Can tumour marker assays be a guide in the prescription of bone scan for breast and lung cancers?

Considering the current need to improve cost-effectiveness in cancer patient management, a prospective study was undertaken in order to define the optimal combination of bone scan and tumour marker assays in breast and lung cancer strategies, as has been done in the case of prostate cancer. All patients with breast or lung cancer referred to the Nuclear Medicine Department of the Grenoble Teaching Hospital between December 1995 and April 1997 were included. A blood sample was drawn in each case for marker assay (CA15-3 or CEA and CYFRA 21-1) on the same day as the bone scan. Two hundred and seventy-five patients were included: 118 with lung cancer and 157 with breast cancer. With regard to lung cancer, no information useful for guiding bone scan prescription was obtained through CEA and CYFRA 21-1 assays. For breast cancer, the results suggest that in asymptomatic patients, a CA15-3 level of less than 25 U/ml (upper normal value chosen as the threshold) is strongly predictive of a negative bone scan; by contrast, high tumour marker levels are predictive of neoplastic bone involvement. When a doubtful bone scan is obtained in a patient with breast cancer, a normal marker level makes it highly probable that bone scan abnormalities are not related to malignancy.

Pulmonary embolus as a complication of femoral venous catheter removal.

The case of a 31 year old woman who developed asymptomatic pulmonary emboli after removal of a femoral venous catheter is reported. A deep venous thrombus had previously been shown to be associated with the catheter. Therefore it is argued that care should be taken when removing femoral lines especially in patients at high risk of thrombosis and that femoral venous duplex scan may be warranted prior to line removal in these high risk patients.

[Evaluation of the diagnostic usefulness of CA125 immunoscintigraphy for ovarian carcinoma follow-up after treatment: contribution of this technique in Grenoble University Medical Center]. / Evaluation de l'utilité diagnostique de l'immunoscintigraphie au CA.125 dans le suivi des carcinomes du revêtement épithélial de l'ovaire après traitement: apport décisionnel de la technique au CHU de Grenoble.

Immunoscintigraphy using indium-111-labeled OC125 monoclonal antibody F(ab')2 fragments is a technic complementary of morphological imaging (i.e. ultrasonography and computed tomography). It allows early detection of recurrences of ovarian carcinomas. We performed immunoscintigraphy 30 times in 26 patients who previously underwent radical treatment for ovarian carcinoma, and were suspected to have a recurrence. Our purposes were appreciation of diagnostic accuracy of the method, and above all its impact on clinical decisions and evolution of the patients. There were, after reevaluation of the results, 18 true positives, 7 true negatives, 3 false negatives and 2 false positive cases (sensitivity 85.7%, specificity 77.8%). Bayesian analysis showed positive and negative predictive values of 86% and 87% when probability of recurrence a priori was 50%, and 80% and 58% when probability of recurrence a priori was 70%. The result of immunoscintigraphy contributed to clinical decisions in 24 cases out of 30, and led to a correct decision for the patient in 21 cases. Conversely, for the 6 cases in which the result has not been considered, to take this result into account would have been beneficial in 4 cases, but harmful in 2. Finally, survival tended to be longer when immunoscintigraphy was negative, which could be associated with a better prognosis. We conclude that OC125-immunoscintigraphy may be useful for ovarian carcinoma follow-up and may contribute to a better therapeutic strategy.