Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 16 de 16
Filtrar
1.
Clin Nutr ESPEN ; 59: 270-278, 2024 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38220386

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Patients who experience gastrointestinal (GI) intolerance and hyperglycemia (or glucose intolerance) may not achieve appropriate caloric requirements and experience poor outcomes. The aim was to examine patient characteristics, disease severity, and enteral nutrition (EN) formula use in relation to feeding intolerance and healthcare resource utilization. METHODS: A retrospective, cross-sectional design using real-world data from PINC AI™ Healthcare Database, 2015-2019 was used. Critically ill hospitalized adults who required ≥3 days of 100% whey peptide-based EN, other peptide-based diets, or intact-protein standard and diabetic EN formulas were included. Primary outcomes were enteral feeding intolerance, including GI intolerance and hyperglycemia. Pairwise comparisons of other peptide-based and standard intact-protein groups with 100% whey-peptide were completed. Associations between EN group with GI intolerance and hyperglycemia, respectively, were evaluated via multivariable logistic regressions. RESULTS: Across 67 US hospitals, 19,679 inpatients (3242,100% whey-peptide, 3121 other peptide-based, and 13,316 standard intact-protein) were included. The 100% whey-peptide group had higher severity of illness and frequencies of comorbidities compared with other peptide-based and standard intact-protein groups. Hospital length of stay, intensive care unit stay, and 30-day readmission were similar across peptide-based cohorts. After controlling for demographic, visit, and severity characteristics, odds of GI intolerance were 18% higher for the other peptide-based group and 15% higher for the standard intact-protein group compared with the 100% whey-peptide group (each P < 0.03). In secondary analysis, odds of hyperglycemia were 81% higher for the other peptide-based group compared with the subgroup of very high-protein/low carbohydrate 100% whey-peptide (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Lower GI intolerance and greater glycemic control were associated with the use of 100% whey-peptide formulas relative to other formulas. Appropriate and optimal delivery of EN using specialized peptide-based formulas is a strategy to minimize feeding intolerance and benefit critically ill patients.


Asunto(s)
Nutrición Enteral , Hiperglucemia , Adulto , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Nutrición Enteral/efectos adversos , Estudios Transversales , Enfermedad Crítica/terapia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Proteínas , Péptidos
2.
Am J Surg ; 226(5): 675-681, 2023 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37479563

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Incidence of, and potential risk factors for, postoperative gastrointestinal dysfunction (POGD) after gastrointestinal procedures performed in US hospitals were examined. METHODS: This retrospective study used hospital discharge data of inpatients who underwent ≥1 gastrointestinal procedures from 1-Jan-2016 to 30-Apr-2019. POGD incidence was calculated based on all hospitalizations for MDC-06 procedures. Predictors of POGD were assessed using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: POGD incidence was 5.8% among 638 611 inpatient hospitalizations. Major bowel procedures, peritoneal adhesiolysis, and appendectomy were the most notable predictors of POGD among gastrointestinal procedures assessed (adjusted odds ratios [95% confidence intervals]: 2.71 [2.59-2.83], 2.48 [2.34-2.64], and 2.15 [2.03-2.27], respectively; all p < 0.05). Procedures performed by colorectal/gastroenterology specialists (0.86 [0.84-0.89]), and those performed percutaneously (0.55 [0.54-0.56]) were associated with significantly lower odds of POGD (both P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Findings may help clinicians tailor management plans targeting patients at high-risk of POGD.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo , Enfermedades Gastrointestinales , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Incidencia , Factores de Riesgo , Enfermedades Gastrointestinales/epidemiología , Enfermedades Gastrointestinales/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo/efectos adversos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología
3.
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open ; 11(4): e4908, 2023 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37051208

