Analysis of malpractice claims: The Franco-Belgian "Cœlio Club" experience.

Malpractice claims are a regularly increasing concern in gastrointestinal surgery. The goal of this study was to compare the current status of claims in two different French-speaking communities by a retrospective descriptive study of surgeons' experiences, from the beginning of their practice up until December 31 2014. Data included the number, the reasons, and the results of medicolegal claims and their jurisdictions. Forty-three surgeons participated in this study. Two hundred medicolegal claims were analyzed. The mean number was 5.8 per surgeon. Bariatric surgery, colorectal surgery and parietal surgery were the most exposed. Forty-six (23%) faults were noted, while no fault was pronounced in 139 (69.5%) cases. The main reasons for lodging complaints were nosocomial infections, anastomotic leaks, poor postoperative care, hollow organ perforation, peripheral neurologic complication, and insufficient preoperative information. Forty-four percent of the complaints were analyzed by the conciliation and compensation commissions and 43.5% by the High Court. In the French-speaking group, there were 13 complaints, two of which gave rise to compensation. French surgeons are highly exposed to complaints: in French law, clumsiness or technical maladdress is considered as a fault. The patient should be informed preoperatively of all possible severe risks of a medical procedure. In Belgium, complications are exceptional and are considered random therapeutic events. Adhering to the recommendations emanating from the French High Authority of Health and Learned Societies as well as accreditation issued by the same High Authority should allow to decrease the number of undesirable events related to care and malpractice.

Presence of anesthesiologists and nurses in the operating room: Liability of surgeons and health care facilities.

The presence of an anesthesiologist and certified registered nurse anesthesiologist in the operating room remains a topic of discussion in many facilities. This article provides an overview on the legislation and recommendations on this topic and recounts some of the related jurisprudence. The opinions of various actors, surgeons, anesthesiologists, anesthesiology-intensive care physicians, certified registered nurse anesthesiologists, care-facility directors and insurance companies are included. Based on these elements, we attempt to answer the question of presence of competence in anesthesiology in the operating room.

Expert witness testimony step by step and how to prepare it.

The medical expert witness testimony is a key moment in the pathway of patient complaints as well as in the line of defense of the defendant-physician. For the defendant, it is a difficult time, often experienced as humiliating, because his or her competences are questioned, appraised and discussed in public. However, the defendant must perceive and use this encounter as an opportunity to express his/her viewpoint on the medical accident. This article provides the principal juridical rules that govern the medical expert witness testimony that must be known, as well as some practical advice on how the medical expert witness testimony evolves and how to protect oneself from the complaints, In order to enable the defendant to best prepare for this confrontation between the involved parties.

Medical expert witness testimony in France and in Europe.

Health care professionals are usually at a loss when it comes to medical "complaints", essentially because they lack knowledge with regard to existing litigation procedures. After a short reminder of the different rights of appeal in France, we describe how medical appeals function in other European countries. Next, we give the details of how the evaluation of claims of bodily damage works, a process in which every physician may be called upon to participate several times in a career, either as the defendant, or as a medical counselor, or as an expert. The goal of this update is to understand the different compensation appeal circuits available to patients and help the surgeon demystify and dedramatize the situation while preparing for the medical expert witness testimony. All such testimony reports, via whatever appeal circuit, follow a similar procedure, even if they are not exactly identical.

Malpractice claims and abdominal wall hernia repair.

PURPOSE: To present factual data on the medico-legal aspects of medicolegal claims after abdominal wall surgery in France. METHOD: Analysis of the complaints following parietal surgery that were addressed to a company that specializes in medical malpractice insurance between 2010 and 2016. RESULTS: Of 209 files, 180 were analyzable; these included 75 women and 105 men with a mean age of 51 years and a mean BMI of 29.8. Cases were mainly heard by the Conciliation and Compensation Commission (CCI) (82 patients) and the High Court (79 patients). The surgical procedures concerned were groin hernias (85 patients) or anterior abdominal wall hernias (95 patients). Conventional open surgery was performed in 123 patients and laparoscopic surgery in 57 patients. The incidents motivating patient complaints after groin hernia surgery were chronic pain (27 patients), infection (24 patients), testicular damage (10 patients). Seven patients died as a result of this surgery (including one fetus). Claims after ventral hernia repair were motivated by infections (46 patients) and post-operative peritonitis or bowel obstruction (12 patients). Nine patients died following these ventral hernia repairs. Surgical error was identified in 59 of the 168 cases analyzed (35.1%); 44% of recognized faults were surgical site infections, 27% linked to delay in re-operation, and 20% were related to the operating room environment. CONCLUSION: Hernia surgery, although an everyday event for many practitioners, requires the same rigor as all other visceral surgery.

Prevention of parastomal hernia by intraperitoneal onlay mesh reinforcement at the time of stoma formation.

