SAME day amBulatory c (SAMBA): a multicenter, prospective, randomized clinical trial protocol.

BACKGROUND: A recent meta-analysis concluded that outpatient appendectomy appears feasible and safe, but there is a lack of high-quality evidence and a randomized trial is needed. The aim of this trial is to demonstrate that outpatient appendectomy is non-inferior to conventional inpatient appendectomy in terms of overall morbi-mortality on the 30th postoperative day (D30). METHODS: SAMBA is a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter non-inferiority trial. We will include 1400 patients admitted to 15 French hospitals between January 2023 and June 2025. Inclusion criteria are patients aged between 15 and 74 years presenting acute uncomplicated appendicitis suitable to be operated by laparoscopy. Patients will be randomized to receive outpatient care (day-surgery) or conventional inpatient care with overnight hospitalization in the surgery department. The primary outcome is postoperative morbi-mortality at D30. Secondary outcomes include time from diagnosis to appendectomy, length of total hospital stay, re-hospitalization, interventional radiology, re-interventions until D30, conversion from outpatient to inpatient, and quality of life and patient satisfaction using validated questionnaires. DISCUSSION: The SAMBA trial tests the hypothesis that outpatient surgery (i.e., without an overnight hospital stay) of uncomplicated acute appendicitis is a feasible and reliable procedure in establishments with a technical platform able to support this management strategy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05691348. Registered on 20 January 2023.

A Comprehensive Insight into the Economic Profile of People Receiving Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Use in France.

BACKGROUND: The use of metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) is not uniformly distributed within the population, even if it is governed by established guidelines. This disparity seems to be associated, among other factors, with the economic profile of people receiving this surgery. OBJECTIVES: We investigated the disparities in the use of MBS with respect to the socio-economic level in France based on socio-economic status (SES). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A descriptive observational study was conducted to compare the population of individuals with obesity who underwent MBS (MBS group) with individuals with obesity with no history of MBS (obese group). Data were extracted from the French National Hospital discharge database ("Programme De Médicalisation des Systèmes d'Information," PMSI). Socio-economic status (SES) was assessed through the French Deprivation Index (FDep). RESULTS: The use of MBS was significantly lower in patients having a higher SES compared to those having a lower one. There was no statistically significant difference in the use of MBS between individuals within the 4th and 5th SES quintiles compared to those in the 2nd and 3rd quintiles. No difference was found in the specific MBS procedures used depending on the SES. The obesity level was significantly lower in patients from the 1st and 3rd SES quintiles compared to the patients having a lower SES. CONCLUSION: Our study provides valuable insights into the complex interrelationships between the use of MBS, patients' SES, and obesity levels according to the FDep. These findings underscore the importance of developing targeted interventions to address disparities in the use of bariatric care.

Bariatric surgery reduces the incidence of hidradenitis suppurativa in individuals with obesity: results of a nationwide administrative data study in France.

BACKGROUND: Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a systemic inflammatory condition associated with obesity, metabolic syndrome, and environmental factors. Bariatric surgery (BS) is effective in reducing weight and resolving obesity-related medical problems. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this case-control study is to evaluate the effects of BS on the occurrence and recurrence of HS in individuals with obesity. SETTING: Nationwide administrative data study using the French national discharge database. METHODS: We compared 297,776 individuals with obesity and without a history of HS who underwent BS (BS group) with 2,735,930 individuals with obesity who did not receive BS (control group) to assess the incidence of de novo HS. From the same database, we compared hospitalization rates for HS recurrence between 310 individuals with obesity and HS who had BS (HS_BS group) and 3875 individuals with obesity who did not have BS (HS_control group). Propensity score matching using the nearest-neighbor method was implemented to create comparable patient groups. RESULTS: Individuals with obesity and without a history of HS who received BS exhibited a significantly reduced risk of developing de novo HS (RR = .736 [.639; .847]). Among patients with a history of HS, those who underwent BS had a nonsignificantly reduced risk of HS recurrence (RR = .676 [.369; 1.238]) compared with those who did not. CONCLUSION: BS reduces the risk of developing de novo HS and seems to have a protective effect on its recurrence in individuals with obesity, although the latter effect was not statistically significant.

Hidradenitis suppurativa and social disadvantage: A nationwide administrative data study of the French hospitalized population.

BACKGROUND: A lower socioeconomical status (SES) has been reported in patients suffering from hidradenitis suppurative (HS). However, limitations in the available studies prevent drawing definitive conclusions. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to assess the SES of HS patients using a specific SES indicator, the French DEPrivation index (FDep), specifically designed and validated for the French population. METHODS: This cross-sectional cohort study compared the HS hospitalized population with the general hospitalized population without HS. Data were extracted from the French national hospital discharge database, an exhaustive database on all reimbursed hospital stay in the country with a rolling 10-year history (2012-2021). We included all patients aged 7-75 years with at least one stay in a French hospital. A 1:40 propensity score matching, adjusted for age, sex, smoking status and obesity, was performed to create 2 groups of comparable patients. Subgroup analysis was done in the minor (7-17 years) and major (25-75 years) populations independently. RESULTS: In the overall population, we identified 33,880 patients with HS and 24,445,337 patients without HS. After propensity score matching, logistic regression showed a significant association between HS and social disadvantage. There is a 22.5% increased risk of developing HS for individuals being in quintile 5 (the most disadvantaged quintile) versus quintile 1 (the least disadvantaged quintile) (p < 0.0001). After propensity score matching, the logistic regression showed no association between HS and social disadvantage in the 7-17 subgroup. In this minor population, an association between HS and social disadvantage was observed when propensity score matching was performed on age and sex only. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate a significant association between HS and low SES in the adult population. In children between 7 and 17, low SES was associated with obesity and tobacco consumption, but not with HS when the populations were matched on these confounding factors.

Bariatric surgery reduces the risk of pancreatic cancer in individuals with obesity before the age of 50 years: A nationwide administrative data study in France.

BACKGROUND: Obesity is a well-established risk factor for pancreatic cancer. Bariatric surgery has demonstrated superior results in terms of weight loss and obesity-related comorbidities compared to medical and behavioral treatments. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of bariatric surgery on pancreatic cancer incidence in individuals with obesity. METHOD: Individuals with a diagnosis of obesity were retrieved from the French national hospital discharge database. We conducted a cohort study comparing the risk to develop pancreatic cancer in individuals with obesity with and without history of bariatric surgery; the inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) method was performed to assess the uncertainty around the results. Moreover, a subgroup analysis according to age at the time of bariatric surgery was performed to study its impact on the risk of pancreatic cancer. Finally, possible differences depending on the type of bariatric procedure (sleeve gastrectomy vs Roux-en-Y gastric bypass) were also explored. RESULTS: 160,129 (Bariatric Surgery group) and 1,263,804 (control group) patients with 5.2 ± 1.9 and 6.0 ± 1.9 years of follow-up respectively were included. A significant reduced risk to develop pancreatic cancer during follow-up was identified for the bariatric surgery group in the overall population (HR: 0.567). However, this reduced risk was only observed in the 18-50 years group. These results were furtherly confirmed after IPTW analysis. No difference was found between different bariatric procedures. CONCLUSION: Bariatric surgery has a protective effect against pancreatic cancer in the 18-50 years population. High-quality prospective studies are needed to confirm these results.

Impact of Extended Use of Ablation Techniques in Cirrhotic Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the extended use of ablation for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with cirrhosis in an expert ablation center when compared to the non-extended use of ablation in equivalent tertiary care centers. METHODS: Consecutive cirrhotic patients with non-metastatic HCC, no prior treatment, and referred to three tertiary care centers between 2012 and 2016 were retrospectively identified. The Bondy group, including all of the patients treated at Jean Verdier Hospital, where the extended use of ablation is routinely performed, was compared to the standard of care (SOC) group, including all of the patients treated at the Beaujon and Mondor Hospitals, using propensity score matching. A cost-effectiveness analysis was carried out from the perspective of French health insurance using a Markov model on a lifetime horizon. RESULTS: 532 patients were matched. The Bondy group led to incremental discounted lifetime effects of 0.8 life-years gained (LYG) (95% confidence interval: 0.4, 1.3) and a decrease in lifetime costs of EUR 7288 (USD 8016) (95% confidence interval: EUR 5730 [USD 6303], EUR 10,620 [USD 11,682]) per patient, compared with the SOC group, resulting in a dominant mean incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). A compliance with the Barcelona Clinic Liver Classification (BCLC) guidelines for earlier stage contributed to the greater part of the ICER. CONCLUSION: The extended use of ablation in cirrhotic patients with HCC was more effective and less expensive than the non-extended use of the ablation strategy.

Clinical and Economic Impact of Bariatric Surgery Post Liver Transplantation: a Nationwide, Population-Based Retrospective Study.

PURPOSE: Prevalence of obesity in liver transplant recipients is increasing with the overall epidemic augmentation of severe obesity, the effects of immunosuppressive drugs, and lifestyle changes which are responsible for de novo obesity development or aggravation of pre-existing obesity. The aim of this study is to analyze the differences in overall mortality, re-hospitalization rate, and hospitalization-related costs between patients undergoing bariatric surgery after liver transplantation and patients undergoing bariatric surgery alone. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty patients with history of liver transplantation who underwent bariatric surgery were analyzed from the French National Hospital Discharge Database. Overall mortality, re-hospitalization rate, length of stay for bariatric procedure, and the costs of bariatric surgery hospitalization and eventual re-hospitalizations were compared to a group of 360,846 patients who underwent bariatric surgery alone from 2010 to 2019. Furthermore, a 1:1 propensity score matching analysis was conducted. RESULTS: Patients with a history of liver transplantation showed an increased risk of overall mortality (HR: 7.66, p = 0.0047) and increased costs of hospitalization for bariatric surgery (8250 ± 4822€ vs 5583 ± 3398€, p = 0.0005). No differences in length of stay, re-hospitalization rate, and costs were found after multivariate analysis. After propensity score matching analysis, a significant increased cost of hospitalization (8250 ± 4822€ vs 6086 ± 1813€, p = 0.0195) still resulted for the liver transplantation group. CONCLUSION: Bariatric surgery represents the best treatment for obesity and its related associated medical problems. Our study highlights an increased risk of overall all-cause mortality and increased costs of hospitalization in this population compared to patients undergoing bariatric surgery alone.

Clinical and Economic Impact of Previous Bariatric Surgery on Liver Transplantation: a Nationwide, Population-Based Retrospective Study.

PURPOSE: The present study aims to determine the impact of previous bariatric surgery (BS) on the length of hospital stay; the incidence of mortality, re-transplantation, and re-hospitalization after LT; and the related economic costs, through the analysis of the French National Health Insurance Information System. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients aged > 18 years who underwent LT in France in the period from 2010 to 2019 were included. Thirty-nine patients with a history of BS (study group) were compared with 1798 obese patients without previous BS (control group). RESULTS: At the time of LT, patients with a history of BS were significantly younger than those of the control group and had lower Charlson comorbidity index. Female sex was significantly more represented in the study group. No significant differences were detected between the two groups regarding the postoperative mortality rate after LT (10.3% in the study group versus 8.0% in the control group), long-term mortality (0.038 versus 0.029 person-year of follow-up, respectively), re-transplantation (adjusted hazard ratio (HR) = 2.15, p = 0.2437), re-hospitalization (adjusted analysis, IRR = 0.93, p = 0.7517), and costs of LT hospitalization (73,515 € in the study group versus 65,878 € in the control group). After 1:2 propensity score matching, the duration of the LT hospital stay was significantly longer in the study group (58.3 versus 33.4 days, p = 0.0172). CONCLUSION: No significant differences were detected between patients with previous BS versus obese patients without history of BS undergoing LT concerning the rates of mortality, re-LT, re-hospitalization after LT, and costs of hospitalization and re-hospitalizations.

How Should we Use Multicolumn Spinal Cord Stimulation to Optimize Back Pain Spatial Neural Targeting? A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Trial (ESTIMET Study).

BACKGROUND: Recent studies have highlighted multicolumn spinal cord stimulation (SCS) efficacy, hypothesizing that optimized spatial neural targeting provided by new-generation SCS lead design or its multicolumn programming abilities could represent an opportunity to better address chronic back pain (BP). OBJECTIVE: To compare multicolumn vs. monocolumn programming on clinical outcomes of refractory postoperative chronic BP patients implanted with SCS using multicolumn surgical lead. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twelve centers included 115 patients in a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial. After randomization, leads were programmed using only one or several columns. The primary outcome was change in BP visual analogic scale (VAS) at six months. All patients were then programmed using the full potential of the lead up until 12-months follow-up. RESULTS: At six months, there was no significant difference in clinical outcomes whether the SCS was programmed using a mono or a multicolumn program. At 12 months, in all patients having been receiving multicolumn SCS for at least six months (n = 97), VAS decreases were significant for global pain (45.1%), leg pain (55.8%), and BP (41.5%) compared with baseline (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The ESTIMET study confirms the significant benefit experienced on chronic BP by patients implanted with multicolumn SCS, independently from multicolumn lead programming. These good clinical outcomes might result from the specific architecture of the multicolumn lead, giving the opportunity to select initially the best column on a multicolumn grid and to optimize neural targeting with low-energy requirements. However, involving more columns than one does not appear necessary, once initial spatial targeting of the "sweet spot" has been achieved. Our findings suggest that this spatial concept could also be transposed to cylindrical leads, which have drastically improved their capability to shape the electrical field, and might be combined with temporal resolution using SCS new modalities.

Do We Need to Assess Quality-of-Life with Both the St George's Respiratory Questionnaire and the EuroQol 5-Dimension Questionnaire in a Clinical Study with an Economic Component: Insights from the REVOLENS Study in Severe Emphysema.

Introduction: The use of two quality-of-life questionnaires in a single clinical trial with an economic component can be challenging due to the associated workload in terms of data collection and an increased risk of missing data. The aim of our study was to determine whether the questionnaire chosen to measure health status, the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), could be administered on its own without adding the EuroQol five dimensions questionnaire (EQ-5D) for economic evaluation in emphysema studies. Materials and Methods: Data were prospectively collected during the REVOLENS trial assessing endobronchial coil treatment in severe emphysema. To quantify the association between the two questionnaires, correlations between the EQ-5D and the SGRQ were first tested and the concordance was then studied in order to know whether the two questionnaires were interchangeable. Finally, the Starkie et al algorithm predicting EQ-5D utility values from the SGRQ was used on REVOLENS's individual patient data. The Student's t-test, correlation and concordance between EQ-5D individual value (from the REVOLENS study) and predicted value (from the Starkie et al algorithm) were studied to test this algorithm. Results: Results showed a strong correlation but no concordance between the EQ-5D and the SGRQ, demonstrating that the two questionnaires are not interchangeable. Moreover, the algorithm predicting EQ-5D utilities from the SGRQ did not provide utility values comparable to those observed in the REVOLENS study. Indeed, our study demonstrated a strong correlation between predicted and individual EQ-5D values but no concordance. Conclusion: The use of both the EQ-5D and the SGRQ in a clinical study with an economic component is justified. Based on our results, the SGRQ should not be used to obtain a utility score to calculate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio and conclude on the efficiency of an intervention in emphysema patients.

Early detection and curative treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: A cost-effectiveness analysis in France and in the United States.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the leading cause of death in patients with cirrhosis. Patients outside clinical trials seldom benefit from evidence-based monitoring. The objective of this study was to estimate the cost-effectiveness of complying with HCC screening guidelines. The economic evaluation compared surveillance of patients with cirrhosis as recommended by the guidelines ("gold-standard monitoring") to "real-life monitoring" from the health care system perspective. A Markov model described the history of the disease and treatment course including current first-line curative treatment: liver resection, radiofrequency ablation (RFA), and liver transplantation. Transition probabilities were derived mainly from two French cohorts, CIRVIR and CHANGH. Costs were computed using French and U.S. tariffs. Effectiveness was measured in life years gained (LYG). An incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated for a 10-year horizon and tested with one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. The cost difference between the two groups was $648 ($87,476 in the gold-standard monitoring group vs. $86,829 in the real-life monitoring group) in France and $11,965 ($93,795 vs. $81,829) in the United States. Survival increased by 0.37 years (7.18 vs. 6.81 years). The ICER was $1,754 per LYG in France and $32,415 per LYG in the United States. The health gain resulted from earlier diagnosis and access to first-line curative treatments, among which RFA provided the best value for money. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that gold-standard monitoring for patients with cirrhosis is cost-effective, attributed to a higher probability of benefiting from a curative treatment and so a higher survival probability. (Hepatology 2017;65:1237-1248).

Lung Volume Reduction Coil Treatment vs Usual Care in Patients With Severe Emphysema: The REVOLENS Randomized Clinical Trial.

IMPORTANCE: Therapeutic options for severe emphysema are limited. Lung volume reduction using nitinol coils is a bronchoscopic intervention inducing regional parenchymal volume reduction and restoring lung recoil. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy, safety, cost, and cost-effectiveness of nitinol coils in treatment of severe emphysema. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Multicenter 1:1 randomized superiority trial comparing coils with usual care at 10 university hospitals in France. Enrollment of patients with emphysema occurred from March to October 2013, with 12-month follow-up (last follow-up, December 2014). INTERVENTIONS: Patients randomized to usual care (n = 50) received rehabilitation and bronchodilators with or without inhaled corticosteroids and oxygen; those randomized to bilateral coil treatment (n = 50) received usual care plus additional therapy in which approximately 10 coils per lobe were placed in 2 bilateral lobes in 2 procedures. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was improvement of at least 54 m in the 6-minute walk test at 6 months (1-sided hypothesis test). Secondary outcomes included changes at 6 and 12 months in the 6-minute walk test, lung function, quality of life as assessed by St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (range, 0-100; 0 being the best and 100 being the worst quality of life; minimal clinically important difference, ≥4), morbidity, mortality, total cost, and cost-effectiveness. RESULTS: Among 100 patients, 71 men and 29 women (mean age, 62 years) were included. At 6 months, improvement of at least 54 m was observed in 18 patients (36%) in the coil group and 9 patients (18%) in the usual care group, for a between-group difference of 18% (1-sided 95% CI, 4% to ∞; P = .03). Mean between-group differences at 6 and 12 months in the coil and usual care groups were +0.09 L (95% CI, 0.05 L to ∞) (P = .001) and +0.08 L (95% CI, 0.03 L to ∞) (P = .002) for forced expiratory volume in the first second, +21 m (95% CI, -4 m to ∞) (P = .06) and +21 m (95% CI, -5 m to ∞) (P = .12) for 6-minute walk distance, and -13.4 points (95% CI, -8 points to ∞) and -10.6 points (95% CI, -5.8 points to ∞) for St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (1-sided P < .001 for both). Within 12 months, 4 deaths occurred in the coil group and 3 in the usual care group. The mean total 1-year per-patient cost difference between groups was $47,908 (95% CI, $47,879-$48,073) (P < .001); the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was $782,598 per additional quality-adjusted life-year. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this preliminary study of patients with severe emphysema followed up for 6 months, bronchoscopic treatment with nitinol coils compared with usual care resulted in improved exercise capacity with high short-term costs. Further investigation is needed to assess durability of benefit and long-term cost implications. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01822795.