RESUMEN

Peripheral nerve injuries not repaired in an effective and timely manner may lead to permanent functional loss and/or pain. For gaps greater than 5 mm, autograft has been the gold standard. Allograft has recently emerged as an attractive alternative, delivering comparable functional recovery without risk of second surgical site morbidities. Cost is an important factor when considering surgical options, and with a paucity of nerve repair cost data, this study aimed to compare allograft and autograft procedure costs. Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional observational study using the US all-payer PINC AI Healthcare Database examined facility procedure costs and cost drivers in patients undergoing allograft or autograft repair of an isolated single peripheral nerve injury between January 2018 and August 2020. Inpatient repairs were limited to nerve-specific DRGs. Multivariable regression evaluated risk-adjusted procedure cost differences. Results: Peripheral nerve graft repairs (n = 1363) were more frequent in the outpatient setting, and more than half involved the use of allograft nerve. Procedure costs for allograft and autograft repair were not significantly different in the outpatient (P = 0.43) or inpatient (P = 0.71) setting even after controlling for other risk factors. Operating room cost was significantly higher for autograft in outpatient (P < 0.0001) but not inpatient (P = 0.46), whereas allograft implant cost was significantly higher in both settings (P < 0.0001). Conclusions: No significant differences in procedure costs for autograft and allograft repair in inpatient and outpatient settings were found using real-world data. Future research should explore longer-term costs.

4.
Ann Med Surg (Lond) ; 85(2): 153-160, 2023 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36845794

RESUMEN

Reducing emergency room (ER) use may indicate the improved quality of patient care at index hospitalization. The aim of this study is to determine whether the use of near-infrared fluorescence (NIRF) imaging with indocyanine green (ICG) during coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery is associated with a lowered 90-day all-cause ER use. Materials and Methods: This retrospective cohort study included adult patients with inpatient hospitalizations between January 2016 and June 2020 for an isolated CABG procedure at a US hospital. Propensity score matching was used to create matched cohorts to address the differences in patient, payer type, hospital, and clinical characteristics. A multivariable regression analysis was conducted to determine the association of NIRF imaging with ICG on ER use within 90 days of discharge after controlling for patient, payer type, hospital, and clinical covariates. Results: In total, 230 506 adult patients underwent an isolated CABG procedure. Less than 1% (n=1965) were assessed with NIRF imaging using ICG. There were differences in patient demographic and hospital characteristics between the treatment group (i.e. NIRF with ICG) and the comparison group (i.e. no NIRF with ICG). After controlling for covariates, a statistically significant lower 90-day all-cause ER use was documented among the treatment group (adjusted odds ratio=0.84, 95% confidence interval=0.73-0.96, P<0.009). Reasons associated with ER use were similar between the two groups. Conclusion: Routine intraoperative graft patency assessment with NIRF imaging using ICG may help to improve a patient's care experience and reduce subsequent resource utilization. Intraoperative graft patency assessment with NIRF imaging using ICG is associated with a 90-day all-cause ER use reduction among CABG patients. Further studies are needed to compare the ER usage among centers that used this technique versus those that did not to determine if associated reductions in ER use are a center or technique-specific phenomenon.

5.
Future Oncol ; 18(32): 3609-3621, 2022 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36305495

RESUMEN

Aim: This retrospective, observational study assessed healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and costs for newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients receiving intensive induction chemotherapy. Materials & methods: Adult AML patients with inpatient hospitalization or hospital-based outpatient visit receiving intensive induction chemotherapy (CPX-351 or 7 + 3 treatments) were identified from the Premier Healthcare Database (US). Results: All 642 patients had inpatient hospitalizations (median number = 2; median length of stay = 16 days); 22.4% had an ICU admission. Median total outpatient hospital cost was US$2904 per patient, inpatient hospital cost was $83,440 per patient, and ICU cost was $16,550 per patient. Discussion: In the US hospital setting, substantial HCRU and costs associated with intensive induction chemotherapy for AML were driven by inpatient hospitalizations.


Asunto(s)
Quimioterapia de Inducción , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda , Adulto , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estrés Financiero , Hospitalización , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/diagnóstico , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/tratamiento farmacológico
6.
J Health Econ Outcomes Res ; 9(2): 1-10, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35854856

RESUMEN

Background: High-protein enteral nutrition is advised for patients who are critically ill. Options include immunonutrition formulas of various compositions and standard high-protein formulas (StdHP). Additional research is needed on the health economic value of immunonutrition in a broad cohort of severely ill hospitalized patients. Objective: The study goal was to compare healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and cost between immunonutrition and StdHP using real-world evidence from a large US administrative database. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was designed using the PINC AI™ Healthcare Database from 2015 to 2019. IMPACT® Peptide 1.5 (IP) was compared with Pivot® 1.5 (PC), and StdHP formulas. Inclusion criteria comprised patients age 18+ with at least 1 day's stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) and at least 3 out of 5 consecutive days of enteral nutrition. Pairwise comparisons of demographics, clinical characteristics, HCRU, and costs were conducted between groups. Multivariable regression was used to assess total hospital cost per day associated with enteral nutrition cohort. Results: A total of 5752 patients were identified across 27 hospitals. Overall, a median 7 days of enteral nutrition was received over a 16-day hospital and 10-day ICU stay. Median total and daily hospital costs were lower for IP vs PC ($71 196 vs $80 696, P<.001) and ($4208 vs $4373, P=.019), with each higher than StdHP. However, after controlling for covariates such as mortality risk, surgery, and discharge disposition, average total hospital cost per day associated with IP use was 24% lower than PC, and 12% lower than StdHP (P<.001). Readmissions within 30 days were less frequent for patients receiving IP compared with PC (P<.02) and StdHP (P<.001). Discussion: Choice of high-protein enteral nutrition for patients in the ICU has implications for HCRU and daily hospital costs. Considering these correlations is important when comparing formula ingredients and per unit costs. Among the enteral nutrition products studied, IP emerged as the most cost-saving option, with lower adjusted hospital cost per day than PC or StdHP. Conclusions: Using a select immunonutrition formula for critically ill patients may provide overall cost savings for the healthcare system.

7.
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res ; 14: 21-34, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35035224

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: CPX-351 is dual-drug liposomal encapsulation of daunorubicin and cytarabine at a fixed synergistic 1:5 molar ratio. This study determined current real-world use of CPX-351 versus conventional 7+3 (cytarabine+daunorubicin) therapy and evaluated hospital length of stay (LOS) and supportive care utilization in t-AML and AML-MRC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective, observational study utilized the Premier Healthcare Database and included patients who were aged ≥18 years with t-AML or AML-MRC and treated with CPX-351 or 7+3 between August 1, 2017 and February 28, 2019. All patients treated with 7+3 were required to be eligible for CPX-351 based on its FDA-approved indication. Outcome variables were annualized and adjusted for patient, hospital, and clinical confounding factors. The primary outcome was inpatient LOS. Secondary outcomes included use of blood products and use of anti-infectives. RESULTS: The study included 195 qualifying patients treated with CPX-351 and 160 patients treated with 7+3 who were eligible for CPX-351. Approximately one-third of the patients treated with CPX-351 were administered therapy in a hospital-based outpatient setting, and all patients treated with 7+3 received it in the inpatient setting. The regression-adjusted annualized inpatient LOS was shorter with CPX-351 than 7+3 (mean of 183.7 vs 197.1 days, p<0.001). The difference in mean-adjusted LOS was most pronounced for t-AML, with a mean-adjusted LOS of 168.9 versus 192.5 days for CPX-351 versus 7+3, respectively (nominal p<0.001). Supportive care utilization, including the number of administrations of red blood cells, the number of administrations of platelets, and the number of days on anti-infectives, was similar between treatment groups. CONCLUSION: CPX-351 was associated with a shorter inpatient LOS than 7+3. Supportive care use, including blood products and anti-infectives, was similar for CPX-351 and 7+3. These findings suggest CPX-351 conveys resource advantages over 7+3 in patients with newly diagnosed t-AML and AML-MRC.

