.9 years, 123.6 kg, and 45.4 kg/m, respectively. Intraoperative complication rate and conversion rate were 0.9% and 0.9%, respectively. Early postoperative complication rate was 4.2% and early reoperation rate was 0.5%. Mean hospital length of stay was 6.3 days. Mortality was nil. The 10-year follow-up rate was 70.4% (150 patients). Late postoperative complication rate was 14.7%, and 10-year revisional surgery rate was 10.0%. The excess weight loss percentages at 3, 5, and 10 years were 65.0%, 59.9%, and 59.8%, respectively. The resolution and/or improvement rate for comorbidity were 47.5% for hypertension, 55.6% for diabetes, 75% for sleep apnea, and 47.4% for arthritis. Mean Moorehead-Ardelt Quality of Life Questionnaire and BAROS values were 1.4 and 3.8, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The present study demonstrates that laparoscopic VBG in carefully selected patients leads to long-term results comparable with more complex and invasive procedures. Given the low postoperative morbidity for laparoscopic VBG, its present clinical role should be, in our opinion, reevaluated.

Laparoscopic adjustable silicone gastric banding vs laparoscopic vertical banded gastroplasty in morbidly obese patients: long-term results of a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Aim of the study is to present long-term results of a prospective randomized single-institution clinical trial comparing laparoscopic adjustable silicone gastric banding (LASGB) with laparoscopic vertical banded gastroplasty (LVBG) in morbid obesity. METHODS: A total of 100 morbidly obese patients (body mass index 40 to 50 kg/m2) were randomized to LASGB (n=49) or LVBG (n=51) and followed up for a minimum of 7 years. RESULTS: Mean operative time was 65.4 min in LASGBs and 94.2 min in LVBGs (p<0.05); mean hospital stay was 3.7 and 6.6 days, respectively (p<0.05). Late complication rates were 36.7% in LASGBs vs 15.7% in LVBGs at 3 years (p<0.05), 46.9% vs 43.1% at 5 years (NS), and 55.1% vs 47.1% at 7 years (NS). Late reoperation rates were 28.6% in LASGBs and 2.0% in LVBGs at 3 years (p<0.001), 38.8% and 2.0% at 5 years (p<0.001), and 46.9% and 7.8% at 7 years (p<0.001). Excess weight loss in LASGBs was 41.8% at 3 years, 33.2% at 5 years, and 29.9% at 7 years; excess weight loss in LVBGs was 60.9%, 57%, and 53.1%, respectively (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that in a carefully selected group of patients, LVBG is significantly more effective than LASGB in terms of late complications, late reoperations, and long-term results on weight loss.

Disappointing results with a 5 cm calibrating device for laparoscopic vertical banded gastroplasty.

BACKGROUND: The gastric outlet represents a critical point of laparoscopic vertical banded gastroplasty (LVBG): the diameter and the material used to calibrate the gastric outlet are essential for long-term success. We present the results of our initial clinical experience with the Proring band, a new calibrating device specifically designed to calibrate LVBG outlet. METHODS: Between February and April 2004, 13 LVBG were performed using the Proring band. There were 12 women and one man; their mean age was 44 years; mean preoperative weight was 118.8 kg; mean body mass index (BMI) was 44.4 kg/m(2). RESULTS: The immediate postoperative course was uneventful in all cases. In the follow-up 10 patients out of 13 (76.9%) presented a sudden or progressive food intolerance. Five patients were immediately reoperated by laparoscopic approach and five underwent endoscopic dilatation with initial clinical improvement; early recurrence of symptoms despite further dilatations occurred in four out of five cases. These four patients were then reoperated. Therefore a total of nine (69.2%) patients underwent a laparoscopic reoperation with Proring band removal and its replacement with a polypropylene band. In seven cases an intraoperative endoscopic dilatation was associated with the laparoscopic procedure. Outcome was successful in all cases, with discharge after two days. CONCLUSION: The results of our experience using the Proring band are unsatisfactory, showing 76.9% with outlet stenosis and 69.2% with reoperations. These data compare negatively with our previous experience on more than 900 VBG procedures using polypropylene mesh.

Laparoscopic adjustable silicone gastric banding versus vertical banded gastroplasty in morbidly obese patients: a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare, in a prospective, randomized, single-institution trial laparoscopic adjustable silicone gastric banding (LASGB) with laparoscopic vertical banded gastroplasty (LVBG) in morbidly obese patients. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: LASGB is a simple and safe procedure, but some reports have suggested disappointing long-term results. Despite the recent widespread use of LASGB, there are no prospective nor randomized trials comparing LASGB with other laparoscopic procedures. METHODS: A total of 100 morbidly obese patients, with body mass index (BMI) 40 to 50 kg/m2, without compulsive eating, were randomized to either LASGB (n = 49) or LVBG (n = 51). Minimum follow-up was 2 years (mean 33.1 months). RESULTS: There were no deaths or conversions in either group. Mean operative time was 94.2 minutes in LVBGs and 65.4 in LASGBs (P < 0.05). Early morbidity rate was lower in LASGBs (6.1%) versus LVBGs (9.8%) (P = 0.754). Mean hospital stay was shorter in LASGBs versus LVBGs: 3.7 days versus 6.6 (P < 0.05). Late complications rate in LVBGs was 14% (7 of 50) and in LASGBs 32.7% (16 of 49) (P < 0.05). The most frequent complication was the slippage of the band (18%). Late reoperations rate in LVBGs was 0% (0 of 50) versus 24.5% (12 of 49) in LASGBs (P < 0.001). Excess weight loss in LVBGs was, at 2 years, 63.5% and, at 3 years, 58.9%; in LASGBs, excess weight loss, respectively, was 41.4% and 39%. BMI in LVBGs was, at 2 years, 29.7 kg/m2 and, at 3 years, 30.7 kg/m2; in LASGBs, BMI was 34.8 kg/m2 at 2 years and 35.7 kg/m2 at 3 years. According to Reinhold's classification, a residual excess weight <50% was achieved, at 2 years, in 74% of LVBG and 35% of LASGB (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that, in patients with BMI 40 to 50 kg/m2, LASGB requires shorter operative time and hospital stay but LVBG is more effective in terms of late complications, reoperations, and weight loss.