Strength of Thoracic Spine Under Simulated Direct Vertebral Rotation: A Biomechanical Study.

BACKGROUND: Direct vertebral rotation (DVR) has gained increasing popularity for deformity correction surgery. Despite large moments applied intraoperatively during deformity correction and failure reports including screw plow, aortic abutment, and pedicle fracture, to our knowledge, the strength of thoracic spines has been unknown. Moreover, the rotational response of thoracic spines under such large torques has been unknown. PURPOSE: Simulate DVR surgical conditions to measure torsion to failure on thoracic spines and assess surgical forces. STUDY DESIGN: Biomechanical simulation using cadaver spines. METHODS: Fresh-frozen thoracic spines (n = 11) were evaluated using radiographs, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. An apparatus simulating DVR was attached to pedicle screws at T7-T10 and transmitted torsion to the spine. T11-T12 were potted and rigidly attached to the frame. Strain gages measured the simulated surgical forces to rotate spines. Torsional load was increased incrementally till failure at T10-T11. Torsion to failure at T10-T11 and corresponding forces were obtained. RESULTS: The T10-T11 moment at failure was 33.3 ± 12.1 Nm (range = 13.7-54.7 Nm). The mean applied force to produce failure was 151.7 ± 33.1 N (range = 109.6-202.7 N), at a distance of approximately 22 cm where surgeons would typically apply direct vertebral rotation forces. Mean right rotation at T10-T11 was 11.6°±5.6°. The failure moment was significantly correlated with bone mineral density (Pearson coefficient 0.61, p = .047). Failure moment also positively correlated with radiographic degeneration grade (Spearman rho > 0.662, p < .04) and MRI degeneration grade (Spearman rho = 0.742, p = .01). CONCLUSION: The present study indicated that with the advantage of lever arms provided with DVR techniques, relatively small surgical forces, <200 N, can produce large moments that cause irreversible injury. Although further studies are required to establish the safety of surgical deformity correction surgeries, the present study provides a first step in the quantification of thoracic spine strength.

Effect of proximal femoral bone support on the fixation of a press-fit noncemented total hip replacement femoral component.

PURPOSE: Proximal femoral bone loss is a common challenge in revision hip arthroplasty. In this study, in-vitro fixation of a non-cemented, rectangular, dual-tapered, press-fit femoral component designed to achieve metadiaphyseal fixation was analyzed using an accelerated proximal femoral bone loss model to assess the potential use in revision cases. METHODS: The press-fit AlloclassicTM femoral stem was implanted in ten cadaveric femurs and tested under cyclic biomechanical loading in an intact state, and then again after sequential proximal femoral bone resections, simulating increasing amounts of bone deficiency. Anterior-posterior and medial-lateral interface motions were measured at the distal stem tip throughout loading. 
 RESULTS: Three specimens remained stable throughout testing, with initial and peak per-cycle motions of less than 50 µm. Six specimens were destabilized under loading with higher per-cycle motions, specifically at the distal stem tip during peak loading in the anterior-posterior direction, with motions of 78±69 µm, compared to 12±9 µm in the stable specimens (P<.05). Total migration of the destabilized specimens was also significantly higher, specifically at the proximal stem tip in the medial-lateral direction, with migrations of 101±34 µm (P<.05) and at the distal stem tip in the anterior-posterior direction, with migrations of 155±179 µm (P<.05), compared to 33±12 µm and 13±11 µm for the stable specimens. CONCLUSION: The results indicate that when strong initial fixation is achieved, long-term success is possible given substantial proximal femoral bone loss.