[Patient decision aids for cancer prevention Synthesis for the francophone community]. / Outils d'aide à la décision pour la prévention des cancers. Synthèse pour la francophonie.

In recent years, the relationship between patients and healthcare professionals, and more broadly between public health actors and citizens, has shifted from a paternalistic, top-down approach to one of increased patient involvement in decision-making. Primary and secondary cancer prevention involve both benefits and risks, underscoring the importance of informed decision-making aligned with each patient and citizen's unique values and preferences. Shared decision-making, supported by decision aids, offers patients and citizens clear and comprehensible information about their options, enabling informed choices. This article aims to compile and define the characteristics of tools developed or translated into French for this purpose.

Depuis plusieurs années, la relation entre les patients et les professionnels de la santé et plus largement entre les acteurs de la santé publique et les citoyens a évolué, passant d'une approche paternaliste et top-down à une implication accrue des patients dans les décisions les concernant. La prévention primaire et secondaire des cancers présente des bénéfices mais parfois également des risques, nécessitant une décision alignée avec les valeurs et les préférences des patients et des citoyens. La prise de décision partagée, via des outils d'aide à la décision, offre aux patients des informations claires et faciles à comprendre à propos des options qui leur sont offertes, afin de prendre une décision éclairée. Cet article vise à recenser les outils créés ou traduits en français et à en définir les caractéristiques.

Why did Swiss citizens vote to ban tobacco advertising?

In February 2022, Swiss citizens agreed to modify the Swiss Constitution to ban tobacco advertising reaching children and adolescents. This case study analyses the arguments used by both opponents and supporters of the constitutional amendment. Opponents argued that the proposed regulation went too far, threatened the economy, restricted personal freedom, was superfluous as the current law already protected youth and that it opened the door to marketing bans of other harmful products. Proponents focused on youth protection and invoked the burden of smoking on public health and the fact that advertising bans are an effective evidence-based measure. A comparison with previous campaigns to ban tobacco advertising that had failed suggests factors accounting for the positive vote in 2022. These include the strategic framing of youth protection, the separation of tobacco from other issues (such as alcohol advertising), the deteriorating image of the tobacco industry and the ability of the proponents to mobilise a broad coalition of health and youth organisations, with improved funding and communication. The lessons may be instructive for other campaigns seeking to regulate commercial determinants of health.

[New puff-like disposable electronic cigarettes: expert consensus on their regulation]. / Nouvelles cigarettes électroniques jetables « puffs ¼ : consensus d'expert-e-s sur leur réglementation.

New disposable electronic cigarettes have arrived on the Swiss market since 2020. Our study, conducted according to the three steps of the Delphi fast-track approach developed at Unisanté, obtained a consensual agreement among French-speaking Switzerland experts on the regulation of these products. Ideally, the panel of experts recommends a sales ban of the product. If this is not possible, a number of aspects should be strictly regulated: taxation, product composition and marketing, and sales and consumption restrictions. These regulations should go further than the current European directive and the future Swiss law. The conclusions will be useful to support and guide political decision making from a public health and environmental perspective.

De nouvelles cigarettes électroniques jetables sont arrivées sur le marché suisse depuis 2020. Notre étude, conduite selon les trois étapes de la démarche Delphi fast-track développée à Unisanté, a obtenu un accord consensuel entre expert-e-s suisses romand-e-s sur la réglementation de ces produits. Dans l'idéal, le panel d'expert-e-s recommande une interdiction de vente du produit. Si cela n'est pas possible, certains aspects doivent être strictement réglementés : taxation, composition des produits et marketing, restrictions de vente et de consommation. Ces réglementations devraient aller plus loin que l'actuelle directive européenne et la future loi suisse. Les conclusions seront utiles pour soutenir et orienter la prise de décision politique dans une perspective de santé publique et environnementale.

Cigarette smoking during pregnancy and adverse perinatal outcomes: a cross-sectional study over 10 years.

BACKGROUND: It has been shown that active exposure to tobacco is associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes including, but not limited to, intrauterine fetal death, reduced fetal weight, and higher risk of preterm birth. We want to investigate these effects in a high-income country. METHODS: This cross-sectional study examined 20,843 pregnant women who delivered over 10 years at the Maternity Hospital of the Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV) in Lausanne, Switzerland. The objective was to evaluate a dose-response relationship between daily cigarette use during pregnancy and possible adverse perinatal outcomes. The social and clinical characteristics as well as obstetric and neonatal outcomes were compared between the smoking and the non-smoking groups. Adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and trend analyses (ptrend) were calculated. RESULTS: Nineteen thousand five hundred fifty-four pregnant women met the inclusion criteria and 2,714 (13.9%) of them were smokers. Even after adjusting for confounding factors, smoking during pregnancy was associated with preterm birth, birthweight < 2500 g, intrauterine growth restriction, neonatal respiratory and gastrointestinal diseases, transfer to the neonatal intensive care unit, and neonatal intensive care unit admissions > 7 days. Intrauterine death and neonatal infection were associated with heavy smoking (≥ 20 cigarettes/day). Smoking appeared to be a protective factor for pre-eclampsia and umbilical cord arterial pH below 7.1. A significant trend (ptrend < 0.05) was identified for preterm birth, intrauterine growth restriction, birthweight < 2500 g, umbilical cord arterial pH below 7.1, transfers to our neonatal intensive care unit, and neonatal intensive care unit admissions more than 7 days. CONCLUSION: Cigarette smoking is associated with several adverse perinatal outcomes of pregnancy with a dose-dependent effect.

Nicotine Replacement Therapy for Smokers with Acute Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: An International Survey.

INTRODUCTION: Smoking prevalence is twice as high among patients admitted to hospital because of the acute condition of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) as in the general population. Smoking cessation may improve the prognosis of aSAH, but nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) administered at the time of aSAH remains controversial because of potential adverse effects such as cerebral vasospasm. We investigated the international practice of NRT use for aSAH among neurosurgeons. METHODS: The online SurveyMonkey software was used to administer a 15-question, 5-min online questionnaire. An invitation link was sent to those 1425 of 1988 members of the European Association of Neurosurgical Societies (EANS) who agreed to participate in surveys to assess treatment strategies for withdrawal of tobacco smoking during aSAH. Factors contributing to physicians' posture towards NRT were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 158 physicians from 50 nations participated in the survey (response rate 11.1%); 68.4% (108) were affiliated with university hospitals and 67.7% (107) practiced at high-volume neurovascular centers with at least 30 treated aSAH cases per year. Overall, 55.7% (88) of physicians offered NRT to smokers with aSAH, 22.1% (35) offered non-NRT support including non-nicotine medication and counselling, while the remaining 22.1% (35) did not actively support smoking cessation. When smoking was not possible, 42.4% (67) of physicians expected better clinical outcomes when prescribing NRT instead of nicotine deprivation, 36.1% (57) were uncertain, 13.9% (22) assumed unaffected outcomes, and 7.6% (12) assumed worse outcomes. Only 22.8% (36) physicians had access to a local smoking cessation team in their practice, of whom half expected better outcomes with NRT as compared to deprivation. CONCLUSIONS: A small majority of the surveyed physicians of the EANS offered NRT to support smoking cessation in hospitalized patients with aSAH. However, less than half believed that NRT could positively impact clinical outcome as compared to deprivation. This survey demonstrated the lack of consensus regarding use of NRT for hospitalized smokers with aSAH.

The neighborhood environment and its association with the spatio-temporal footprint of tobacco consumption and changes in smoking-related behaviors in a Swiss urban area.

This study aimed to evaluate the association of the neighborhood environment with the spatio-temporal dependence of tobacco consumption and changes in smoking-related behaviors in a Swiss urban area. Data were obtained from the CoLaus cohort (2003-2006, 2009-2012, and 2014-2017) in Lausanne, Switzerland. Local Moran's I was performed to assess the spatial dependence of tobacco consumption. Prospective changes in tobacco consumption and the location of residence of participants were assessed through Cox regressions. Analyses were adjusted by individual and neighborhood data. The neighborhood environment was spatially associated with tobacco consumption and changes in smoking-related behaviors independently of individual factors.

[Community-based medical practice. New academic teaching through a mass COVID-19 screening]. / Pratique médicale communautaire - Un nouvel enseignement universitaire à l'occasion d'un dépistage de masse de Covid-19.

Clusters of COVID-19 cases emerged during the months of December 2020 and January 2021 in the Vaud Alps. This epidemiological situation was worrying, as it appeared before a winter holiday period. In view of this epidemiological risk, the cantonal authorities decided to carry out mass screening in three communes from 5 to 13 February 2021 in addition to the standard measures in place. Seeing an opportunity to create innovative university teaching, Unisanté set up a new course for medical students of the University of Lausanne called Community Medical Practice. This immersion in the practice of public health enabled some thirty students to carry out several activities (clinical, research and epidemiological) in a unique pandemic context.

L'émergence de clusters de cas de Covid-19 a été constatée de décembre 2020 à janvier 2021 dans les Alpes vaudoises. Cette situation épidémiologique est devenue préoccupante, puisqu'elle est apparue avant une période de vacances hivernales. Face à ce risque épidémiologique, les autorités cantonales ont décidé d'effectuer un dépistage de masse, du 5 au 13 février 2021, dans trois communes en complément des mesures en vigueur. Voyant l'occasion de créer un exercice pédagogique novateur, Unisanté a mis en place un nouvel enseignement destiné aux étudiant·e·s de médecine de l'université de Lausanne, nommé Pratique médicale communautaire. Cette immersion dans la pratique de santé publique a permis à une trentaine d'étudiant·e·s d'exercer plusieurs activités (cliniques, de recherche et épidémiologiques) dans un contexte unique de pandémie.

International expert consensus on electronic nicotine delivery systems and heated tobacco products: a Delphi survey.

OBJECTIVES: To provide a consensus from a panel of international experts about electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) and heated tobacco products (HTP). DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. METHODS: A Delphi survey was conducted among international experts in tobacco control and smoking cessation. The first part addressed statements or recommendations about ENDS, the second about HTP, both divided into four categories: regulation, sale, use and general issues. SETTING: Experts from 15 countries. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals with clinical, public health or research expertise in tobacco control and/or smoking cessation. RESULTS: 268 experts were contacted, 92 (34%) completed the first, 55/92 (60%) the second round. Consensus for ENDS: components of e-liquids, an upper limit of nicotine concentration should be defined; a warning on the lack of evidence in long-term safety and addiction potential should be stated; ENDS should not be regulated as consumer products but either as a new category of nicotine delivery or tobacco products; ENDS should not be sold in general stores but in specialised shops, shops selling tobacco or in pharmacies with restriction on sale to minors; administration of illegal drugs is likely with ENDS. Consensus for HTP: HTP have the same addictive potential as cigarettes; they should be regulated as a tobacco product with similar warning messages as cigarettes; their advertisement should not be allowed. ENDS and HTP use should not be allowed in indoor public places; a specific tax should be implemented for ENDS, taxes on HTP should not be lower than those for cigarettes; use of cigarettes is more likely with both ENDS and HTP (dual use) than quitting smoking. CONCLUSIONS: Experts in tobacco control and/or smoking cessation recommend differential regulation for ENDS and HTP. The results of this survey may be useful for health authorities, decision makers and researchers of the tobacco use and cessation field.

Spatial clusters of daily tobacco consumption before and after a smoke-free policy implementation.

This study assessed the spatial dependence of daily tobacco consumption and how it is spatially impacted by individual and neighborhood socioeconomic determinants, and tobacco consumption facilities before and after a smoke-free implementation. Individual data was obtained from the Bus Santé, a cross-sectional survey in Geneva. Spatial clusters of high and low tobacco consumption were assessed using Getis-Ord Gi*. Daily tobacco consumption was not randomly clustered in Geneva and may be impacted by tobacco consumption facilities independently of socioeconomic factors and a smoking ban. Spatial analysis should be considered to highlight the impact of smoke-free policies and guide public health interventions.

[Mass testing for Covid-19 : what can we learn from real-world implementation ?] / Dépistage de masse du Covid-19 : quelles leçons tirer des récentes expériences ?

While several modelling studies suggest mass testing for SARS-CoV-2 could be effective, real-world attempts at implementation have not been sufficient to evaluate its contribution to controlling the pandemic. To slow the spread of the virus, a mass-testing campaign would need frequent testing over a prolonged period with high rates of participation, all while maintaining public health measures. Screening seems more useful for targeted populations or high-risk events (businesses, teaching facilities, public or private institutions, sporting or cultural events). With their low cost and rapid results, rapid tests should be favored for these interventions.

Bien que des modélisations de dépistage de masse pour le SARS-CoV-2 suggèrent une certaine efficacité, leur réalisation en pratique n'a, à ce jour, pas été confirmée et leur potentiel impact en termes de contrôle sur la pandémie reste à démontrer. Pour espérer endiguer la propagation du virus, il faut réaliser un dépistage fréquent, sur une période prolongée, et atteindre un taux de participation très élevé, cela tout en maintenant les mesures sanitaires. Le dépistage semble toutefois envisageable s'il est ciblé sur une population ou un événement à risque (entreprises, lieux de formation, établissements publics ou privés, manifestations sportives ou culturelles). De par leur faible coût et leur rendu rapide du résultat, les tests rapides sont à favoriser pour de telles stratégies interventionnelles de dépistage.

May direct-to-consumer genetic testing have an impact on general practitioners' daily practice? a cross-sectional study of patients' intentions towards this approach.

BACKGROUND: Direct-to-consumer genetic testing (DTCGT) offers individuals access to information on their probable risks of suffering from a wide range of chronic diseases. General practitioners (GPs) will probably play a major role in supporting its use, but patients' perception of DTCGT remain unclear. This study aimed to describe those attitudes and expectations and how they might affect GPs' daily practices. METHODS: In 2018-2019, a study related to the use of DTCGT for preventive care in general medicine was conducted among patients in Switzerland's French-speaking areas. Data were collected in the waiting room using a self-administrated questionnaire about patients' interest in DTCGT and what their attitudes might be if testing revealed an elevated risk of diabetes, colorectal cancer, or Alzheimer's disease. RESULTS: About 40% of the 929 participating (participation rate about 80%) patients had heard about DTCGT and, once the test had been explained, 43% reported that they would be interested in being tested. If that testing suggested an elevated risk of disease, the majority of patients reported that they would change their lifestyle (65%-81%, depending on the disease), request more examinations (63%-77%), and expect changes in their GP's follow-up (48%-59%). Personal characteristics such as sex, age, urbanity, marital status, and perceived health were factors predictive of patients' attitudes. CONCLUSION: Findings indicated that the generalization of DTCGT might affect GPs' daily practices in terms of workload and knowledge about this approach. However, this result must be qualified by the fact that it is based on hypothetical situations.

[To screen or not to screen after age 75 ?] / Dépistages : que faire au-delà de 75 ans ?

The older population is heterogenous: at the same age, elderly patients can be robust, frail or dependent. Screening decisions must be individualized, taking into account the remaining life expectancy, the Time to Benefit (TTB: delay until preventive care gives a benefit), and patient preferences. Thus, robust patients, who have a longer life expectancy, can still benefit from some screening tests over age 75 that are inappropriate in vulnerable or dependent patients whose life expectancy is shorter than the TTB. Discussing life expectancy issues remains difficult outside of crises but medical encounters are unique opportunities to inquire about individual preferences and expectations, in order to define care objectives and discuss advanced care planning.

La population âgée est hétérogène : à âge identique, les patients peuvent être robustes, vulnérables ou dépendants. Le dépistage doit être individualisé en mettant en relation l'espérance de vie résiduelle estimée (EVR), le Time To Benefit (TTB : délai jusqu'à l'apparition de bénéfices après intervention) et les préférences du patient. Ainsi, les patients robustes, dont l'EVR est supérieure au TTB, peuvent encore bénéficier de certains examens de dépistage après 75 ans alors qu'ils seront inappropriés chez ceux dont l'EVR est inférieure au TTB (vulnérables, dépendants). Bien que discuter de l'EVR puisse être ardu, chaque consultation est une opportunité pour l'aborder, s'enquérir des préférences et attentes du patient quant à sa santé afin de définir ensemble les modalités de sa prise en charge et de son projet de soins anticipés.

[Lung cancer screening: what can we tell our patients while we await a screening program†?] / Dépistage du cancer du poumon†: que dire à nos patient·e·s en attendant un programme organisé†?

The NLST study in the United States showed, in 2011, that low-dose lung CT scans can reduce lung cancer mortality but was limited in its routine recommendation by 96% of false positive screening results. The European NELSON trial, published in 2020, confirmed a 24% decrease in lung cancer mortality and, by using lung nodule volume and volume doubling time, decreased false positive results to 56% of positive tests. The implementation of screening programs is now expected in Europe, including Switzerland. In anticipation, we have developed a decision aid to present patients with the benefits (decreased lung cancer mortality), risks (false positives and indeterminate results), and uncertainties (incidental findings) of lung cancer screening.

L'étude clinique américaine National Lung Screening Trial a démontré en 2011 que le dépistage du cancer du poumon par CT-scan thoracique à faible dose (low-dose) pouvait en diminuer la mortalité, mais était limité dans son applicabilité par une proportion rédhibitoire de 96 % de faux positifs. L'étude clinique européenne Nederlands-Leuven Screening Onderzoek, publiée en 2020, confirme une diminution de la mortalité du cancer du poumon de 24 % et, en se basant sur le temps de doublement du volume des nodules pulmonaires, a pu réduire la prévalence de faux positifs à 56 %. Des programmes de dépistage se préparent dans plusieurs pays européens, y compris la Suisse. Dans ce contexte, nous avons développé une aide à la décision qui reprend les bénéfices (diminution de la mortalité), les risques (faux positifs et résultats indéterminés) et incertitudes (découvertes fortuites) du dépistage du cancer du poumon.

Primary Care-Led Transition Clinics Hold Promise in Improving Care Transitions for Cancer Patients Facing Social Disparities: A Commentary.

Transitions in care are key junctions during which care coordination, communication, and individualized support are required to ensure optimal health outcomes for patients. This is particularly true for patients who face social disparities, such as poverty, limited health literacy, or belonging to a racial or ethnic minority, who are particularly at risk for experiencing poor care transitions. Interdisciplinary primary care-led transition clinics are an intervention that have shown promise in improving care transitions for diverse patient populations, including those that face social disparities, but their role in improving transitions in cancer care remains largely untapped. In this commentary we highlight why the time-limited support of an interdisciplinary primary care-led transition clinic that targets socially vulnerable cancer patients holds the promise of achieving more equitable healthcare access, healthcare quality, and ultimately more equitable health outcomes for cancer patients.

Self-reported screening practices of family physicians participating in the colorectal cancer screening program of the canton of Vaud: a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: The organized colorectal cancer (CRC) screening program in the canton of Vaud, Switzerland offers citizens the choice of the faecal immunochemical test (FIT) or colonoscopy via a visit with a family physician (FP). Given the central role of FPs in the program, this study aimed to compare their self-reported preventive practices with the objectives of the program, namely to inform patients about CRC screening and present the choice of colonoscopy and FIT, and to identify factors associated with presenting a choice of tests. METHODS: Mixed-methods study using an online survey and semi-structured interviews. Participants were FPs from the canton of Vaud who had included ≥1 patient in the screening program. We used multivariate logistic regression to compare FPs offering only colonoscopy to those who offered a choice of tests or FIT. RESULTS: The participation rate was 40% (177 respondents / 443 eligible). Most FPs (68%) reported informing more than 75% of eligible patients about the program. Lack of time (n = 86, 33%) was the principal reason cited for not informing patients. Regarding the screening methods, 20% (n = 36) of FPs prescribed only colonoscopy, 13% (n = 23) only FIT and 65% (n = 115) both screening methods. Predictors of offering only colonoscopy rather than a choice of screening tests included: first, FP reporting that they chose/would choose colonoscopy for themselves (OR 8.54 [95% CI 1.83-39.79, P < 0.01]); second, being > 20 years in practice (OR 4.8 [95% CI 1.3-0.17.66, P = 0.02]); and third, seeing 300 or more patients per month (OR 3.05 [95% CI 1.23-7.57, P = 0.02]). When asked what could improve the program, 17% (n = 31) wrote that patients should be informed in advance about the program by postal mail and a large-scale communication campaign. CONCLUSION: The majority of FPs reported CRC screening practices consistent with the objectives of the program. However, to ensure that patients are well informed and to save time, all patients need to be systematically informed about the program. Further, FPs should be encouraged to offer a choice of tests.

[Environmental impact of tobacco]. / Impact environnemental du tabagisme.

Tobacco has not only negative effects on health; it also has an environmental impact. Each year, tobacco production requires 22 000 billion liters of water, mainly for cultivation. Thousands hectares of forestland are cleared annually, largely for the desiccation of tobacco leaves. Cigarette production is responsible for 84 million tons of CO2 equivalent. This paper reviews the environmental impact of the production and consumption of cigarettes from tobacco growing and manufacturing to consumption and waste production, and compares it with current consumption data.

Le tabac a non seulement des effets négatifs sur la santé, mais également un impact environnemental. La production de tabac nécessite 22 000 milliards de litres d'eau par année, principalement pour la culture. La surface de déforestation, en grande partie pour le processus de dessiccation des feuilles de tabac concerne des milliers d'hectares par an. La production de cigarettes est à l'origine de 84 millions de tonnes d'équivalent CO2. Cet article résume l'impact environnemental de la production et consommation des cigarettes, en décrivant les différentes étapes, de la culture du tabac et manufacture jusqu'à la consommation et production de déchets, et fait des comparatifs avec des données de consommation courante.

Variation in colorectal cancer testing between primary care physicians: a cross-sectional study in Switzerland.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the proportion of 50-75-year-old patients who visit a primary care physician's (PCP) office and were tested for colorectal cancer (CRC) by either colonoscopy within 10 years or fecal occult blood testing (FOBT) within 2 years. To describe the variation in care between PCPs and factors associated with these proportions. METHODS: Cross-sectional data collected between April and December 2017. PARTICIPANTS: PCPs reporting for the Swiss Sentinel Surveillance Network. Each PCP collected demographic data and CRC testing status from 40 consecutive patients. MEASUREMENTS: proportions of patients up to date with CRC screening and method used (colonoscopy/FOBT/Other); variation in the outcome measures between PCPs; association of physician-level factors with main outcomes. RESULTS: 91/129 PCPs collected data from 3451 patients; 45% had been tested for CRC within recommended intervals (41% colonoscopy, 4% FOBT). The proportions of patients tested and testing with colonoscopy versus FOBT varied widely between PCPs. Language region was associated with PCPs' rate of FOBT prescription. CONCLUSIONS: Less than half of patients who visited PCPs in Switzerland were tested for CRC within recommended intervals. PCPs varied widely in their testing practices.