The Oswestry Spinal Risk Index (OSRI) in assessing prognosis of patients with spinal metastases.

Introduction: The Oswestry Spinal Risk Index (OSRI) was designed to predict life expectancy of patients presenting with spinal metastases. It integrates the most predictive items of existing scores and is calculated using not more than two items: General condition and primary tumor. Research question: The purpose of this study was to externally validate the OSRI in a large cohort and to compare it with the established scores. Material and methods: We retrospectively identified 211 consecutive surgical patients with symptomatic spinal metastases. We collected clinical and radiographic data, such as Karnofsky Performance Score (KPS), Frankel Status, primary tumor pathology and metastatic spread to calculate the Tokuhashi score, Tomita score, modified Bauer score and the OSRI. Logistic regression models, Kaplan-Meyer-curves, discriminant power and variance analyses were applied using Harrell's C-index and Cox and Snell's Pseudo R². Results: Predicted and actual survival of our cohort's patients correlated significantly in each investigated scoring systems (p < 0.001). In test quality measurements Tokuhashi score performed best (C = 0.7204; R² = 0.3619), followed by OSRI (C = 0.7023; R² = 0.2612), Tomita (C = 0.6748; R² = 0.2818) and modified Bauer score (C = 0.6653; R² = 0.2486). Accuracy of predicted life expectancy was highest in modified Bauer score and OSRI. Discussion and conclusion: Compared to the original scores, the OSRI provided equal or even superior results in assessing our study population's life expectancy. Its particular advantage lies in the simplicity of its application, which well meets the demands of surgical decision-making in daily practice.

Acute gastrointestinal bleeding: results from the prospective German electronic registry of nearly 11 000 endoscopies (ALGK GI-bleeding registry).

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Gastrointestinal bleeding is frequently observed in the German population. However, recent epidemiological data are not available. This study aimed to elucidate gastrointestinal bleeds under real-life conditions in 3 German hospitals. By using a standardized electronic documentation system, a large number of consecutive endoscopies could be established, thus offering representative data. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From June 2017 to December 2018, all upper and lower gastrointestinal tract endoscopies were recorded consecutively in the 3 hospitals. The electronic documentation system used included a case report form for storing data on bleeding as obligatory input for completion of the endoscopy report. In the case of gastrointestinal bleeding, specific data on the bleeding source and intensity, as well as individual characteristics, were documented. RESULTS: A total of 10 948 consecutive endoscopies were recorded, and 10 904 could be analyzed. Signs of gastrointestinal bleeding were found in 863 patients (7.9 % of all endoscopies performed), 538 patients with an intake of hemostasis-affecting drugs, and 325 patients without (62.3 % and 37.7 %, respectively). Platelet inhibitors and anticoagulants were the most frequently used hemostasis-affecting medication. There was a significant increase in age from patients without bleeding (median 68.5 years) to patients with bleeding (73.5 years) and to patients with bleeding who took hemostasis-affecting medication (80.4 years). Among the patients, 257 (29.8 %) and 606 (70.2 %) presented with major and minor bleeding, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: About 8 % of all patients undergoing upper or lower gastrointestinal endoscopy reveal signs of bleeding. A considerable number are older patients taking hemostasis-affecting drugs.