Drug-coated balloon angioplasty versus balloon angioplasty for treating patients with in-stent restenosis in the femoropopliteal artery: A meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The introduction of endovascular surgery has led to frequent stent use, although in-stent restenosis (ISR) remains a challenging issue. Drug-coated balloon (DCB) and conventional balloon angioplasty (BA) are common endovascular procedures for addressing ISR in the femoropopliteal artery. However, there is controversy regarding which procedure provides the greatest benefit to patients. METHODS: The PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases were searched for prospective controlled trials that compared DCB and BA for patients with ISR in the femoropopliteal artery. The study has been approved by Ethics Committee of Wuhan Central Hospital. RESULTS: The meta-analysis included 6 prospective trials with 541 patients. We found that DCB use was associated with significant reductions in binary restenosis at 6 months (relative risk [RR]: 0.45, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.33-0.63; P < .00001), binary restenosis at 1 year (RR: 0.44, 95% CI: 0.34-0.57; P < .00001), target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 6 months (RR: 0.36, 95% CI: 0.20-0.65; P = .0006), and TLR at 1 year (RR: 0.38, 95% CI: 0.27-0.54; P < .00001). The DCB group also had significantly better clinical improvement (RR: 1.39, 95% CI: 1.13-1.71; P = .002), although we did not detect inter-group differences in terms of death, target vessel thrombosis, or ipsilateral amputation. The brand of DCB may a cause of heterogeneity. CONCLUSION: Relative to BA, DCB use increases the durability of treatment for ISR in the femoropopliteal artery, based on significant reductions in binary restenosis and TLR at 6-12 months after the procedure. Furthermore, DCB use was associated with better clinical improvement. However, additional randomized controlled trials are needed to validate these findings.

The effect of somatostatin analogues on postoperative outcomes following pancreatic surgery: A meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Leakage from the pancreatic stump is a leading cause of morbidity following pancreatic surgery. It is essential to evaluate the effect of somatostatin analogues (SAs) following pancreatic surgery by analyzing all recent clinical trials. DATA SOURCES: We performed a literature search in the Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Web of Science databases up to May 29, 2016. Publication bias was assessed with Egger's test. Study quality was assessed using the Jadad Composite Scale. CONCLUSIONS: Twelve clinical trials involving 1703 patients from Jan 1st, 2000 to May 29th, 2016 were included in the study. With improvements in surgical management and peri-operative patient care, prophylactic use of somatostatin and its analogues reduced the overall incidence of pancreatic fistulas (RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.55-0.94; p = 0.02) and decreased the post-operative hospital stay after pancreatic surgery (the weighted mean difference was -1.06, 95% CI-1/88 to -0.23; p = 0.01). Other post-operative outcomes did not change significantly with the use of somatostatin analogues.

A retrospective study of elevated post-operative parathormone in primary hyperparathyroid patients.

We retrospectively analyzed the relationship between normocalcemic parathormone elevation (NPE) and recurrence of primary hyperparathyroidism (pHPT) after surgery, as well as the risk factors of NPE. Out of 309 patients with pHPT that underwent parathyroidectomy. Six months after surgery, 75 patients exhibited NPE with high preoperative serum levels of alkaline phosphatase, calcium and intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH), postoperative day 1 iPTH, and large parathyroid volume. 15 exhibited NPE at 2 years after surgery with low serum vitamin D levels. Postoperative serum iPTH levels gradually normalized in most patients. Multivariate analysis showed that male patients were at greater risk for postoperative NPE (p<0.05). Only 3 of 309 patients showed recurrence during the follow-up period. NPE may not predict recurrent hyperparathyroidism or incomplete parathyroidectomy for benign parathyroid lesions. Postoperative NPE thus appears to be a response to severe hyperparathyroidism and vitamin D deficiency.

Serum Carbohydrate Antigen 19-9 in Differential Diagnosis of Benign and Malignant Pancreatic Cystic Neoplasms: A Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Using serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9) in discriminating between benign and malignant pancreatic disease remains controversial. We aim to evaluate the diagnostic value of serum CA 19-9 in predicting malignant pancreatic cystic lesions. METHODS: Eligible studies were identified through searching MEDLINE and EMBASE prior to March 2016. Studies were assessed for quality using the Quality Assessment for Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy, 2nd version (QUADAS-2). Pooled sensitivity and specificity with 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using random-effects models. Summary receiver operator characteristic (SROC) curves and the area under curve (AUC) were performed. RESULTS: A total of thirteen studies including 1437 patients were enrolled in this meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.47(95% CI: 0.35-0.59), and 0.88(95% CI: 0.86-0.91), respectively, and the AUC was 0.87(95% CI, 0.84-0.90). Meta-regression analysis showed that sample size, region and reference standards were not the main sources of heterogeneity. CONCLUSIONS: Serum CA 19-9 has satisfying pooled specificity while poor pooled sensitivity for discriminating benign from malignant PCNs. It deserves to be widely used as complementary to other clinical diagnostic methods.

Diagnostic performance of parafibromin immunohistochemical staining for sporadic parathyroid carcinoma: a meta-analysis.

It is a challenge to distinguish parathyroid carcinoma (PTCA) from benign parathyroid lesions without recurrence or metastasis. Parafibromin immunohistochemical (IHC) staining had been described for the diagnosis of PTCA. But great variations existed in the reported sensitivity and specificity among different studies. We conducted a meta-analysis to summarize the diagnostic accuracy of parafibromin staining for PTCA. Published studies from Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched using the combination of terms "parafibromin," "CDC73," "HRPT2," and "parathyroid." Pooled sensitivity and specificity with 95 % confidence interval (CI) were calculated and the summary receiver operator characteristic (SROC) curves were constructed. The heterogeneity among included studies was evaluated and possible reasons were explored by meta-regression. A total of 10 studies including 202 patients with PTCA were finally enrolled in this meta-analysis. For parafibromin staining, sensitivity varied from 29 to 100 % (pooled estimate of 68 %; 95 % CI 49-82 %) and specificity ranged from 61 to 100 % (pooled estimate of 95 %; 95 % CI 85-98 %). The AUC for parafibromin staining was 0.91 (95 % CI 0.88-0.93). A significant heterogeneity was observed among included studies. According to meta-regression analysis, the scoring criteria and parafibromin antibody used in IHC were the covariates influencing the sensitivity. And the specificity decreased if atypical parathyroid adenomas were included in the control groups. The specificity of parafibromin staining was satisfactory for diagnosis of PTCA, while the sensitivity was limited. We suggested that a standardized IHC protocol and scoring system criteria should be applied in future studies to improve the diagnostic performance of parafibromin staining.