Camptocormia in Parkinson Disease: Systematic Review of Management Using Spine Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Postural abnormalities are a debilitating symptom of Parkinson disease (PD) that may require spinal intervention. Camptocormia is a unique abnormality most seen in PD, defined by a severe forward flexion of the trunk that completely resolves when supine. The condition presents a challenge due to an undefined pathophysiology and optimal therapeutic approach in a high-risk patient population. In this study, we systematically reviewed the literature regarding the use of spine surgery for the treatment of camptocormia in PD. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were systematically queried for studies involving spine surgery as treatment of PD-associated camptocormia. Studies involving nonsurgical management, involving deep brain stimulation, involving noncamptocormic PD patients undergoing surgery, or were out of scope were excluded. RESULTS: The search resulted in 5 studies, with a total of 19 patients with PD with camptocormia who underwent spine surgery (73.7% women). The mean age was 69.5 years (range, 59-83), and the mean PD duration was 69.5 months (range, 36-84). Of 19 patients, 11 required surgical revision (57.9%), with an average of 0.68 revisions per patient (range, 0-2). Radiographic and patient-reported outcomes were inconsistently reported yet showed improvement. Ultimately, 18 patients were reported to have positive outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Despite an increased risk of complication and revision that is inherent to patients with PD, spine surgery has been proven as a reasonable alternative that should be prospectively studied further because 18 of 19 patients had favorable outcomes.

The demographic, clinical, and management differences between traumatic dens fracture patients with and without simultaneous atlas fractures.

Introduction: Atlas fractures often accompany traumatic dens fractures, but existing literature on the management of simultaneous atlantoaxial fractures is limited. Methods: We examined all patients with traumatic dens fractures at our institution between 2008 and 2018. We used multivariable logistic regression and ordinal logistic regression to identify factors independently associated with presentation with a simultaneous atlas fracture, as well myelopathy severity, fracture nonunion, and selection for surgery. Results: Two hundred and eighty-two patients with traumatic dens fractures without subaxial fractures were identified, including 65 (22.8%) with simultaneous atlas fractures. The distribution of injury mechanisms differed between groups (χ2 P = 0.0360). On multivariable logistic regression, dens nonunion was positively associated with type II fractures (odds ratio [OR] = 2.00, P = 0.038) and negatively associated with having surgery (OR = 0.52, P = 0.049), but not with having a C1 fracture (P = 0.3673). Worse myelopathy severity on presentation was associated with having a severe injury severity score (OR = 102.3, P < 0.001) and older age (OR = 1.28, P = 0.002), but not with having an atlas fracture (P = 0.2446). Having a simultaneous atlas fracture was associated with older age (OR = 1.29, P = 0.024) and dens fracture angulation (OR = 2.62, P = 0.004). Among patients who underwent surgery, C1/C2 posterior fusion was the most common procedure, and having a simultaneous atlas fracture was associated with selection for occipitocervical fusion (OCF) (OR = 14.35, P = 0.010). Conclusions: Among patients with traumatic dens, patients who have simultaneous atlas fractures are a distinct subpopulation with respect to age, mechanism of injury, fracture morphology, and management. Traumatic dens fractures with simultaneous atlas fractures are independently associated with selection for OCF rather than posterior cervical fusion alone.

