Systematic Review of Culturally-Based Breast Cancer Health Studies in Hawai'i.

Breast cancer disproportionately impacts Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander communities in Hawai'i, as exemplified by high breast cancer prevalence and mortality rates. Breast cancer disparities are linked to socio-cultural determinants of health, signifying the importance of culturally-based interventions. This paper systematically reviewed breast cancer studies conducted in Hawai'i. The literature search yielded 813 published studies, with a final total of 13 peer-reviewed studies that met this paper's inclusion criteria. All but 1 study incorporated cultural components. By evaluating key intervention components and assessing the quality of each study, the research team aimed to analyze the importance of cultural values in health interventions. Family and spirituality in coping with a cancer diagnosis were key themes in patients' lived experiences. Other culturally-based components in these studies included community-engaged research and cultural training for health professionals. The collective findings suggest that breast cancer health interventions that incorporate cultural strengths, values, and worldviews may play a central role in reducing the overall breast cancer burden among these communities. The present review advocates for future research to take a more culturally-based strategy in addressing breast cancer health disparities among Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islanders in Hawai'i.

Cancer Health Disparities Research Training: A Qualitative Report.

The Research Education Core of the Pacific Islands Partnership for Cancer Health Equity (PIPCHE) conducted a systematic review of participant learning. All students from both the University of Guam and the University of Hawai'i who have completed the program were asked two open-ended questions, which were then thematically analyzed. (1) What impact did the training have on your career? (2) What did you learn about cancer health disparities? Findings include themes such as expanding social networks, building professional skills, providing opportunities and funding, inspiring a future career in research, and giving back to the community. The results also indicate that students learned that cancer disparities research was complex and diverse, required cultural sensitivity, different areas of cancer research and education, the importance of mentor and peer relationships. Trainees spoke very favorably about the weekly seminar format. These findings are consistent with studies in other similar programs. The authors recommend future educational outcome research.