An Evidence-Based Update on Anticholinergic Use for Drug-Induced Movement Disorders.

Drug-induced movement disorders (DIMDs) are associated with use of dopamine receptor blocking agents (DRBAs), including antipsychotics. The most common forms are drug-induced parkinsonism (DIP), dystonia, akathisia, and tardive dyskinesia (TD). Although rare, neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS) is a potentially life-threatening consequence of DRBA exposure. Recommendations for anticholinergic use in patients with DIMDs were developed on the basis of a roundtable discussion with healthcare professionals with extensive expertise in DIMD management, along with a comprehensive literature review. The roundtable agreed that "extrapyramidal symptoms" is a non-specific term that encompasses a range of abnormal movements. As such, it contributes to a misconception that all DIMDs can be treated in the same way, potentially leading to the misuse and overprescribing of anticholinergics. DIMDs are neurobiologically and clinically distinct, with different treatment paradigms and varying levels of evidence for anticholinergic use. Whereas evidence indicates anticholinergics can be effective for DIP and dystonia, they are not recommended for TD, akathisia, or NMS; nor are they supported for preventing DIMDs except in individuals at high risk for acute dystonia. Anticholinergics may induce serious peripheral adverse effects (e.g., urinary retention) and central effects (e.g., impaired cognition), all of which can be highly concerning especially in older adults. Appropriate use of anticholinergics therefore requires careful consideration of the evidence for efficacy (e.g., supportive for DIP but not TD) and the risks for serious adverse events. If used, anticholinergic medications should be prescribed at the lowest effective dose and for limited periods of time. When discontinued, they should be tapered gradually.

Treatment of schizophrenia with catatonic symptoms: A narrative review.

Catatonia is a neuropsychiatric syndrome consisting of psychomotor abnormalities caused by a broad range of disorders affecting brain function. While the nosological status of catatonia is no longer restricted to a subtype of schizophrenia in standardized diagnostic systems, the character, course, and clinical significance of catatonia in people with schizophrenia remain unclear. Evidence suggests that catatonia could be a nonspecific state-related phenomenon, a fundamental core symptom dimension of schizophrenia, or a subcortical variant of schizophrenia. Either way, the validity of catatonia in schizophrenia is clinically significant only insofar as it predicts prognosis and response to treatment. Most contemporary clinical trials of antipsychotics have targeted schizophrenia as an overly broad unitary psychosis neglecting any differential response defined by phenomenology or course. However, early naturalistic studies showed that catatonia predicted poor response to first-generation antipsychotics in chronic schizophrenia and case reports cautioned against the risk of triggering neuroleptic malignant syndrome. More recent studies suggest that second-generation antipsychotics, particularly clozapine, may be effective in schizophrenia with catatonic symptoms, while small randomized controlled trials have found that the short-term response to ECT may be faster and more significant. Based on available data, conclusions are limited as to whether antipsychotics are as effective and safe in acute and chronic schizophrenia with catatonic symptoms compared to other treatments and compared to schizophrenia without catatonia. Further studies of the pathophysiology, phenomenology, course and predictive value of catatonia in schizophrenia are worthwhile.

Intravenous dantrolene in hypermetabolic syndromes: a survey of the U.S. Veterans Health Administration database.

BACKGROUND: Intravenous dantrolene is often prescribed for hypermetabolic syndromes other than the approved indication of malignant hyperthermia (MH). To clarify the extent of and indications for dantrolene use in conditions other than MH, we sought to document current practices in the frequency, diagnoses, clinical characteristics and outcomes associated with dantrolene treatment in critical care settings. METHODS: Inpatients receiving intravenous dantrolene from October 1, 2004 to September 30, 2014 were identified retrospectively in the U.S. Veterans Health Administration national database. Extracted data included; diagnoses of hypermetabolic syndromes; triggering drugs; dantrolene dosages; demographics; vital signs; laboratory values; in-hospital mortality; complications; and lengths of stay. Frequency and mortality of patients who did not receive dantrolene were obtained in selected diagnoses for exploratory comparisons. RESULTS: Dantrolene was administered to 304 inpatients. The most frequent diagnoses associated with dantrolene treatment were neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS; N = 108, 35.53%) and sepsis (N = 47, 15.46%), with MH accounting for only 13 (4.28%) cases. Over half the patients had psychiatric comorbidities and received psychotropic drugs before dantrolene treatment. Common clinical findings in patients receiving dantrolene included elevated temperature (mean ± SD; 38.7 ± 1.3 °C), pulse (116.33 ± 22.80/bpm), respirations (27.75 ± 9.58/min), creatine kinase levels (2,859.37 ± 6,646.88 IU/L) and low pO2 (74.93 ± 40.16 mmHg). Respiratory, renal or cardiac failure were common complications. Mortality rates in-hospital were 24.01% overall, 7.69% in MH, 20.37% in NMS and 42.55% in sepsis, compared with mortality rates in larger and possibly less severe groups of unmatched patients with MH (5.26%), NMS (6.66%), or sepsis (41.91%) who did not receive dantrolene. CONCLUSIONS: In over 95% of cases, dantrolene administration was associated with diagnoses other than MH in critically-ill patients with hypermetabolic symptoms and medical and psychiatric comorbidities. Exploratory survey data suggested that the efficacy and safety of dantrolene in preventing mortality in hypermetabolic syndromes other than MH remain uncertain. However, randomized and controlled studies using standardized criteria between groups matched for severity are essential to guide practice in using dantrolene.

Antipsychotics for schizophrenia spectrum disorders with catatonic symptoms.

BACKGROUND: Whilst antipsychotics are the mainstay of treatment for schizophrenia spectrum disorders, there have been numerous attempts to identify biomarkers that can predict treatment response. One potential marker may be psychomotor abnormalities, including catatonic symptoms. Early studies suggested that catatonic symptoms predict poor treatment response, whilst anecdotal reports of rare adverse events have been invoked against antipsychotics. The efficacy and safety of antipsychotics in the treatment of this subtype of schizophrenia have rarely been studied in randomised controlled trials (RCTs). OBJECTIVES: To compare the effects of any single antipsychotic medication with another antipsychotic or with other pharmacological agents, electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), other non-pharmacological neuromodulation therapies (e.g. transcranial magnetic stimulation), or placebo for treating positive, negative, and catatonic symptoms in people who have schizophrenia spectrum disorders with catatonic symptoms. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's Study-Based Register of Trials, which is based on CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, the ISRCTN registry, and WHO ICTRP, on 19 September 2021. There were no language, date, document type, or publication status limitations for inclusion of records in the register. We also manually searched reference lists from the included studies, and contacted study authors when relevant. SELECTION CRITERIA: All RCTs comparing any single antipsychotic medication with another antipsychotic or with other pharmacological agents, ECT, other non-pharmacological neuromodulation therapies, or placebo for people who have schizophrenia spectrum disorders with catatonic symptoms. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: two review authors independently inspected citations, selected studies, extracted data, and appraised study quality. For binary outcomes, we planned to calculate risk ratios and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) on an intention-to-treat basis. For continuous outcomes, we planned to calculate mean differences between groups and their 95% CI. We assessed risk of bias for the included studies, and created a summary of findings table; however, we did not assess the certainty of the evidence using the GRADE approach because there was no quantitative evidence in the included study. MAIN RESULTS: Out of 53 identified reports, one RCT including 14 hospitalised adults with schizophrenia and catatonic symptoms met the inclusion criteria of the review. The study, which was conducted in India and lasted only three weeks, compared risperidone with ECT in people who did not respond to an initial lorazepam trial.   There were no usable data reported on the primary efficacy outcomes of clinically important changes in positive, negative, or catatonic symptoms. Whilst both study groups improved in catatonia scores on the Bush-Francis Catatonia Rating Scale (BFCRS), the ECT group showed significantly greater improvement at week 3 endpoint (mean +/- estimated standard deviation; 0.68 +/- 4.58; N = 8) than the risperidone group (6.04 +/- 4.58; N = 6; P = 0.035 of a two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) for repeated measures originally conducted in the trial). Similarly, both groups improved on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) scores by week 3, but ECT showed significantly greater improvement in positive symptoms scores compared with risperidone (P = 0.04). However, data on BFCRS scores in the ECT group appeared to be skewed, and mean PANSS scores were not reported, thereby precluding further analyses of both BFCRS and PANSS data according to the protocol.  Although no cases of neuroleptic malignant syndrome were reported, extrapyramidal symptoms as a primary safety outcome were reported in three cases in the risperidone group. Conversely, headache (N = 6), memory loss (N = 4), and a prolonged seizure were reported in people receiving ECT. These adverse effects, which were assessed as specific for antipsychotics and ECT, respectively, were the only adverse effects reported in the study. However, the exact number of participants with adverse events was not clearly reported in both groups, precluding further analysis.  Our results were based only on a single study with a very small sample size, short duration of treatment, unclear or high risk of bias due to unclear randomisation methods, possible imbalance in baseline characteristics, skewed data, and selective reporting. Data on outcomes of general functioning, global state, quality of life, and service use, as well as data on specific phenomenology and duration of catatonic symptoms, were not reported. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: We found only one small, short-term trial suggesting that risperidone may improve catatonic and positive symptoms scale scores amongst people with schizophrenia spectrum disorders and catatonic symptoms, but that ECT may result in greater improvement in the first three weeks of treatment. Due to small sample size, methodological shortcomings and brief duration of the study, as well as risk of bias, the evidence from this review is of very low quality. We are uncertain if these are true effects, limiting any conclusions that can be drawn from the evidence. No cases of neuroleptic malignant syndrome were reported, but we cannot rule out the risk of this or other rare adverse events in larger population samples.  High-quality trials continue to be necessary to differentiate treatments for people with symptoms of catatonia in schizophrenia spectrum disorders. The lack of consensus on the psychopathology of catatonia remains a barrier to defining treatments for people with schizophrenia. Better understanding of the efficacy and safety of antipsychotics may clarify treatment for this unique subtype of schizophrenia.

ANTECEDENTES: Aunque los antipsicóticos son la base del tratamiento de los trastornos del espectro de la esquizofrenia, ha habido numerosos intentos de identificar biomarcadores que puedan predecir la respuesta al tratamiento. Un posible marcador podrían ser las anomalías psicomotoras, incluidos los síntomas catatónicos. Los estudios más antiguos indican que los síntomas catatónicos predicen una respuesta deficiente al tratamiento, mientras que se han alegado informes anecdóticos de eventos adversos poco frecuentes contra los antipsicóticos. La eficacia y la seguridad de los antipsicóticos en el tratamiento de este subtipo de esquizofrenia rara vez se han estudiado en ensayos controlados aleatorizados (ECA). OBJETIVOS: Comparar los efectos de cualquier fármaco antipsicótico único con otro antipsicótico o con otros agentes farmacológicos, terapia electroconvulsiva (TEC), otras terapias de neuromodulación no farmacológicas (p. ej., estimulación magnética transcraneal) o placebo para el tratamiento de los síntomas positivos, negativos y catatónicos en personas que presentan trastornos del espectro de la esquizofrenia con síntomas catatónicos. MÉTODOS DE BÚSQUEDA: El 19 de septiembre de 2021 se realizaron búsquedas en el registro de ensayos basados en estudios del Grupo Cochrane de Esquizofrenia (Cochrane Schizophrenia Group), que se basa en CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, el registro ISRCTN y la ICTRP de la OMS. No hubo limitaciones de idioma, fecha, tipo de documento o estado de publicación para la inclusión de los registros en el registro. También se realizaron búsquedas manuales en las listas de referencias de los estudios incluidos y se estableció contacto con los autores de los estudios cuando fue pertinente. CRITERIOS DE SELECCIÓN: Todos los ECA que compararan cualquier fármaco antipsicótico único con otro antipsicótico o con otros agentes farmacológicos, TEC, otras terapias de neuromodulación no farmacológicas o placebo en personas que presentan trastornos del espectro de la esquizofrenia con síntomas catatónicos. OBTENCIÓN Y ANÁLISIS DE LOS DATOS: Dos autores de la revisión inspeccionaron de forma independiente las citas, seleccionaron los estudios, extrajeron los datos y evaluaron la calidad de los estudios. Para los desenlaces binarios se planeó calcular las razones de riesgos y sus intervalos de confianza (IC) del 95% sobre la base de la intención de tratar. Para los desenlaces continuos se planeó calcular las diferencias de medias entre los grupos y sus IC del 95%. Se evaluó el riesgo de sesgo de los estudios incluidos y se creó una tabla de resumen de los hallazgos. Sin embargo, no se evaluó la certeza de la evidencia mediante el método GRADE porque no hubo evidencia cuantitativa en el estudio incluido. RESULTADOS PRINCIPALES: De los 53 informes identificados, un ECA que incluyó a 14 adultos hospitalizados con esquizofrenia y síntomas catatónicos cumplió con los criterios de inclusión de la revisión. El estudio, realizado en la India y que sólo duró tres semanas, comparó la risperidona con la TEC en personas que no respondieron a una prueba inicial con lorazepam. No se informaron datos utilizables sobre los desenlaces principales de eficacia de cambios clínicamente importantes en los síntomas positivos, negativos o catatónicos. Aunque ambos grupos del estudio mejoraron en las puntuaciones de catatonia en la Bush­Francis Catatonia