Validating a New Surgical Gouge for Autogenous Ear Reconstruction During Simulated Microtia Workshops.

Autologous ear reconstruction remains a gold standard surgical technique for the treatment of external ear deformities. This highly technical procedure requires experience, an understanding of aesthetic principles, and a surgical approach that can consistently produce optimal results. As an experienced microtia surgeon having trained under Dr Satoru Nagata, the senior author has emphasized the importance of appropriate surgical tools during this procedure. Here, we present results of a novel surgical handle and gouge meant to optimize complex cartilage carving. The senior author regularly holds microtia workshops to help train individuals around the United States. During 2 of such workshops held in 2022, participants were given access to both the standard, commercially available surgical gouge as well as a prototype of a novel surgical gouge developed by the authors. Participants were then given a Likert-scale survey to assess their subjective feedback for both tools. Twenty-seven total participants completed the postworkshop survey. Cumulatively, the results demonstrated that participants rated the custom gouge significantly higher than its counterpart (4.2 versus 3.2, P<0.001). They also had a significantly higher likelihood of using the custom gouge again (4.1 versus 3.2, P=0.023). The custom gouge designed by the senior author demonstrated higher subjective ratings when compared with what is currently available on the market. This serves as a primary validation study that demonstrates feasibility for further assessment in a true operative setting.

Assessing the Current State of Microtia Reconstruction in the United States.

OBJECTIVE: Microtia is a congenital ear deformity with variability in surgical techniques and tools across surgeons pursuing an autologous reconstruction. Different techniques have emerged over time, and surgeons opt for various tools to aid in creating the complex three-dimensional cartilaginous ear framework. The purpose of this study was to understand the current state of microtia reconstruction in the United States. METHODS: Microtia surgeons affiliated with the nonprofit, Ear Community, were invited to complete a 20-item survey. Data were collected on demographic information regarding surgeons, considerations when approaching microtia repair in patients, and techniques and comfort levels. Additional data were collected on materials, tools, flaps, and skin grafts used for reconstruction. RESULTS: Twenty-two surgeons responded to the survey reporting 3 different techniques learned and utilized in practice including the Brent, Nagata, and Firmin techniques. About two-thirds of surgeons were "extremely comfortable" with their techniques and one-third were "extremely uncomfortable" or "somewhat uncomfortable." Most respondents reported using a tunneled temporoparietal fascial flap or a posterior fascial flap along with a full-thickness skin graft for the second stage (ear elevation). Most surgeons utilized a combination of scalpels and gouges when carving the ear framework along with sutures or wire. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the current state of autogenous microtia reconstruction underscoring the variability in approaches and preferences. These data may guide future directions that aim to improve patient outcomes. Surgeons may gain insight into different practices and choose to adopt different aspects to enhance their surgical approach.

Update on Total Auricular Construction.

LEARNING OBJECTIVES: After studying this article, the participant should be able to: 1. Understand principles of preoperative planning for microtia repair. 2. Understand key techniques for flap design, skin envelope dissection, framework creation, and donor-site reconstruction. 3. Describe important components of postoperative management. SUMMARY: Total auricular construction remains a challenge for reconstructive surgeons. This article describes current surgical strategies and advancements for microtia construction. The authors' focus is to describe the several keys for success that are useful for young surgeons who wish to train themselves to create satisfactory results.

Predictors of Adverse Outcomes Following Cleft Palate Repair: An Analysis of Over 2500 Patients Using International Smile Train Data.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to use data from Smile Train's global partner hospital network to identify patient characteristics that increase odds of fistula and postoperative speech outcomes. DESIGN: Multi-institution, retrospective review of Smile Train Express database. SETTING: 1110 Smile Train partner hospitals. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: 2560 patients. INTERVENTIONS: N/A. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Fistula occurrence, nasal emission, audible nasal emission with amplification (through a straw or tube) only, nasal rustle/turbulence, consistent nasal emission, consistent nasal emission due to velopharyngeal dysfunction, rating of resonance, rating of intelligibility, recommendation for further velopharyngeal dysfunction assessment, and follow-up velopharyngeal dysfunction surgery. RESULTS: The patients were 46.6% female and 27.5% underweight by WHO standards. Average age at palatoplasty was 24.7 ± 0.5 months and at speech assessment was 6.8 ± 0.1 years. Underweight patients had higher incidence of hypernasality and decreased speech intelligibility. Palatoplasty when under 6 months or over 18 months of age had higher rates of affected nasality, intelligibility, and fistula formation. The same findings were seen in Central/South American and African patients, in addition to increased velopharyngeal dysfunction and fistula surgery compared to Asian patients. Palatoplasty technique primarily involved one-stage midline repair. CONCLUSIONS: Age and nutrition status were significant predictors of speech outcomes and fistula occurrence following palatoplasty. Outcomes were also significantly impacted by location, demonstrating the need to cultivate longitudinal initiatives to reduce regional disparities. These results underscore the importance of Smile Train's continual expansion of accessible surgical intervention, nutritional support, and speech-language care.

Revisiting the U-Shaped Elevator for Zygomaticomaxillary Fracture: Study and Comparison of Elevators for Zygomaticomaxillary Fracture Reduction.

The authors present the case of a 15-year-old male who sustained a unilateral zygomaticomaxillary complex fracture and underwent open reduction and rigid internal fixation, for which a U-shaped elevator was utilized. The authors discuss techniques in reduction and fixation of zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures, focusing on the use of various elevators during reduction, including straight-type and curved elevators. The U-shaped elevator is a handheld tool with bilateral symmetrically curved ends that is seldom used, despite its specific benefits including nonslip serrated tips, symmetrical nature that allows for direct loading needed for accurate reduction, visualization of the fracture site, and avoidance of tissue compression during elevation.

Do Race and Socioeconomic Status Affect Date of Initial Presentation and Repair of Patients with Cleft lip ± Palate and Head Shape Conditions?

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate regarding the effect of race and socioeconomic status (SES) on the timing of cleft lip and/or palate (CL ± P), craniosynostosis, and plagiocephaly presentation to clinic and possible repair. DESIGN/METHODS: A retrospective review of patients with CL ± P and head shape conditions from Jan 2001 to Feb 2022 were included. Age at first plastic surgery clinic appointment, age at repair if applicable, gender, race, and zip code were collected. The Validated Child Opportunity Index (COI) scale was calculated based on zip code as a measure of SES. Kruskal-Wallis tests and Dunn's procedures were used for continuous variables and post hoc pairwise comparisons. RESULTS: 2733 patients with CL ± P, 9974 with plagiocephaly/brachycephaly, and 59 patients with craniosynostosis were included. Among patients with CL ± P, Black and Hispanic patients presented significantly later to both first plastic surgery clinic appointment and age at repair than White patients (P < .001). White patients and higher SES were associated with a significantly earlier date of initial presentation to plastic surgery clinic for head shape conditions (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Race and SES may play an important role in the delay of first presentation to plastic surgery clinic and subsequent repair for these patient populations. Further educational efforts must be provided to ensure equitable care. This single institutional study may serve to encourage other academic centers to analyze the timing of care for our pediatric patients.

Practice Profile of Practicing Plastic Surgeons: A 20-year Review of Plastic Surgery Statistics.

Background: Evaluation of practice patterns by American Board of Plastic Surgery (ABPS) diplomates allows for a greater understanding as to how the field is progressing. Understanding evolving procedural trends can give insight into plastic surgeons' subspecialty focus and influence resident training to prepare them for future practice. Methods: American Society of Plastic Surgeons member only projections for aesthetic and reconstructive procedures were reviewed from 1999 to 2018 in 5-year increments to identify shifts in frequency between the beginning (1999-2003) and end (2014-2018) of the timeframe. Tracer utilization for all four ABPS modules were also examined between 2014 and 2018. Descriptive statistics were performed to identify significant changes (P < 0.05) in subspecialty focus and procedure trends. Results: Annual procedure incidence between 2014 and 2018 was compared with that between 1999 and 2003. The annual number of procedures more than doubled from 3,244,084 to 6,628,082. Among reconstructive procedures, there was a statistically significant increase in the number of breast reconstruction, breast implant removal, and maxillofacial surgery procedures, and a statistically significant decrease in the number of procedures focused on reconstruction of birth defects, burn injuries, and hand anomalies. In aesthetic surgery, significant increases were seen in the number of augmentation mammoplasty, abdominoplasty, and mastopexy procedures, with significant decreases in the number of blepharoplasty and rhinoplasty procedures. Conclusions: Understanding the changing practice patterns of ABPS diplomates is essential to define the direction that our specialty is taking over time, and to guide program directors in plastic surgery on areas of focus for appropriate training of plastic surgeons.

Racial Disparities Following Reconstructive Flap Procedures.

BACKGROUND: Prior reports have highlighted disparities in healthcare access, environmental conditions, and food insecurity between Black and White populations in the United States. However, limited studies have explored racial disparities in postoperative complications, particularly reconstructive flap surgeries. METHODS: Cases of flap reconstruction based on named vascular pedicles were identified in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database and grouped into 3 time periods: 2005 to 2009, 2010 to 2014, and 2015 to 2019. Logistic regression was used to compare rates of postoperative complications between White and Black patients within each time period while controlling for comorbidities. Data for flap failure was only available from 2005 to 2010. RESULTS: A total of 56,116 patients were included in the study, and 6293 (11.2%) were Black. Black patients were significantly younger than White patients and had increased rates of hypertension, smoking, and diabetes across all years ( P <0.01). Black patients had significantly higher rates of sepsis compared to White patients in all time periods. From 2005 to 2009, Black patients had a significantly higher incidence of flap failure (aOR=2.58, P <0.01), return to the operating room (aOR=1.53, P =0.01), and having any complication (aOR=1.48, P <0.01). From 2010 to 2019, White patients had a higher incidence of superficial surgical site infection. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical complication rates following flap reconstruction based on a named vascular pedicle were higher for Black patients. Limited data on this topic currently exists, indicating that additional research on the drivers of racial disparities is warranted to improve plastic surgery outcomes in Black patients.