Chemoprophylactic Anticoagulation After Spine Surgery Does Not Increase Epidural Hematoma Risk: A Propensity-matched Analysis.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: To calculate the magnitude of any increased risk of epidural hematoma (EDH) associated with chemoprophylactic anticoagulation (chemoprophylaxis), if any. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Chemoprophylaxis for the prevention of venous thromboembolic events may be associated with an increased risk of EDH after spine surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 6869 consecutive spine surgeries performed at our institution were identified, and clinical and demographic data were collected. We identified cases in which symptomatic EDHs were evacuated within 30 days postoperatively. Patients receiving chemoprophylaxis and controls were matched using K-nearest neighbor propensity score matching to calculate the effect of anticoagulation on the rate of postoperative EDH. RESULTS: After propensity score matching, 1071 patients who received chemoprophylaxis were matched to 1585 controls. Propensity scores were well balanced between populations (Rubin B=20.6, Rubin R=1.05), and an 89.6% reduction in bias was achieved, with a remaining mean bias of 3.2%. The effect of chemoprophylaxis on EDH was insignificant ( P =0.294). Symptomatic EDH was independently associated with having a transfusion [odds ratio (OR)=7.30 (1.15, 46.20), P =0.035], having thoracic-level surgery [OR=41.19 (3.75, 452.4), P =0.002], and increasing body mass index [OR=1.44 (1.04, 1.98), P =0.028] but was not associated with chemoprophylaxis. Five out of 13 patients who developed EDH (38.5%) were receiving some form of anticoagulation, including 1 patient on therapeutic anticoagulation, 1 concurrently on aspirin and chemoprophylaxis, and 2 who were also found to have developed thrombocytopenia postoperatively. The median time on anticoagulation before EDH was 8.1 days. A higher proportion of patients who developed EDH also developed venous thromboembolic events than the general population [38.5% vs. 2.4%, OR=25.34 (9.226, 79.68), P <0.0001], and 1 EDH patient died from pulmonary embolism while off chemoprophylaxis. CONCLUSIONS: Chemoprophylactic anticoagulation did not cause an increase in the rate of spinal EDH in our patient population.

Using machine learning and big data for the prediction of venous thromboembolic events after spine surgery: A single-center retrospective analysis of multiple models on a cohort of 6869 patients.

Objective: Venous thromboembolic event (VTE) after spine surgery is a rare but potentially devastating complication. With the advent of machine learning, an opportunity exists for more accurate prediction of such events to aid in prevention and treatment. Methods: Seven models were screened using 108 database variables and 62 preoperative variables. These models included deep neural network (DNN), DNN with synthetic minority oversampling technique (SMOTE), logistic regression, ridge regression, lasso regression, simple linear regression, and gradient boosting classifier. Relevant metrics were compared between each model. The top four models were selected based on area under the receiver operator curve; these models included DNN with SMOTE, linear regression, lasso regression, and ridge regression. Separate random sampling of each model was performed 1000 additional independent times using a randomly generated training/testing distribution. Variable weights and magnitudes were analyzed after sampling. Results: Using all patient-related variables, DNN using SMOTE was the top-performing model in predicting postoperative VTE after spinal surgery (area under the curve [AUC] =0.904), followed by lasso regression (AUC = 0.894), ridge regression (AUC = 0.873), and linear regression (AUC = 0.864). When analyzing a subset of only preoperative variables, the top-performing models were lasso regression (AUC = 0.865) and DNN with SMOTE (AUC = 0.864), both of which outperform any currently published models. Main model contributions relied heavily on variables associated with history of thromboembolic events, length of surgical/anesthetic time, and use of postoperative chemoprophylaxis. Conclusions: The current study provides promise toward machine learning methods geared toward predicting postoperative complications after spine surgery. Further study is needed in order to best quantify and model real-world risk for such events.

Traumatic Dens Fracture Patients Comprise Distinct Subpopulations Distinguished by Differences in Age, Sex, Injury Mechanism and Severity, and Outcome.

BACKGROUND: Dens fractures are an increasingly common injury, yet their epidemiology and its implications remain underexamined. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed all traumatic dens fracture patients managed at our institution over a 10-year period, examining demographic, clinical, and outcomes data. Patient subsets were compared across these parameters. RESULTS: Among 303 traumatic dens fracture patients, we observed a bimodal age distribution with a strong goodness of fit centered at age 22.3 ± 5.7 (R = 0.8781) and at 77.7 ± 13.9 (R = 0.9686). A population pyramid demonstrated a bimodal distribution among male patients, but not female patients, which was confirmed with a strong goodness of fit for male patient subpopulations age <35 (R = 0.9791) and age ≥35 (R = 0.8843), but a weaker fit for a second female subpopulation age <35. Both age groups were equally likely to undergo surgery. Patients younger than age 35 were more likely to be male (82.4% vs. 46.9%, odds ratio [OR] = 5.29 [1.54, 17.57], P = 0.0052), have motor vehicle collision as their mechanism of injury (64.7% vs. 14.1%, OR = 11.18 [3.77, 31.77], P < 0.0001), and to have a severe trauma injury severity score (17.6% vs. 2.9%, OR = 7.23 [1.88, 28.88], P = 0.0198). Nevertheless, patients age <35 were less likely to have fracture nonunion at follow (18.2% vs. 53.7%, OR = 0.19 [0.041, 0.76], P = 0.0288). CONCLUSIONS: The dens fracture patient population comprises 2 subpopulations, distinguished by differences in age, sex, injury mechanism and severity, and outcome, with male dens fracture patients demonstrating a bimodal age distribution. Young, male patients were more likely to have high-energy injury mechanisms leading to severe trauma, yet were less likely to have fracture nonunion at follow-up.

Outcome Reporting in Spine Surgery: A Review of Historical and Emerging Trends.

The general objectives of spine surgery are to alleviate pain, restore neurologic function, and prevent or treat spinal deformities or instability. The accumulating expanse of outcome measures has allowed us to more objectively quantify these variables and, therefore, gauge the success of treatments, ultimately improving the quality of the delivered health care. It has become increasingly evident that spinal conditions and their accompanying interventions affect all aspects of a patient's life, including their physical, mental, emotional, and social well-being. This underscores the challenge of creating clinically relevant and accurate outcome measures in spine care, and the reason why there is a growing recognition of the importance of subjective measures such as patient-reported outcome measures, that consider a patients' health-related quality of life. Subjective measures provide valuable insights into patient experiences and perceptions of treatment outcomes, whereas objective measures provide a reproducible glimpse into key radiographic and clinical parameters that are associated with a successful outcome. In this narrative review, we provide a detailed analysis of the most common subjective and objective outcome measures employed in spine surgery, with a special focus on their current role as well as the possible future of outcome reporting.

Functional Anatomy and Biomechanics of the Craniovertebral Junction.

The craniovertebral junction (CVJ) involves the atlas, axis, and occiput along with the atlanto-occipital and atlantoaxial joints. The anatomy and neural and vascular anatomy of the junction render the CVJ unique. Specialists treating disorders that affect the CVJ must appreciate its intricate anatomy and should be well versed in its biomechanics. This first article in a three-article series provides an overview of the functional anatomy and biomechanics of the CVJ.

Surgery Decreases Nonunion, Myelopathy, and Mortality for Patients With Traumatic Odontoid Fractures: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Existing literature suggests that surgical intervention for odontoid fractures is beneficial but often does not control for known confounding factors. OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of surgical fixation on myelopathy, fracture nonunion, and mortality after traumatic odontoid fractures. METHODS: We analyzed all traumatic odontoid fractures managed at our institution between 2010 and 2020. Ordinal multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with myelopathy severity at follow-up. Propensity score analysis was used to test the treatment effect of surgery on nonunion and mortality. RESULTS: Three hundred and three patients with traumatic odontoid fracture were identified, of whom 21.6% underwent surgical stabilization. After propensity score matching, populations were well balanced across all analyses (Rubin's B < 25.0, 0.5 < Rubin's R < 2.0). Controlling for age and fracture angulation, type, comminution, and displacement, the overall rate of nonunion was lower in the surgical group (39.7% vs 57.3%, average treatment effect [ATE] = -0.153 [-0.279, -0.028], P = .017). Controlling for age, sex, Nurick score, Charlson Comorbidity Index, Injury Severity Score, and selection for intensive care unit admission, the mortality rate was lower for the surgical group at 30 days (1.7% vs 13.8%, ATE = -0.101 [-0.172, -0.030], P = .005) and at 1 year was 7.0% vs 23.7%, ATE = -0.099 [-0.181, -0.017], P = .018. Cox proportional hazards analysis also demonstrated a mortality benefit for surgery (hazard ratio = 0.587 [0.426, 0.799], P = .0009). Patients who underwent surgery were less likely to have worse myelopathy scores at follow-up (odds ratio = 0.48 [0.25, 0.93], P = .029). CONCLUSION: Surgical stabilization is associated with better myelopathy scores at follow-up and causes lower rates of fracture nonunion, 30-day mortality, and 1-year mortality.

Outpatient telemedicine in neurosurgery: 15,677 consecutive encounters in a comparative analysis of its effectiveness and impact on the surgical conversion rate.

OBJECTIVE: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has necessitated the use of telehealth visits (THVs). The effects on neurosurgical practice have not been well characterized, especially concerning new-patient THVs. Therefore, the authors of this study reviewed their institution's experience with outpatient clinic visits and THVs from before the COVID-19 pandemic to the present to focus on clinical metrics, rates of surgery, and the effects of implementing THVs in order to better understand their implications for clinical practice as more data emerge over time. METHODS: The authors reviewed 15,677 consecutive new outpatient in-person visits (IPVs), THVs, and neurosurgical procedures/cases proceeding from their institution between 2018 and 2022 for trends and associations related to THVs. RESULTS: Among spine patients, there was no difference in the proportion of encounters that led to surgery (surgical conversion rate) between THVs and IPVs (p = 0.49). Among cranial patients, THVs were negatively associated with conversion (OR 0.73, p = 0.03). On average, patients using THVs lived further from the hospital (p < 0.001); however, the patient catchment area appeared unchanged. The median distance to the hospital among THV patients was counterbalanced by a decreased distance for spine patients pursing IPVs (p < 0.001), with no significant change to case volume. There was no change in distance to the hospital among cranial patients. For both cranial and spine patients, surgical conversion was more likely among those who lived a great distance from the hospital if their initial encounter was an IPV (p = 0.007 and < 0.001, respectively). However, there was no relationship between distance from the hospital and surgical conversion among THV patients (p = 0.565). The availability of THVs did not significantly affect follow-up time (p = 0.837). For new patients at IPVs, there was no difference in time to the operating room between cranial and spine cases; for new patients at THVs, however, time to the operating room was significantly faster for cranial cases than for spine cases (p = 0.0018). CONCLUSIONS: Compared to IPVs, THVs lead to decreased surgical conversion for cranial patients but not spine patients. THVs do not appear to increase the catchment area. For patients who live far from the hospital, an IPV is associated with surgical conversion. Surgical conversion is faster following cranial THVs than after spine THVs. THVs did not increase the duration of follow-up.

Advances, Challenges, and Future Directions in the Management of Craniovertebral Junction Pathologies.

In this third article in a 3-article series on the craniocervical junction, we define the terms "basilar impression," "cranial settling," "basilar invagination," and "platybasia," noting that these terms are often used interchangeably but represent distinct entities. We then provide examples that represent these pathologies and treatment paradigms. Finally, we discuss the challenges and future direction in the craniovertebral junction surgery space.

An Approach to Managing Disorders Affecting the Craniovertebral Junction.

The craniovertebral junction (CVJ), or the "first junction," can be affected by a variety of pathological states. Some of these conditions could represent a gray area in that they can be treated by general neurosurgeons or such specialists as skull base or spinal surgeons. However, some conditions are best managed with a multidisciplinary approach. The importance of in-depth knowledge of the anatomy and biomechanics of this junction cannot be overemphasized. Identifying what represents clinical stability or instability is key to successful diagnosis and, hence, treatment. In this report, the second in a 3-article series, we describe our approach to managing CVJ pathologies in a case-based fashion to illustrate key concepts.

