Standardizing terms, definitions and concepts for describing and interpreting unwanted immunogenicity of biopharmaceuticals: recommendations of the Innovative Medicines Initiative ABIRISK consortium.

Biopharmaceuticals (BPs) represent a rapidly growing class of approved and investigational drug therapies that is contributing significantly to advancing treatment in multiple disease areas, including inflammatory and autoimmune diseases, genetic deficiencies and cancer. Unfortunately, unwanted immunogenic responses to BPs, in particular those affecting clinical safety or efficacy, remain among the most common negative effects associated with this important class of drugs. To manage and reduce risk of unwanted immunogenicity, diverse communities of clinicians, pharmaceutical industry and academic scientists are involved in: interpretation and management of clinical and biological outcomes of BP immunogenicity, improvement of methods for describing, predicting and mitigating immunogenicity risk and elucidation of underlying causes. Collaboration and alignment of efforts across these communities is made difficult due to lack of agreement on concepts, practices and standardized terms and definitions related to immunogenicity. The Innovative Medicines Initiative (IMI; www.imi-europe.org), ABIRISK consortium [Anti-Biopharmaceutical (BP) Immunization Prediction and Clinical Relevance to Reduce the Risk; www.abirisk.eu] was formed by leading clinicians, academic scientists and EFPIA (European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations) members to elucidate underlying causes, improve methods for immunogenicity prediction and mitigation and establish common definitions around terms and concepts related to immunogenicity. These efforts are expected to facilitate broader collaborations and lead to new guidelines for managing immunogenicity. To support alignment, an overview of concepts behind the set of key terms and definitions adopted to date by ABIRISK is provided herein along with a link to access and download the ABIRISK terms and definitions and provide comments (http://www.abirisk.eu/index_t_and_d.asp).

Incorporation of an interferon-ß neutralizing antibody assay into routine clinical practice.

BACKGROUND: Incorporation of routine clinical testing for neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) to interferon (IFN)-ß has remained problematic. With increasing treatment choice for patients, routine NAb testing should be incorporated to aid therapeutic decisions. OBJECTIVE: We sought to improve interpretation of NAb results by combining the luciferase NAb assay (luciferase gene expression assay under control of interferon-stimulated response element) and in-vivo biomarker (myxovirus A protein, MxA) induction in patients with MS. METHODS: Blood samples (serum and PAXGene(®) for RNA) were obtained pre-injection and 12 hours post-injection of IFN-ß from 144 subjects. Sera were tested for NAbs using the luciferase assay. MxA expression was quantified by real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR). RESULTS: 26% of samples were NAb positive (titre > 20 NU). There was no difference in NAb titres in the pre- or post-dose sera (p = 0.643). MxA expression was inhibited in a dose-dependent fashion in NAb positive samples. Mean MxA level post-IFN-ß: NAb negative 2330 (95% CI 1940-2719), NAb 20-99 NU 1533 (95% CI 741-2324), NAb 100-600 NU 832 (186-1478) and NAb > 600 NU 101 (95% CI 0-224). NAb titre and MxA level correlated strongly: MxA pre- (Spearman r = -0.72, p < 0.0001), MxA post- (Spearman r = -0.79, p < 0.0001) and MxA induction (Spearman r = -0.67, p = 0.0004). CONCLUSION: A single, 12-hour post-injection sample should be used to test for NAbs using the luciferase assay and IFN-ß bioactivity (MxA) in the clinical setting.