CSF lactate for accurate diagnosis of community-acquired bacterial meningitis.

CSF lactate measurement is recommended when nosocomial meningitis is suspected, but its value in community-acquired bacterial meningitis is controversial. We evaluated the diagnostic performance of lactate and other CSF parameters in a prospective cohort of adult patients with acute meningitis. Diagnostic accuracy of lactate and other CSF parameters in patients with microbiologically documented episodes was assessed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. The cut-offs with the best diagnostic performance were determined. Forty-five of 61 patients (74%) had a documented bacterial (n = 18; S. pneumoniae, 11; N. meningitidis, 5; other, 2) or viral (n = 27 enterovirus, 21; VZV, 3; other, 3) etiology. CSF parameters were significantly different in bacterial vs. viral meningitis, respectively (p < 0.001 for all comparisons): white cell count (median 1333 vs. 143/mm(3)), proteins (median 4115 vs. 829 mg/l), CSF/blood glucose ratio (median 0.1 vs. 0.52), lactate (median 13 vs. 2.3 mmol/l). ROC curve analysis showed that CSF lactate had the highest accuracy for discriminating bacterial from viral meningitis, with a cutoff set at 3.5 mmol/l providing 100% sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and efficiency. CSF lactate had the best accuracy for discriminating bacterial from viral meningitis and should be included in the initial diagnostic workup of this condition.

[Infection of a total knee prosthesis with Brucella spp]. / Infection d'une prothèse totale du genou par "Brucella spp".

Brucellosis, an "anthropophitic" disease of worldwide distribution can involve several organs and tissues but the osteoarticular disease is the most common complication. It can occur as sacroiliitis, bursitis, tenosynovitis or osteomyelitis. Prosthetic joint infection is a serious complication of total joint arthroplasty, with coagulase negative staphylococci and Staphylococcus aureus accounting for 50% of cases. Treatment of prosthetic infections remains complex. Prosthetic infections caused by Brucella spp are rarely described in the literature. We report a patient with a prosthetic joint infection due to Brucella spp, documented by a polymerase chain reaction. The patient has been cured after two-stage exchange of the prosthesis and long-term antimicrobial therapy.

Piperacillin-tazobactam monotherapy in high-risk febrile and neutropenic cancer patients.

Combination therapy with a beta-lactam plus an aminoglycoside has been the standard approach for treating febrile neutropenia for many years. More recently, beta-lactam monotherapy has also been shown to be a reliable and safe approach. In the present study, 763 eligible patients with fever and neutropenia received piperacillin-tazobactam monotherapy. On day 3, according to the study protocol, 165 patients with persistent fever who fulfilled the study entry criteria were randomised to receive vancomycin or a placebo. The success rate was 51% in the intention-to-treat analysis and 62% in the per-protocol analysis. The overall mortality rate was 8% (58/763), with only 18 (2.4%) deaths attributed to the initial or subsequent infection. Randomisation had no influence on the study endpoints. The adverse event rate was evaluated only in the patient population not included in the randomised part of the study. Among these patients, adverse events probably or definitely related to piperacillin-tazobactam therapy were uncommon, confirming the favourable safety profile of piperacillin-tazobactam. It was concluded that piperacillin-tazobactam could be considered as monotherapy for patients with high-risk febrile neutropenia.

[Treatment with oral antibiotics of febrile neutropenia in onco-haematology. The experience of the EORTC antimicrobial group]. / Traitement antibiotique oral des neutropénies fébriles en onco-hématologie. L'expérience du groupe antimicrobien de l'EORTC.

THE CONTEXT: Up until the nineties, the intravenous administration of a broad spectrum antibiotic was the classical treatment of any patient presenting with febrile neutropenia. Since then, in patients considered at low risk and with expected of neutropenia less than 7-10 days, oral antibiotherapy has become an attractive option. TWO LARGE STUDIES: A study by the antimicrobial group of the EORTC (European organisation for research and treatment of cancer) and a North American study have compared the efficacy of an oral combination of ciprofloxacine and amoxicillin/clavulanic acid with that of an intravenous antibiotherapy in low-risk patients presenting febrile neutropenia. In both studies, the success rate was the same in the group of patients treated with oral antibiotics and those treated with intravenous antibiotics. RESERVATIONS: These two studies were conducted in hospitalised patients. No conclusions can be drawn with regard to out-patient treatment. Out-patient management would only be possible after appropriate selection of patients at low risk.

Vancomycin versus placebo for treating persistent fever in patients with neutropenic cancer receiving piperacillin-tazobactam monotherapy.

