Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros











Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis ; 7(5): e2221, 2013.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23675549

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Neglected tropical diseases are co-endemic in many areas of the world, including sub Saharan Africa. Currently lymphatic filariasis (albendazole/ivermectin) and trachoma (azithromycin) are treated separately. Consequently, financial and logistical benefit can be gained from integration of preventive chemotherapy programs in such areas. METHODOLOGY/FINDINGS: 4 villages in two co-endemic districts (Kolondièba and Bougouni) of Sikasso, Mali, were randomly assigned to coadministered treatment (ivermectin/albendazole/azithromycin) or standard therapy (ivermectin/albendazole with azithromycin 1 week later). These villages had previously undergone 4 annual MDA campaigns with ivermectin/albendazole and 2 with azithromycin. One village was randomly assigned to each treatment arm in each district. There were 7515 eligible individuals in the 4 villages, 3011(40.1%) of whom participated in the study. No serious adverse events occurred, and the majority of adverse events were mild in intensity (mainly headache, abdominal pain, diarrhoea and "other signs/symptoms"). The median time to the onset of the first event, of any type, was later (8 days) in the two standard treatment villages than in the co-administration villages. Overall the number of subjects reporting any event was similar in the co-administration group compared to the standard treatment group [18.7% (281/1501) vs. 15.8% (239/1510)]. However, the event frequency was higher in the coadministration group (30.4%) than in the standard treatment group (11.0%) in Kolondièba, while the opposite was observed in Bougouni (7.1% and 20.9% respectively). Additionally, the overall frequency of adverse events in the co-administration group (18.7%) was comparable to or lower than published frequencies for ivermectin+albendazole alone. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that co-administration of ivermectin+albendazole and azithromycin is safe; however the small number of villages studied and the large differences between them resulted in an inability to calculate a meaningful overall estimate of the difference in adverse event rates between the regimens. Further work is therefore needed before co-administration can be definitively recommended. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT01586169.


Asunto(s)
Antihelmínticos/efectos adversos , Antibacterianos/efectos adversos , Filariasis Linfática/tratamiento farmacológico , Filariasis Linfática/prevención & control , Tracoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Tracoma/prevención & control , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Albendazol/efectos adversos , Albendazol/uso terapéutico , Antihelmínticos/uso terapéutico , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Azitromicina/efectos adversos , Azitromicina/uso terapéutico , Quimioprevención/efectos adversos , Quimioprevención/métodos , Niño , Preescolar , Coinfección/tratamiento farmacológico , Coinfección/prevención & control , Quimioterapia Combinada/efectos adversos , Quimioterapia Combinada/métodos , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/epidemiología , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/patología , Femenino , Humanos , Ivermectina/efectos adversos , Ivermectina/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Malí , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedades Desatendidas/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedades Desatendidas/prevención & control , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA