Effect of High-Dose Intravitreal Aflibercept, 8 mg, in Patients With Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: The Phase 2 CANDELA Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Aflibercept, 8 mg, may have greater therapeutic benefits compared with aflibercept, 2 mg, in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD), including potentially improved outcomes and decreased treatment burden. Objective: To assess safety and efficacy of aflibercept, 8 mg, in patients with nAMD. Design, Setting, and Participants: The CANDELA trial was a phase 2, randomized, single-masked, open-label, 44-week clinical trial conducted in the US. Treatment-naive patients with active subfoveal choroidal neovascularization secondary to nAMD and a best-corrected visual acuity score of 78 to 24 letters (approximately 20/32 to 20/320) in the study eye were enrolled between November 2019 and November 2021. Interventions: Eligible participants were randomized 1:1 to receive 3 monthly doses of 8 mg (70 µL) or 2 mg (50 µL) of aflibercept followed by doses at weeks 20 and 32. Main Outcomes and Measures: Coprimary end points were the proportion of eyes without fluid (absence of intraretinal and subretinal fluid) in the central subfield at week 16 and safety. Results: All 106 eligible eyes were randomized to receive aflibercept, 8 mg (n = 53), or aflibercept, 2 mg (n = 53). Overall, 66 participants (62.3%) were female. The proportion of eyes without fluid in the central subfield with 8-mg vs 2-mg aflibercept was 50.9% (n = 27) vs 34.0% (n = 18) (difference, 17.0 [95% CI, -1.6 to 35.5] percentage points; P = .08) at week 16 and 39.6% (n = 21) vs 28.3% (n = 15) (difference, 11.3 [95% CI, -6.6 to 29.2] percentage points; nominal P = .22) at week 44. At week 44, mean (SE) change in central retinal thickness was -159.4 (16.4) vs -137.2 (22.8) µm with 8 mg vs 2 mg of aflibercept, respectively (least squares mean difference, -9.5 [95% CI, -51.4 to 32.4]; nominal P = .65) and mean (SE) change in best-corrected visual acuity score was +7.9 (1.5) vs +5.1 (1.5) letters (least squares mean difference, +2.8 [95% CI, -1.4 to +7.0]; nominal P = .20). No differences in safety profiles between the groups were observed. Conclusions and Relevance: Although aflibercept, 8 mg, did not achieve the primary efficacy end point at week 16 at the 2-sided significance level of 5%, the observed trends in anatomic and visual improvements over 44 weeks with aflibercept, 8 mg, indicate potential additional therapeutic benefit over aflibercept, 2 mg. No new safety signals were observed over 44 weeks. These findings support further evaluation of aflibercept, 8 mg, in pivotal trials of exudative retinal diseases including nAMD and diabetic macular edema. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04126317.

A pharmacodynamically guided dose selection of PF-00337210 in a phase I study in patients with advanced solid tumors.

PURPOSE: PF-00337210 is an oral, highly selective vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) inhibitor. We evaluated a composite of biomarkers in real time to identify the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) and preliminary anticancer activity of PF-00337210. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients (Pts) with advanced cancers were treated once (QD) or twice daily (BID) with escalating doses. Acute effects on tumor perfusion and vascularity were assessed using DCE-MRI, weekly BP readings, soluble VEGFR-2, and hemoglobin levels. RESULTS: Forty-six pts were treated with 0.67-9 mg QD and 4-6 mg BID of PF-00337210. Nineteen pts (41%) previously received VEGF/VEGFR inhibitors. Two pts had dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) at 9 mg QD (troponin I increase and hypertension). The MTD at QD dose was 8 mg. Common drug-related adverse events were hypertension, fatigue, proteinuria, and nausea. Hypertension incidence and intensity corresponded with dose, but was well controlled with medication. Two confirmed partial responses and minor regressions (>10 to <30% reduction in target lesions) were noted. Complete DCE-MRI was acquired in 21 pts (20 evaluable for vascular response). Ten pts were vascular responders, including 5/6 pts at BID doses. Greatest modulation of soluble VEGFR-2 was at 6 mg BID. The maximum change from baseline in diastolic BP was higher at BID doses. There were no significant differences for systolic BP and hemoglobin levels. CONCLUSIONS: PF-00337210 has profound VEGFR inhibition effects at well-tolerated doses. Antitumor activity and VEGF inhibition effects were observed across BID doses. The RP2D was 6 mg BID.