Chemoprophylactic Anticoagulation Following Lumbar Surgery Significantly Reduces Thromboembolic Events After Instrumented Fusions, Not Decompressions.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. OBJECTIVE: To quantify any reduction in venous thromboembolic events (VTEs) caused by chemoprophylaxis among lumbar surgery patients. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Chemoprophylactic anticoagulation (chemoprophylaxis) is used to prevent VTE after lumbar surgery. However, the treatment effect of chemoprophylaxis has not been reported among spine surgery patients, as conventional statistical methods preclude such inferences. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 1243 consecutive lumbar fusions and 1433 noninstrumented lumbar decompressions performed at our institution over a six-year period were identified, and clinical and demographic data were collected, including on VTE events within 30 days postoperatively. Instrumented lumbar fusions and noninstrumented lumbar surgeries were analyzed separately. Patients who were given chemoprophylaxis (treatment) and controls were matched according to known VTE risk factors, including age, body mass index, sex, diabetes, chronic kidney disease, history of VTE, estimated blood loss, length of surgery, transfusion, whether surgery was staged, and whether surgery used an anterior approach. K-nearest neighbor propensity score matching was performed, and the treatment effect of chemoprophylaxis was calculated. RESULTS: Unadjusted, there was no difference in the rate of VTE between treatment and controls in either population. Baseline clinical and demographic characteristics differed significantly between treatment and control groups. In all, 575 lumbar fusion patients and 435 noninstrumented lumbar decompression patients were successfully propensity score matched, yielding balanced models (Rubin B <25, 0.560% reduction in known bias for both populations. The treatment effect of chemoprophylaxis after lumbar fusion in our patient population was a reduction in VTE incidence from 9.4% to 4.2% ( P <0.05), and propensity score adjusted regression confirmed a reduced odds of VTE with chemoprophylaxis (odds ratio=0.37, P =0.035). The treatment effect was not significant for noninstrumented lumbar decompression patients. CONCLUSION: Among patients undergoing instrumented lumbar fusions, chemoprophylactic anticoagulation causes a significant reduction in VTE, but causes no significant reduction among patients undergoing noninstrumented lumbar decompression.

Atlas fractures with and without simultaneous dens fractures differ with respect to clinical, demographic, and management characteristics.

Background: Patients with simultaneous fractures of the atlas and dens have traditionally been managed according to the dens fracture's morphology, but data supporting this practice are limited. Methods: We retrospectively examined all patients with traumatic atlas fractures at our institution between 2008 and 2016. We used multivariable regression and propensity score matching to compare the presentation, management, and outcomes of patients with isolated atlas fractures to patients with simultaneous atlas-dens fractures. Results: Ninety-nine patients were identified. Patients with isolated atlas fractures were younger (61 ± 22 vs. 77 ± 14, P = 0.0003), had lower median Charlson Comorbidity Index (3 vs. 5, P = 0.0005), had better presenting Nurick myelopathy scores (0 vs. 3, P < 0.0001), and had different mechanisms of injury (P = 0.0011). Multivariable regression showed that having a simultaneous atlas-dens fracture was independently associated with older age (odds ratio [OR] =1.59 [1.22, 2.07], P = 0.001), worse presenting myelopathy (OR = 3.10 [2.04, 4.16], P < 0.001), and selection for surgery (OR = 4.91 [1.10, 21.97], P = 0.037). Propensity score matching yielded balanced populations (Rubin's B = 23.3, Rubin's R = 1.96) and showed that the risk of atlas fracture nonunion was no different among isolated atlas fractures compared to simultaneous atlas-dens fractures (P = 0.304). Age was the only variable independently associated with atlas fracture nonunion (OR = 2.39 [1.15, 5.00], P = 0.020), having a simultaneous atlas-dens fracture was not significant (P = 0.2829). Conclusions: Among patients with atlas fractures, simultaneous fractures of the dens occur in older patients and confer an increased risk of myelopathy and requiring surgical stabilization. Controlling for confounders, the risk of atlas fracture nonunion is equivalent for isolated atlas fractures versus simultaneous atlas-dens fractures.

Anterior approach lumbar fusions cause a marked increase in thromboembolic events: Causal inferences from a propensity-matched analysis of 1147 patients.

OBJECTIVE: Anterior lumbar fusions are thought to be associated with elevated venous thromboembolic event (VTE) rates, but the magnitude of this increase in VTE is not well described. The objective of this study was to quantify any increase in VTE caused by anterior approach lumbar fusion. METHODS: 1147 consecutive lumbar fusions performed at our institution over a six-year period were identified, and clinical and demographic data were collected. K-nearest neighbor propensity score matching and propensity score adjusted regression were performed. Patients undergoing anterior versus posterior approach lumbar fusions were matched according to age, body mass index, sex, VTE history, estimated blood loss, length of surgery, transfusion, selection for postoperative intensive care unit (ICU) admission, comorbid disease burden, and use of chemoprophylactic anticoagulation. RESULTS: Anterior approach surgery (OR=4.29, p < 0.001), a history of VTE (OR=8.67, p < 0.001), age (OR=1.53, p = 0.014), length of surgery (OR=1.16, p = 0.044), and selection for postoperative ICU admission (OR=4.60, p = 0.005) were independently associated with VTE on multivariable regression. 1058 anterior or posterior approach fusion patients were matched. After matching, overall bias was reduced by 71.0 %, no covariates remained significantly different between groups, and propensity scores were well balanced between populations (Rubin's B≤0.25, 0.5 ≤Rubin's R≤2.0). Significantly more patients in the anterior group underwent lower extremity duplex ultrasonography (LED) (36.9 % vs. 14.8 %, OR=3.36 [2.38, 4.76], p < 0.0001), and a statistically insignificantly higher proportion of LEDs were positive among patients in the anterior group (23.2 % vs. 13.2 %, OR=1.99 [0.92, 4.25], p = 0.108). After matching, the rate of VTE was 8.6 % for the anterior group and 1.3 % for the posterior group, with anterior approach surgery causing an increase in VTE by 7.2 % (95 % CI [2.28 %, 12.16 %], p = 0.004). CONCLUSION: Among patients undergoing lumbar fusions, anterior approach surgery causes an increase in VTE by 7.2%, which is a multifold increase in the proportion of patients with thromboembolic complications.

Surgical Site Infection in the Intensive Care Setting After Posterior Spinal Fusion: A Case Series Highlighting the Microbial Profile, Risk Factors, and the Importance of Comorbid Disease Burden.

BACKGROUND: Most posterior spinal fusion (PSF) patients do not require admission to an intensive care unit (ICU), and those who do may represent an underinvestigated, high-risk subpopulation. OBJECTIVE: To identify the microbial profile of and risk factors for surgical site infection (SSI) in PSF patients admitted to the ICU postoperatively. METHODS: We examined 3965 consecutive PSF patients treated at our institution between 2000 and 2015 and collected demographic, clinical, and procedural data. Comorbid disease burden was quantified using the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). We performed multivariable logistic regression to identify risk factors for SSI, readmission, and reoperation. RESULTS: Anemia, more levels fused, cervical surgery, and cerebrospinal fluid leak were positively associated with ICU admission, and minimally invasive surgery was negatively associated. The median time to infection was equivalent for ICU patients and non-ICU patients, and microbial culture results were similar between groups. Higher CCI and undergoing a staged procedure were associated with readmission, reoperation, and SSI. When stratified by CCI into quintiles, SSI rates show a strong linear correlation with CCI ( P = .0171, R = 0.941), with a 3-fold higher odds of SSI in the highest risk group than the lowest (odds ratio = 3.15 [1.19, 8.07], P = .032). CONCLUSION: Procedural characteristics drive the decision to admit to the ICU postoperatively. Patients admitted to the ICU have higher rates of SSI but no difference in the timing of or microorganisms that lead to those infections. Comorbid disease burden drives SSI in this population, with a 3-fold greater odds of SSI for high-risk patients than low-risk patients.

Frailty predicts readmission, reoperation, and infection after posterior spinal fusion: An institutional series of 3965 patients.

OBJECTIVE: Frailty is a measure of physiologic vulnerability conceptualized as the accumulation of deficits with aging, and may be useful for predicting risk of adverse events following posterior spinal fusion. Our objective was to investigate the utility of the Canadian Study on Health and Aging (CHSA) Modified Frailty Index (mFI) in patients undergoing posterior spinal fusion (PSF) as a predictor of several surgical quality metrics including readmission, reoperation, and surgical site infection. METHODS: We examined 3965 consecutive PSF patients treated at our institution between 2000 and 2015, and collected demographic, clinical, and frailty and comorbid disease burden measures using the mFI and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). We examined trends and changes in these clinical and demographic characteristics over the course of the study period. We performed multivariable regression to identify independent predictors of readmission, reoperation, and surgical site infection. RESULTS: Over the course of the study period, the mean patient age increased linearly year-over-year (ß=0.60 [0.48, 0.72], p < 0.0001, R=0.94), while the SSI rate decreased linearly (ß=-0.14 [-0.27, -0.02], p = 0.0249, R=0.56), and frailty scores did not change significantly (p = 0.8124, R=0.065). Among all patients undergoing PSF, postoperative wound infection was independently associated with number of levels fused (OR=1.104 p < 0.001), frailty as measured by mFI (OR=1.150 p = 0.006), and BMI (OR=1.041 p = 0.008). Frailty was also independently associated with postoperative ICU admission (OR=1.1080 p = 0.005), 30-day readmission (OR=1.181 p < 0.001), and 30-day reoperation (OR=1.128 p < 0.001). Among all patients, rate of postoperative wound infection increased with increasing frailty (p = 0.0002) and increasing comorbid disease burden (chi-square p = 0.0012). CONCLUSION: The mFI predicts adverse events among patients undergoing PSF, including readmission, reoperation, and surgical site infection. When controlling for frailty, age was not an independent predictor of adverse events.

Neurologic, functional, and survival outcomes following surgical management of metastatic breast cancer to the spine.

OBJECTIVE: Metastatic spinal tumors commonly arise from primary breast cancer. We assessed outcomes and identified associated variables for patients who underwent surgical management for spinal metastases of breast cancer. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients surgically treated for spinal metastases of breast cancer. Neurologic and functional outcomes were analyzed via Frankel scale and Karnofksy Performance Status (KPS) scores, respectively. Variables associated with Frankel and KPS scores after surgery were identified. Multivariable analysis was used to assess predictors for postoperative survival. RESULTS: Forty-nine patients were identified. There was no significant difference in Frankel scores postoperatively and at last follow-up. KPS scores (P = 0.002) significantly improved at last follow-up. Preoperative non-ambulation and postprocedural complications were associated with non-ambulation postoperatively. Postprocedural complications and disease-free interval (DFI) < 24 and < 60 months were associated with functional impairment at last follow-up. Current smoking status at the time of surgery (P = 0.021) and triple negative (negative immunohistochemistry for estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and HER2) breast cancer (P = 0.038) were significantly associated with shortened postoperative survival. CONCLUSION: When indicated, surgery for spinal metastases of breast cancer leads to preservation of neurologic status and long-term functional improvement. Preoperative ambulatory status and postprocedural complications were associated with ambulatory status after surgery, while postprocedural complications and shortened DFI were associated with functional status after surgery.Current smoking status at the time of surgery and triple negative breast cancer are negative predictors for postoperative survival after metastatic breast cancer to the spine.

The role of preoperative embolization in the treatment of spinal metastases from renal cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: One strategy to reduce extensive intraoperative bleeding for patients undergoing surgery for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) to the spine is preoperative embolization. Prior studies have shown mixed results. The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of preoperative embolization in patients undergoing spine surgery for metastatic RCC with consideration of multiple confounders. We aim to assess blood loss and other outcomes reflective of functional status and postoperative complications. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted for 43 patients that underwent surgery for metastatic spinal RCC and either received preoperative embolization (n = 29) or did not (n = 14). Mann Whitney tests were run for initial analyses. Multivariate regression models were then used to predict outcomes while controlling for multiple demographic and preoperative variables. RESULTS: Mann Whitney tests revealed a significant difference between the mean age of patients undergoing preoperative embolization in comparison to those that did not (59.2 years versus 52.4 years; p = 0.044). We found that preoperative embolization was not significantly associated with decreased blood loss (2257 mL versus 2000 mL; p = 0.97). There were also no significant differences between groups in post-procedural complications (34.5% versus 14.3%; p = 0.097), last follow-up Nurick score (ß = 0.72, p = 0.18; 2.1 versus 1.6) or operative duration (ß = 28, p = 0.66; 408 min versus 353 min). The female gender was found to be significantly associated with higher last follow-up Nurick scores (ß = 1.24, p = 0.033). CONCLUSION: We observed no differences in blood loss or other outcomes between patients undergoing preoperative embolization and those that did not.

Surgical Site Infection, Readmission, and Reoperation After Posterior Long Segment Fusion.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case series. OBJECTIVE: We sought to identify risk factors associated with surgical site infection (SSI) after posterior long segment spinal fusion (PLSF). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Patients who undergo PLSF may be at elevated risk of SSI. Identifying factors associated with SSI in these operations can help risk stratify patients and tailor management. METHODS: We analyzed PLSFs-seven or more levels-at our institution from 2000 to 2015. Data on patients' clinical characteristics, procedural factors, and antimicrobial management were collected. Multivariable analysis identified factors independently associated with outcomes of interest. RESULTS: In 628 cases, SSI was associated with steroid use (P = 0.024, odds ratio [OR] = 2.54) and using cefazolin (P < 0.001, OR = 4.37) or bacitracin (P = 0.010, OR 3.49) irrigation, as opposed to gentamicin or other irrigation. Gram-positive infections were more likely with staged procedures (P = 0.021, OR 4.91) and bacitracin irrigation (P < 0.001, OR = 17.98), and less likely with vancomycin powder (P = 0.050, OR 0.20). Gram-negative infections were more likely with a history of peripheral arterial disease (P = 0.034, OR = 3.21) or cefazolin irrigation (P < 0.001, OR 25.47). Readmission was more likely after staged procedures (P = 0.003, OR = 3.31), cervical spine surgery (P = 0.023, OR = 2.28), or cefazolin irrigation (P = 0.039, OR = 1.85). Reoperation was more common with more comorbidities (P = 0.022, OR 1.09), staged procedures (P < 0.001, OR = 4.72), cervical surgeries (P = 0.013, OR = 2.36), more participants in the surgery (P = 0.011, OR = 1.06), using cefazolin (P < 0.001, OR = 3.12) or bacitracin (P = 0.009, OR = 3.15) irrigation, and higher erythrocyte sedimentation rate at readmission (P = 0.009, OR = 1.04). Washouts were more likely among patients with more comorbidities (P = 0.013, OR = 1.16), or who used steroids (P = 0.022, OR = 2.92), and less likely after cervical surgery (P = 0.028, OR = 0.24). Instrumentation removal was more common with bacitracin irrigation (p = 0.013, OR = 31.76). CONCLUSION: Patient factors, whether a procedure is staged, and choice of antibiotic irrigation affect the risk of SSI and ensuing management required.Level of Evidence: 4.