Transanal proximal rectosigmoidectomy. A new operation for severe chronic idiopathic constipation associated with megarectosigmoid.

BACKGROUND: At the severe end of the idiopathic constipation spectrum exist patients with chronic idiopathic constipation associated with an enormous megarectosigmoid, among whom few require surgery. We performed transanal proximal rectosigmoidectomy, involving preservation of a 5 cm rectal reservoir, to ameliorate inconsistent and unpredictable outcomes and fecal incontinence occurring in some patients operated on with other techniques. METHODS: We retrospectively observed patients with chronic idiopathic constipation with megarectosigmoid who underwent transanal proximal rectosigmoidectomy during July 2017-May 2018. We analyzed sex, age, operation indication, complications, functional outcome, and time of follow-up. We statistically compared the dosage of laxative before and after the procedure. RESULTS: Thirteen patients were included in the study. Median age during surgery was 8 years. In 9 cases, the indication for surgery was chronic intake of a daily high dose of Senna with failed weaning trials, and 4 had persistent fecal impaction with laxative-intolerance and refusal of rectal enemas. No intra/postoperative complications occurred. Currently, all 13 patients have daily voluntary bowel movements and no fecal accidents. Laxative dosage was significantly reduced (p = 0.007). Follow-up ranged 6-16 months. CONCLUSION: Preliminary results suggest transanal proximal rectosigmoidectomy as an adequate alternative for patients requiring surgery for chronic idiopathic constipation with megarectosigmoid. TYPE OF STUDY: Clinical research. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Transanal endorectal approach for the treatment of idiopathic rectal prolapse in children: Experience with the modified Delorme's procedure.

BACKGROUND: Persistent or recurrent idiopathic rectal prolapse in children requires surgical intervention. Several techniques have been used to repair this problem. However, recurrence and complications continue to be a challenge in the management of this condition. Here we report our experience in using the modified Delorme's procedure to treat such patients. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective observational study of patients with idiopathic rectal prolapse who underwent the modified Delorme's procedure during 2013-2017. We analyzed the clinical characteristics of the patients and the recurrence and complication rates during a follow-up of 15-68 months. RESULTS: We included 14 patients. The age at operation ranged from 2 to 17 years, and the length of the prolapse was 3-15 cm. There were no intraoperative or postoperative complications. All patients achieved postoperative fecal control, and there were no recurrences. CONCLUSION: The modified Delorme's procedure was effective for the treatment of idiopathic rectal prolapse. There were no recurrences or complications. Because it is a perineal technique, the procedure avoids the risk of nerve injury that exists for transabdominal methods.

The anal canal is the fine line between "fecal incontinence and colitis" after a pull-through for Hirschsprung disease.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Fecal incontinence after a pull-through is associated with different factors, although damage to the anal canal seems to be the most important. The objective of this article is to identify the variables related to the presence of fecal control and colitis in a homogeneous group of children after pull-through. METHODS: A retrospective cross-sectional study was performed in patients with HD for evaluation of post-operative problems from May 2014 to November 2016. The patients (39) had a transanal approach and were divided into two groups: Group 1 patients with fecal continence and Group 2 patients with fecal incontinence. RESULTS: Group 1 patients (13) had the anastomosis in the rectum, no damage to the anal canal, and a positive history of colitis. Group 2 (26) had the anastomosis at the skin, anoderm, pectinate line, or a combination of these and a negative history of colitis. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated that patients with a technical error in the anastomosis have fecal incontinence, but not colitis. Preservation of the anal canal is associated with fecal control and colitis because it is a high-pressure zone. Education for proper identification of the anal canal during a pull-through is an absolute necessity. TYPE OF STUDY: Retrospective Comparative Study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Vaginal agenesis and rectovestibular fistula. Experience utilizing distal ileum for the vaginal replacement in these patients, preserving the natural fecal reservoir.

BACKGROUND: The association of rectovestibular fistula (RVF) and vaginal agenesis (VA) presents a diagnostic and management challenge. The vaginal replacement is usually performed with rectum or sigmoid, which are the natural fecal reservoirs; thus, the fecal control could be affected. We present our experience utilizing ileum to preserve the rectum and sigmoid. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of eight patients with RVF and VA treated from May 2011 to June 2015 at two colorectal centers, at Pittsburgh and Mexico. We recorded the age at diagnosis of VA, treatment, presence of other associated malformations and outcome. RESULTS: Eight of forty-nine girls with RVF had an associated VA (16.3%). Three patients had a timely diagnosis and five a delayed diagnosis. Six patients were submitted to a vaginal replacement with ileum and achieved fecal control. Two are waiting for surgery. CONCLUSIONS: A high index of suspicion of vaginal agenesis helps in a timely diagnosis in girls with RVF. The use of ileum allows for preservation of the fecal reservoirs, thus optimizing the chance for fecal control in patients with anorectal malformations.

Primary sigmoidectomy and appendicostomy for chronic idiopathic constipation.

PURPOSE: To present our experience in patients with chronic idiopathic constipation complicated by megarectosigmoid and fecal incontinence who underwent a primary sigmoidectomy and appendicostomy. METHODS: We reviewed eight patients referred to the Colorectal Center from 2014 to 2016 with chronic idiopathic constipation and undergoing a sigmoidectomy and appendicostomy. We analyzed the previous medical treatment, indications for the surgical procedure, and outcomes. RESULTS: Age at operation was 5-19 years. Time with constipation was 4-15 years. All patients received multiple laxatives, mainly polyethylene glycol, and all had severe social problems. Four patients have autism. The indication for surgery was an unsuccessful laxative trial, refusal to continue with rectal enemas or both, and social fear of continued fecal incontinence. Post-operatively, all patients were having daily bowel movements without fecal accidents. CONCLUSION: Selected patients with chronic idiopathic constipation complicated by megarectosigmoid and fecal incontinence can obtain great benefit from primary sigmoidectomy and appendicostomy.