9.
J Med Econ ; 20(8): 871-883, 2017 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28562132

RESUMEN

AIMS: Sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS) is a life-threatening complication of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Healthcare utilization, costs, and mortality were assessed in HSCT patients diagnosed with SOS, with and without multi-organ dysfunction (MOD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective observational study identified real-world patients undergoing HSCT between January 1, 2009 and May 31, 2014 using the Premier Healthcare Database. In absence of a formal ICD-9-CM diagnostic code, SOS patients were identified using a pre-specified definition adapted from Baltimore and Seattle criteria and clinical practice. Severe SOS (SOS/MOD) and non-severe SOS (SOS/no-MOD) were classified according to clinical evidence for MOD in the database. RESULTS: Of the 5,418 patients with a discharge diagnosis of HSCT, 291 had SOS, with 134 categorized as SOS/MOD and 157 as SOS/no-MOD. The remaining 5,127 patients had HSCT without SOS. Overall SOS incidence was 5.4%, with 46% having evidence of MOD. Distribution of age, gender, and race were similar between the SOS cohorts and non-SOS patients. After controlling for hospital profile and admission characteristics, demographics, and clinical characteristics, the adjusted mean LOS was 31.0 days in SOS/MOD compared to 23.9 days in the non-SOS cohort (medians = 26.9 days vs 20.8 days, p < .001). The adjusted mean cost of SOS/MOD patients was $140,653, which was $41,702 higher than the non-SOS cohort (medians = $105,749 vs $74,395, p < .001). An almost 6-fold increased odds of inpatient mortality was associated with SOS/MOD compared to the non-SOS cohort (odds ratio = 5.88; 95% CI = 3.45-10.33). LIMITATIONS: Limitations of retrospective observational studies apply, since the study was not randomized. Definition for SOS was based on ICD-9 diagnosis codes from a hospital administrative database and reliant on completeness and accuracy of coding. CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of real-world data shows that SOS/MOD is associated with significant increases in healthcare utilization, costs, and inpatient mortality.


Asunto(s)
Gastos en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas/efectos adversos , Enfermedad Veno-Oclusiva Hepática/economía , Enfermedad Veno-Oclusiva Hepática/etiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Baltimore , Femenino , Recursos en Salud/economía , Recursos en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermedad Veno-Oclusiva Hepática/complicaciones , Enfermedad Veno-Oclusiva Hepática/mortalidad , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Hospitalización/economía , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Insuficiencia Multiorgánica/complicaciones , Insuficiencia Multiorgánica/economía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Adulto Joven
10.
BMC Nephrol ; 15: 116, 2014 Jul 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25015348

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Several major ESRD-related regulatory and reimbursement changes were introduced in the United States in 2011. In several large, national datasets, these changes have been associated with decreases in erythropoiesis stimulating agent (ESA) utilization and hemoglobin concentrations in the ESRD population, as well as an increase in the use of red blood cell (RBC) transfusions in this population. Our objective was to examine the use of RBC transfusion before and after the regulatory and reimbursement changes implemented in 2011 in a prevalent population of chronic dialysis patients in a large national claims database. METHODS: Patients in the Truven Health MarketScan Commercial and Medicare Databases with evidence of chronic dialysis were selected for the study. The proportion of chronic dialysis patients who received any RBC transfusion and RBC transfusion event rates per 100 patient-months were calculated in each month from January 1, 2007 to March 31, 2012. The results were analyzed overall and stratified by primary health insurance payer (commercial payer or Medicare). RESULTS: Overall, the percent of chronic dialysis patients with RBC transfusion and RBC transfusion event rates per 100 patient-months increased between January 2007 and March 2012. When stratified by primary health insurance payer, it appears that the increase was driven by the primary Medicare insurance population. While the percent of patients with RBC transfusion and RBC transfusion event rates did not increase in the commercially insured population between 2007 and 2012 they did increase in the primary Medicare insurance population; the majority of the increase occurred in 2011 during the same time frame as the ESRD-related regulatory and reimbursement changes. CONCLUSIONS: The regulatory and reimbursement changes implemented in 2011 may have contributed to an increase in the use of RBC transfusions in chronic dialysis patients in the MarketScan dataset who were covered by Medicare plus Medicare supplemental insurance.