This prospective, double-blind trial assessed whether the addition of a glycopeptide would be able to reduce the time to defervescence in neutropenic patients with cancer who had persistent fever 48-60 h after the initiation of empirical piperacillin-tazobactam monotherapy. Of 763 eligible patients, 165 with persistent fever were randomized to receive piperacillin-tazobactam therapy plus either vancomycin therapy or placebo. Defervescence was observed in 82 (95%) of 86 patients in the vancomycin group and in 73 (92%) of 79 patients in the placebo group (P=.52). The distributions of the time to defervescence were not statistically significant between the 2 groups (estimated hazard ratio, 1.03; 95% confidence interval, 0.75-1.43; P=.75). The number of additional episodes of gram-positive bacteremia and the percentage of patients for whom amphotericin B was empirically added to their therapy regimen were also similar in both groups. This study failed to demonstrate that the empirical addition of vancomycin therapy to the treatment regimen is of benefit to persistently febrile neutropenic patients with cancer.

[Review of infected total arthroplasties of the hip and knee--apropos of 28 cases]. / Revue des arthroplasties totales de la hanche et du genou infectées--à propos de 28 cas.

This study is a long-term analysis of a group of patients with infected arthroplasties of the hip or the knee. We identified 28 patients with an infected arthroplasty (22 hips, 6 knees) documented by bacterial culture or on direct examination. At the time of diagnosis and on follow-up (a mean of 46 months after treatment) we evaluated the clinical picture, the radiological appearances of the articulation and the biological parameters. 19/28 patients showed a typical clinical picture, whereas in 9 others the picture was more doubtful. The treatments were 14 two-stage replacements of the arthroplasties, 7 simple resections, 5 conservative treatments and 2 one-stage replacements. On follow-up, 25 patients were considered as cured of their infection and 3 as failures. From a functional viewpoint, 9 patients showed no limitation, whereas 19 were limited in the daily activity. Half of the patients had no pain. Radiology showed that 20/26 evaluated patients had no signs of recurrence. Paraclinical examinations are important in the diagnosis of persistent low grade infections, particularly the demonstration of bacteria by pre-surgical sampling (fine needle aspiration, culture from draining sinuses). In spite of the cure of infection, the functional and painful sequellae are often considerable. As a result of our experience, we recommend a two-stage surgical procedure. Only when the general condition of the patient is poor, or when the infection is not under control, would we envisage an alternative procedure (arthrodesis, girdelstone, conservative).

[Evaluation of antibiotic prophylaxis in neutropenic patients with hematologic malignancies]. / Evaluation de la prophylaxie antibiotique chez les patients neutropéniques avec hémopathie maligne.

The benefits of oral prophylaxis for neutropenia have remained controversial up to now. We evaluated retrospectively the effect of antibiotic prophylaxis with ciprofloxacin and penicillin on the prevention of bacterial infections in 112 cases of prolonged neutropenia in adult patients treated for haematological malignancies. 41 patients received prophylaxis between December 1993 and November 1994 while 71 patients did not receive prophylaxis between December 1994 and November 1995. There were no significant differences between groups in age, sex, type or stage of haemopathy, type of chemotherapy and duration of neutropenia. The antibiotic prophylaxis reduced the number of overall infections (p = 0.05) and the number of gram-negative bacteraemias (p = 0.02). The median time to the onset of fever, the duration of fever, the duration of antibiotic treatment, the duration of hospitalization or admission to the intensive care unit, the number of serious complications or death were not influenced by antibiotic prophylaxis. The prophylaxis did not reduce the overall incidence of bacteraemia, of clinically documented infections or of fever of unknown origin. This retrospective study confirms that oral prophylaxis with ciprofloxacin and penicillin decreases the incidence of infections and, in particular, of gram-negative bacteraemia, but does not modify the overall morbidity and mortality in our patients. In view of the risk of emergence of bacterial resistance, these data do not support the routine use of oral antibiotic prophylaxis in neutropenic patients with haematological malignancies.

Oral versus intravenous empirical antimicrobial therapy for fever in patients with granulocytopenia who are receiving cancer chemotherapy. International Antimicrobial Therapy Cooperative Group of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Intravenously administered antimicrobial agents have been the standard choice for the empirical management of fever in patients with cancer and granulocytopenia. If orally administered empirical therapy is as effective as intravenous therapy, it would offer advantages such as improved quality of life and lower cost. METHODS: In a prospective, open-label, multicenter trial, we randomly assigned febrile patients with cancer who had granulocytopenia that was expected to resolve within 10 days to receive empirical therapy with either oral ciprofloxacin (750 mg twice daily) plus amoxicillin-clavulanate (625 mg three times daily) or standard daily doses of intravenous ceftriaxone plus amikacin. All patients were hospitalized until their fever resolved. The primary objective of the study was to determine whether there was equivalence between the regimens, defined as an absolute difference in the rates of success of 10 percent or less. RESULTS: Equivalence was demonstrated at the second interim analysis, and the trial was terminated after the enrollment of 353 patients. In the analysis of the 312 patients who were treated according to the protocol and who could be evaluated, treatment was successful in 86 percent of the patients in the oral-therapy group (95 percent confidence interval, 80 to 91 percent) and 84 percent of those in the intravenous-therapy group (95 percent confidence interval, 78 to 90 percent; P=0.02). The results were similar in the intention-to-treat analysis (80 percent and 77 percent, respectively; P=0.03), as were the duration of fever, the time to a change in the regimen, the reasons for such a change, the duration of therapy, and survival. The types of adverse events differed slightly between the groups but were similar in frequency. CONCLUSIONS: In low-risk patients with cancer who have fever and granulocytopenia, oral therapy with ciprofloxacin plus amoxicillin-clavulanate is as effective as intravenous therapy.

Empiric antibiotic monotherapy with carbapenems in febrile neutropenia: a review.

Early empiric antibiotic therapy can significantly decrease the risk of mortality and infectious morbidity in patients with hematologic malignancies. Broad-spectrum antibiotics, usually a combination regimen of a beta-lactam and an aminoglycoside, have traditionally been employed against the wide variety of organisms that cause febrile episodes. However, since the 1970's, there has been a shift in epidemiology from Gram-negative to Gram-positive infections, against which traditional combination regimens have only limited efficacy. The carbapenems offer a suitable monotherapeutic alternative as they have a very broad spectrum of antibacterial activity, and equivalent efficacy and safety compared with combination regimes. Trials using imipenem/cilastatin have shown equal efficacy to ceftazidime but neurologic and gastrointestinal toxicity were observed at high doses (1 g 6-hourly). In the largest study to date, meropenem (1 g 8-hourly) provided effective, well tolerated monotherapy for patients with febrile neuropenia, equivalent to a regimen of ceftazidime plus amikacin. It is concluded that meropenem appears to be a realistic option for initial monotherapy in febrile neutropenic patients, providing therapy that is equivalent to a standard regimen of ceftazidime and amikacin.

Monotherapy with meropenem versus combination therapy with ceftazidime plus amikacin as empiric therapy for fever in granulocytopenic patients with cancer. The International Antimicrobial Therapy Cooperative Group of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer and the Gruppo Italiano Malattie Ematologiche Maligne dell'Adulto Infection Program.

Combinations of beta-lactams plus aminoglycosides have been standard therapy for suspected infections in granulocytopenic cancer patients, especially those with profound long-lasting granulocytopenia. With the advent of new broad-spectrum bactericidal antibiotics such as extended-spectrum cephalosporins or carbapenems, the need to combine beta-lactams with aminoglycosides became more controversial. The objective of this prospective randomized multicenter study was to compare the efficacy, safety, and tolerance of meropenem monotherapy with those of the combination of ceftazidime plus amikacin for the empirical treatment of fever in granulocytopenic cancer patients. Of 1,034 randomized patients, 958 were assessable in the intent-to-treat analysis for response to antibacterial therapy, including 483 in the meropenem group and 475 in the ceftazidime-plus-amikacin group. The median durations of neutropenia were 16 and 17 days, respectively. A successful outcome was reported in 270 of 483 (56%) patients treated with monotherapy compared with 245 of 475 (52%) patients treated with the combination group (P = 0.20). The success rates in the monotherapy group and the combination group were similar by type of infection (single gram-negative bacteremia, single gram-positive bacteremia, clinically documented infection, and possible infection). The occurrence of further infections assessed in patients for whom the allocated regimen was not modified did not differ between the two groups (12% in both groups). Mortality due to the presenting infection or further infection was relatively low (8 patients treated with the monotherapy compared with 13 patients treated with the combination). A total of 1,027 patients were evaluable for adverse events; the proportion of those who developed adverse effects was similar between the two groups (29% in both groups), and only 19 (4%) patients in the monotherapy group and 31 (6%) in the combination group experienced an adverse event related or probably related to the study drug. Allergic reactions were the only reason for stopping the protocol antibiotic(s) (3 and 5 patients, respectively). This study confirms that monotherapy with meropenem is as effective as the combination of ceftazidime plus amikacin for the empiric treatment of fever in persistently granulocytopenic cancer patients, and both regimens were well tolerated.

Molecular epidemiology of fluoroquinolone-resistant Escherichia coli bloodstream isolates from patients admitted to European cancer centers.

Previous reports have suggested an increasing incidence of highly fluoroquinolone-resistant Escherichia coli causing bacteremia among cancer patients on prophylactic therapy. We used genotyping by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis of chromosomal DNA digests and random amplified polymorphic DNA fingerprinting to study clonal relationships among such isolates obtained at 10 cancer centers located across Europe and the Middle East. Analysis by both methods indicated that isolates from different centers were genotypically unrelated to each other. There were five centers from which more than one individual patient isolate was available, and most demonstrated significant within-center genetic diversity of strains. Strains shared among patients could be identified at two centers. At the center with the largest number of bloodstream isolates from cancer patients available, fluoroquinolone-resistant control isolates from surgical patients and fluoroquinolone-susceptible control isolates from patients admitted to medical services during the same time period were unrelated to resistant cancer patient isolates and to each other as well. A substantial number of fluoroquinolone-resistant isolates (19 of 58) were nontypeable by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. Fluoroquinolone resistance was commonly associated with multiple antibiotic resistance to chemically unrelated antibacterial agents irrespective of the origin of the isolates.

Multicenter quality control study of amikacin assay for monitoring once-daily dosing regimens. International Antimicrobial Therapy Cooperative Group of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer.

During once-daily dosing regimens of aminoglycosides, administration of large single doses results in high peak levels and low 24-h trough levels. However, commercial assays for monitoring aminoglycoside levels are designed to cover the smaller range of serum concentrations usually observed during multiple daily dosing regimens. The study assessed (a) the range of serum concentrations during once-daily dosing of amikacin and (b) the performance of a widely used assay system for measuring concentrations within this range. A total of 42 dosing intervals from eight patients receiving a once-daily regimen of amikacin (20 mg/kg) were monitored. Median (and range) of peak, 8- and 24-h trough levels were 61 (25-89), 5.9 (2.2-19), and 1.3 (< 0.8-6.2) mg/L, respectively. The accuracy of a fluorescence polarization immunoassay for measuring concentrations of amikacin during once-daily dosing regimens was assessed in an international multicenter study. The performance of the assay was excellent for peak and 8-h concentrations; median deviations from the target concentrations were < 5%. The majority of the trough levels (26 of 42) measured in patients during once-daily treatment were within the range of 1-2 mg/L and could also be determined with an accuracy sufficient for clinical monitoring (median deviations 14%).

[Should patients over 65 years old with acute myeloid leukemia be treated with myelosuppressive chemotherapy?]. / Faut-il traiter avec une chimiothérapie aplasiante des patients de plus de 65 ans souffrant d'une leucémie myéloïde aiguë?

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is frequently encountered in elderly patients (> 65) whereas most myelosuppressive chemotherapy protocols are restricted to younger patients. We retrospectively reviewed the 21 patients older than 65 (median age: 70, range: 66-86) hospitalized in our leukemia unit for recently diagnosed AML between 1. 1. 1988 and 31. 3. 1993. 16 had de novo AML (n-AML) and 5 had AML secondary to myelodysplastic syndromes (s-AML). Induction therapy consisted of cytarabine and either daunorubicine or mitoxantrone at conventional dosage in 18/21 patients. Early consolidation therapy was given to 14/21 patients and consisted of m-AMSA and VP-16 in 11 of them. The response to, and toxicity from, myelosuppressive chemotherapy was different according to the type of AML. In patients with n-AML a complete remission (CR) was obtained in 63% (10/16) and only 19% (3/16) died of MCT-related toxicity. In contrast, only 1/5 patients with s-AML achieved CR while 4/5 died of toxicity. The median duration of CR was 40 weeks (range: 5-147+) and median overall survival 23 weeks (range: 1-211+), with an estimated 3-year overall survival rate of 9.5% (2/21). Overall survival of patients with n-AML was significantly longer than that of patients with s-AML (p < 0.05). Hospital stay in relation to survival time was 100% for patients with s-AML, 49% for patients with n-AML not achieving CR and 25% for patients with n-AML with CR. In conclusion, elderly patients with AML can benefit from myelosuppressive chemotherapy providing they present with de novo AML.

Piperacillin-tazobactam plus amikacin versus ceftazidime plus amikacin as empiric therapy for fever in granulocytopenic patients with cancer. The International Antimicrobial Therapy Cooperative Group of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer.

Gram-positive bacteria have become the predominant infecting organisms in granulocytopenic cancer patients. Empiric antibiotic regimens used in febrile neutropenic patients often include an extended-spectrum cephalosporin, but the response to therapy in gram-positive coccal bacteremia has been unsatisfactory. Thus, new antibiotics with better activity against gram-positive bacteria should be tested. The objective of this prospective randomized controlled study was to evaluate and compare the efficacy and tolerance of piperacillintazobactam plus amikacin with that of ceftazidime plus amikacin, the standard regimen of the International Antimicrobial Therapy Cooperative Group of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, in the empiric treatment of febrile granulocytopenic cancer patients. A total of 858 episodes were eligible for this study, and 706 episodes were assessable for efficacy. The antibiotic treatment was successful in 210 (61%) of 342 episodes in the piperacillin-tazobactam-amikacin group compared with 196 (54%) of 364 episodes treated with ceftazidime plus amikacin (P = 0.05). The time to defervescence was significantly shorter (P = 0.01) and the time to failure was significantly longer (P = 0.02) in the piperacillin-tazobactam-amikacin group. A significant difference in response to bacteremic infections between the two patient groups was found: piperacillin-tazobactam plus amikacin was successful in 40 of 80 episodes (50%), and ceftazidime plus amikacin was successful in 35 of 101 episodes (35%) (P = 0.05). A multivariate analysis showed that the probability of failure was significantly greater with ceftazidime plus amikacin than with piperacillin-tazobactam plus amikacin (P = 0.02). This trial suggests that piperacillin-tazobactam plus amikacin is more effective than ceftazidime plus amikacin for the empiric treatment of fever and bacteremia in granulocytopenic cancer patients. Although cutaneous reaction was more frequently associated with piperacillin-tazobactam plus amikacin than with ceftazidime-amikacin, this unwanted effect was relatively mild and its incidence was comparable to that of other penicillin compounds.

Antibiotic therapy for gram-negative bacteremia.

Although antibiotic therapy is the mainstay of therapy for gram-negative bacillary bacteremia, the amelioration of the underlying conditions, the correction of predisposing factors, the drainage of abscesses, the removal of infected foreign bodies, and adequate supportive care are also of paramount importance for curing the infection and should not be neglected. Beginning in the late 1960s, most of the clinical work on gram-negative infections has focused on the evaluation of new antibiotics. Numerous studies have shown that early, appropriate antibiotic treatment of gram-negative bacteremia significantly improved patients' outcomes and prevented the development of septic shock. Prescribing standard doses of antibiotics does not necessarily mean that therapeutic levels will be reached in all patients, and relapses of infections or breakthrough bacteremias can occur in patients with subinhibitory serum levels of antibiotics. The monitoring of serum concentrations of antibiotic is therefore recommended in critically ill septic patients. Whereas initial studies on the antibiotic treatment of gram-negative bacteremia were carried out in nonneutropenic patients, more recent clinical investigations have been performed almost exclusively in cancer patients with neutropenia. Studies conducted in the 1970s and 1980s among these patients have shown the following: (1) early empirical therapy reduced the mortality of gram-negative bacteremia; (2) therapy with a combination of two antibiotics, be it an extended spectrum penicillin plus an aminoglycoside or a third-generation cephalosporin, has significantly improved patients' outcomes; and (3) triple-drug combinations (i.e., a penicillin plus a cephalosporin plus an aminoglycoside) are not superior to combinations of beta-lactams and aminoglycosides. For the treatment of gram-negative bacteremia, clinicians today have a choice between well-established antibiotic combinations and broad-spectrum single-agent therapy with third-generation cephalosporins or carbapenem antibiotics. Although recent studies suggested that monotherapy could be as effective as combination therapy for the empirical treatment of fever in the neutropenic host, no definitive study has so far unquestionably demonstrated the equivalence of these treatments in patients with gram-negative bacteremias, especially those caused by P. aeruginosa, or in patients with adverse prognostic conditions, such as persistent and profound granulocytopenia. This literature should however be reviewed with great caution. Indeed, only a minority of studies have included a sufficient number of patients to confidently assess the impact of therapy on patients' outcomes. Obviously, small studies can have a significant risk of type II errors, that is, making false-negative conclusions.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)