PURPOSE: Parastomal hernia (PSH) is a very frequent complication after creation of a permanent colostomy. The aim of this study is to assess the safety and prophylactic effect of intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) reinforcement of the abdominal wall at the time of primary stoma formation to prevent PSH occurrence. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This multicentre prospective study concerned 20 patients operated for low rectal carcinoma between 2008 and 2010. Those patients had an elective and potentially curative abdominoperineal excision associated with IPOM reinforcement of the abdominal wall with a round composite mesh centred on the stoma site and covering the lateralised colon. There were 8 men and 12 women with a median age of 69 years (range: 44-88) and a body mass index of 27 (range: 21-35). The major outcomes analysed in the study were operative time, complications related to mesh and PSH occurrence. Patients were evaluated 1 month after surgery and then every 6 months with physical examination and computed tomography scan (CT-scan). For PSH, we used the classification of Moreno-Matias. RESULTS: Surgery was performed by laparoscopy in 17 patients and by laparotomy in 3; 12 had an extraperitoneal colostomy, and 8 had a transperitoneal colostomy. The median size of the mesh was 15 cm (range: 12-15). The median operative time was 225 min (range: 175-300), and specific time for mesh placement was 15 min (range: 12-30). One month after surgery, one patient presented with a mild stoma stenosis that was treated successfully by dilatation. With a median follow-up of 24 months (range: 6-42), no other complication potentially related to the use of the mesh was recorded and no mesh had to be removed. On clinical examination, one patient (1/20 = 5 %) had a stoma bulge that appeared a few months after surgery, but was not associated with symptoms. CT-scan evaluation confirmed that all the patients with a normal clinical examination had no PSH and revealed that the patient with the stoma bulge had a stoma loop hernia (type 1a hernia). This patient was followed up for 36 months, no clinical or radiological aggravation of the stoma loop hernia was observed, and he remained totally asymptomatic. CONCLUSIONS: With 95 % of excellent results, IPOM reinforcement at the time of end colostomy formation in selected patients is a very promising procedure. A drawback of this technique is the possibility of developing a stoma loop hernia due to sliding of the exiting colon between the covering mesh and the abdominal wall. However, this risk is low, and no adverse clinical consequence for the patient was noted in our series.

Intraoperative events and their outcome: data from 4007 laparoscopic interventions by the French "Club Cœlio".

AIM: To assess the operative and postoperative course of intraoperative events occurring in laparoscopic surgery according to the classification of Clavien. This evaluation aims at ascertaining morbidity and mortality of abdominal laparoscopic operations, thus serving as a reference for future comparative studies. METHOD: Twenty-nine senior surgeons, all of them members of the Cœlio Club prospectively and consecutively summarized all their laparoscopic activity over a period of 6 months. RESULTS: Of 4007 patients, 373 (9.31%) developed complications, 69 (1.72%) requiring surgery. Establishing the pneumoperitoneum and trocar placement caused 15 vascular (0.37%) and six visceral (0.15%) injuries; seven vascular (0.17%) and 22 visceral (0.55%) injuries occurred intraoperatively. Surgery of the colon and especially the rectum were associated with the highest morbidity with Clavien grades III, IV and V reported in 8, 10 and 15.97% of patients, respectively; 1.2% occurred in biliary surgery and 0.67% in inguinal/femoral hernia repair. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of surgical intraoperative events and postoperative complications is higher than reported in the literature. Clavien's classification is applicable to abdominal laparoscopic surgery; further information is necessary to assess intraoperative surgical events as well as conversions.

[Spontaneous rupture of the esophagus]. / La rupture spontanée de l'oesophage.

Eighteen patients (16 men and two women), aged 20 to 77 years, were admitted to the University hospital between 1973 and 1984 for a Boerhaave's syndrome. Fourteen over eighteen were more than forty years old. Other particular features were the frequency of alcoholism (11 patients) and the lack of preexisting gastrointestinal symptomatology. The cardinal symptom, pain, occurred in 17 cases. It was preceded in 10 subjects by vomiting. Subcutaneous emphysema was only found in five patients, but standard chest X-ray showed seven times a pneumomediastinum. Pleural effusion was present in 14 subjects. Thirteen patients underwent thoracotomy: five within 48 h (1 death) and eight after 48 h (4 deaths); two further deaths were due to withholding surgery, and a third by performing bipolar oesophageal exclusion at a late stage (8th day); six of these deaths were related to local infection. The clinical and radiological features of Boerhaave's syndrome are presented in a review of the literature; particular attention is paid to the various methods of treatment.

[Surgery of aneurysms of the abdominal aorta. Clinical study and surgical results. Apropos of a series of 54 cases]. / La chirurgie des anévrysmes de l'aorte abdominale. Etude clinique et résultats chirurgicaux. A propos d'une série de 54 cas.

54 patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm were hospitalized between 1969 and 1980 in the Clinic of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery at Rennes (Pr. Y. Logeais): 35 were ruptured aneurysms, 19 non-ruptured. The average age of the patients was 70.6 years. 48% of patients showed signs of atheroma in at least one other site. 24% had arterial hypertension. Arteriography was carried out in 51.5% of the non-ruptured aneurysm cases and in 26% of the ruptured cases. Both ultrasound and tomography are regarded presently as very useful tests. The intervention carried out in 41 patients always involved the insertion of a by-pass graft (aortic only in 7 cases; aorto-biiliac in 19 cases; aorto-bifemoral in 15 cases). Mortality was 7.7% for the non-ruptured aneurysms. 59% for the ruptured aneurysms, the deaths above all being related to the degree of visceral ischaemia. Secondary mortality was comparable for all the aneurysms operated on. More than 80% of patients were surviving 5 years after surgery.