Content Validity of a Novel Scar Assessment Tool Evaluating the Career and Sexual Well-being Impact of Scars.

Currently, patient reported outcome scales used to assess scar impact focus solely on psychosocial well-being, symptoms, and appearance. There remains a need to develop a broadened measure of scar impact on patients, focusing on sexual and career aspects. This study investigates the content validity of the novel Career and Sexual Well-being (CS) Scar Impact Scale. Method: The CS scale contains five questions and was developed from previous patient thematic analysis interviews describing scar impact, and covers self-conscious behavior, new partners, hiding of the scar, being hindered in the workplace, and concerns regarding unprofessional appearance. Cognitive interviews and established guidelines were used to ensure that the scale was comprehensive, reproducible, and easily understandable. Results: In total, 86 patients completed cognitive interviews. Patients had a clear understanding of the questions and elicited their intent in the interviews. An estimated 86% of patients rated the CS scale coverage of scar impact on career and sexual health at a three or above out of four; 95% said the specific instructions were clear, and 92% stated it took them less than 4 minutes to complete the scale. After the first round of interviews, a question about "perception/self-consciousness in a professional environment" was added based on patient suggestions. Conclusions: The CS scar scale demonstrated face validity, acceptability, and field-readiness through cognitive interviewing of patients at our institution. Sexual well-being and career performance are important yet often neglected themes with which scars should be assessed. Usage of these tools would serve to improve current scar scales.

Diagnosis and Treatment of a Nonhealing Wound Secondary to a Reepithelialized Hair Tourniquet With Ultrasound.

A 9-month-old girl presented with a chronic wound on the dorsal surface of her toe that failed 6 months of medical management. Due to the prolonged clinical course, there was a concern for a foreign body. Intraoperative ultrasound was utilized to identify linear echogenic structures, which were excised and consistent with reepithelialized hairs secondary to hair-thread tourniquet syndrome. There were also erosive changes to the underlying phalanx. Intraoperative ultrasound was also used to guide the incision size and confirm the complete removal of the hairs.

Demystifying Small Concha-type Microtia: Advancements in Classification and Surgical Approach.

The accurate identification of microtia type is foundational to preoperative planning and intraoperative strategies for auricular reconstruction using an autologous costal cartilage framework. Although the repair of lobule type microtia has similarities to that of small concha-type, the latter has specific nuances that must be considered to optimize functional and aesthetic outcomes. The article describes the senior author's advancements in repair of all microtia types: use of an "auricular rectangle" to determine ideal ear placement, W-flap manipulation for vestige transposition, and skin trimming. The additional focus on small concha-type microtia addresses common errors in identification and reconstruction of the conchal bowl.

The financial implications of telemedicine practice patterns across pediatric surgical specialties.

BACKGROUND: Telemedicine has played an increasingly important role in surgical care during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, yet little is known about its usage and correlation to cost both within and across surgical specialties during the pandemic. STUDY DESIGN: We collected data on telehealth encounters from April 2020 to June 2021 for all surgical specialties at a pediatric academic institution. The percent of total encounters that were telemedicine vs. in-person were analyzed over time. Data on charge and reimbursement were averaged for each encounter type, and the percent difference in average charge and reimbursement was calculated and compared between surgical specialties. RESULTS: Of the 147,007 surgical clinical visits identified, 6,566 encounters (4.5%) were telemedicine. Usage peaked in April and plateaued in June of 2020. The specialties with the highest total percentages of telemedicine visits were neurosurgery (23.2%) and cardiovascular-thoracic (11.9%). Orthopedics reported the lowest usage at 2%. Charges for in-person encounters were higher for nearly all specialties while reimbursements remained equal. CONCLUSION: Our institutional trends reveal that conversion to telemedicine varied across surgical specialty during the COVID-19 pandemic. Charges for in-person encounters were higher than telehealth ones for nearly all specialties, but the reimbursements were fairly the same. Understanding trends in telemedicine volume instigated by and following the pandemic may better prepare pediatric institutions to navigate the accelerated adoption and influence policy changes. This is particularly relevant given the fluctuating impact of the pandemic on healthcare institutions as new strains of COVID-19 emerge. EVIDENCE LEVEL: Level V.