Rating Scale (BFCRS), el grupo de TEC mostró una mejoría significativamente mayor en el desenlace a las tres semanas (media +/­ desviación estándar estimada; 0,68 +/­ 4,58; n = 8) que el grupo de risperidona (6,04 +/­ 4,58; n = 6; p = 0,035 de un análisis de varianza (ANOVA) de dos vías para medidas repetidas realizado originalmente en el ensayo). Asimismo, ambos grupos mejoraron en las puntuaciones de la Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) a las tres semanas, pero la TEC mostró una mejoría significativamente mayor en las puntuaciones de los síntomas positivos en comparación con la risperidona (p = 0,04). Sin embargo, los datos sobre las puntuaciones de la BFCRS en el grupo de TEC parecieron estar sesgados, y no se informaron las puntuaciones medias de la PANSS, lo que impidió realizar más análisis de los datos de la BFCRS y la PANSS según el protocolo. Aunque no se informaron casos de síndrome neuroléptico maligno, en tres casos del grupo de risperidona se notificaron síntomas extrapiramidales como un desenlace principal de seguridad. Por el contrario, en las personas que recibieron TEC se informó cefalea (n = 6), pérdida de memoria (n = 4) y una convulsión prolongada. Estos efectos adversos, que se evaluaron como específicos de los antipsicóticos y de la TEC, respectivamente, fueron los únicos efectos adversos notificados en el estudio. Sin embargo, el número exacto de participantes con eventos adversos no se informó claramente en ambos grupos, lo que impidió realizar un análisis más profundo. Los resultados de esta revisión se basaron en un solo estudio con un tamaño muestral muy pequeño, una duración corta del tratamiento, un riesgo de sesgo incierto o alto debido a métodos de asignación al azar poco claros, un posible desequilibrio en las características iniciales, datos sesgados y un informe selectivo. No se informaron datos sobre los desenlaces de funcionalidad general, estado global, calidad de vida ni uso de los servicios, así como tampoco datos sobre la fenomenología específica ni la duración de los síntomas catatónicos. CONCLUSIONES DE LOS AUTORES: Solo se encontró un ensayo pequeño, a corto plazo, que indica que la risperidona podría mejorar las puntuaciones de la escala de síntomas catatónicos y positivos entre las personas con trastornos del espectro de la esquizofrenia y síntomas catatónicos, pero que la TEC podría producir una mayor mejoría en las primeras tres semanas de tratamiento. Debido al pequeño tamaño muestral, las deficiencias metodológicas y la breve duración del estudio, así como el riesgo de sesgo, la evidencia de esta revisión es de calidad muy baja. No hay confianza en que estos efectos sean verdaderos, lo que limita cualquier conclusión que se pueda sacar a partir de la evidencia. No se notificaron casos de síndrome neuroléptico maligno, pero no se puede descartar el riesgo de este u otros eventos adversos poco frecuentes en muestras poblacionales más grandes. Aún se necesitan ensayos de calidad alta para diferenciar los tratamientos en las personas con síntomas de catatonia en los trastornos del espectro de la esquizofrenia. La falta de consenso sobre la psicopatología de la catatonia todavía es un obstáculo para definir los tratamientos para las personas con esquizofrenia. Un mejor conocimiento de la eficacia y la seguridad de los antipsicóticos podría aclarar el tratamiento de este subtipo único de esquizofrenia.

Effect of Varenicline on Tardive Dyskinesia: A Pilot Study.

OBJECTIVE: Although evidence implicates striatal cholinergic impairment as a mechanism underlying tardive dyskinesia, trials of nonspecific cholinergic agents have been inconclusive. As a partial agonist at specific nicotinic receptor subtypes, varenicline reduces drug-induced dyskinesias in animal models suggesting promise as a treatment for tardive dyskinesia. METHODS: Three schizophrenia patients with tardive dyskinesia who were smokers underwent an open trial of varenicline. After a 2-week baseline, subjects received varenicline 1 mg twice daily. Changes from baseline on the Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale were measured after a 4-week varenicline stabilization period, and 6 weeks after the smoking quit date in one patient. RESULTS: Varenicline had no effect on mean Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale scores after 4 weeks. Although smoking decreased after 4 weeks on varenicline and diminished further in one patient after 10 weeks, this also appeared to have no effect on ratings of tardive dyskinesia. CONCLUSION: In contrast to animal models, no significant change in tardive dyskinesia occurred in response to varenicline replacement in three schizophrenia patients. Further investigations of cholinergic mechanisms in tardive dyskinesia are worthwhile as agents for specific cholinergic targets become available for treatment. In addition, treatment trials of tardive dyskinesia should control for smoking status, while patients on antipsychotics receiving nicotine replacement therapies for smoking should be studied further for changes in movement.

Drug-induced Hyperthermic Syndromes in Psychiatry.

Hyperthermia, or extreme elevations in body temperature, can be life-threatening and may be caused by prescription drugs or illegal substances acting at a number of different levels of the neuraxis. Several psychotropic drug classes and combinations have been associated with a classic clinical syndrome of hyperthermia, skeletal muscle hyper-metabolism, rigidity or rhabdomyolysis, autonomic dysfunction and altered mental status ranging from catatonic stupor to coma. It is critical for clinicians to have a high index of suspicion for these relatively uncommon drug-induced adverse effects and to become familiar with their management to prevent serious morbidity and mortality. Although these syndromes look alike, they are triggered by quite different mechanisms, and apart from the need to withdraw or restore potential triggering drugs and provide intensive medical care, specific treatments may vary. Clinical similarities have led to theoretical speculations about common mechanisms and shared genetic predispositions underlying these syndromes, suggesting that there may be a common "thermic stress syndrome" triggered in humans and animal models by a variety of pharmacological or environmental challenges.

Revisiting amantadine as a treatment for drug-induced movement disorders.

BACKGROUND: Amantadine, an aliphatic primary amine with complex actions on neurotransmitter systems in the basal ganglia, is approved for treating Parkinson's disease and drug-induced movement disorders (DIMDs). These disorders have a significant impact on clinical outcomes and quality of life in patients receiving antipsychotic treatment. METHODS: We searched PubMed up to June 1, 2019 to identify relevant studies. The following search terms were used: "amantadine" AND "dystonia," "parkinsonism, " "akathisia," "tardive dyskinesia," "catatonia," "neuroleptic malignant syndrome." Reference lists were reviewed for additional material. RESULTS: Evidence from multiple, small, controlled trials supports the efficacy of amantadine as a treatment for drug-induced parkinsonism. Studies show amantadine has a more favorable tolerability profile than anticholinergic medications in these patients. Clinical evidence from observational studies and case reports suggests that further trials might be warranted to support use of amantadine in select patients for preventing dystonic reactions and as a second-line agent for treating catatonia, neuroleptic malignant syndrome, and tardive dyskinesia. Evidence is lacking on the use of amantadine specifically for akathisia relative to other treatments. CONCLUSIONS: Amantadine is an evidence-based pharmacologic strategy for treating drug-induced parkinsonism and might be an alternative treatment for other DIMDs in select patients. Additional randomized controlled trials are needed.

Risk of Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome with Vesicular Monoamine Transporter Inhibitors.

OBJECTIVE: Vesicular monoamine transporter-2 (VMAT2) inhibitors have been proven to be effective for the treatment of tardive dyskinesia and their use is likely to increase. The evidence base of published clinical reports was reviewed to evaluate the possible risk of neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS) with these drugs. METHODS: Pubmed, Embase, Web of Science and PsycINFO databases were queried for all years using terms for "neuroleptic malignant syndrome", "hyperthermia" AND "vesicular monoamine transporter inhibitors", "reserpine", "tetrabenazine", "valbenazine" or "deutetrabenazine". RESULTS: Thirteen clinical cases, ten of which involved tetrabenazine, were identified in which VMAT2 inhibitors were prescribed in patients with current or past NMS episodes. In most cases, the association was confounded by limited reporting of clinical data, variable temporal correlation with VMAT2 inhibitors, polypharmacy with antipsychotics, and uncertain differential diagnoses. CONCLUSION: While rare cases of NMS meeting consensus criteria have been reported primarily with tetrabenazine, the risk with recently developed VMAT2 inhibitors may be even less. Evidence of causality of NMS with VMAT2 inhibitors is confounded by concomitant treatment with antipsychotics and diagnostic uncertainties in patients susceptible to basal ganglia dysfunction. Nevertheless, clinicians should remain vigilant for early signs of NMS in all patients treated with any drugs that affect brain dopamine activity.

A Modified Delphi Consensus Study of the Screening, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Tardive Dyskinesia.

OBJECTIVE: A nominal group process followed by a modified Delphi method was used to survey expert opinions on best practices for tardive dyskinesia (TD) screening, diagnosis, and treatment and to identify areas lacking in clinical evidence. PARTICIPANTS: A steering committee of 11 TD experts met in nominal group format to prioritize questions to be addressed and identify core bibliographic materials and criteria for survey panelists. Of 60 invited experts, 29 (23 psychiatrists and 6 neurologists) agreed to participate. EVIDENCE: A targeted literature search of PubMed (search term: tardive dyskinesia) and recommendations of the steering committee were used to generate core bibliographic material. Inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) review articles, meta-analyses, guidelines, or clinical trials; (2) publication in English between 2007 and 2017; (3) > 3 pages in length; and (4) publication in key clinical journals with impact factors ≥ 2.0. Of 29 references that met these criteria, 18 achieved a score ≥ 5 (calculated as the number of steering committee votes multiplied by journal impact factor and number of citations divided by years since publication) and were included. CONSENSUS PROCESS: Two survey rounds were conducted anonymously through electronic media from November 2017 to January 2018; responses were collected, collated, and analyzed. Respondent agreement was defined a priori as unanimous (100%), consensus (75%-99%), or majority (50%-74%). For questions using a 5-point Likert scale, agreement was based on percentage of respondents choosing ≥ 4 ("agree completely" or "agree"). Round 1 survey included questions on TD screening, diagnosis, and treatment. Round 2 questions were refined per panelist feedback and excluded Round 1 questions with < 25% agreement and > 75% agreement (unless feedback suggested further investigation). CONCLUSIONS: Consensus was reached that (1) a brief, clinical assessment for TD should be performed at every clinical encounter in patients taking antipsychotics; (2) even mild movements in 1 body area may represent possible TD; (3) management requires an overall evaluation of treatment, including reassessment of antipsychotics and anticholinergics as well as consideration of vesicular monoamine transporter 2 (VMAT2) inhibitors; and (4) informed discussions with patients/caregivers are essential.

A Validation Study of the International Consensus Diagnostic Criteria for Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Neuroleptic malignant syndrome requires prompt recognition for effective management, but there are no established diagnostic criteria. This is the first validation study of recently published international expert consensus (IEC) diagnostic criteria, which include priority points assigned on the basis of the importance of each criterion for making a diagnosis of neuroleptic malignant syndrome. METHODS: Data were extracted from 221 archived telephone contact reports of clinician-initiated calls to a national telephone consultation service from 1997 to 2009; each case was given a total priority point score on the basis of the IEC criteria. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision, (DSM-IV-TR) research criteria, in original form and modified to accept less than "severe" rigidity, served as the primary diagnostic reference standard. Consultants' diagnostic impressions were used as a secondary reference standard. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to optimize the priority point cutoff score with respect to the reference standards. RESULTS: Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve ranged from 0.715 (95% confidence interval, 0.645-0.785; P = 1.62 × 10) for consultant diagnoses to 0.857 (95% confidence interval, 0.808-0.907; P < 5 × 10) for modified DSM-IV-TR criteria. The latter was associated with 69.6% sensitivity and 90.7% specificity. CONCLUSIONS: Agreement was best between IEC criteria with a cutoff score of 74 and modified DSM-IV-TR criteria (sensitivity, 69.6%; specificity, 90.7%); this cutoff score demonstrated the highest agreement in all comparisons. Consultant diagnoses showed much better agreement with modified, compared with original, DSM-IV-TR criteria, suggesting that the DSM-IV-TR criterion of "severe" rigidity may be more restrictive than what most knowledgeable clinicians use in practice.

Drug-Induced Extrapyramidal Syndromes: Implications for Contemporary Practice.

The development of drugs to treat psychosis is a fascinating nexus for understanding mechanisms underlying disorders of mind and movement. Although the risk of drug-induced extrapyramidal syndromes has been mitigated by the acceptance of less potent dopamine antagonists, expansive marketing and off-label use has increased the number of susceptible people who may be at risk for these neurologic effects. Clinicians need to be familiar with advances in diagnosis and management, which are reviewed herein. A better understanding of drug-induced effects on the motor circuit may improve patient safety, enhance antipsychotic effectiveness, and provide insights into mechanisms underlying antipsychotic activity in parallel brain circuits.

Recurrent Idiopathic Catatonia: Implications beyond the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 5th Edition.

We describe a case of recurrent, life-threatening, catatonic stupor, without evidence of any associated medical, toxic or mental disorder. This case provides support for the inclusion of a separate category of "unspecified catatonia" in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 5th edition (DSM-5) to be used to classify idiopathic cases, which appears to be consistent with Kahlbaum's concept of catatonia as a distinct disease state. But beyond the limited, cross-sectional, syndromal approach adopted in DSM-5, this case more importantly illustrates the prognostic and therapeutic significance of the longitudinal course of illness in differentiating cases of catatonia, which is better defined in the Wernicke-Kleist-Leonhard classification system. The importance of differentiating cases of catatonia is further supported by the efficacy of antipsychotics in treatment of this case, contrary to conventional guidelines.

An international consensus study of neuroleptic malignant syndrome diagnostic criteria using the Delphi method.

OBJECTIVE: The lack of generally accepted diagnostic criteria for neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS) impedes research and clinical management of patients receiving antipsychotic medications. The purpose of this study was to develop NMS diagnostic criteria reflecting a broad consensus among clinical knowledge experts, represented by an international multispecialty physician panel. PARTICIPANTS: Eleven psychiatrists, 2 neurologists, 2 anesthesiologists, and 2 emergency medicine specialists participated in a formal Delphi consensus procedure. EVIDENCE: A core bibliography consisting of 12 prominent, current reviews of the NMS literature was identified by an objective, comprehensive electronic search strategy. Each panel member was given a copy of these references and asked to examine them before commencing the survey process. CONSENSUS PROCESS: After reviewing the core bibliography, panel members were asked to list any clinical signs or symptoms or diagnostic studies that they believed, on the basis of their knowledge and clinical experience, were useful in making a diagnosis of NMS. In subsequent survey rounds, panel members assigned priority points to these items, and items that failed to receive a minimum priority score were eliminated from the next round. Information about individual panel member responses was fed back to the group anonymously in the form of the group median or mean and the number of members who had ranked or scored each survey item. The a priori consensus endpoint was defined operationally as a change of 10% or less in the mean priority score for any individual item, and an average absolute value change of 5% or less across all items, between consecutive rounds. The survey was conducted from January 2009 through September 2009. RESULTS: Consensus was reached on the fifth round regarding the following criteria: recent dopamine antagonist exposure, or dopamine agonist withdrawal; hyperthermia; rigidity; mental status alteration; creatine kinase elevation; sympathetic nervous system lability; tachycardia plus tachypnea; and a negative work-up for other causes. The panel also reached a consensus on the relative importance of these criteria and on the following critical values for quantitative criteria: hyperthermia, > 100.4°F or > 38.0°C on at least 2 occasions; creatine kinase elevation, at least 4 times the upper limit of normal; blood pressure elevation, ≥ 25% above baseline; blood pressure fluctuation, ≥ 20 mm Hg (diastolic) or ≥ 25 mm Hg (systolic) change within 24 hours; tachycardia, ≥ 25% above baseline; and tachypnea, ≥ 50% above baseline. CONCLUSIONS: These diagnostic criteria significantly advance the field because they represent the consensus of an international multispecialty expert panel, include critical values, provide guidance regarding the relative importance of individual elements, and are less influenced by particular theoretical biases than most previously published criteria. They require validation before being applied in clinical settings.

Movement disorders induced by antipsychotic drugs: implications of the CATIE schizophrenia trial.

Drug-induced movement disorders have dramatically declined with the widespread use of second-generation antipsychotics, but remain important in clinical practice and for understanding antipsychotic pharmacology. The diagnosis and management of dystonia, parkinsonism, akathisia, catatonia, neuroleptic malignant syndrome, and tardive dyskinesia are reviewed in relation to the decreased liability of the second-generation antipsychotics contrasted with evidence from the Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness (CATIE) Schizophrenia Trial. Data from the CATIE trial imply that advantages of second-generation antipsychotics in significantly reducing extrapyramidal side effects compared with haloperidol may be diminished when compared with modest doses of lower-potency first-generation drugs.