Cardiovascular events among 1090 cancer patients treated with sunitinib, interferon, or placebo: a comprehensive adjudicated database analysis demonstrating clinically meaningful reversibility of cardiac events.

PURPOSE: To define cardiovascular (CV) risk and reversibility of cardiac events in patients who received sunitinib versus comparator treatment (interferon-alfa or placebo). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective adjudication of comprehensive CV adverse events (AEs) from two phase 3 trials. Components of the comprehensive CV AE end-point comprised hypertension, symptomatic and asymptomatic left ventricular ejection fraction decreases (SD-LVEF; AD-LVEF) and extent of reversibility, heart-failure symptoms, thromboembolic events, dysrhythmia and CV death. Three cardiologists and one oncologist, blinded to treatment allocation, adjudicated suspected CV AEs in the pooled trial database (N=1090). RESULTS: Incidence rates (IR) for sunitinib versus Interferon-alfa (IFN-α)/placebo were hypertension: 6.9 versus 2.6 (hazard ratio (HR), 3.1; 95% confidence interval (CI), 2.4-4.0); SD-LVEF: 0.4 versus 0.2 (HR, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.0-6.2); AD-LVEF: 1.1 versus 0.8 (HR, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.3-3.4); and composite CV AE end-point: 10.1 versus 4.8 (HR, 2.5; 95% CI, 2.0-3.1), however reversibility, not previously quantified, was found to be clinically meaningful. CONCLUSIONS: Hypertension and SD-LVEF/AD-LVEF were significantly higher with sunitinib versus IFN-α/placebo. Among patients who experienced a cardiac event, symptomatic and asymptomatic instances of decreased cardiac dysfunction were adjudicated as reversible in 47 of 83 (56%) and 17 of 30 (57%), respectively. Among sunitinib-treated patients, many were able to resume sunitinib dosing following resolution of events, a finding that is important for clinical care. In comparator groups, symptomatic and asymptomatic instances were adjudicated as reversible in 4 of 6 (66.7%) and 11 of 21 (52%), respectively. Thromboembolic, dysrhythmic and/or CV deaths were not significantly higher in sunitinib-treated patients.

Phase II study of irinotecan in combination with temozolomide (TEMIRI) in children with recurrent or refractory medulloblastoma: a joint ITCC and SIOPE brain tumor study.

BACKGROUND: This multicenter phase II study investigated temozolomide + irinotecan (TEMIRI) treatment in children with relapsed or refractory medulloblastoma. METHODS: Patients received temozolomide 100-125 mg/m(2)/day (days 1-5) and irinotecan 10 mg/m(2)/day (days 1-5 and 8-12) every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was tumor response within the first 4 cycles confirmed ≥4 weeks and assessed by an external response review committee (ERRC). In a 2-stage Optimum Simon design, ≥6 responses in the first 15 evaluable patients were required within the first 4 cycles for continued enrollment; a total of 19 responses from the first 46 evaluable patients was considered successful. RESULTS: Sixty-six patients were treated. Seven responses were recorded during stage 1 and 15 in the first 46 ERRC evaluated patients (2 complete responses and 13 partial responses). The objective response rate during the first 4 cycles was 32.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 19.5%-48.0%). Median duration of response was 27.0 weeks (7.7-44.1 wk). In 63 patients evaluated by local investigators, the objective response rate was 33.3% (95% CI, 22.0%-46.3%), and 68.3% (95% CI, 55.3%-79.4%) experienced clinical benefit. Median survival was 16.7 months (95% CI, 13.3-19.8). The most common grade 3 treatment-related nonhematologic adverse event was diarrhea (7.6%). Grade 3/4 treatment-related hematologic adverse events included neutropenia (16.7%), thrombocytopenia (12.1%), anemia (9.1%), and lymphopenia (9%). CONCLUSIONS: The planned study primary endpoint was not met. However, its tolerability makes TEMIRI a suitable candidate chemotherapy backbone for molecularly targeted agents in future trials in this setting.

A phase II single-arm study of irinotecan in combination with temozolomide (TEMIRI) in children with newly diagnosed high grade glioma: a joint ITCC and SIOPE-brain tumour study.

A multicenter, two stage phase II study, investigated irinotecan plus temozolomide in children with newly diagnosed high grade glioma. The primary endpoint was tumor response during a two-cycle treatment window, confirmed by external review committee. Patients received oral temozolomide 100 mg/(m(2) day) (days 1-5) and intravenous irinotecan 10 mg/(m(2) day) (days 1-5 and 8-12) for two 21-day cycles (three cycles for patients exhibiting objective tumor response). Standard treatment was then administered according to local investigator choice. In total 17 patients were enrolled and treated by local investigators. However, central pathology review found three patients did not have a diagnosis of high grade glioma and another four patients did not have evaluable disease according to independent central radiological review. The primary endpoint was based on the first ten evaluable patients as determined by the external review committee. Recruitment was stopped for futility after there were no complete or partial responses during the two-cycle treatment window in the first ten evaluable patients. Five patients had stable disease, and five progressed. Data for secondary endpoints including; time to tumor progression, time to treatment failure, and overall survival is reported. The safety profile of the treatment showed the combination was tolerable with two patients (11.8 %) having grade three nausea, and one (5.9 %) experiencing a grade four neutropenia, leading to permanent discontinuation from adjuvant treatment. Irinotecan plus temozolomide, although well tolerated did not improve outcome over historical controls in this setting.

Five-year analysis of the prevention of colorectal sporadic adenomatous polyps trial.

OBJECTIVES: Subjects in the Prevention of Colorectal Sporadic Adenomatous Polyps (PreSAP) trial (PRESAP/NCT00141193/www.clinicaltrials.gov) were studied to determine efficacy and safety at a year 5 assessment. METHODS: In this randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial, 1,561 subjects with diagnosed colorectal adenomas removed within 3 months of the study's initiation were assessed after ~ 3 years on celecoxib followed by 2 years off. Studied in 107 primary and secondary care settings, subjects were stratified by cardioprotective aspirin use and randomized to receive orally 400 ng celecoxib (933 subjects) or placebo (628 subjects) once daily. Efficacy was measured by colonoscopy at years 1, 3, and 5, and safety was measured by investigators for the on-treatment period and collected by subject self-report over 2 years post-treatment. RESULTS: At year 5, the primary outcome measure was the rate of new adenomas measured cumulatively from baseline. This rate was statistically significantly lower in the celecoxib group (51.4%) than in the placebo group (57.5%; P<0.001). Similarly, the cumulative rate of new advanced adenomas was significantly lower in the celecoxib group (10.0%) than in the placebo group (13.8%; P=0.007). However, the year 5 interval measure, which was not cumulative and did not take the rates of previous years into account, showed that after 2 years off treatment, the celecoxib group (27.0%) was 1.66 times more likely to have new adenomas than the placebo group (16.3%; P<0.0001). Similarly, the percentage of patients with new advanced adenomas was significantly higher in the celecoxib group (5.0%) than in the placebo group (3.8%) (P=0.0072). The evaluation of safety from baseline through year 5 indicated that the risks of serious cardiac disorders (relative risk (RR) 1.66; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01-2.73), selected renal/hypertension events (RR 1.35; 95% CI 1.09-1.68), and general vascular (RR 1.34; 95% CI 1.08-1.68) and cardiac disorders (RR 1.59; 95% CI 1.12-2.26) were higher in those taking celecoxib than in those on placebo. CONCLUSIONS: The year 5 cumulative measures of the incidence of new and advanced adenomas were significantly lower in the celecoxib group than in the placebo group, but the year 5 interval rates of these measures were significantly lower in the placebo group than the celecoxib group, perhaps suggesting a release of cyclooxygenase-2 inhibition. Consistent with what has been previously reported, increased risk of renal/hypertension events and cardiac disorders associated with celecoxib therapy mandates caution in patient selection.

Five-year efficacy and safety analysis of the Adenoma Prevention with Celecoxib Trial.

The Adenoma Prevention with Celecoxib Trial examined the efficacy and safety of the cyclooxygenase (Cox)-2 inhibitor, celecoxib, for sporadic colorectal adenoma prevention in patients at high risk for colorectal cancer. The trial randomized 2,035 subjects to receive either placebo, celecoxib 200 mg twice daily, or celecoxib 400 mg twice daily. The primary study safety and efficacy analyses involved 3 years of treatment. The results showed significant antitumor effect but also indicated increased cardiovascular adverse events in patients treated with celecoxib compared with placebo. A total of 933 patients participated in an extension of the Adenoma Prevention with Celecoxib Trial, with a planned total treatment and surveillance duration of 5 years. Study medication was stopped early, resulting in a median treatment duration of 3.1 years for those with a year 5 colonoscopy. Patients treated on the placebo arm had a cumulative adenoma incidence of 68.4% over 5 years of observation. This figure was 59.0% (P < 0.0001) for those receiving low-dose celecoxib, and 60.1% (P < 0.0001) for those receiving high-dose celecoxib. The cumulative incidence of advanced adenomas over 5 years was 21.3% of those taking placebo, 12.5% (P < 0.0001) of those taking low dose celecoxib and 15.8% (P < 0.0001) of those taking high-dose celecoxib. Investigator reported treatment emergent adverse events were similar across all treatment groups for categories including renal and hypertensive events and gastrointestinal ulceration and hemorrhage events. For a category composed of cardiovascular and thrombotic events, the risk relative to placebo was 1.6 (95% confidence interval, 1.0, 2.5) for those using 200 mg twice daily celecoxib and 1.9 (95% confidence interval, 1.2, 3.1) for those using 400 mg twice daily celecoxib. Secondary analysis showed an interaction between a baseline history of atherosclerotic heart disease and study drug use with respect to cardiovascular and thrombotic adverse events (P = 0.004). These results confirm the inhibitory effect of celecoxib on colorectal adenoma formation, and provide additional safety data indicating an elevated risk for cardiovascular and thrombotic adverse events, particularly for patients with preexisting atherosclerotic heart disease.

Cytochrome P450 2C9 variants influence response to celecoxib for prevention of colorectal adenoma.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Variants in the cytochrome P450 2C9 (CYP2C9) gene are associated with impaired metabolism of celecoxib. We examined the influence of CYP2C9*2 (R144C) and CYP2C9*3 (I359L) variants on dose-related response or toxicity in a randomized trial of celecoxib. METHODS: We identified individuals with CYP2C9*2 and CYP2C9*3 genotypes (>or=1 variant allele) in the Adenoma Prevention with Celecoxib trial. Following adenoma removal, patients were assigned randomly to groups given placebo or low-dose (200 mg twice daily) or high-dose (400 mg twice daily) celecoxib and underwent follow-up colonoscopies at 1 and/or 3 years. RESULTS: Among 1660 patients, 21% were CYP2C9*2, and 12% were CYP2C9*3 genotypes. Overall, celecoxib was associated with a dose-dependent reduction in adenoma, compared with placebo, with relative risks (RR) of 0.65 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.56-0.76) for the low-dose and 0.54 (95% CI: 0.46-0.63) for the high-dose groups. However, the additional protective effect of the high dose, compared with the low-dose, was observed only in those with CYP2C9*3 genotypes (RR, 0.51; 95% CI: 0.30-0.87). The high dose, compared with low dose, was not associated with significant risk reduction among those with CYP2C9*2 (RR, 0.83; 95% CI: 0.57-1.21) or wild-type (RR, 0.89; 95% CI: 0.72-1.11) genotypes. Compared with placebo, a higher incidence of cardiovascular events was associated with both doses among patients with wild-type genotypes but only with the high dose among patients with variant genotypes. CONCLUSIONS: The greater efficacy of high-dose celecoxib, compared with the low-dose, in preventing colorectal adenoma appears confined to individuals with slow metabolizer (CYP2C9*3) genotypes. Genetic variability influences susceptibility to the potential benefits and hazards of celecoxib.