Four-factor Prothrombin Complex Concentrate During Liver Transplantation: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Background: Four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) is a plasma product that contains factors II, VII, IX, X, protein C, and protein S. PCC can be used off-label to treat coagulopathy during orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). However, its use comes with safety concerns regarding thrombosis. The purpose of our study is to determine the safety of PCC in OLT. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients who received 4-factor PCC during OLT at our institution from January 1, 2018, to May 1, 2022, with a 1:1 match of 83 patients who received PCC and 83 patients who did not. We evaluated 30-d mortality, 1-y mortality, prevalence of thrombotic complications (portal vein thrombosis, deep venous thrombosis, myocardial infarction, and pulmonary embolus), and postoperative intensive care (ICU) length of stay (LOS). Results: There was no significant difference in 30-d mortality (odds ratio [OR] 5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.58-42.8; P = 0.14), 1-y mortality (OR 3; 95% CI, 0.61-14.86; P = 0.18), or ICU LOS (OR -13.8; 95% CI, -39.2 to 11.6; P = 0.29). There was no increased incidence of thrombotic complications among patients receiving PCC 90 d after surgery, including portal vein thrombosis (OR 1.5; 95% CI, 0.42-5.32; P = 0.53), pulmonary embolus (OR 1; 95% CI, 0.14-7.1; P = 0.99), deep venous thrombosis (OR 0.67; 95% CI, 0.11-3.99; P = 0.66), and myocardial infarction (OR 1.67; 95% CI, 0.4-6.97; P = 0.48). Conclusions: Although there was a statistically insignificant increase in mortality after PCC administration during OLT, we did not see a significant increase in perioperative complications, including thrombotic events and increased ICU LOS.

Dexamethasone, Glycemic Control, and Outcomes in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Undergoing Elective, Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty.

Background: Dexamethasone (DEX) has been shown to reduce pain and postoperative nausea and vomiting for patients undergoing elective total joint arthroplasty (TJA). We investigated the impact of DEX on glycemic control and outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus undergoing elective primary TJA. Methods: All patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus undergoing primary elective TJA between January 2016 and December 2021 at 4 sites within 1 hospital system were identified. Propensity scores were calculated to match patients receiving or not receiving DEX. Primary outcomes were perioperative blood glucose levels and the incidence of hyperglycemia. Secondary outcomes were the amount of insulin administered, the occurrence of 30-day postoperative surgical site infections, hospital readmission, and mortality. Results: After matching, we identified 1372 patients. DEX administration was associated with a significant increase in mean blood glucose levels in mg/dL on postoperative days (PODs) 0 to 2: POD 0 (28.4, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 24.6-32.1), POD 1 (14.4, 95% CI: 10.1-18.8), POD 2 (12.4, 95% CI: 7.5-17.2) when comparing patients who did or did not receive DEX. Additionally, patients receiving DEX, compared to patients who did not receive DEX, had increased odds of experiencing hyperglycemia on POD 0 (odds ratio: 4.0, 95% CI: 3.1-5.2). DEX was not associated with a significant difference in insulin administration, surgical site infections, hospital readmission, or mortality. Conclusions: In our review of 1372 patients with propensity-matched type 2 diabetes mellitus undergoing elective, primary TJA, we found that DEX administration was associated with an increased risk of elevated mean glucose on POD 0-2, hyperglycemia on POD 0, but was not associated with an increase in total insulin dose administered nor occurrence of surgical site infections, hospital readmission, or mortality within 30 days of surgery in patients who received DEX compared to patients who did not receive DEX. Level of Evidence: IV.

Emergency Department Visits Before Cancer Diagnosis Among Women at Mayo Clinic.

Objective: To determine associations of incident cancer diagnoses in women with recent emergency department (ED) care. Patients and Methods: A retrospective cohort study analyzing biological females aged 18 years and older, who were diagnosed with an incident primary cancer (12 cancer types studied) from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2021, from electronic health records. The primary outcome was a cancer diagnosis within 6 months of a preceding ED visit. Secondary outcomes included patient factors associated with a preceding ED visit. Results: Of 25,736 patients (median age of 62 years, range 18-101) diagnosed with an incident primary cancer, 1938 (7.5%) had an ED visit ≤6 months before a diagnosis. The ED-associated cancer cases were highest in lung cancer (n=514, 14.7%) followed by acute lymphoblastic leukemia (n=22, 13.3%). Patient factors increasing the likelihood of ED evaluation before diagnosis included 18-50 years of age (OR=1.32; 95% CI, 1.09-1.61), Elixhauser score (measure of comorbidities) >4 (OR=17.90; 95% CI, 14.21-22.76), use of Medicaid or other government insurance (OR=2.10; 95% CI, 1.63-2.69), residence within the institutional catchment areas (OR=3.18; 95% CI, 2.78-3.66), non-Hispanic Black race/ethnicity (OR=1.41; 95% CI, 1.04-1.88), and established primary care provider at Mayo Clinic (OR=1.45; 95% CI, 1.28-1.65). The ED visits were more likely in those who died within 6 months of diagnosis (n=327, 37.8%) than those who did not die (n=1611, 6.5%). Conclusion: Patient characteristics identified in this study offer opportunities to provide cancer risk assessment and health navigation, particularly among individuals with comorbidities and limited health care access.

Features associated with travel distance for radical cystectomy in Florida: Implications for access to care.

INTRODUCTION: Characteristics associated with travel distance for radical cystectomy (RC) remain incompletely defined but are needed to inform efforts to bridge gaps in care. Therefore, we assessed features associated with travel distance for RC in a statewide dataset. METHODS: We identified RC patients in the Florida Inpatient Discharge dataset from 2013 to 2019. Travel distance was estimated using zip code centroids. The primary outcome was travel >50 miles for RC. Secondary outcomes included inpatient mortality, nonhome discharge, and inpatient complications. U.S. County Health Rankings were included as model covariates. Mixed effects logistic regression models accounting for clustering within hospitals were utilized. RESULTS: We identified 4,209 patients, of whom 2,284 (54%) traveled <25 miles, 654 (16%) traveled 25 to 50 miles, and 1271 (30%) traveled >50 miles. Patients who traveled >50 miles primarily lived in central and southwest Florida. Following multivariable adjustment, patients traveling >50 miles were less likely to be Hispanic/Latino (odds ratio [OR] 0.35, 95% CI: 0.23-0.51), and more likely to reside in a county with the lowest health behavior (OR 6.48, 95% CI: 3.81-11.2) and lowest socioeconomic (OR 7.63, 95% CI: 5.30-11.1) rankings compared to those traveling <25 miles (all P < 0.01). Travel distance >50 miles was associated with treatment at a high-volume center and significantly lower risks of inpatient mortality, nonhome discharge, and postoperative complications (all P < 0.02). CONCLUSION: These data identify characteristics of patients and communities in the state of Florida with potentially impaired access to RC care and can be used to guide outreach efforts designed to improve access to care.

Trainee Effect on Procedural Efficiency is Limited in Vascular Surgery Operations.

