Posttransplant proteinuria due to Apolipoprotein E2 deposition in a kidney allograft.

Lipoprotein deposition disorders limited to the kidney and causing proteinuria are rare. We present a case of nephrotic range proteinuria presenting within 4 months after deceased donor renal transplantation in a patient with end-stage kidney disease presumed secondary to hypertension. Two transplant kidney biopsies were performed sixteen weeks after transplantation, and one year after the first biopsy, both showing lipoprotein deposits in the glomeruli, progressive focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, and effacement of visceral foot processes. The patient had a normal lipid profile. Based on previous case reports of Apolipoprotein E variants causing proteinuria in native kidneys, Apolipoprotein E genotyping was performed. Genotyping showed Apolipoprotein E2 homozygosity. This Apolipoprotein E variant has been associated with lipoprotein deposition, proteinuria, and progressive kidney disease in the native kidneys. However, this is the first case of Apolipoprotein E2 homozygosity-related kidney disease in a transplant recipient. The patient was treated with fenofibrate, angiotensin enzyme inhibition, and angiotensin receptor blockade with reduction in proteinuria, and he kept good stable kidney function.

Subclinical Cognitive Impairment and Listing for Kidney Transplantation.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Cognitive impairment is common in patients with kidney disease and can affect physicians' perception and/or patients' ability to complete the pretransplant evaluation. We examined whether cognitive impairment influences the likelihood for transplant listing and whether patients with cognitive impairment take longer to be listed. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: We conducted a single-center longitudinal cohort study. Patients presenting for their index kidney transplant evaluation were screened for cognitive impairment using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment. A score <26 indicated cognitive impairment. The transplant selection committee was blinded to the scores. Kaplan-Meier analysis assessed time to active listing by level of cognition. A Cox proportional hazards model that included age, sex, race/ethnicity, smoking, coronary artery disease, and diabetes was constructed to evaluate the association between Montreal Cognitive Assessment score and listing for transplant. RESULTS: In total, 349 patients who underwent Montreal Cognitive Assessment testing at their initial visit were included in the analysis. Patients with cognitive impairment were more likely to be older, black, and smokers. The time to listing in patients with cognitive impairment was longer than the time to listing in those with no cognitive impairment (median time, 10.6 versus 6.3 months; log rank test P=0.01). Cognitive impairment was independently associated with a lower likelihood of being listed for transplant (hazard ratio, 0.93 per unit lower Montreal Cognitive Assessment score; 95% confidence interval, 0.88 to 0.99; P=0.02). A lower proportion of patients with cognitive impairment were listed compared with patients without cognitive impairment at 1 month (2% versus 11%), 6 months (17% versus 37%), and 1 year (23% versus 41%), (P<0.001 for all). CONCLUSIONS: Cognitive impairment is associated with a lower likelihood of being listed for kidney transplant, and is associated with longer time to transplant listing.

Accelerated podocyte detachment early after kidney transplantation is related to long-term allograft loss of function.

BACKGROUND: Kidney allograft half-life has not improved despite excellent short-term survival. Recent long-term surveillance biopsy studies identify accumulating glomerulosclerosis (GS) to be associated with late allograft loss. While podocyte depletion is well known to drive proteinuria and GS in animal models and human glomerular diseases, its role in renal allograft loss of function is generally not recognized. METHODS: To address these questions, we collected urine from 125 kidney allograft recipients in the first posttransplant year for urine pellet messenger RNA (mRNA) and protein analysis, with a median follow up of 4.5 years. RESULTS: Using multivariable linear models adjusted for proteinuria, transplant, recipient and donor factors, we observed that the average urine pellet podocin mRNA normalized to urine creatinine (UPodCR) in the first posttransplant year was significantly associated with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) decline (P = 0.001). The relationship between UPodCR and eGFR decline persisted even among recipients who were nonproteinuric and who had no recurrent or de novo glomerular disease identified on 1-year protocol biopsy. Finally, we identified recipient, donor and recipient:donor body surface area mismatch ratio to be independently associated with UPodCR early after transplantation. A larger donor was protective, while a larger recipient and increased recipient:donor size mismatch ratio were associated with increased UPodCR. CONCLUSIONS: These findings support the concept that in kidney allografts, accelerated podocyte loss precedes proteinuria and is associated with inferior long-term allograft outcomes as measured by eGFR decline and may be initiated by recipient:donor size mismatch. Modulating factors driving early podocyte detachment after kidney transplantation may help improve long-term outcomes.

Population pharmacokinetics of mycophenolic acid in lung transplant recipients with and without cystic fibrosis.

PURPOSE: The objective of this work was to characterize and compare the population pharmacokinetics (PK) mycophenolic acid (MPA) in adult lung transplant recipients with cystic fibrosis (CF) and without the disease (NCF) following repeated oral administration of the prodrug mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) as an immunosuppressant. METHODS: Three separate 12-h PK visits were conducted for lung transplant patients with or without CF following repeated MPA treatment with at least a 2-week break between the visits. A population PK model was developed using nonlinear mixed effects modeling (NONMEM), and the contribution of physiological and pathological factors and time dependence of apparent oral clearance (CL/F) were assessed. RESULTS: For both CF and NCF patients, MPA serum concentration-time profiles were best described by a two-compartment PK model with first-order absorption. CF patients had a slower absorption rate (Ka), and elevated CL/F and volume of distribution (Vd/F) compared with NCF patients. There is a significant contribution of body weight and CF disease to MPA CL/F, and both were included in the final model as covariates. CONCLUSIONS: The population PK model developed from our study successfully characterizes the absorption, distribution, and elimination of MPA in lung transplant recipients with or without CF disease. The decrease of MPA absorption and increase of both oral clearance (CL/F) and volume of distribution (V2/F and V3/F) in the CF patients would suggest the importance of MPA therapeutic monitoring for this group.

Mycophenolic acid pharmacokinetics in lung transplant recipients with cystic fibrosis.

BACKGROUND: Lung transplantation is an established treatment for cystic fibrosis (CF) patients with end-stage lung disease. Current immunosuppression includes the prodrug mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), which has led to improved transplant outcomes. Given the pancreatic insufficiency and malabsorption in CF patients, some transplant centers give higher doses of MMF to these patients based on lower predose levels (C(0)), even though C(0) values correlate poorly with mycophenolic acid (MPA) exposure. The focus of this pilot study was to determine the pharmacokinetics (PK) of MPA in CF when compared with noncystic fibrosis (NCF) lung transplant recipients. METHODS: Five CF and 5 NCF patients had 3 separate PK analyses performed through our clinical research center. In addition to MMF, all patients were on tacrolimus and prednisone and were diabetic on insulin. Twelve-hour total serum concentration-time profiles of MPA and MPA glucuronide (MPAG) were obtained after oral administration of MMF. Concentrations of total MPA and MPAG were determined by a validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method. PK parameters of MPA were calculated by the noncompartmental method. Student t test or Mann-Whitney test was used to assess the differences in the PK parameters between the 2 cohorts. RESULTS: CF patients were significantly younger (30.6 versus 59.4 years; P < 0.001) and had significantly lower serum albumin (3.8 versus 4.1 g/dL; P = 0.0018) than NCF patients. CF patients had significantly lower MPA area under the curve (47.7 versus 83.1 mg·h·L(-1); P = 0.016) and MPAG area under the curve (569 versus 911 mg·h·L(-1); P = 0.047) when compared with NCF patients. In addition, C(0) (2.6 versus 4.6 mg/L; P = 0.026) and maximum serum concentration (9.2 versus 20.3 mg/L; P = 0.016) were significantly lower, and apparent oral clearance (0.26 versus 0.13 L·h·kg(-1); P = 0.009) was significantly higher in CF patients. T(max) was delayed in CF patients but not significantly. No difference between CF and NCF patients was observed for intra- and interindividual variability. CONCLUSIONS: Given these results, the lower MPA exposure in CF patients may impact transplant outcome in this lung transplant population.

Randomized trial of everolimus-facilitated calcineurin inhibitor minimization over 24 months in renal transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Strategies allowing calcineurin inhibitor minimization while maintaining efficacy may improve renal transplant outcomes. METHODS: A2309 was a 24-month, phase IIIb, open-label trial of 833 de novo renal transplant recipients randomized to everolimus, targeting trough concentrations of 3-8 or 6-12 ng/mL plus reduced-exposure cyclosporine A (CsA) or to mycophenolic acid (MPA) 1.44 g per day plus standard-exposure CsA. All patients received basiliximab ± corticosteroids. The incidence of the primary composite efficacy endpoint and its components (treated biopsy-proven acute rejection, graft loss, death, or loss to follow-up), renal function (serum creatinine and estimated glomerular filtration rate), and adverse events (AEs) were compared at 24 months; as per the protocol, these analyses were not noninferiority. RESULTS: Composite efficacy failure rates (95% confidence interval for difference vs. MPA) were 32.9% (-2.2%, 13.0%), 26.9% (-7.9%, 6.8%), and 27.4% at month 24 in the everolimus 3-8 and 6-12 ng/mL and MPA groups, respectively. Mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (Modification of Diet in Renal Disease) at month 24 was 52.2 (-2.1, 5.5 mL/min/1.73 m(2)), 49.4 (-4.8, 2.7 mL/min/1.73 m(2)), and 50.5 mL/min/1.73 m(2), respectively. AEs were generally mild to moderate in severity and comparable between the groups. AEs leading to discontinuation were reported in 28.5% (P = 0.03 vs. MPA), 30.6% (P = 0.007 vs. MPA), and 20.5% of patients receiving everolimus 3-8 and 6-12 ng/mL and MPA, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Everolimus trough concentrations targeted to 3-8 ng/mL, along with a greater than 60% reduction in CsA exposure, was associated with comparable efficacy and renal function versus MPA plus standard-exposure CsA over the 2-year period. A significantly higher incidence of AEs led to discontinuation in the everolimus groups compared with the MPA group.