Asunto(s)
Transfusión de Eritrocitos/tendencias , Hematínicos/uso terapéutico , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Medicare/tendencias , Mecanismo de Reembolso/tendencias , Diálisis Renal/tendencias , Estudios de Cohortes , Transfusión de Eritrocitos/economía , Femenino , Hematínicos/economía , Humanos , Fallo Renal Crónico/economía , Masculino , Medicare/economía , Mecanismo de Reembolso/economía , Diálisis Renal/economía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos
11.
Am J Rhinol Allergy ; 25(4): 257-62, 2011.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21639996

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Allergic rhinitis (AR) is a global health problem because of its increasing impact on economics, society, and the individual's quality of life. This study compares the outcomes and cost of three intranasal therapeutic approaches to the treatment of AR. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study using propensity scores to achieve balanced cohorts. The study population included patients ≥16 years of age with at least one intranasal prescription claim, without concurrent nasal polyps or sinusitis. Health care use and costs, airway infections, pharmacy costs, and indicators of unsatisfactory treatment (i.e., treatment augmentation or switching) were evaluated in the 1-year follow-up period using a claims database. RESULTS: Data from 141,190 patients in intranasal antihistamines (INA) therapy, intranasal steroids (INS) therapy, and intranasal combination therapy (ICT) cohorts were analyzed. The INA cohort showed the lowest rate of change in treatment (switching or augmentation). Switching rates were lowest in the INS therapy cohort, whereas augmentation was lowest in the INA cohort. AR- and asthma-related medication costs were significantly lower in the INA cohort. No differences were observed in airway infections and overall health care costs. Concurrent chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder and asthma were the strongest predictors of health care cost and respiratory infection in the follow-up period. CONCLUSION: A change in treatment was noted in ∼⅓ of the entire study population. None of the treatments had a remarkable effect on health care costs or the occurrence of airway infections. The INA treatment cohort had lower AR- and asthma-related medication costs.


Asunto(s)
Costos de la Atención en Salud , Antagonistas de los Receptores Histamínicos/economía , Rinitis Alérgica Perenne/economía , Rinitis Alérgica Estacional/economía , Esteroides/economía , Administración Intranasal , Estudios de Cohortes , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Antagonistas de los Receptores Histamínicos/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Masculino , Cumplimiento de la Medicación , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Rinitis Alérgica Perenne/tratamiento farmacológico , Rinitis Alérgica Perenne/fisiopatología , Rinitis Alérgica Estacional/tratamiento farmacológico , Rinitis Alérgica Estacional/fisiopatología , Esteroides/uso terapéutico
12.
Clin Ther ; 33(7): 914-25, 2011 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21684600

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Clinical trials have shown that treatment with disease-modifying therapies (DMTs), such as interferon, at the time of clinically isolated syndrome can delay the onset of multiple sclerosis (MS). OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to assess health care utilization and expenditures associated with treating patients early with DMTs rather than delaying until patients meet the full diagnostic criteria of MS. METHODS: A retrospective study used insurance claims data (2000-2008) of enrolled patients before documented MS (1 inpatient or 2 outpatient claims with International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification 340 coding). Treatment cohorts were early DMT (DMT claim before the first documented MS; N = 227) and delayed DMT (DMT started after documented MS; N = 3724). Comparisons during 1 year of follow-up were adjusted for confounding using multivariate methods. RESULTS: Adjusted annual per-patient expenditures (including patient out of pocket) for early versus delayed were as follows: total ($28,280 vs $29,102; P = 0.44), excluding DMT cost ($15,214 vs $17,630; P < 0.01), and MS-related ($9365 vs $13,661; P < 0.01). Hospitalizations were 10.1% versus 16.5% (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 0.51; 95% CI, 0.32-0.81). CONCLUSIONS: Analysis indicated that early DMT treatment was associated with fewer hospitalizations than delayed treatment, and there was no statistically significant difference in annual health care expenditures. This suggests that the drug costs of early therapy were offset by savings in other medical expenditures.