BACKGROUND: Surgical residents prepare during their training for independent operating experience. However, there is a fine balance between supervised intraoperative teaching and the need to keep operations short since this is associated with improved patient safety. We aim to understand if the composition of the vascular surgical team-presence of anesthesia and surgical trainees as well as the number of circulating nurses-affects elective operative times at our institution. As a secondary aim, we analyzed how time of day affects overall operative time. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of all vascular surgery elective operations occurring between January 1, 2019, and October 15, 2021. Our reference operation between procedures was the construction of an arteriovenous fistula (AVF). Reference teams included circulating staff (fewer than two nurses), anesthesia (anesthesiologist with certified registered nurse anesthetist [CRNA]), and surgery (surgeon with nurse practitioner). The primary dependent variable was the time interval in minutes from wheels-in to wheels-out of surgery, which was divided into three subintervals: wheels-in to cut, cut to close, and close to wheels-out. Univariate analysis was performed to examine each surgical procedure's distribution of wheels-in to wheels-out time interval. Linear regression was performed to determine the effect of team composition and time of day on operative durations. RESULTS: We included a total of 853 vascular operations. Regarding overall operative time, different procedures took various amounts of time compared with the reference operation (AVF creation). Amputations and arteriograms were shorter (-30 min, P = 0.03, and -12 min, P = 0.05, respectively). Other procedures were longer: endarterectomy (+48 min, P < 0.01), rib resection (+78 min, P < 0.01), endovascular aorta repair (+120 min, P < 0.01), lower extremity bypass (+170 min, P < 0.01), and open aortic repair (+410 min, P < 0.01). No significant difference was found in carotid artery stent placement. Overall, there was a significant reduction in the close to wheels-out interval for anesthesiologists with a trainee (mean: -2.4 min; 95%; CI: -4.7, -0.12; P = 0.04). AVF took significantly more time with a surgical resident: wheels-in to cut time (mean: +4.2 min; 95%; CI: 0.92, 7.4; P = 0.01) and cut to close time (mean: +13 min; 3.2, 23; P < 0.01). Arteriogram wheels-in to cut time took longer with a surgeon alone (mean: +5.6; 95%; CI: 0.29, 11; P = 0.04). There were no other statistically significant findings with change in composition of the surgical team or changes in start time. CONCLUSIONS: General surgery residents generally do not add time to vascular surgery cases but may do so in certain cases, perhaps when they are given more autonomy (i.e. AVF creation). Future studies should look at multiple centers, specific vascular procedures, and level of training to explore whether experience among residents (i.e., intern versus senior resident) and case complexity play a role in procedural length, as this may indirectly affect attending surgeon burnout and patient outcomes.

The Association Between Mood and Anxiety Disorders With Perioperative Outcomes Following Radical Cystectomy.

OBJECTIVE: To identify associations between preoperative psychiatric diagnoses and perioperative outcomes after RC. METHODS: The Florida Inpatient Data File was used to identify patients who underwent RC from 2013 to 2019. ICD-10 codes for a mood or anxiety disorder were identified and analyzed as a 3-level variable: neither, one of these, or both. Outcomes included inpatient mortality, non-home discharge, in-hospital complications, and length of stay. Mixed-effects logistic regression (accounting for clustering within hospitals) and negative binomial regression models were utilized. RESULTS: We identified 4396 RC patients, including 306 (7.0%) with a mood disorder and 389 (8.8%) with an anxiety disorder. After multivariable adjustment, there was no significant association between mood and/or anxiety disorders with mortality or the presence or number of in-hospital complications. However, a mood or anxiety disorder was significantly associated with increased odds of non-home discharge (OR 1.60, 95% CI 1.20-2.14) and longer length of stay (IRR 1.13, 95% CI 1.07-1.19); these associations were also increased among patients with both mood and anxiety disorder diagnoses (non-home discharge OR 2.66, 95% CI 1.61-4.38; length of stay IRR 1.12, 95% CI 1.01-1.24). CONCLUSION: Patients with mood and/or anxiety disorders undergoing RC had longer length of stay and increased odds of discharge to a non-home facility despite similar risks of perioperative complications. These data suggest an opportunity for perioperative intervention to address these disparities in postoperative outcomes. However, further work is needed to determine the underlying causes of these differences and to develop effective interventions.

Temporary vs. permanent stoma: factors associated with the development of complications and costs for rectal cancer patients.

OBJECTIVE: To compare in-hospital complication rates and treatment costs between rectal cancer patients receiving permanent and temporary stomas. Surgical complications and costs associated with permanent stoma formation are still poorly understood. While choosing between the two stoma options is usually based on clinical and technical factors, disparities exist. METHODS: Patients with rectal cancer, stoma formation, complications, and cost of care were identified from the Florida Agency for Health Care Administration Discharge Database. Rectal cancer patients who underwent elective surgery and received a permanent or temporary stoma were identified using ICD-10 codes. Patients who underwent colostomy with resection were included in the "Permanent stoma" group, and those who underwent "resection with ileostomy" were included in the "temporary stoma" group. Multivariable models compared patients receiving temporary vs. permanent stomas. RESULTS: Regression models revealed no difference in the odds of having a complication between patients who obtained permanent versus temporary stoma (OR 0.96, 95% CI: 0.70-1.32). Further, after adjusting for the number of surgeries, demographic variables, socioeconomic and regional factors, comorbidities, and type of surgery, there was a significant difference between permanent and temporary stomas for rectal cancer (ß - 0.05, p = 0.03) in the log cost of creating a permanent stoma. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest there are no differences associated with complications, and reduced cost for permanent compared to temporary stomas. Increased costs are also associated with receiving minimally invasive surgery. As a result, disparities associated with receipt of MIS could ultimately influence the type of stoma received.

Permanent stoma: a quality outcome in treatment of rectal cancer and its impact on length of stay.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to identify socioeconomic predictors of permanent stoma in rectal cancer treatment and examine its association with length of stay at the treatment facility. METHODS: Rectal cancer patients who underwent elective surgery between January 2015 and December 2018 were identified from the Agency for Health Care Administration Florida Hospital Inpatient Discharge Dataset. Multivariate regression models were utilized to identify demographic and socioeconomic factors associated with receiving a permanent stoma as well as the associated length of stay of these patients. RESULTS: Of 2630 rectal cancer patients who underwent surgery for rectal cancer, 21% had a permanent stoma. The odds of receiving permanent stoma increased with higher Elixhauser score, metastatic disease, advanced age, having open surgery, residence in Southwest Florida, and having Medicaid insurance or no insurance/self-payers (p < 0.05). Patients with a permanent stoma had a significantly extended stay after surgery (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with a permanent stoma following cancer resection were more likely to have open surgery, had more comorbidities, and had a longer length of stay. Having permanent stoma was higher in patients living in South West Florida, patients with Medicaid insurance, and in the uninsured. Additionally, the payer type significantly affected the length of stay.

Impact of travel distance on quality outcomes in colorectal cancer.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to examine the impact of distance traveled from place of residence to surgical facility for elective colorectal surgery on surgical outcomes, length of stay, and complication rate. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study. METHODS: Patients with colorectal cancer were identified from the Florida Inpatient Discharge Database. Distance traveled from primary residence to surgical facility was estimated using zip code. After adjusting for patient and hospital characteristics, multivariate regression models compared bypassed hospitals, the length of stay, and complication rates for patients traveling different distances to receive care. RESULTS: Patients residing in rural areas and in South (odds ratio [OR], 2.37; 95% CI, 1.55-3.63) and Central Florida (OR, 5.86; 95% CI, 3.86-8.89) were more likely to travel more than 50 miles for treatment. Teaching status of the hospital (OR, 9.99; 95% CI, 6.98-14.31), a hospital's availability of a colorectal surgeon (OR, 1.83; 95% CI, 1.45-2.31), and metastasized cancer (OR, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.17-1.82) influenced the patient's decision to travel farther for treatment. Length of stay was significantly higher for patients traveling farther (P < .0343). However, there was no significant difference in the rate of complications among the groups (those traveling 25-50 miles vs < 25 miles [P = .5766] and those traveling > 50 miles vs < 25 miles [P = .4516]). CONCLUSIONS: A greater number of patients travel more than 50 miles to the surgical facility at a later stage of disease. These patients do not significantly differ from those traveling less than 50 miles in their rates of complications; however, they stay longer at the surgical facility.