Efficacy and safety of concentration-controlled everolimus with reduced-dose cyclosporine in Japanese de novo renal transplant patients: 12-month results.

BACKGROUND: No study to date has evaluated the efficacy and safety of everolimus with reduced-exposure cyclosporine in Japanese de-novo renal transplant (RTx) patients. METHODS: This 12-month, multicenter, open-label study randomized (1:1) 122 Japanese de-novo RTx patients to either an everolimus regimen (1.5 mg/day starting dose (target trough: 3 to 8 ng/ml) + reduced-dose cyclosporine) or a mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) regimen (2 g/day + standard dose cyclosporine). All patients received basiliximab and corticosteroids. Key endpoints at month 12 were composite efficacy failure (treated biopsy-proven acute rejection, graft loss, death, or loss to follow-up) and renal function (estimated glomerular filtration rate; Modification of Diet in Renal Disease-4). RESULTS: Clear cyclosporine exposure reduction was achieved in the everolimus group throughout the study (52% reduction at month 12). Month 12 efficacy failure rates showed everolimus 1.5 mg to be non-inferior to MMF (11.5% vs. 11.5%). The median estimated glomerular filtration rate at month 12 was 58.00 ml/minute/1.73 m2 in the everolimus group versus 55.25 ml/minute/1.73 m2 in the MMF group (P = 0.063). Overall, the incidence of adverse events was comparable between the groups with some differences in line with the known safety profile of the treatments. The everolimus group had a higher incidence of wound healing events and edema, whereas a higher rate of cytomegalovirus infections was reported in the MMF group. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirmed the efficacy of everolimus 1.5 mg/day (target trough: 3 to 8 ng/ml) in Japanese RTx patients for preventing acute rejection, while allowing for substantial cyclosporine sparing. Renal function and safety findings were comparable with previous reports from other RTx populations. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT00658320.

Randomized trial of everolimus-facilitated calcineurin inhibitor minimization over 24 months in renal transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Strategies allowing calcineurin inhibitor minimization while maintaining efficacy may improve renal transplant outcomes. METHODS: A2309 was a 24-month, phase IIIb, open-label trial of 833 de novo renal transplant recipients randomized to everolimus, targeting trough concentrations of 3-8 or 6-12 ng/mL plus reduced-exposure cyclosporine A (CsA) or to mycophenolic acid (MPA) 1.44 g per day plus standard-exposure CsA. All patients received basiliximab ± corticosteroids. The incidence of the primary composite efficacy endpoint and its components (treated biopsy-proven acute rejection, graft loss, death, or loss to follow-up), renal function (serum creatinine and estimated glomerular filtration rate), and adverse events (AEs) were compared at 24 months; as per the protocol, these analyses were not noninferiority. RESULTS: Composite efficacy failure rates (95% confidence interval for difference vs. MPA) were 32.9% (-2.2%, 13.0%), 26.9% (-7.9%, 6.8%), and 27.4% at month 24 in the everolimus 3-8 and 6-12 ng/mL and MPA groups, respectively. Mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (Modification of Diet in Renal Disease) at month 24 was 52.2 (-2.1, 5.5 mL/min/1.73 m(2)), 49.4 (-4.8, 2.7 mL/min/1.73 m(2)), and 50.5 mL/min/1.73 m(2), respectively. AEs were generally mild to moderate in severity and comparable between the groups. AEs leading to discontinuation were reported in 28.5% (P = 0.03 vs. MPA), 30.6% (P = 0.007 vs. MPA), and 20.5% of patients receiving everolimus 3-8 and 6-12 ng/mL and MPA, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Everolimus trough concentrations targeted to 3-8 ng/mL, along with a greater than 60% reduction in CsA exposure, was associated with comparable efficacy and renal function versus MPA plus standard-exposure CsA over the 2-year period. A significantly higher incidence of AEs led to discontinuation in the everolimus groups compared with the MPA group.

Association of clinical events with everolimus exposure in kidney transplant patients receiving reduced cyclosporine.

BACKGROUND: The association between clinical events and everolimus exposure in patients receiving reduced-exposure calcineurin inhibitor therapy is poorly explored. METHODS: In a pre-planned, descriptive analysis of data from a randomized controlled trial, events were correlated with everolimus trough concentrations in 556 newly transplanted kidney transplant patients receiving everolimus with reduced-exposure cyclosporine (CsA) and steroids. Influence of everolimus exposure on clinical events was stratified according to predefined time-normalized concentrations. RESULTS: The incidence of treated biopsy-proven acute rejection and graft loss at month 12 was highest in patients with everolimus <3 ng/mL (36.4% and 28.6%, respectively, vs. 9.1-15.3% and 0.9-5.0% with higher concentration ranges). A higher mortality rate was observed in patients with an everolimus trough concentration ≥ 12 ng/mL (10.0% vs. 1.7-5.6% with lower concentration ranges). The lowest rates of renal dysfunction (defined as poor renal function [estimated GFR, serum creatinine] or proteinuria), wound healing events, peripheral edema, new-onset diabetes mellitus, hypercholesterolemia and hypertriglyceridemia were generally observed with everolimus trough concentration in the range 3-8 ng/mL and CsA <100 ng/mL. Proteinuria occurred most frequently in patients with very low or very high everolimus trough concentrations. CONCLUSIONS: These results support an exposure-response relationship between clinical events and everolimus trough concentrations in kidney transplant patients receiving reduced-exposure CsA.

Voluntary exploratory data submissions to the US FDA and the EMA: experience and impact.

Heterogeneity in the underlying mechanisms of disease processes and inter-patient variability in drug responses are major challenges in drug development. To address these challenges, biomarker strategies based on a range of platforms, such as microarray gene-expression technologies, are increasingly being applied to elucidate these sources of variability and thereby potentially increase drug development success rates. With the aim of enhancing understanding of the regulatory significance of such biomarker data by regulators and sponsors, the US Food and Drug Administration initiated a programme in 2004 to allow sponsors to submit exploratory genomic data voluntarily, without immediate regulatory impact. In this article, a selection of case studies from the first 5 years of this programme - which is now known as the voluntary exploratory data submission programme, and also involves collaboration with the European Medicines Agency - are discussed, and general lessons are highlighted.