Association of clinical events with everolimus exposure in kidney transplant patients receiving reduced cyclosporine.

BACKGROUND: The association between clinical events and everolimus exposure in patients receiving reduced-exposure calcineurin inhibitor therapy is poorly explored. METHODS: In a pre-planned, descriptive analysis of data from a randomized controlled trial, events were correlated with everolimus trough concentrations in 556 newly transplanted kidney transplant patients receiving everolimus with reduced-exposure cyclosporine (CsA) and steroids. Influence of everolimus exposure on clinical events was stratified according to predefined time-normalized concentrations. RESULTS: The incidence of treated biopsy-proven acute rejection and graft loss at month 12 was highest in patients with everolimus <3 ng/mL (36.4% and 28.6%, respectively, vs. 9.1-15.3% and 0.9-5.0% with higher concentration ranges). A higher mortality rate was observed in patients with an everolimus trough concentration ≥ 12 ng/mL (10.0% vs. 1.7-5.6% with lower concentration ranges). The lowest rates of renal dysfunction (defined as poor renal function [estimated GFR, serum creatinine] or proteinuria), wound healing events, peripheral edema, new-onset diabetes mellitus, hypercholesterolemia and hypertriglyceridemia were generally observed with everolimus trough concentration in the range 3-8 ng/mL and CsA <100 ng/mL. Proteinuria occurred most frequently in patients with very low or very high everolimus trough concentrations. CONCLUSIONS: These results support an exposure-response relationship between clinical events and everolimus trough concentrations in kidney transplant patients receiving reduced-exposure CsA.

Optimal everolimus concentration is associated with risk reduction for acute rejection in de novo renal transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Everolimus (Evl) plus tacrolimus (Tac) in de novo renal transplantation is effective and safe. Whether the concentration of Evl affects efficacy and safety in a Tac-based regimen has not been previously reported. AIM: To evaluate whether the concentration of Evl affects biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR), renal function, adverse events (AEs); and to assess for pharmacokinetic (PK) interactions. METHODS: Data were from a prospective, multicenter, open-label, randomized, exploratory 6-month study of 92 renal transplant patients treated de novo with concentration-controlled Evl (target trough levels > or =3 ng/mL) plus low-dose Tac or Evl plus standard-dose Tac; both groups received basiliximab and corticosteroids. Data were pooled across study arms to examine BPAR rates in patients with Evl trough levels less than 3 (n=26), 3 to 8 (n=62), or more than 8 ng/mL (n=4). Groups were stratified by both Evl and Tac trough levels to evaluate glomerular filtration rate and AEs. Evl and Tac PK interactions were evaluated in a subset of 14 patients. RESULTS: Evl trough level of more than or equal to 3 ng/mL was associated with significantly lower rates of BPAR as compared with a trough level of less than 3 ng/mL. Glomerular filtration rate was similar at 6 months for both the low and standard Tac groups. No apparent PK interactions were observed between Evl and Tac. AEs were infrequent and did not seem to be associated with the Evl or Tac level. CONCLUSIONS: Evl trough levels > or =3 ng/mL plus Tac are associated with low rates of BPAR without adversely affecting renal function. No evident PK interaction exists between Evl and Tac.

Lymphoma after solid organ transplantation: risk, response to therapy, and survival at a transplantation center.

PURPOSE: We studied the incidence, risk factors, treatment, and outcomes of post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) that occurred at the University of Michigan since 1964. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We identified 7,040 patients who received solid organ transplantation (SOT) and post-transplantation immunosuppressive therapy. Seventy-eight patients developed PTLD. RESULTS: Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (n = 43), polymorphic PTLD (n = 10), Hodgkin's lymphoma (n = 7), Burkitts lymphoma (n = 6), plasmacytoma (n = 5), and mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma (n = 3) were all over-represented in the SOT population compared with a population sample from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database; follicular lymphoma (n = 0) was underrepresented. Negative pretransplantation Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) serology was a risk factor for PTLD. Available histologic analysis of tumor tissue showed that 75% were CD20 positive and that 62% were EBV positive; EBV-positive tumors occurred sooner after SOT than EBV-negative tumors (mean, 29 v 66 months). Extralymphatic disease (79%), poor performance status (68%), elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH; 71%), and advanced stage (68%) disease were all common at the time of lymphoma diagnosis. Two thirds of patients had a complete response when treated with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone-like chemotherapy (either with or without rituximab). Median overall survival in all patients with PTLD was 8.23 years (95% CI, 2.28 to 30.0 years). CONCLUSION: EBV-naïve patients who receive a donor organ from an EBV-infected donor are in the highest-risk situation for PTLD development. Most of these lymphomas are CD20 positive. Follicular lymphoma is unusual. With treatment, survival of patients with PTLD was indistinguishable from that of the SEER population sample.

Multicenter, randomized study of the use of everolimus with tacrolimus after renal transplantation demonstrates its effectiveness.

BACKGROUND: Clinical data are lacking concerning concomitant administration of everolimus and tacrolimus in renal transplant recipients. METHODS: In a prospective, multicenter, open-label, exploratory, randomized, 6-month study, 92 de novo renal transplant patients received everolimus, steroids, and basiliximab with low or standard tacrolimus exposure. The primary objective was to compare renal function at 6 months after transplant. RESULTS: Mean 6-month serum creatinine (primary safety variable) was 112+/-31 micromol/L (1.26+/-0.35 mg/dL) and 127+/-50 micromol/L (1.44+/-0.57 mg/dL) in the low and standard tacrolimus groups, respectively, (n.s.); mean estimated GFR (Nankivell) was 75.3+/-16.6 mL/min and 72.5+/-15.2 mL/min (n.s.). Biopsy-proven acute rejection occurred in 13 patients: seven (14%) in the low tacrolimus group and six (14%) in the standard tacrolimus group, n.s. One graft was lost in the standard tacrolimus group. No patients died. CONCLUSIONS: Tacrolimus exposure reduction in the presence of everolimus, steroids and basiliximab induction results in good efficacy in de novo renal transplant recipients with very well-preserved renal function. Additional studies are warranted because between-group comparisons were limited by the relatively small differences in tacrolimus exposure in the 2 arms; trough levels were toward the upper end of the low-exposure ranges and toward the bottom of the standard-exposure ranges.

Renal function with cyclosporine C2 monitoring, enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium and basiliximab: a 12-month randomized trial in renal transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Cyclosporine exposure, as estimated by the area under the curve (AUC), predicts outcomes in renal transplantation. Cyclosporine concentration at two h post-dose (C(2)) has been shown to be the most reliable, single-point surrogate marker for AUC. The objective of this study was to measure renal function beyond month 2 post-transplant using two different C(2) maintenance targets in combination with enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS), corticosteroids, and basiliximab induction. METHODS: In this open-label, multicenter trial, renal transplant recipients entered one of two randomized groups at day 61 post-transplant: group A (higher-C(2) range) or group B (lower-C(2) range). RESULTS: Patients (164) were recruited, and 141 patients were entered the randomized groups (group A, n = 66; group B, n = 75). At 12 months, the mean calculated creatinine clearance was significantly greater in group B than in group A (79.2 vs. 71.0 mL/min, p < 0.05). Biopsy-proven acute rejection occurred in 14.7% patients in group B and in 24.2% patients in group A (n.s.). During the 12-month trial, 17.7% patients discontinued EC-MPS because of adverse events. Group B (44.0%) had fewer serious adverse events when compared with group A (62.1%; p = 0.04). Overall patient and graft survival were 99.4% and 95.7% respectively. Among 99 high-risk patients (i.e., African-American race, previous transplant, PRA >35% or >4 HLA mismatches), mean creatinine clearance at 12 months was 65.6 mL/min and biopsy-proven rejection occurred in 20.2% patients. CONCLUSIONS: Low cyclosporine C(2) levels are associated with improved renal function compared with higher C(2) levels when used in conjunction with EC-MPS, steroids and basiliximab induction. EC-MPS with low cyclosporine C(2) levels, corticosteroids and basiliximab provides excellent renal function with good efficacy even in high-risk patients.

Rabbit antithymocyte globulin versus basiliximab in renal transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Induction therapy reduces the frequency of acute rejection and delayed graft function after transplantation. A rabbit antithymocyte polyclonal antibody or basiliximab, an interleukin-2 receptor monoclonal antibody, is most commonly used for induction. METHODS: In this prospective, randomized, international study, we compared short courses of antithymocyte globulin and basiliximab in patients at high risk for acute rejection or delayed graft function who received a renal transplant from a deceased donor. Patients taking cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil, and prednisone were randomly assigned to receive either rabbit antithymocyte globulin (1.5 mg per kilogram of body weight daily, 141 patients) during transplantation (day 0) and on days 1 through 4 or basiliximab (20 mg, 137 patients) on days 0 and 4. The primary end point was a composite of acute rejection, delayed graft function, graft loss, and death. RESULTS: At 12 months, the incidence of the composite end point was similar in the two groups (P=0.34). The antithymocyte globulin group, as compared with the basiliximab group, had lower incidences of acute rejection (15.6% vs. 25.5%, P=0.02) and of acute rejection that required treatment with antibody (1.4% vs. 8.0%, P=0.005). The antithymocyte globulin group and the basiliximab group had similar incidences of graft loss (9.2% and 10.2%, respectively), delayed graft function (40.4% and 44.5%), and death (4.3% and 4.4%). Though the incidences of all adverse events, serious adverse events, and cancers were also similar between the two groups, patients receiving antithymocyte globulin had a greater incidence of infection (85.8% vs. 75.2%, P=0.03) but a lower incidence of cytomegalovirus disease (7.8% vs. 17.5%, P=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients at high risk for acute rejection or delayed graft function who received a renal transplant from a deceased donor, induction therapy consisting of a 5-day course of antithymocyte globulin, as compared with basiliximab, reduced the incidence and severity of acute rejection but not the incidence of delayed graft function. Patient and graft survival were similar in the two groups. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00235300 [ClinicalTrials.gov].).

Randomized controlled trial of FTY720 versus MMF in de novo renal transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Phase II trials of FTY720, a novel immunomodulator, have shown promise in preventing rejection with both standard and reduced cyclosporine exposure. This study was designed to confirm those findings. METHODS: This one-year, multicenter, randomized, phase III study in 696 de novo renal transplant patients compared FTY720 5 mg plus reduced-dose cyclosporine (RDC) or FTY720 2.5 mg plus full-dose cyclosporine (FDC) with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) plus FDC. All patients received concomitant corticosteroid therapy without antibody induction. The primary efficacy composite endpoint was the incidence of first treated biopsy-proven acute rejection (treated BPAR), graft loss, death or premature study discontinuation at month 12. RESULTS: FTY720 2.5 mg plus FDC was demonstrated to be non-inferior to MMF plus FDC as the primary efficacy endpoint (30.8% and 30.6%) was comparable. The FTY720 5 mg plus RDC treatment regimen was discontinued due to an increased incidence of acute rejection episodes (primary endpoint 43.3%). FTY720 was associated with significantly lower creatinine clearance with a mean difference at 12 months between FTY720 2.5 mg plus FDC and MMF plus FDC of 8 ml/min. CONCLUSIONS: While FTY720 2.5 mg plus FDC yielded similar efficacy to MMF plus FDC, the FTY720 5 mg plus RDC did not allow a 50% reduction in cyclosporine exposure. The associated lower creatinine clearance indicated that FTY720 combined with cyclosporine provided no benefit over standard care.

Evaluation of pancreatic allograft dysfunction by laparoscopic biopsy.

BACKGROUND: Histologic evaluation of a failing pancreatic allograft is necessary for accurate classification of graft dysfunction. Unlike percutaneous or transcystoscopic techniques, laparoscopic biopsy allows visualization of the allograft in addition to obtaining tissue for histologic examination. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all laparoscopic pancreas transplant biopsies performed over a 15-month period ending February 2002. RESULTS: There were 12 laparoscopic pancreas biopsies performed in 11 patients between 6 weeks and 8 years (mean 2.5+/-2.8 years) after transplant. Indications for biopsy were hyperglycemia (n=8), hyperamylasemia (n=3), and graft tenderness (n=1). Adequate tissue was obtained in 11 of 12 biopsies. Two patients received definitive treatment at the time of laparoscopy (pseudocyst debridement, ovarian cyst excision). CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic pancreas transplant biopsy allows safe visualization of the allograft and effective specimen retrieval, and in some cases provides the opportunity for therapeutic intervention.