Asunto(s)
Adyuvantes Inmunológicos/uso terapéutico , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Esclerosis Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Adyuvantes Inmunológicos/administración & dosificación , Adyuvantes Inmunológicos/economía , Adulto , Ahorro de Costo , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Acetato de Glatiramer , Hospitalización/economía , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Interferón beta/administración & dosificación , Interferón beta/economía , Interferón beta/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Esclerosis Múltiple/economía , Análisis Multivariante , Péptidos/administración & dosificación , Péptidos/economía , Péptidos/uso terapéutico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo
13.
J Med Econ ; 14(2): 147-58, 2011.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21288057

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)-related expenditure and hospitalisation in COPD patients treated with tiotropium versus alternative long-acting bronchodilators (LABDs). METHODS: Data were from the Thomson Reuters MarketScan Research Databases. COPD patients ≥ 35 years with at least one LABD claim between July 1, 2004 and June 30, 2006 were classified into five cohorts based on index LABD: monotherapy with tiotropium, salmeterol/fluticasone propionate, formoterol fumarate, or salmeterol or combination therapy. Demographic and clinical characteristics were evaluated for a 6-month pre-period and COPD-related utilisation and total costs were evaluated for a 12-month follow-up period. LABD relationship to COPD-related costs and hospitalisations were estimated by multivariate generalised linear modelling (GLM) and multivariate logistic regression, respectively. RESULTS: Of 52,274 patients, 53% (n = 27,457) were male, 71% (n = 37,271) were ≥ 65 years, and three LABD cohorts accounted for over 90% of the sample [53% (n = 27,654) salmeterol/fluticasone propionate, 23% (n = 11,762) tiotropium, and 15% (n = 7755) combination therapy]. Patients treated with salmeterol/fluticasone propionate (p < 0.001), formoterol fumarate (p = 0.032), salmeterol (p = 0.004), or with combination therapy (p < 0.001) had higher COPD-related costs and a greater risk of inpatient admission (p < 0.01 for all) versus tiotropium. LIMITATIONS: These data are based on administrative claims and as such do not include clinical information or information on risk factors, like smoking status, that are relevant to this population. CONCLUSIONS: Patients treated with tiotropim had lower COPD-related expenditures and risk of hospitalisation than patients treated with other LABDs.


Asunto(s)
Broncodilatadores/economía , Recursos en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Costos de Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Pacientes Internos/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/economía , Derivados de Escopolamina/economía , Adulto , Anciano , Broncodilatadores/farmacocinética , Broncodilatadores/uso terapéutico , Quimioterapia Combinada/economía , Quimioterapia Combinada/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Lineales , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Derivados de Escopolamina/farmacocinética , Derivados de Escopolamina/uso terapéutico , Factores de Tiempo , Bromuro de Tiotropio , Estados Unidos
14.
Pain Pract ; 11(3): 217-29, 2011.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21199319

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate changes in health-care resource use and costs after initiating pregabalin or duloxetine in employees with fibromyalgia (FM). METHODS: Employees (18 to 64 years old) with at least one claim for an FM-attributable medication within 60 days following an FM diagnosis were identified using the Thomson Reuters MarketScan(®) Commercial Database (2006 to 2008). Patients newly initiated on pregabalin were propensity score matched to patients newly initiated on duloxetine. These treatment cohorts were evaluated for changes between the 6-month pre- and post-initiation periods in health-care utilization including prescriptions, imputed medically related work loss and expenditures. Pre- to post-initiation changes were compared between pregabalin and duloxetine using a difference-in-difference approach based on univariate statistics and multivariable models. RESULTS: A total of 731 employees with FM initiated on pregabalin (89.9% female, mean age 47.1±9.7 years) were matched with 731 employees initiated on duloxetine (89.5% female, mean age 47.1±9.8 years); other demographic and clinical characteristics were also comparable between cohorts. The adjusted marginal effects were not statistically significant for pre- to post-changes in opioid utilization (P=0.856), number of FM-attributable (P=0.151) or FM-related medications (P=0.462), and all-cause (P=0.323) or FM-attributable (P=0.991) expenditures. Pregabalin was associated with a significantly lower probability of any medically related work loss of 3.2 percentage points (P=0.030) compared with duloxetine, but changes in indirect costs were not significantly different (P=0.600). CONCLUSIONS: The changes in health resource utilization and costs after initiation of pregabalin were not significantly different than the changes observed after initiation of duloxetine. These results not only demonstrate an overall similarity of resource utilization, but also suggest cost neutrality between pregabalin and duloxetine.


