Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 11 de 11
Filtrar
1.
Oncologist ; 26(3): 242-249, 2021 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33486852

RESUMEN

On November 5, 2020, a marketing authorization valid through the European Union (EU) was issued for acalabrutinib monotherapy or acalabrutinib in combination with obinutuzumab (AcalaObi) in adult patients with treatment-naïve (TN) chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and also for acalabrutinib monotherapy in adult patients with relapsed or refractory (RR) CLL. Acalabrutinib inhibits the Bruton tyrosine kinase, which plays a significant role in the proliferation and survival of the disease. Acalabrutinib was evaluated in two phase III multicenter randomized trials. The first trial (ACE-CL-007) randomly allocated acalabrutinib versus AcalaObi versus chlorambucil plus obinutuzumab (ChlObi) to elderly/unfit patients with TN CLL. The progression-free survival (PFS), as assessed by an independent review committee, was superior for both the AcalaObi (hazard ratio [HR], 0.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.06-0.17) and acalabrutinib (HR, 0.2; 95% CI, 0.13-0.3) arms compared with the ChlObi arm. The second trial (ACE-CL-309) randomly allocated acalabrutinib versus rituximab plus idelalisib or bendamustine to adult patients with RR CLL. Also in this trial, the PFS was significantly longer in the acalabrutinib arm (HR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.20-0.49). Adverse events for patients receiving acalabrutinib varied across trials, but the most frequent were generally headache, diarrhea, neutropenia, nausea, and infections. The scientific review concluded that the benefit-risk ratio of acalabrutinib was positive for both indications. This article summarizes the scientific review of the application leading to regulatory approval in the EU. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Acalabrutinib was approved in the European Union for the treatment of adult patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia who have not received treatment before and for those who have received therapy but whose disease did not respond or relapsed afterward. Acalabrutinib resulted in a clinically meaningful and significant lengthening of the time from treatment initiation to further disease relapse or patient's death compared with standard therapy. The overall safety profile was considered acceptable, and the benefit-risk ratio was determined to be positive.


Asunto(s)
Leucemia Linfocítica Crónica de Células B , Adulto , Anciano , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Benzamidas/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Leucemia Linfocítica Crónica de Células B/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios Multicéntricos como Asunto , Pirazinas/efectos adversos , Rituximab/uso terapéutico
2.
ESMO Open ; 5(6): e000798, 2020 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33188050

RESUMEN

On the 15 November 2018, the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use adopted an extension to an existing indication for the use of nivolumab (Opdivo) in combination with ipilimumab (Yervoy) for the first-line treatment of adult patients with intermediate/poor-risk advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). The approval was based on results from the Pivotal CA209214 study, a randomised, open-label, phase III study, comparing nivolumab +ipilimumab with sunitinib in subjects≥18 years of age with previously untreated advanced RCC (not amenable for surgery or radiotherapy) or metastatic RCC, with a clear-cell component. A total of 1096 patients were randomised in the trial, of which 847 patients had intermediate/poor-risk RCC and received either nivolumab (n=425) in combination with ipilimumab administered every 3 weeks for 4 doses followed by nivolumab monotherapy 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks or sunitinib (n=422) administered orally for 4 weeks followed by 2 weeks off, every cycle. A statistically significant difference in overall survival (OS) was observed in the nivolumab + ipilimumab group compared with the sunitinib group in intermediate/poor-risk subjects (HR 0.63 (99.8% CI 0.44 to 0.89); stratified log-rank 2-sided p-value<0.0001). The median OS was not reached for the nivolumab + ipilimumab group and was 25.95 months for the sunitinib group. The OS rates were 89.5% and 86.2% at 6 months, and 80.1% and 72.1% at 12 months in the nivolumab +ipilimumab and the sunitinib groups, respectively. K-M curves separated after approximately 3 months, favouring nivolumab + ipilimumab. This was not mirrored in the favourable-risk patients where no statistically significant difference was observed between nivolumab + ipilimumab and sunitinib in favourable-risk patients (HR 1.45 (descriptive 99.8% CI 0.51 to 4.12), p =0.2715).


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Renales , Neoplasias Renales , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Carcinoma de Células Renales/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Inmunoterapia , Ipilimumab/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Renales/tratamiento farmacológico , Nivolumab/uso terapéutico , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto
3.
ESMO Open ; 5(4)2020 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32847837

RESUMEN

The therapeutic landscape in the treatment of advanced/metastatic renal cell cancer has evolved over the last 2 years with the advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors. In 2018 and 2019, marketing authorisations valid throughout the European Union were issued for nivolumab and ipilimumab dual checkpoint inhibition and pembrolizumab or avelumab in combination with the tyrosine kinase inhibitor axitinib. These applications presented numerous regulatory challenges.In this paper, we summarise the main regulatory considerations, originating from the assessment of the dossiers submitted from the applicants for the three combinations. The regulatory issues are grouped in four sections: clinical pharmacology, efficacy, biomarkers and safety. In each section, we describe the issues raised during the regulatory evaluation performed by the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) assessors. The CHMP assessments determine whether the medicines concerned meet the necessary quality, safety and efficacy requirements, and whether the benefit-risk balance is positive.In summary, although the overall benefit-risk was considered positive for the three combinations, the immaturity of the outcome data and the absence of long-term safety data remain issues to be addressed. Postauthorisation efficacy studies have been required to confirm the effects of the new combinations.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Renales , Neoplasias Renales , Axitinib , Humanos , Ipilimumab , Nivolumab
4.
Oncologist ; 25(4): e709-e715, 2020 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32297447

RESUMEN

On November 15, 2018, the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) recommended the extension of indication for blinatumomab to include the treatment of adults with minimal residual disease (MRD) positive B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Blinatumomab was authorized to treat relapsed or refractory B-precursor ALL, and the change concerned an extension of use. On March 29, 2018, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) granted accelerated approval to blinatumomab to treat both adults and children with B-cell precursor ALL who are in remission but still have MRD. On July 26, 2018, the CHMP had originally adopted a negative opinion on the extension. The reason for the initial refusal was that although blinatumomab helped to reduce the amount of residual cancer cells in many patients, there was no strong evidence that it led to improved survival. During the re-examination, the CHMP consulted the scientific advisory group. The CHMP agreed with the expert group's conclusion that, although there was no strong evidence of patients living longer, the available data from the main study (MT103-203) indicated a good durable response to blinatumomab, with an overall complete response rate for the primary endpoint full analysis set (defined as all subjects with an Ig or T-cell receptor polymerase chain reaction MRD assay with the minimum required sensitivity of 1 × 10-4 at central lab established at baseline [n = 113]) as 79.6% (90/113; 95% confidence interval, 71.0-86.6), with a median time to complete MRD response of 29.0 days (range, 5-71). Therefore, the CHMP concluded that the benefits of blinatumomab outweigh its risks and recommended granting the change to the marketing authorization. The Committee for Orphan Medicinal Products, following reassessment, considered that significant benefit continued to be met and recommended maintaining the orphan designation and thus 10 years market exclusivity (the Orphan Designation is a legal procedure that allows for the designation of a medicinal substance with therapeutic potential for a rare disease, before its first administration in humans or during its clinical development). The marketing authorization holder for this medicinal product is Amgen Europe B.V. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Immunotherapy with blinatumomab has excellent and sustainable results, offering new hope for patients with minimal residual disease-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia, a disease with poor prognosis. New recommendations and change of practice for treatment of this patient group are detailed.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Biespecíficos , Antineoplásicos , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras B , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras , Adulto , Anticuerpos Biespecíficos/uso terapéutico , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Niño , Europa (Continente) , Humanos , Neoplasia Residual , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras B/tratamiento farmacológico , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras/tratamiento farmacológico , Linfocitos T
6.
Oncologist ; 20(3): 329-34, 2015 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25673103

RESUMEN

On August 5, 2013, a marketing authorization valid throughout the European Union (EU) was issued for pomalidomide in combination with dexamethasone for the treatment of adult patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (MM) who have received at least two prior treatment regimens, including both lenalidomide and bortezomib, and have demonstrated disease progression on the last therapy. Pomalidomide is an immunomodulating agent. The recommended starting dose of pomalidomide is 4 mg once daily taken on days 1-21 of repeated 28-day cycles. The main evidence of efficacy for pomalidomide in MM was based on a phase III multicenter, randomized, open-label study (CC-4047-MM-003) in which pomalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone therapy (POM+LoDEX) was compared with high-dose dexamethasone alone (HiDEX) in previously treated adult patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma who had received at least two prior treatment regimens, including both lenalidomide and bortezomib, and had demonstrated disease progression on the last therapy. For the intent-to-treat population, median progression-free survival based on International Myeloma Working Group criteria was 15.7 weeks (95% confidence interval [CI]: 13.0-20.1) in the POM+LoDEX group versus 8.0 weeks (95% CI: 7.0-9.0) in the HiDEX group (log-rank p value <.001). Overall survival (secondary endpoint) was also different in the two treatment groups (hazard ratio 0.53 [95% CI: 0.37-0.74]). The most commonly reported adverse reactions to pomalidomide in clinical studies were anemia (45.7%), neutropenia (45.3%) and thrombocytopenia (27%), fatigue (28.3%), pyrexia (21%), peripheral edema (13%), and infections including pneumonia (10.7%). Peripheral neuropathy adverse reactions were reported in 12.3% of patients, and venous embolic or thrombotic (VTE) adverse reactions were reported in 3.3% of patients. Pomalidomide is expected to be teratogenic. This paper summarizes the scientific review of the application leading to approval in the EU. The detailed scientific assessment report and product information, including the summary of product characteristics, are available on the EMA website (http://www.ema.europa.eu).


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Dexametasona/administración & dosificación , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Talidomida/análogos & derivados , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Ácidos Borónicos/administración & dosificación , Bortezomib , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Resistencia a Antineoplásicos , Europa (Continente) , Humanos , Lenalidomida , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/tratamiento farmacológico , Pirazinas/administración & dosificación , Tasa de Supervivencia , Talidomida/administración & dosificación
7.
Oncologist ; 19(4): 421-5, 2014 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24668331

RESUMEN

On March 27, 2013, a conditional marketing authorization valid throughout the European Union was issued for bosutinib (Bosulif) for the treatment of adult patients with chronic-phase, accelerated-phase, and blast-phase Philadelphia chromosome positive (Ph⁺) chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) previously treated with one tyrosine kinase inhibitor or more and for whom imatinib, nilotinib, and dasatinib are not considered appropriate treatment options. Bosutinib is a kinase inhibitor that targets the BCR-ABL kinase. The recommended dose is 500 mg of bosutinib once daily. The main evidence of efficacy for bosutinib was based on a CML subgroup analysis of study 3160A4-200, a phase I/II study of bosutinib in Ph⁺ leukemia in imatinib-resistant or intolerant CML. The subgroup was defined based on the presence of a BCR-ABL kinase domain mutation that would be expected to confer resistance to dasatinib (F317, E255) or nilotinib (E255, Y253, F359) and expected to have sensitivity to bosutinib or based on the presence of medical conditions or prior toxicities that may predispose the patient to unacceptable risk in the setting of nilotinib or dasatinib therapy. A conditional marketing authorization was granted because of the limited evidence of efficacy and safety currently supporting this last-line indication.


Asunto(s)
Compuestos de Anilina/uso terapéutico , Proteínas de Fusión bcr-abl/antagonistas & inhibidores , Proteínas de Fusión bcr-abl/genética , Leucemia Mielógena Crónica BCR-ABL Positiva/tratamiento farmacológico , Nitrilos/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/uso terapéutico , Quinolinas/uso terapéutico , Compuestos de Anilina/efectos adversos , Aprobación de Drogas , Resistencia a Antineoplásicos/genética , Europa (Continente) , Unión Europea , Femenino , Humanos , Leucemia Mielógena Crónica BCR-ABL Positiva/mortalidad , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mutación , Nitrilos/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/efectos adversos , Quinolinas/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento
8.
Transl Androl Urol ; 2(2): 89-91, 2013 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26816730
9.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 8(9): 1354-9, 2012 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22863755

RESUMEN

Active immunotherapy products (widely known as "cancer vaccines") are products intended to stimulate an immune response to mediate tumor destruction or reduce the progression of disease in patients where cancer has been diagnosed. Some quality attributes of these products are very difficult to characterize or present a high variability (especially if they are for autologous use), further complicating the interpretation of some of the clinical data. Furthermore, questions arise in the evaluation of efficacy and safety data in comparison with current chemical or biological treatments for the same indications. Some of these aspects are discussed in this paper in relationship with the regulatory requirements in the European Union and as applied to two recently assessed medicinal products, Oncophage and Provenge, both considered therapeutic "cancer vaccines" for renal cell carcinoma and prostate cancer, respectively.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra el Cáncer/uso terapéutico , Unión Europea/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Inmunoterapia/legislación & jurisprudencia , Inmunoterapia/normas
10.
Eur J Cancer ; 48(2): 237-42, 2012 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22030452

RESUMEN

On 13 July 2011 the European Commission issued a marketing authorisation valid throughout the European Union (EU) for ipilimumab for the treatment of advanced (unresectable or metastatic) melanoma in adults who have received prior therapy. Ipilimumab is a monoclonal antibody that specifically blocks the inhibitory signal of cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4), resulting in T cell activation, proliferation and lymphocyte infiltration into tumours, leading to tumour cell death. The recommended induction regimen of ipilimumab is 3mg/kg administered intravenously over a 90 min period every 3 weeks for a total of four doses. In a phase 3 trial in patients with advanced melanoma, median overall survival for ipilimumab was 10 months versus 6 months for gp100, an experimental melanoma vaccine (Hazard ratio (HR) 0.66; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.51, 0.87; p = 0.0026). Ipilimumab was most commonly associated with adverse reactions resulting from increased or excessive immune activity. Most of these, including severe reactions, resolved following initiation of appropriate medical therapy or withdrawal of ipilimumab. The most common side-effects (affecting more than 10% of patients) were diarrhoea, rash, pruritus, fatigue, nausea, vomiting, decreased appetite and abdominal pain. The objective of this paper is to summarise the scientific review of the application leading to approval in the EU. The detailed scientific assessment report and product information, including the summary of product characteristics (SmPC), are available on the European Medicines Agency (EMA) website (www.ema.europa.eu).


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Factores Inmunológicos/uso terapéutico , Melanoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Cutáneas/tratamiento farmacológico , Unión Europea , Humanos , Ipilimumab , Melanoma/inmunología , Melanoma/secundario , Neoplasias Cutáneas/inmunología
11.
Oncologist ; 16(10): 1451-7, 2011.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21963999

RESUMEN

The product Teysuno™ (S-1) contains tegafur, a prodrug of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), and two modulators of 5-FU metabolism, gimeracil and oteracil. The main clinical study in this application was a randomized controlled study comparing S-1 plus cisplatin with 5-FU plus cisplatin. In this study, median overall survival times of 8.6 months and 7.9 months for S-1 plus cisplatin and 5-FU plus cisplatin, respectively, were observed (hazard ratio, 0.92; 95% confidence interval, 0.80-1.05). The Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use of the European Medicines Agency concluded that S-1 in combination with cisplatin (75 mg/m²) was noninferior to 5-FU plus cisplatin (100 mg/m²) in patients with advanced gastric cancer and adopted a positive opinion recommending the marketing authorization for this product for the treatment of advanced gastric cancer when given in combination with cisplatin. The recommended dose of S-1 is 25 mg/m² (expressed as tegafur content) twice a day, for 21 consecutive days followed by 7 days rest (one treatment cycle), in combination with 75 mg/m² cisplatin i.v. administered on day 1. This treatment cycle is repeated every 4 weeks. The most common side effects reported in the pivotal study were anemia, neutropenia, vomiting, diarrhea, abdominal pain, weight decrease, anorexia, and fatigue. The objective of this paper is to summarize the scientific review of the application leading to approval in the EU. The full scientific assessment report and the summary of product characteristics are available on the European Medicines Agency website (http://www.ema.europa.eu).


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Gástricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Animales , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Cisplatino/administración & dosificación , Cisplatino/efectos adversos , Esquema de Medicación , Aprobación de Drogas , Unión Europea , Humanos , Ácido Oxónico/administración & dosificación , Ácido Oxónico/efectos adversos , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Piridinas/administración & dosificación , Piridinas/efectos adversos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Tegafur/administración & dosificación , Tegafur/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA