Prevalence and severity of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease are underestimated in clinical practice: impact of a dedicated screening approach at a large university teaching hospital.

AIMS: To define the attitudes and current clinical practice of diabetes specialists with regard to non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and, based on the results, implement an evidenced-based pathway for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease assessment. METHODS: An online survey was disseminated to diabetes specialists. Based on findings from this survey, we sought a local solution by launching an awareness campaign and implementing a screening algorithm across all diabetes clinics at a secondary/tertiary referral centre. RESULTS: A total of 133 diabetes specialists responded to the survey. Fewer than 5% of responders correctly assessed the prevalence and severity of advanced fibrotic non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in people with diabetes as 50-75%. Whilst most clinicians performed liver function tests, only 5.7% responded stating that they would use, or had used, a non-invasive algorithm to stage the severity of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Implementing a local non-alcoholic fatty liver disease awareness campaign and screening strategy using pre-printed blood request forms, we ensured that 100% (n=395) of all people with Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes mellitus attending secondary/tertiary care diabetes clinics over a 6-month period were appropriately screened for advanced fibrotic non-alcoholic fatty liver disease using the Fib-4 index; 17.9% required further investigation or assessment. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence and severity of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease are underestimated among diabetes specialists. The Fib-4 index can easily be incorporated into clinical practice in secondary/tertiary care to identify those individuals at risk of advanced fibrosis who require further assessment and who may benefit from a dedicated multidisciplinary approach to their management.

Hepatic vein transit times of a microbubble agent in assessing response to antiviral treatment in patients with chronic hepatitis C.

Microbubble measurement of hepatic vein transit times (HVTT) may have the potential to assess severity of hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related liver disease, where there is a shorter HVTT with more severe disease. We investigated the utility of this test as a marker of response to antiviral treatment. Thirty-seven patients with biopsy-proven HCV-related disease undergoing antiviral treatment were studied. All had baseline scans and then repeat scans 6 months after the end of treatment. HVTT using Levovist were obtained from the right and middle hepatic veins, and the shorter time was used for analysis. The aspartate aminotransferase to platelet ratio index (APRI) scores were calculated retrospectively. There were seven patients with mild hepatitis, 23 with moderate/severe hepatitis and seven with cirrhosis. The mean baseline HVTT in responders ± SE increased from 27.3 ± 2.29 s to 33.5 ± 2.8 s posttreatment (P = 0.01). In the 10 nonresponders, the HVTT remained the same; 43.3 ± 9 s baseline compared to 44 ± 7.8 s posttreatment (P = 0.84). This trend was also seen with the APRI score where in responders, the mean score decreased from 1.1 ± 0.2 to 0.74 ± 1 (P = 0.03) and in nonresponders, the score remained unchanged; 0.88 ± 0.2 compared to 0.84 ± 0.2 (P = 0.31). HVTT measurement lengthened, while APRI scores decreased in patients who responded to antiviral treatment while both remained the same, shortened (HVTT) or increased (APRI), respectively, in patients who were nonresponders. These results are encouraging and indicate that these tests could be potentially used as markers of response to treatment and could obviate the need for serial biopsies in antiviral future treatment studies.

Optimal combinations of ultrasound-based and serum markers of disease severity in patients with chronic hepatitis C.

Combinations of noninvasive markers may improve discrimination of chronic liver disease severity. The aims of this study were to compare four validated serum and ultrasound-based markers of hepatic disease severity head-to-head with liver biopsy and to assess optimal combinations with consideration of cost. A total of 67 patients with biopsy-proven chronic hepatitis C underwent all four techniques on the same visit [aspartate aminotransferase (AST) to platelet ratio index (APRI); Enhanced Liver Fibrosis (ELF) panel; transient elastography (TE) and ultrasound microbubble hepatic transit times (HTT)]. Markers were combined according to increasing financial cost and ordinal regression used to determine contributions. APRI, ELF, TE and HTT predicted cirrhosis with diagnostic accuracy of 86%, 91%, 90% and 83% respectively. ELF and TE were the most reliable tests with an intra-class correlation of 0.94 each. Either ELF or TE significantly enhanced the prediction of fibrosis stage when combined with APRI, but when combined together, did not improve the model further. Addition of third or fourth markers did not significantly improve prediction of fibrosis. Combination of APRI with either ELF or TE effectively predicts fibrosis stage, but combinations of three or more tests lead to redundancy of information and increased cost.