Monoterapia biológica en pacientes con artritis reumatoidea en Argentina / Biological monotherapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in Argentina

Introducción: La utilización de agentes biológicos para el tratamiento de la Artritis Reumatoidea (AR) es habitualmente usada en aquellos pacientes con enfermedad activa que no hayan respondido al tratamiento con drogas modificadoras de la Artritis Reumatoidea convencionales (DMARD, por sus siglas en inglés) o que hayan presentado intolerancia a las mismas. Al estado actual de la evidencia, la terapia combinada de agentes biológicos más un DMARD convencional (principalmente metotrexato) constituye el estándar de tratamiento. Sin embargo existen algunos escenarios como la intolerancia, la falta de adherencia y la aparición de eventos adversos a las DMARDs convencionales donde la monoterapia biológica emerge como una opción terapéutica válida. Según los distintos registros a nivel internacional, la frecuencia de utilización de agentes biológicos en monoterapia oscila entre 12 a 39%. Debido a la ausencia de estos datos a nivel local decidimos realizar este estudio para conocer el porcentaje de pacientes que se encuentran en monoterapia biológica y analizar las causas que llevaron a este tipo de tratamiento. Materiales y métodos: Estudio de tipo corte transversal donde se invitó a participar a diferentes centros reumatológicos distribuidos a lo largo de Argentina. Cada centro revisó las historias clínicas de los últimos 30 a 50 pacientes consecutivos vistos con AR, mayores de 18 años, que habían presentado inadecuada respuesta al tratamiento con DMARDs y que estaban bajo tratamiento biológico. Se completaba una ficha por cada paciente incluido, registrando datos demográficos, de la enfermedad y tratamientos previos. Resultados: Se incluyeron 32 centros y se evaluaron 1148 historias clínicas de pacientes con AR durante el mes de octubre y noviembre del 2012. Un 21,4% (246) de los pacientes al momento del estudio se encontraba bajo tratamiento biológico en monoterapia...

Introduction: The use of biological agents for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is commonly used in patients with active disease who have not responded to treatment with conventional rheumatoid arthritis-modifying drugs (DMARDs) or Who have presented intolerance to them. At the present state of evidence, combined therapy of biological agents plus conventional DMARD (mainly methotrexate) is the standard of treatment. However, there are some scenarios such as intolerance, lack of adherence and the appearance of adverse events to conventional DMARDs where biological monotherapy emerges as a valid therapeutic option. According to different international registries, the frequency of use of biological agents in monotherapy ranges from 12 to 39%. Due to the absence of these data at the local level we decided to carry out this study to know the percentage of patients who are in biological monotherapy and to analyze the causes that led to this type of treatment. Materials and methods: A cross-sectional study where different rheumatologic centers throughout Argentina were invited to participate. Each center reviewed the medical records of the last 30 to 50 consecutive patients seen with RA, older than 18 years, who had inadequate response to treatment with DMARDs and who were under biological treatment. One card was completed for each patient included, recording demographic, disease and previous treatment data. Results: Thirty-two centers were included and 1148 clinical records of patients with RA were evaluated during October and November 2012. A total of 244 patients (246) at the time of the study were under monotherapy...

Efficacy of liposomal amphotericin B for secondary prophylaxis of visceral leishmaniasis in HIV-infected patients.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Visceral leishmaniasis (VL) is characterized by frequent relapses in HIV-infected patients, even in those who receive secondary prophylaxis. The aim of our study was to evaluate the efficacy of liposomal amphotericin B (L-AMB) for secondary prophylaxis of VL in HIV-infected patients. METHODS: From January 2001 to December 2005, 17 HIV patients, with at least one previous episode of VL who received L-AMB as secondary prophylaxis for VL, were included in the study. Efficacy was measured as the proportion of patients remaining free (non-relapse) of VL at different time points. Relapses were analysed as time-to-relapse distribution and were evaluated by survival analysis using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Twenty-one episodes of VL were diagnosed and nine relapsed. The median follow-up time was 14 (5-44) months. The probability of remaining free of relapse at 6 months was 89.7% (95% CI, 76.2-100); at 12 months, the probability was 79.1% (95% CI, 61-97.2) and at 24 and 36 months, the probability was 55.9% (95% CI, 30.5-81.3). In the non-relapsing group, patients had a significant increase in CD4 cell levels of 102 (10-174) and 126 (4-159) cells/mm(3) at 12 and 24 months, respectively (P = 0.037), whereas in the relapsing group, no significant increase was observed. Prophylaxis with L-AMB was well tolerated and only three patients had a mild impairment of renal function without requiring any change in treatment. CONCLUSIONS: L-AMB is well tolerated and useful for secondary prophylaxis of VL.

[Bladder carcinoma with osteoclast-type giant cells. A case with a rare presentation. Review of the literature]. / Carcinoma con células gigantes tipo osteoclasto de vejiga. Un caso de rara presentación. Revisión de la literatura.

We report a case of neoplasm of the urinary bladder with pseudosarcomatous stromal differentiation. Heterologous carcinosarcomas are extremely rare malignant neoplasms (seventy-eight cases have been previously described). This is a case of carcinoma containing numerous osteoclast type giant cells that stained for vinmentin and acid phosphatase and were negative for cytokeratin and lysozyme.

Serological and parasitological follow-up in dogs experimentally infected with Leishmania infantum and treated with meglumine antimoniate.

Six healthy beagle dogs were infected with Leishmania infantum (MCAN/ES/92/BCN-83/MON-1) by intravenous inoculation of 5 x 10(7) promastigotes and two others were used as controls. When animals showed clinical signs of disease at 29, 37, 41 and 45 weeks post-infection (p.i.), they were treated with meglumine antimoniate (20.4 mg Sb/kg/12 h) subcutaneously for two periods of 10 days each. Sera were tested periodically for Leishmania antibodies by Dot-ELISA, ELISA and Western blot (WB). Aspirates of popliteal lymph node (PLN), peripheral blood sample (PB) and healthy skin were cultured in NNN and Schneider's medium. PLNs were positive between 8 and 20 weeks p.i. and in one animal PB was positive 6 weeks p.i. Samples of healthy skin, obtained before treatment, were also positive. Dot-ELISA and ELISA detected specific antibodies at an early stage between 4 and 12 weeks p.i and surpassed the cut-off between 16-24 weeks p.i., while the WB was positive between 10-19 weeks p.i. The pattern of bands revealed during the first stages of infection was variable and only in two cases did the positivity start with bands of low molecular weight (12-14 kD); the number of bands increased until 15-24 weeks p.i., after which sera revealed a complete pattern of bands, from 12 to 85 kD, in the antigen of Leishmania. After treatment the clinical improvement of the animals was accompanied by a decrease in antibody titers (Dot-ELISA and ELISA) although the parasites remained in the PLN. This was reflected in the WB by a decrease in the intensity of bands, especially those in the region of 12-30 kD. A new increase in the antibody levels between 3 and 5 months after terminating the therapy was detected in the WB by a restoration of the initial complete pattern of bands.

Markers of hepatitis C infection among hemodialysis patients with acute and chronic infection: implications for infection control strategies in hemodialysis units.

To evaluate strategies for screening patients on hemodialysis (HD) for markers of acute and chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, we studied sixty-nine patients at a single center over a 36-month period. Serum samples were tested for alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels, anti-HCV and HCV RNA at 3-4 month intervals. Anti-HCV was tested for by EIA1, EIA2, and RIBA2. HCV RNA was detected by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). In addition, IgM antibody to the c33 antigen of HCV was detected by an experimental EIA. Of the 43 HD patients at the start of the study, anti-HCV was detected by EIA1 in 13 (30%). All EIA1 positive patients and 14 (47%) of the 30 EIA1 negative patients tested positive by EIA2. Thus, at the start of the study 27 (63%) of 43 patients tested positive for anti-HCV by EIA2. The presence of anti-HCV among EIA2 positive patients was confirmed by RIBA2 in all patients. Based on the PCR results, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value for EIA1 were 48%, 100%, 53% and 100%, respectively, and for EIA2 were 100%, 100%, 100% and 100%, respectively. During follow-up, 26 EIA2 negative patients began HD in the unit. Of the 42 EIA2 negative patients, five (12%) seroconverted for anti-HCV during follow-up. All five patients with new HCV infection tested positive for HCV RNA three months prior to the detection of anti-HCV by EIA2.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)