Asunto(s)
Empleo/estadística & datos numéricos , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiofenos/uso terapéutico , Ácido gamma-Aminobutírico/análogos & derivados , Adolescente , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Analgésicos/economía , Analgésicos/uso terapéutico , Depresión/etiología , Clorhidrato de Duloxetina , Femenino , Fibromialgia/complicaciones , Fibromialgia/diagnóstico , Fibromialgia/tratamiento farmacológico , Fibromialgia/economía , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pregabalina , Estudios Retrospectivos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Trastornos del Sueño-Vigilia/etiología , Tiofenos/economía , Adulto Joven , Ácido gamma-Aminobutírico/economía , Ácido gamma-Aminobutírico/uso terapéutico
15.
J Med Econ ; 14(1): 1-9, 2011.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21108534

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To estimate total costs and metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)-related costs and assess primary cost drivers of treating newly diagnosed mCRC patients after the introduction of biologic therapies. METHODS: Using a large national claims database, costs of mCRC patients were estimated in 2004-2009 by examining (1) the cost difference between mCRC patient and their matched non-cancer cohorts, and (2) mCRC-related costs. Costs were further assessed by phase of disease (diagnostic, treatment, and death). The survival analysis technique was used to estimate cost of handling variable length of follow-up and data censoring. RESULTS: A total of 6,746 mCRC patients met all eligibility criteria, 6,675 of them were matched to patients without cancer. Among the three phases of disease, the treatment phase was the longest (16.4 months). Compared with matched patients with no cancer, total monthly costs were $14,585 higher for mCRC patients, which was driven by higher inpatient ($7,546) and outpatient ($6,749) care (p < 0.001 for all comparisons). During the study period, cost share of biologics increased from 4.8% among patients diagnosed in 2004 to 9.4% for those diagnosed in 2008. CONCLUSIONS: The costs associated with treating mCRC are substantial. Inpatient and outpatient care remain key cost drivers in the medical management of mCRC. Cost chare of biologics was low, but increased between 2004 and 2009. The study sample only included patients with commercial and Medicare supplemental insurance in the US thus may not be generalizable to patients with other insurance or in other countries. Indirect costs associated with mCRC were not examined.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales/economía , Neoplasias Colorrectales/fisiopatología , Costo de Enfermedad , Metástasis de la Neoplasia/fisiopatología , Anciano , Neoplasias Colorrectales/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/tratamiento farmacológico , Femenino , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Metástasis de la Neoplasia/diagnóstico , Metástasis de la Neoplasia/tratamiento farmacológico , Estados Unidos
16.
J Occup Environ Med ; 52(4): 415-20, 2010 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20357681

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Determine lost work time and job attrition for incident breast cancer (BC). METHODS: The cases were employed women, aged 18 to 64, with BC identified by a validated algorithm between 1999 and 2005, from claims (MarketScan) and attendance databases. Controls without cancer were matched 3:1 on age, comorbidity, and index year. RESULTS: First-year mean disability days were 60 (cases, N = 880) versus 5 (controls, N = 2640) (P < 0.001). The first-year disability costs were $4900 for cases versus $385 for controls (P < 0.001). In years 2 through 4, the disability days and associated costs were similar for the cases versus controls. After 4 years, 56.4% of cases were still enrolled in the employer-sponsored insurance programs compared to 6.5% of controls (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The lost work associated with BC is substantial in the first year after diagnosis. Employee retention is much higher for BC cases versus controls.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/economía , Neoplasias de la Mama/epidemiología , Eficiencia , Reembolso de Seguro de Salud/economía , Adolescente , Adulto , Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico , Comorbilidad , Costo de Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA