Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 41
Filtrar
1.
Br J Cancer ; 88(1): 50-7, 2003 Jan 13.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12556959

RESUMEN

Recent use of oral contraceptive pills is associated with a modest risk of breast cancer among very young women. In this US population-based case-control study, we evaluated whether the excess risk associated with recent oral contraceptive use is ubiquitous for all pill types or attributable to specific oral contraceptive preparations. Hormonal content and potency of combination oral contraceptives used for the longest duration within 5 years of interview for breast cancer cases aged 20-44 years (N=1640) were compared with age-matched community controls (N=1492). Women who recently used oral contraceptives containing more than 35 microg of ethinyl oestradiol per pill were at higher risk of breast cancer than users of lower dose preparations when compared to never users (respective relative risks of 1.99 and 1.27, P(trend)<0.01). This relationship was more marked among women <35 years of age, where risks associated with high- and low-dose ethinyl oestradiol use were 3.62 and 1.91 (P(trend)<0.01), respectively. We also found significant trends of increasing breast cancer risk for pills with higher progestin and oestrogen potencies (P(trend)<0.05), which were most pronounced among women aged <35 years of age (P(trend)<0.01). Risk was similar across recently used progestin types. Our findings suggest that newer low-potency/low oestrogen dose oral contraceptives may impart a lower risk of breast cancer than that associated with earlier high-potency/high-dose preparations.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/etiología , Anticonceptivos Orales/efectos adversos , Hormonas/metabolismo , Adulto , Neoplasias de la Mama/epidemiología , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Hormonas/efectos adversos , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Riesgo , Estadística como Asunto
2.
Cancer Causes Control ; 12(5): 431-42, 2001 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11545458

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Few studies have examined methods by which breast cancers are detected, and only one study has been published on predictors of those methods. This study examined patterns and predictors of breast cancer detection methods during 1990-1992 among women age 20-44. METHODS: In-person interview and medical record data were obtained during a population-based case-control study of 1619 women newly diagnosed with breast cancer in three areas of the United States (US). RESULTS: Seventy-one percent of the cancers were identified by self-detection, 9% by routine clinical breast exam (CBE), and 20% by routine mammography. Cancers detected by mammography and CBE, but not those detected by breast self-exam, were much more likely to be early-stage. Detection by mammography increased with age, and a history of mammography use was associated with detection by mammography or CBE. Several commonly studied predictors of screening utilization in the US population were associated with CBE detection, but were less clearly related to or unrelated to mammography detection. CONCLUSION: Findings suggest that, during the 1990s in the US, most breast cancers among women under age 45, including those age 40-44, were self-detected. Few factors other than age and prior screening are verified predictors of method of breast cancer detection.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico , Mamografía , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico por imagen , Femenino , Humanos , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Autocuidado , Autoexamen
3.
Am J Epidemiol ; 153(11): 1119-27, 2001 Jun 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11390332

RESUMEN

Random digit dialing is used frequently in epidemiologic case-control studies to select population-based controls, even when both cases and controls are interviewed face-to-face. However, concerns persist about the potential biases of random digit dialing, particularly given its generally lower response rates. In an Atlanta, Georgia, case-control study of breast cancer among women aged 20-54 years, all of whom were interviewed face-to-face, two statistically independent control groups were compared: those obtained through random digit dialing (n = 652) and those obtained through area probability sampling (n = 640). The household screening rate was significantly higher for the area sample, by 5.5%. Interview response rates were comparable. The telephone sample estimated a significantly larger percentage (by approximately 7%) of households to have no age-eligible women. Both control groups, appropriately weighted, had characteristics similar to US Census demographic characteristics for Atlanta women, except that respondents in both control groups were more educated and more likely to be married. The authors conclude that households contacted through random digit dialing are somewhat less likely to participate in the household screening process, and if they are cooperative, some households may not disclose that age-eligible women reside therein. Investigators need to develop improved methods for screening and enumerating household members in random digit dialing surveys that target a specific subpopulation, such as women.


Asunto(s)
Métodos Epidemiológicos , Teléfono , Adulto , Neoplasias de la Mama/epidemiología , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Georgia/epidemiología , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Muestreo , Sesgo de Selección
4.
J Womens Health Gend Based Med ; 9(7): 791-801, 2000 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11025871

RESUMEN

Little is known about predictors of physicians' personal or clinical compliance with breast cancer screening recommendations. We explored this in 4501 respondents to the Women Physicians' Health Study, a questionnaire-based study of a representative sample of U.S. women M. D.s. Overall, 21% of women physicians performed breast self-examination (BSE) at least monthly, about two thirds had received a clinical breast examination (CBE) within the last year, and 85% had received one within the last 2 years. Of those <40 years old, 14% had received a mammogram in the past year, as had 42% of those 40-49 and 59% of those 50-70 years old. Being a primary care practitioners or obstetrician/gynecologist was a significant predictor of counseling or screening for CBE and mammography. Only 46% of all women physicians reported discussing or performing mammograms at least once a year for those >/=50-

Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico , Tamizaje Masivo , Médicos Mujeres , Competencia Profesional , Adulto , Anciano , Autoexamen de Mamas , Femenino , Adhesión a Directriz , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Humanos , Mamografía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Cooperación del Paciente , Educación del Paciente como Asunto
5.
Int J Epidemiol ; 29(5): 793-8, 2000 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11034958

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This study assessed the nature of potential biases by comparing respondents with non-respondents from a case-control study of breast cancer in younger women. METHODS: The case-control study was conducted in three regions in the US: Atlanta GA, Seattle/Puget Sound WA, and central New Jersey. An abbreviated interview or mailed questionnaire was completed by willing non-respondents, most of whom had refused participation in the main study. RESULTS: Respondents and non-respondents appeared similar with respect to age, race, relative weight, smoking, family history of breast cancer, number of births, age at first birth, and several dietary items. Compared to non-respondents, case and control respondents were of shorter stature, and reported less frequent consumption of doughnuts/pastries. Respondent cases, compared with non-respondent cases, were more highly educated and more likely to have consumed alcohol regularly; similar but not statistically significant tendencies were observed for controls. Respondent cases experienced menarche earlier than non-respondents. Respondent controls were more likely to have used oral contraceptives than non-respondents; a similar but not statistically significant tendency was observed in cases. Comparisons of crude and simulated relative risks using available non-respondents' data generally showed a low impact of non-response on relative risks in this study. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that non-response would not greatly affect relative risk estimates in this study, except possibly regarding height. However, we were limited by the numbers of informative non-respondents and the amount of data collected. Collecting similar information in future studies would be useful, especially since varying methods used to encourage participation may lead to differences in respondents' characteristics.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/epidemiología , Adulto , Distribución por Edad , Consumo de Bebidas Alcohólicas , Neoplasias de la Mama/etiología , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Anticonceptivos Orales/administración & dosificación , Dieta , Escolaridad , Femenino , Humanos , Menarquia , Persona de Mediana Edad , Paridad , Riesgo , Sesgo de Selección , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
6.
Cancer Causes Control ; 11(5): 451-8, 2000 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10877338

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Epidemiologic studies provide evidence for increased breast cancer risk among women with prolonged exposure to endogenous estrogens and progesterone. Menstrual cycle characteristics, such as early menarche, rapid initiation of regular ovulatory cycles, short cycle length, and more days of flow, all potentially contribute to higher cumulative ovarian hormone exposure. METHODS: We assessed the associations between these characteristics and breast cancer risk in a population-based, case-control study of 1505 controls and 1647 newly diagnosed cases, all younger than 45 years of age. RESULTS: Compared to women with menarche at > or =15 years, we observed some increase in risk for women with younger ages at menarche, although those with very early ages were not at particularly high risk [odds ratio (OR) = 1.5, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.1-1.9 for menarche at age 12 and OR = 1.2, 95% CI = 0.9-1.7 for menarche at age < or =10]. Women who reported having regular menstrual cycles within 2 years of menarche were at increased breast cancer risk (OR = 1.7, 95% CI = 1.2-2.3), compared to those never having regular cycles. Stratification by current body mass index revealed slightly stronger associations with menstrual characteristics among thinner women (< 22.0 kg/m2) compared to heavier women (> 28.8 kg/m2). CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that future studies should focus on clarifying how the interrelated effects of body size and menstrual factors, such as age at menarche and cycle regularity, contribute to breast cancer etiology.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/epidemiología , Menstruación , Adolescente , Adulto , Edad de Inicio , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Georgia/epidemiología , Humanos , Menarquia , Trastornos de la Menstruación , Oportunidad Relativa , Factores de Riesgo , Washingtón/epidemiología
7.
Women Health ; 31(2-3): 81-96, 2000.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11289687

RESUMEN

Data on 1,501 control women from a multi-center, population-based, case-control study of breast cancer were used to examine characteristics associated with recreational exercise during the year prior to the interview among women 20 to 44 years of age. In a univariate analysis, higher levels of recreational exercise were associated with: higher education; higher family income; white race; previous participation in recreational exercise above the median level at ages 12 to 13 and at age 20; being nulliparous; ever lactating; being a never or past smoker; having a low current Quetelet's index (QI: weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared); and living in Atlanta or Seattle (compared to New Jersey). In a multiple linear regression model, independent predictors of higher levels of recreational exercise were: participation in higher levels of exercise at 20 years of age; having a low current QI; and never having smoked. Though all women should be encouraged to participate in exercise, these findings identity subgroups of women that may need targeting when developing exercise intervention programs.


Asunto(s)
Ejercicio Físico , Conductas Relacionadas con la Salud , Recreación , Salud de la Mujer , Adulto , Distribución por Edad , Ejercicio Físico/fisiología , Femenino , Georgia/epidemiología , Humanos , Modelos Estadísticos , New Jersey/epidemiología , Recreación/fisiología , Factores Socioeconómicos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Washingtón/epidemiología
8.
Int J Epidemiol ; 28(5): 816-23, 1999 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10597976

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Several common medical conditions are associated with altered hormone levels, and may thus plausibly influence breast cancer risk. Few studies have examined such relationships, and we utilized a population-based case-control study of young women in the US to examine breast cancer risk following a history of various medical conditions. Relationships between breast cancer and each medical condition examined are biologically plausible, and relevant in terms of public health. METHODS: The study included 2173 breast cancer cases and 1990 population-based controls from three areas of the US, under 55 years, who were administered a questionnaire including details of physician-diagnosed medical conditions. RESULTS: No significantly increased or decreased breast cancer risk was associated with a history of thyroid disease, gallbladder disease, colorectal polyps, diabetes, high blood pressure, high cholesterol or surgery for endometriosis. There was some evidence of an increased breast cancer risk associated with ovarian cysts among women who did not receive an oophorectomy (relative risk [RR] = 1.94, 95% CI: 1.0-3.9). Non-significant increases in breast cancer risk were observed following diagnoses of several other cancers, including thyroid cancer, basal cell carcinoma, Hodgkin's disease and malignant melanoma. CONCLUSIONS: To conclude, our generally null results from this large, population-based study support results from previous studies in providing reassurance that women with a history of several common medical conditions do not appear to be at an increased risk of breast cancer at a young age.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/epidemiología , Neoplasias Colorrectales/epidemiología , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiología , Neoplasias de los Genitales Femeninos/epidemiología , Hipertensión/epidemiología , Enfermedades de la Tiroides/epidemiología , Adulto , Distribución por Edad , Neoplasias de la Mama/etiología , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Comorbilidad , Intervalos de Confianza , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Modelos Logísticos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oportunidad Relativa , Vigilancia de la Población , Valores de Referencia , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Análisis de Supervivencia , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
9.
Br J Cancer ; 81(1): 167-74, 1999 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10487629

RESUMEN

Findings have been inconsistent on effects of adolescent body size and adult weight gain on risk of breast cancer in young women. These relations were examined in a population-based case control study of 1590 women less than 45 years of age newly diagnosed with breast cancer during 1990-1992 in three areas of the US and an age-matched control group of 1390 women. Height and weight were measured at interview and participants asked to recall information about earlier body size. Logistic regression was used to estimate the relative risk of breast cancer adjusted for other risk factors. Women who were either much heavier or lighter than average in adolescence or at age 20 were at reduced risk. Weight gain after age 20 resulted in reduced risk, but the effect was confined to early-stage and, more specifically, lower grade breast cancer. Neither the risk reduction nor the variation by breast cancer stage or grade was explained by the method of cancer detection or by prior mammography history. These findings suggest that relations between breast cancer risk in young women and body weight at different ages is complex and that the risk reduction with adult weight gain is confined to less aggressive cancers.


Asunto(s)
Constitución Corporal , Neoplasias de la Mama/epidemiología , Neoplasias de la Mama/fisiopatología , Aumento de Peso , Adolescente , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Índice de Masa Corporal , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Factores de Riesgo
10.
Int J Cancer ; 82(3): 315-21, 1999 Jul 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10399945

RESUMEN

Epidemiologic studies have evaluated the risk of breast cancer related to dietary fat intake, but only recently have other dietary factors received attention. Frequent intakes of fruit, vegetables and fiber have been associated with low risk of the disease in some studies but results are inconsistent. In a large case-control study of early-onset breast cancer, we evaluated risk related to a variety of food groups, associated micronutrients and non-nutritive constituents. Cases treated with chemotherapy appeared to have altered reporting of food intake and were excluded. Analyses were restricted to 568 cases with in situ and localized disease and 1,451 population-based controls. Reduced risks were observed for high intake of cereals and grains [odds ratio (OR) = 0.84, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.6-1.1 for highest compared with lowest quartile], vegetables (OR = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.6-1.1), beans (OR = 0.87, 95% CI = 0.7-1.2) and fiber from beans (OR = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.7-1.2). However, no trends of decreasing risk across quartiles of increasing intake were observed. Risk was not associated with dietary constituents related to these food groups including dietary fiber, carotenoids, vitamins A, C and E and folate. Incorporation of information from vitamin supplements did not alter the results for micronutrients. Our data suggest that intakes of cereals and grains, vegetables and beans are associated with minimal, if any, reduction in risk of early-stage breast cancer among young women.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/epidemiología , Fibras de la Dieta/farmacología , Micronutrientes , Neoplasias de la Mama/etiología , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Calcio/farmacología , Carotenoides/farmacología , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Ingestión de Energía , Femenino , Ácido Fólico/farmacología , Frutas , Humanos , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Factores de Riesgo , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Verduras , Vitaminas/farmacología
11.
Int J Cancer ; 82(1): 23-7, 1999 Jul 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10360815

RESUMEN

Most studies on women with breast cancer indicate that obesity is positively associated with late-stage disease. Some results have shown a similar relationship between breast size and stage. A recent study found that the association between body mass index (BMI) and stage was limited to cancers that were self-detected, suggesting that the BMI-stage relation may be due to delayed symptom recognition. We examined the relationships between stage and both BMI and breast (bra cup) size, stratified by method of detection, using data from a population-based case-control study of 1,361 women (ages 20-44 years) diagnosed with breast cancer during 1990-1992. Height and weight measurements and information on bra cup size, method of cancer detection and other factors predictive of stage at diagnosis were collected during in-person interviews. A case-case comparison was conducted using logistic regression to estimate odds of regional or distant stage rather than local stage in relation to BMI and bra size. Odds of late-stage disease were increased with higher BMI [adjusted odds ratio (OR) for highest to lowest tertile = 1.46, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.10-1.93] and larger bra cup size (OR for cup D vs. cup A = 1.61, 95% CI 1.04-2.48). These relationships were not modified by the method of detection. Differences in etiologic effects, rather than differences in detection methods, may explain the relations observed between stage and both BMI and breast size.


Asunto(s)
Índice de Masa Corporal , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Mama/anatomía & histología , Adulto , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Humanos , Estadificación de Neoplasias
12.
Epidemiology ; 9(6): 641-7, 1998 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9799175

RESUMEN

In a population-based case-control study of parous women less than 45 years of age, we evaluated the relations of various pregnancy characteristics to maternal breast cancer risk. Cases (N = 1,239) diagnosed with in situ or invasive breast cancer from 1990 to 1992 in Atlanta, GA, Seattle/Puget Sound, WA, and five counties in central New Jersey, and population controls (N = 1,166) identified by random-digit dialing, were interviewed regarding the details of their pregnancies. We used logistic regression to estimate relative risks (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) and to adjust for breast cancer risk factors. Women who reported nausea or vomiting in their first pregnancy had a slightly lower risk of breast cancer (RR = 0.87; 95% CI = 0.72-1.0). We found no strong or consistent associations for maternal risk related to gestational length, pregnancy weight gain, gestational diabetes, pregnancy hypertension, or gender of the offspring, although we found some evidence for reductions in risk for toxemia (RR = 0.81; 95% CI = 0.61-1.1) and specific sex (RR for female twins vs singletons = 0.48; 95% CI = 0.20-1.3) and timing characteristics of twinning. Overall, these data provide little support for the hypothesis that pregnancy hormone levels are associated with subsequent maternal risk of breast cancer in young women.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/epidemiología , Complicaciones del Embarazo/epidemiología , Embarazo , Adulto , Neoplasias de la Mama/etiología , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Edad Gestacional , Humanos , Proteínas Gestacionales/farmacología , Factores de Riesgo , Aumento de Peso
13.
Menopause ; 5(3): 145-51, 1998.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9774759

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To assess effects on breast cancer risk of exposure to both oral contraceptives and menopausal hormones, an increasingly common exposure. DESIGN: A case-control study of breast cancer among women under the age of 55 years in Atlanta, GA involving 1,031 cases and 919 population controls was conducted. RESULTS: Ever use of oral contraceptives was associated with a relative risk of 1.1 (95% 0.9-1.4), whereas the relative risk for hormone replacement therapy was 0.9 (95% CI 0.7-1.2). Seventeen percent of the cases versus 19% of the population controls reported exposure to both agents, resulting in a relative risk of 1.0 (95% CI 0.7-1.4) relative to those unexposed to either preparation. Although there was little variation in risk associated with joint effects by either age or race, there were statistically nonsignificant elevations in risk for this exposure among women who had experienced a natural menopause (relative risk = 2.0, 95% CI 0.7-5.6), were relatively thin (relative risk = 1.5, 0.8-3.0), or who had a first degree relative with breast cancer (relative risk = 2.0, 0.6-7.0). When joint effects of longer term use of both agents were considered, subjects who reported use of oral contraceptives for 10 or more years and hormone replacement for 3 or more years had a relative risk of 3.2 (95% CI 1.4-7.4) compared with nonusers of either preparation. CONCLUSIONS: Although our results must be cautiously interpreted given small numbers within subgroups, they raise concern and emphasize the need for further evaluation on breast cancer risk of the increasingly common exposure to both oral contraceptives and hormone replacement therapy.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/epidemiología , Anticonceptivos Orales/efectos adversos , Terapia de Reemplazo de Estrógeno/efectos adversos , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Constitución Corporal , Peso Corporal , Neoplasias de la Mama/genética , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Georgia/epidemiología , Humanos , Menopausia , Persona de Mediana Edad , Grupos Raciales , Factores de Riesgo
14.
Am J Epidemiol ; 148(6): 556-63, 1998 Sep 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9753010

RESUMEN

To investigate whether use of electric blankets, one of the largest sources of electromagnetic field exposure in the home, is associated with the risk of female breast cancer, the authors analyzed data from a population-based US case-control study. The 2,199 case patients were under age 55 years and had been newly diagnosed with breast cancer between 1990 and 1992. The 2,009 controls were frequency-matched to cases by 5-year age group and geographic area. There was little or no risk associated with ever having used electric blankets, mattress pads, or heated water beds among women under age 45 years (adjusted odds ratio = 1.01, 95% confidence interval 0.86-1.18) or among women aged > or =45 years (adjusted odds ratio = 1.12, 95% confidence interval 0.87-1.43). There was no substantial variation in risk with duration of use; with whether the appliance was used only to warm the bed or used throughout the night; with menopausal status; or with the cases' hormone receptor status or stage of disease. Potential breast cancer risk factors that were associated with electric blanket use did not substantially confound the associations under investigation. These data do not support the hypothesis that electric blanket use increases breast cancer risk among women under age 55 years.


Asunto(s)
Ropa de Cama y Ropa Blanca , Neoplasias de la Mama/epidemiología , Neoplasias de la Mama/etiología , Campos Electromagnéticos/efectos adversos , Adulto , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Georgia/epidemiología , Humanos , Menopausia , Persona de Mediana Edad , New Jersey/epidemiología , Oportunidad Relativa , Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Washingtón/epidemiología
15.
Cancer Causes Control ; 9(3): 331-9, 1998 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9684713

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Late age at first birth and nulliparity are established risk factors for breast cancer, yet the extent to which fertility problems contribute to these associations remains largely unexplored. Here, we examine self-reported fertility problems as a risk factor for breast cancer in young women. METHODS: We used a population-based case-control study of 2,173 cases and 1,990 controls aged 20 to 54 years in the United States. Structured in-person interviews were used to elicit detailed information on established and potential breast cancer risk factors. Information was collected on pregnancy details, including difficulties becoming pregnant or maintaining a pregnancy. RESULTS: Self-reported difficulty in becoming pregnant or maintaining a pregnancy was reported by 450 cases and 377 controls. Overall, there was little association between these fertility problems and risk of breast cancer (odds ratio [OR] = 1.05). Parity was associated with a decreased risk of breast cancer in women both with (OR = 0.71) and without (OR = 0.79) fertility problems. There was little evidence of an increased risk of breast cancer with later age at first full-term birth among women without fertility problems (ORage 35+ :age <20 = 1.13, 95 percent confidence interval [CI] = 0.7-1.9), but a relatively strong association among women with fertility problems (ORage 35+ :age <20 = 2.96, CI = 1.3-7.0). Among women with a first full-term birth at age 35 or older, fertility problems were associated with a twofold risk of breast cancer. Analyses of duration of unprotected sexual intercourse prior to first pregnancy as an alternative estimate of infertility produced similar results. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that the association between late age at first birth and breast cancer is stronger among women with self-reported fertility problems than among women with no fertility problems.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/etiología , Infertilidad/complicaciones , Edad Materna , Adulto , Neoplasias de la Mama/epidemiología , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Embarazo , Factores de Riesgo , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
16.
Arch Intern Med ; 158(4): 342-8, 1998 Feb 23.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9487231

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To examine the health-related behaviors of women physicians compared with those of other women of high and not high socioeconomic status and with national goals. METHODS: We examined the results of a questionnaire-based survey of a stratified random sample, the Women Physicians' Health Study, and a US telephone survey (Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Ga). We analyzed 3 samples of women aged 30 to 70 years: (1) respondents from the Women Physicians' Health Study (n = 4501); (2) respondents from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (n = 1316) of the highest socioeconomic status; and (3) all other respondents from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (n = 35,361). RESULTS: Women physicians were more likely than other women of high socioeconomic status and even more likely than other women not to smoke. The few physicians (3.7%) who smoked reported consuming fewer cigarettes per day, and physicians who had stopped smoking reported quitting at a younger age than women in the general population. Women physicians were less likely to report abstaining from alcohol, but those who drank reported consuming less alcohol per episode than other women and were less likely to report binging on alcohol than women in the general population. Unlike women in the general population and even other women of high socioeconomic status, women physicians' reported behaviors exceeded national goals for the year 2000 in all examined behaviors and screening habits. CONCLUSIONS: Women physicians report having generally good health habits even when compared with other socioeconomically advantaged women and report exceeding all examined national goals for personal screening practices and other personal health behaviors. Women physicians' behaviors may provide useful standards for other women in the United States.


Asunto(s)
Conductas Relacionadas con la Salud , Médicos Mujeres , Adulto , Anciano , Consumo de Bebidas Alcohólicas , Femenino , Humanos , Tamizaje Masivo , Persona de Mediana Edad , Fumar , Factores Socioeconómicos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estados Unidos
17.
Am J Epidemiol ; 147(3): 273-80, 1998 Feb 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9482502

RESUMEN

To evaluate whether recreational physical activity is associated with breast cancer among young women, the authors analyzed data from a population-based case-control study. Cases (n = 1,668) were women under age 45 years who had been newly diagnosed with breast cancer between 1990 and 1992 in Atlanta, Georgia, central New Jersey, or Seattle, Washington. Controls (n = 1,505) were frequency-matched to cases by 5-year age group and geographic area of residence. Breast cancer was not associated with recreational activity in any of the three time periods assessed (highest quartile of activity vs. lowest: age- and center-adjusted odds ratio (OR) = 0.94 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.77-1.15) at ages 12-13 years, OR = 1.08 (95% CI 0.88-1.32) at age 20 years, and OR = 1.18 (95% CI 0.97-1.44) during the past year), with the average of the three time periods (OR = 1.02, 95% CI 0.84-1.25), or with daily climbing of at least two flights of stairs (without stopping) during the past year (daily climbing vs. never climbing: OR = 1.03, 95% CI 0.86-1.23). Estimates were not modified or confounded by body mass index, menopausal status, or caloric intake during the past year. These results do not support a protective role for physical activity in the risk of breast cancer among young women.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/etiología , Ejercicio Físico , Adolescente , Adulto , Índice de Masa Corporal , Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de la Mama/epidemiología , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Georgia/epidemiología , Humanos , Menopausia/fisiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , New Jersey/epidemiología , Oportunidad Relativa , Recreación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Washingtón/epidemiología
18.
J Natl Cancer Inst ; 90(3): 226-33, 1998 Feb 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9462680

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: A variety of breast cancer risk factors pertain to a woman's adolescence and may be related to nutritional influences. We assessed risk of early-onset breast cancer related to diet during adolescence in a case-control study. METHODS: Study participants were accrued from the following three geographical regions covered by cancer registries: Atlanta, GA; Seattle/Puget Sound, WA; and central New Jersey. Case patients (n = 1647) were newly diagnosed with breast cancer, and control subjects (n = 1501) were identified by random-digit-dialing techniques. In an interview, each subject was asked to recall the frequency of consumption and portion size of 29 key food items at ages 12-13 years. Mothers of a subset of respondents completed questionnaires, and food groups were recalculated after removal of foods with poor agreement between mother and daughter. Logistic regression analyses were used to calculate odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: When high versus low quartiles of consumption were compared, there was a suggestion of a reduced risk associated with high consumption of fruits and vegetables, although this finding was not statistically significant. Slight increases (of borderline statistical significance) in risk of breast cancer were found for intake of chicken or high-fat meat. Intake of animal fat, high-fat foods, high-fat snacks and desserts, or dairy products during adolescence had no apparent influence on breast cancer risk. Removal of foods suspected to be poorly recalled by the daughters did not change any of the risk estimates. CONCLUSION: These data do not provide evidence for a strong influence of dietary intakes during adolescence on risk of early-onset breast cancer.


Asunto(s)
Conducta del Adolescente , Neoplasias de la Mama/etiología , Dieta/efectos adversos , Adolescente , Adulto , Animales , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Productos Lácteos , Grasas de la Dieta , Femenino , Frutas , Georgia , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Carne , New Jersey , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Verduras , Washingtón
19.
Cancer Causes Control ; 9(6): 583-90, 1998 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10189043

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether heavy cigarette smoking as a teenager or long-term smoking increases breast cancer risk or, alternatively, whether smoking acts as an anti-estrogen and reduces risk. METHODS: Data from a multi-center, population-based, case-control study among women under age 55 were analyzed. RESULTS: Among women under age 45, there was a modest inverse relation with current (OR = 0.82, 95% CI = 0.67, 1.01) but not past (OR = 0.99, 95% CI = 0.81, 1.21) smoking. Odds ratios were decreased for current smokers who began at an early age (0.59 for < or = 15, 95% CI = 0.41, 0.85) or continued for long periods of time (0.70 for >21 years, 95% CI = 0.52, 0.94). In subgroup analyses, reduced odds ratios were observed among current smokers who were ever users of oral contraceptives (0.79, 95% CI = 0.63, 0.98), were in the lowest quartile of adult body size (0.53, 95% CI = 0.34, 0.81), or never or infrequently drank alcohol (0.68, 95% CI = 0.47, 0.98). Among women ages 45-54, there was little evidence for an association with smoking. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that breast cancer risk among women under age 45 may be reduced among current smokers who began smoking at an early age, or long-term smokers, but require confirmation from other studies.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/epidemiología , Neoplasias de la Mama/etiología , Fumar/efectos adversos , Adolescente , Adulto , Distribución por Edad , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Intervalos de Confianza , Femenino , Georgia/epidemiología , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , New Jersey/epidemiología , Oportunidad Relativa , Factores de Riesgo , Washingtón/epidemiología , Salud de la Mujer
20.
Cancer Causes Control ; 8(5): 713-21, 1997 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9328193

RESUMEN

Methodologic investigations have addressed selection and recall bias in case-control studies of diet and breast cancer, whereas the effect of disease progression and medical treatment on estimates of dietary intake has been largely overlooked. In a multicenter, population-based case-control study of breast cancer in the United States, 1,588 newly diagnosed cases and 1,451 controls completed a self-administered food-frequency questionnaire. Initial evaluation suggested increased risk related to high intakes of calories, carbohydrates, fat, and protein. All nutrient associations were diminished after adjustment for calories. Evaluation by stage of disease revealed no relation of calories to risk among women with in situ disease, but elevated risks among women with localized (odds ratio [OR] = 1.33, 95 percent confidence interval [CI] = 1.0-1.7 highest cflowest quartile) or regional and distant disease (OR = 1.79, CI = 1.3-2.4). Further evaluation showed that the increased risk associated with calories was restricted to cases who reported having been treated with chemotherapy (OR = 1.66, CI = 1.3-2.1). A gradient of increasing risk with time interval from diagnosis to interview suggested the chemotherapy regimen itself and not necessarily characteristics of tumors requiring this treatment was responsible for the observed increased risk. These results indicate that epidemiologic studies of diet and breast cancer, particularly among young women, should evaluate possible bias related to post-diagnosis influences.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/epidemiología , Dieta/efectos adversos , Adulto , Neoplasias de la Mama/prevención & control , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Ingestión de Energía , Femenino , Humanos , Factores de Riesgo , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA