Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg ; 89(5): 940-946, 2020 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32345893

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Returning patients to preinjury status is the goal of a trauma system. Trauma centers (TCs) provide inpatient care, but postdischarge treatment is fragmented with clinic follow-up rates of <30%. Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and depression are common, but few patients ever obtain necessary behavioral health services. We postulated that a multidisciplinary Center for Trauma Survivorship (CTS) providing comprehensive care would meet patient's needs, improve postdischarge compliance, deliver behavioral health, and decrease unplanned emergency department (ED) visits and readmissions. METHODS: Focus groups of trauma survivors were conducted to identify issues following TC discharge. Center for Trauma Survivorship eligible patients are aged 18 to 80 years and have intensive care unit stay of >2 days or have a New Injury Severity Score of ≥16. Center for Trauma Survivorship visits were scheduled by a dedicated navigator and included physical and behavioral health care. Patients were screened for PTSD and depression. Patients screening positive were referred for behavioral health services. Patients were provided 24/7 access to the CTS team. Outcomes include compliance with appointments, mental health visits, unplanned ED visits, and readmissions in the year following discharge from the TC. RESULTS: Patients universally felt abandoned by the TC after discharge. Over 1 year, 107 patients had 386 CTS visits. Average time for each appointment was >1 hour. Center for Trauma Survivorship "no show" rate was 17%. Eighty-six percent screening positive for PTSD/depression successfully received behavioral health services. Postdischarge ED and hospital admissions were most often for infections or unrelated conditions. Emergency department utilization was significantly lower than a similarly injured group of patients 1 year before the inception of the CTS. CONCLUSION: A CTS fills the vast gaps in care following TC discharge leading to improved compliance with appointments and delivery of physical and behavioral health services. Center for Trauma Survivorship also appears to decrease ED visits in the year following discharge. To achieve optimal long-term recovery from injury, trauma care must continue long after patients leave the TC. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, Level III.


Asunto(s)
Cuidados Posteriores/organización & administración , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud/organización & administración , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/rehabilitación , Supervivencia , Heridas y Lesiones/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Cuidados Posteriores/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Grupo de Atención al Paciente/organización & administración , Alta del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/diagnóstico , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/etiología , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/psicología , Centros Traumatológicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Heridas y Lesiones/complicaciones , Heridas y Lesiones/mortalidad , Heridas y Lesiones/psicología , Adulto Joven
2.
J Behav Health Serv Res ; 30(4): 444-51, 2003.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14593667

RESUMEN

A database review investigated decisions of clinicians staffing a university-based telephone access center in referring new adult patients to nonpsychiatrists versus psychiatrists for initial ambulatory behavioral health care appointments. Systematically collected demographic and clinical data in a computer log of calls to highly trained care managers at the access center had limited predictive value with respect to their referral decisions. Furthermore, while 28% of the 610 study patients were initially referred to psychiatrists, billing data revealed that in-person therapists soon cross-referred at least 20% more to a psychiatrist. Care managers sent 56% of callers already taking psychotropic medications to nonpsychiatrists, 51% of whom were then cross-referred to psychiatrists. Predictive algorithms showed no potential to enhance efficiency of decisions about referral to a psychiatrist versus a nonpsychiatrist. Efforts to enhance such efficiency may not be cost-effective. It may be more fiscally efficient to assign less-experienced personnel as telephone care managers.


Asunto(s)
Técnicas de Apoyo para la Decisión , Servicios de Salud Mental/clasificación , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Psiquiatría/estadística & datos numéricos , Psicología Clínica/estadística & datos numéricos , Derivación y Consulta/estadística & datos numéricos , Asistencia Social en Psiquiatría/estadística & datos numéricos , Teléfono , Centros Médicos Académicos/organización & administración , Adulto , Anciano , Algoritmos , Femenino , Investigación sobre Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Tamizaje Masivo , Trastornos Mentales/clasificación , Servicios de Salud Mental/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , New Jersey , Problemas Sociales/clasificación , Triaje
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA