Diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection using urease rapid test in patients with bleeding duodenal ulcer: influence of endoscopic signs and simultaneous corporal and antral biopsies.

INTRODUCTION: The sensitivity of invasive diagnostic methods for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection, particularly of urease rapid test, is decreased in cases of gastroduodenal ulcer and upper gastrointestinal bleeding. OBJECTIVES: To assess the influence of blood in the stomach or recent bleeding endoscopic signs in the diagnostic sensitivity of urease rapid test among patients with bleeding duodenal ulcer, as well as the influence of simultaneously collecting corporal and antral biopsy samples. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 120 patients, 85 male and 35 female, with an average age of 62 (18-88) years, who were admitted to our Hospital due to bleeding duodenal ulcer and who received an endoscopic diagnosis within 24 hours of admission were included. None of the patients had been under treatment with non-steroideal antiinflammatory drugs, proton-pump inhibitors or antimicrobial drugs in the two weeks prior to the bleeding event, and none had received eradicating therapy for H. pylori. In this group of selected patients an H. pylori infection rate nearing 100% was assumed. H. pylori infection was ruled out using antral biopsy (69 cases) or both antral and fundic biopsies (51 cases) for urease rapid testing (Jatrox-H.p.-Test). Patients were classified in three groups according to their endoscopic bleeding signs: a) presence of blood in the stomach or recent bleeding ulcer (21 cases); b) ulcer showing non-recent bleeding signs (38 cases); and c) ulcer without bleeding signs (61 cases). The sensitivity of the urease rapid test was compared between patient groups. Similarly, urease test results with an antral biopsy sample were compared in 100 patients with non-bleeding duodenal ulcer. RESULTS: Urease test was positive in 93% of patients with non-bleeding duodenal ulcer, and in 83% of patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding, which reached statistical significance (p = 0.019). This test was positive in 82.6% of patients with an antral biopsy, and in 82.3% of patients with combined antral and fundic biopsies. In group A, urease test was positive in 90.5% of patients; in group B, it was positive in 89.5% of patients, and in group C, the test turned positive in 75.4% of patients. Statistical differences were only reached when patients in group C were compared to patients in groups A and B together (p = 0.037). CONCLUSIONS: 1. The presence of either blood in the stomach or recent bleeding endoscopic signs appeared not to be the conditioning factor for the decreased sensitivity of urease test among patients with bleeding duodenal ulcer. 2. The decreased sensitivity of this test in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding is more evident during the resolution stage, and it does not seem to occur because of H. pylori migration from the antrum to the corporal gastric region.

Diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection in patients with bleeding ulcer disease: rapid urease test and histology.

INTRODUCTION: The endoscopic diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection in patients with bleeding peptic ulcer is limited by a decreased sensitivity in standard invasive tests, rapid urease test and histology. There is controversy about the convenience of using one, neither, or both diagnostic tests. AIMS: To evaluate the results of simultaneously performed rapid urease test and histology in the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection (H. pylori) in patients with bleeding peptic ulcer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We included 173 patients, 98 male and 75 female, with an average age of 62 years (18-88), with upper gastrointestinal bleeding secondary to duodenal ulcer (115) or gastric ulcer (58), diagnosed within 24 hours after hospital admission. None of the patients had received treatment for H. pylori, proton pump inhibitors or antibiotics in the two weeks prior to the upper gastrointestinal bleeding episode. H. pylori infection was investigated in all patients by two antral biopsy samples for histological study (hematoxilin-eosin) and one or two antral biopsies for rapid urease test (Jatrox-H.p.-test). In cases with a negative urease test and histology, a 13C urea breath test was performed. Infection was considered present when at least one invasive test or the breath test was positive, whereas both invasive tests and the breath test had to be negative to establish an absent infection. RESULTS: 152 patients (88%) showed H. pylori infection, 104 patients (90%) with duodenal ulcer and 48 patients (83%) with gastric ulcer. In all 119 cases (78%) were diagnosed by the urease test and 112 cases (74%) by histology. Both methods were used to diagnose 134 of 152 cases (88%) (p < 0.05), these being positive in 97 cases and negative in 39 cases. In 18 of these 39 cases, the breath test was positive. CONCLUSIONS: Histology and urease test have similar diagnostic values for the identification of H. pylori in patients with bleeding peptic ulcer. Due to its rapid results, the urease test should be the method of choice. However, additional biopsies should be performed, and, when negative, a histological study should be carried out, since a combination of both methods allows a more precise diagnosis.

[Carcinoid tumor of the ileum and self-limited colitis]. / Tumor carcinoide ileal y colitis autolimitada.

Carcinoid tumors of the ileum represent the most frequent localization of this type of tumor in the gastrointestinal tract. The association of this tumor with the presence of inflammatory bowel disease is well characterized. Self-limiting colitis is an entity that poses serious difficulties when performing a differential diagnosed by other causes of colitis. We present the case of a patient who was diagnosed with carcinoid tumor of the ileum. Clinical and histological findings of self-limiting colitis were also observed.

The effectiveness of (IgG-ELISA) serology as an alternative diagnostic method for detecting Helicobacter pylori infection in patients with gastro-intestinal bleeding due to gastro-duodenal ulcer.

OBJECTIVES: To establish the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of serology (IgG ELISA) as an alternative diagnostic method for Helicobacter pylori infection in patients with gastro-duodenal peptic ulcer and digestive hemorrhage. The diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection in these patients is difficult due to the low sensitivity of invasive tests and the need to discontinue treatment with proton pump inhibitors to perform a breath test with urea 13C or the detection of Helicobacter pylori antigens in feces. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We included 214 patients (164 men and 50 women) with an average age of 58 +/- 15 years, who were admitted to hospital due to upper gastro-intestinal bleeding caused by a gastro-duodenal peptic ulcer. The presence of Helicobacter pylori was established by means of gastric biopsy (fast urease test histology and/or culture) and a breath test with 13C-labeled urea. Serology was performed with the ELISA method (Pyloriset EIA-G by Orion Diagnostica). Positive Helicobacter pylori infection was accepted with any positive invasive method or breath test, and no infection was established if all invasive tests performed and the breath test with 13C-labeled urea were negative. We calculated the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of serology in the global series and in different subgroups of patients according to age (> 60 and < 40 years), recent exposure to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, type of endoscopic wound and history of gastro-duodenal peptic ulcer. RESULTS: 192 patients (89.7%) showed infection due to Helicobacter pylori. In the global series (n = 214) we obtained a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of 87.5, 54.5, 94.3 and 33.3%, respectively. Specificity was greater in the group not exposed to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (n = 110) as compared to the exposed group (n = 104), in the < 40 year old group (n = 28) with respect to the > 60 years group (n = 105), in the duodenal ulcer group (n = 141) with respect to the gastric ulcer group (n = 59), and in the group with a history of gastro-duodenal peptic ulcers (n = 92) as compared to the group without any of these past events (n = 122); nevertheless, no significant statistics were reached. CONCLUSIONS: IgG (ELISA) serology shows low specificity and a low negative predictive value in the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection in patients with gastro-intestinal bleeding due to gastro-duodenal peptic ulcer. The diagnostic value of serology did not improve significantly when age, recent exposure to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, type of endoscopic wound or history of gastro-duodenal peptic ulcer was taken into consideration. We may consider that serology is not a good diagnostic method for the detection of Helicobacter pylori in patients with digestive hemorrhage caused by gastro-duodenal ulcer.

[Upper gastrointestinal tract injury caused by ingestion of caustic substances]. / Lesiones del tracto digestivo superior causadas por la ingestión de cáusticos.

BACKGROUND: To determine the distribution, extension and severity of injuries produced by the ingestion of caustic substances in the upper gastrointestinal tract, and to assess the relationship of these factors with the type of caustic substance ingested, whether intake was accidental or deliberate and the appearance of strictures or death. PATIENTS AND METHOD: Between 1993 and 1999, 138 patients (74 males and 84 females) who underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in our unit within the first 24 hours after ingestion of caustic substances were included in the study. Mean age was 47 years (14-97 years). The severity of caustic injury was evaluated using the classification of Showkat et al. RESULTS: The type of caustic substance ingested was as follows: lye in 84 patients (53%), nitric acid in 21 (13%), different caustic mixtures in 43 (27%) and unknown in 10 patients (6%). Lesions were grade I in 51 patients(32%), grade II in 33 (21%) and grade III in 20 (13%). No lesions were seen in 54 patients (34%). Of the 158 patients, gastric injury was found in 91 (57.5%), esophageal burn in 72 (45.5%) and duodenal injury in 28 (18%). Ingestion was accidental in 80 patients (51%) and voluntary in 62 (39%); the reasons for ingestion were unclear in 16 patients (10%). Voluntary ingestion and acid use were associated with greater severity of lesions (p < 0.0005). Eight patients (5.0%) died, 10 patients (6.3%) required emergency surgery, and 7 (4.4%) developed esophageal-gastric strictures that required surgery or endoscopic treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The most common type of caustic substance ingested was lye. In 66% of the patients, lesions were absent or superficial. The more severe injuries, producing strictures and higher mortality, were related to voluntary and nitric acid ingestion. The part of the digestive tract most frequently affected after lye and acid ingestion was the stomach.

Antiphospholipid antibodies are related to portal vein thrombosis in patients with liver cirrhosis.

The pathogenesis of portal vein thrombosis (PVT) in cirrhotic liver patients is not known. PVT has been related to liver dysfunction, neoplasm, hemodynamic factors, and hypercoagulability states. PVT has been reported in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome without liver cirrhosis. Our aim was to find the role of antiphospholipid antibodies (APAs) and coagulation inhibitors in PVT in patients with liver cirrhosis. We present a case-controlled study, matched by age, liver function, and etiology, to discover the role of APAs and anticoagulant protein activity in PVT in cirrhotic patients. We studied 30 cirrhotic patients: 6 of 10 (60%) patients with PVT were APA-positive, whereas only 2 of 20 (10%) in the cirrhotic control group were APA-positive (p < 0.005). Low serum levels of protein C, protein S antithrombin III, and plasminogen were found in cirrhotic patients; and, no differences were found between patients with and without PVT. Significantly lower protein S and antithrombin III levels were found in patients with Child-Pugh class C. Therefore, APAs were related to PVT in cirrhotic patients; but, a lower concentration of coagulation inhibitors was associated with liver dysfunction alone.

[Usefulness of Helicobacter pylori antigen detection in stools in the diagnosis of infection and confirming eradication after treatment]. / Utilidad de la detección de antígenos de Helicobacter pylori en heces en el diagnóstico de infección y en el control de la erradicación tras el tratamiento.

BACKGROUND: A new immunoassay to detect H. pylori antigen in stool (HpSA) has been developed. We started this study to know the sensitivity and specificity of this test as diagnostic tool of H. pylori infection and eradication control. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty patients were recruited to study H. pylori infection. At endoscopy, biopsy samples were taken for culture, histology and urease test. Stool specimens were tested by HpSA and serum sample for serology. Patients were defined as H. pylori positive if histology, urease test or culture were positive. Forty-two patients treated with omeprazole based triple therapy were screened 8 weeks after treatment for eradication control using urea breath test, HpSa and serology. Patients with UBT negative were defined as eradicated. RESULTS: As diagnostic tool: 34 out of 40 patients were infected (85%). HpSA was positive in 31 out of 34 patients, and achieve 3 false negative and 1 false positive (sensitivity: 91%, specificity: 84%). IgG anti-H. pylori was positive in 31 out of 34 infected patients, with 3 false positive and 3 false negative (sensitivity 91%, specificity 50%). In eradication control (n = 42), HpSA was negative in 33/38 successfully eradicated patients, and positive in all four non-eradicated patients. Five patients eradicated showed positive HpSA (specificity 87%, positive predictive value: 87%, negative predictive value: 100%). IgG serology was negative in only a third of eradicated patients. CONCLUSIONS: The stool assay was an accurate tool for diagnosis of H. pylori infection and eradication control.

[Prevalence and clinical significance of antiphospholipid antibodies in chronic hepatitis C]. / Prevalencia y significado clínico de los anticuerpos antifosfolipídicos en la hepatitis crónica por virus C.

BACKGROUND: To know the prevalence of antiphospholipid antibodies in chronic hepatitis C and their relationship with disease progression. METHODS: One hundred and twenty-eight patients with chronic hepatitis C and 93 healthy controls were enrolled up. We determined platelets, ALT, gamma GT, RNAHCV in serum and liver and non-organ specific antibodies, grade and stage in liver biopsy, risk factors, duration of disease and alcohol intake were also included. Portal hypertension and liver function parameters were studied. Antiphospholipid antibodies (APA): lupus anticoagulant (LA) and anticardiolipin antibodies (ACA) (IgG and IgM) were measured by EIA. Anti-beta 2 glycoprotein I antibodies were also detected by EIA in ACA positive patients. RESULTS: Thirty one out of 128 (25%; 95% CI: 17.8%-33.4%) showed positive antiphospholipid antibodies. Positive ACA-IgG was higher in patients than controls (22% vs 3.2%; p < 0.05), whereas, ACA-IgM was similar (5% vs 3.2%; p = NS), and LA was absent in both groups. ALT levels, viraemia, viral load in liver, platelets, or ANA titre were similar in patients with and without positive ACA-IgG. Risk factors, duration of disease or alcohol intake were not related yet. Patients with staging F1 showed positive ACA-IgG 4 of 44 (9%; 95% CI: 2.5%-21.7%), in staging F2 7 of 39 (18%; 95% CI: 7.5%-33.5%) and in staging F4 17 of 45 (38%; 95% CI: 23.8%-53.5%; p < 0.005). ACA-IgG was significantly related to portal hypertension, Child-Pugh stage and presence of cirrhosis complications. Anti-beta 2 glycoprotein I antibodies were detected in ten (43.5%; CI 95%: 23.2%-65.5%) out of 23 ACA positive patients. CONCLUSIONS: ACA-IgG seems to be associated with chronic hepatitis C, and could play a potential role in fibrosis progression and liver disease in these patients.

[Prospective study on the influence of gastroduodenal ulcer hemorrhage on the diagnostic methods in Helicobacter pylori infection]. / Estudio prospectivo sobre la influencia de la hemorragia por ulcus gastroduodenal en los métodos diagnósticos de infección por Helicobacter pylori.

BACKGROUND: To know the influence of upper gastrointestinal bleeding in diagnostic methods of H. pylori infection. METHODS: We prospectively studied patients with peptic ulcers: 55 with upper gastrointestinal bleeding and 62 without upper gastrointestinal bleeding. We analysed the results of culture, urease test, Gram, histology and serological test IgG and IgA in both groups. H. pylori infection was determined by a positive culture or positive urease test and histology. RESULTS: Patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding were older, but there were not statistical differences in sex, H. pylori prevalence infection or duodenal or gastric ulcers between patients with and without upper gastrointestinal bleeding. 78% having H. pylori infection. The urease test had a false negative rate in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding of 22% but only 3% in patients without upper gastrointestinal bleeding (p < 0.05). The culture, histology and Gram had higher false negative rate in upper gastrointestinal bleeding group than in non upper gastrointestinal bleeding group but without statistical significance. All patients with false negative urease test had antral culture positive. CONCLUSIONS: Urease test has a high false negative rate when is studied in patients with peptic ulcers and upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Caution should be made if urease test was used alone for diagnosis in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Urease test and culture together could be a good diagnostic method.

[Cytomorphologic characteristics of esophageal carcinosarcoma (pseudosarcoma)]. / Aspectos citomorfológicos del carcinosarcoma (seudosarcoma) esofágico.

We report a case of carcinosarcoma or pseudosarcoma of the esophagus, diagnosed through biopsy and endoscopic brush. We also describe several histogenetics hypothesis about this infrequent neoplasm and the difficulty of its diagnosis by means of endoscopy. We emphasize the endoscopic brush positivity and the description of its cytologic characteristics.