RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Primary cardiac tumors are rare and often asymptomatic or present with unspecific symptoms. Benign cardiac tumors of vascular origin are especially rare, with only few existing data in the literature. CASE PRESENTATION: A 35-year-old Caucasian female patient presented to our department with an asymptomatic giant intracardiac angioma infiltrating both ventricles. Evaluation of this tumor involved electrocardiography, echocardiography, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, coronary angiography, an open myocardial biopsy, and histological examination of the resected specimen. Because our patient was asymptomatic, she was managed conservatively with regular follow-up. We discuss the treatment options available in comparison with similar cases. CONCLUSION: Diagnosis and therapy of benign cardiac tumors, especially of asymptomatic lesions, can be a challenge. There is no evidence available to help in the management of such patients. An extensive evaluation is needed with different imaging modalities, and case-specific decisions should be made that involve experts in cardiology, cardio-oncology, and heart surgery.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Cardíacas/diagnóstico , Hemangioma/diagnóstico , Adulto , Biopsia/métodos , Angiografía Coronaria , Ecocardiografía , Femenino , Ventrículos Cardíacos , Humanos , Hallazgos Incidentales , Angiografía por Resonancia Magnética , Imagen Multimodal , Miocardio/patologíaRESUMEN
Aortic valve stenosis is the most prevalent, clinically significant valvular disorder in adult patients. Surgical valve replacement is the standard therapy for patients with symptomatic and severe aortic stenosis; however, many patients are suboptimal candidates for surgery due to age and co-morbidities. The development of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has broadened the therapeutic options, especially in high-risk patients. The first randomized study comparing surgical valve replacement with TAVI in operable high-risk patients show similar mortality and reduction in symptoms after a 2-year follow-up. These data support the use of this technique in high-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis.