Safety and Feasibility of No.12a Lymph Node Dissection by Portal Vein Approach in Radical Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Traditional laparoscopic No.12a lymph node dissection in radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer may damage the peripheral blood vessels, and is not conducive to the full exposure of the portal vein and the root ligation of the left gastric vein. We recommend a new surgical procedure, the portal vein approach, to avoid these problems. METHODS: 25 patients with advanced gastric cancer underwent radical laparoscopic gastrectomy and No.12a lymph node were dissected by portal vein approach, including 7 cases with total gastrectomy, 18 cases with distal gastric resection, 14 males and 11 females. Operative time, intraoperative blood loss, time to first flatus, postoperative hospital stay, number of total lymph node dissection and No.12a lymph node dissection, No.12a lymph node metastasis rate and postoperative complications were statistically observed. RESULTS: All the patients were operated successfully and No.12a lymph node were cleaned by portal vein approach. A total of 683 lymph nodes were dissected, with the average number of lymph nodes dissection and positive lymph nodes were (27.3 ± 12.7) and (3.8 ± 5.6) respectively. The average number of No.12a lymph node dissection was (2.4 ± 1.95) and the metastasis rate of No.12a lymph node was 16% (4/25). The average operation time of radical laparoscopic distal and total gastrectomy were (239.2 ± 51.4) min and (295.1 ± 27.7) min respectively. The mean intraoperative blood loss was (134.0 ± 65.7) ml, and postoperative first anal exhaust time was (2.24 ± 0.86) d. The mean time to fluid intake was (4.2 ± 1.7) d, and postoperative hospitalization time was (9.6 ± 5.0) d. Without portal vein injure, anastomotic leakage, gastrointestinal bleeding, intestinal obstruction and other complications were observed in all patient. CONCLUSION: Our results show that the laparoscopic No.12a lymph node dissection by portal vein approach for gastric cancer is safe, feasible and has certain clinical application value.

Laparoscopic resection is better than endoscopic dissection for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor between 2 and 5 cm in size: a case-matched study in a gastrointestinal center.

BACKGROUND: The feasibility of endoscopic dissection for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor (gGIST) between 2 and 5 cm in size has been demonstrated. However, its impact on short-term and long-term outcomes, compared with laparoscopic resection, is unknown. The purpose of this study was to compare short-term and long-term outcomes between laparoscopic resection and endoscopic dissection for 2-5-cm gGIST. METHODS: A case-matched study was performed using the propensity score. To overcome selection bias, we performed a 1:1 match using six covariates, including age, sex, BMI, ASA score, tumor size, and tumor location. Short-term and long-term outcomes between laparoscopic resection and endoscopic dissection were compared. RESULTS: A total of 210 patients with 2-5-cm gGIST were enrolled between 2006 and 2017 in our gastrointestinal center. According to the intention-to-treat approach, 165 patients underwent laparoscopic resection, and 45 patients underwent endoscopic dissection. After the propensity score, 45 pairs were balanced and analyzed. There was no significant difference in the baseline characteristics between the laparoscopic and endoscopic groups after matching. The rate of complications was significantly higher in the endoscopic group compared with the laparoscopic group (P < 0.001). Perforations occurred in 16 patients in the endoscopic group (16/45, 35.6%). The postoperative hospital stay was significantly longer in the endoscopic group compared with the laparoscopic group (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference between the two groups in disease-free survival or overall survival. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic resection is better than endoscopic dissection for 2-5-cm gGIST because of the lower complication rate and shorter hospital stay.

Real-time in vivo optical biopsy using confocal laser endomicroscopy to evaluate distal margin in situ and determine surgical procedure in low rectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: In low rectal cancer, a negative distal margin (DM) is necessary for R0 radical resection, and therefore, the choice of surgical procedure is dependent on whether the planned transection rectum has residual cancer or not. Currently, surgeons choose surgical procedures according to intraoperative in vitro DM frozen sections. This study aimed to investigate the feasibility of real-time in vivo optical biopsy using confocal laser endomicroscopy (CLE) to evaluate DM in situ and determine the surgical procedure in low rectal cancer. METHODS: Optical biopsy using CLE was performed when the rectum was dissected at the levator ani plane and rectum transection was ready. For negative DM, the surgical procedure of low anterior resection (LAR) was chosen. For positive DM, the surgical procedure of abdominoperineal resection (APR) was chosen. The specimen at the site of the planned transection rectum underwent intraoperative frozen section and routine pathological procedures. RESULTS: Eighteen patients underwent real-time in vivo optical biopsy using CLE in surgery. Eleven patients' CLE images of DM showed a regular, round crypt, and round luminal opening covered by a simple layer of columnar epithelial cells and goblet cells. LAR was then performed. Pathology revealed that the 11 DMs were negative, and the median length of the DMs was 2.0 cm. The remaining seven patients' CLE images of the planned transection rectum showed the loss of crypt architecture and irregular epithelial layer with loss of goblet cells. APR was then performed. Pathology confirmed cancer invasion, and the median distance from tumor to dentate line was 1.0 cm. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of CLE optical biopsy of DM were 85.71%, 100%, and 94.44%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: It is feasible to perform real-time in vivo optical biopsy using CLE to evaluate DM in situ and determine the surgical procedure in low rectal cancer.

A case-control study of using carbon nanoparticles to trace decision-making lymph nodes around inferior mesenteric artery in rectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Accurate identification of lymph nodes localized around inferior mesenteric artery (IMA), with or without metastasis, is of crucial importance for surgeons when dissecting D2 or D3 lymph nodes in patients with rectal cancer (RC). The following study evaluates whether carbon nanoparticles can be used for detection of decision-making lymph nodes (DLNs) in station 253 lymph nodes found around IMA during RC surgery. METHODS: A total of 66 patients with rectal adenocarcinomas were recruited between January 2014 and August 2017. Patients were divided into carbon nanoparticle (CN) group and control (CL) group; for the CN group, 1 ml nanoparticles were endoscopically injected into submucosal layer of primary tumor 1 day before surgery. DLNs were defined as black-dyed nodes in CN group or macroscopic lymph nodes in CL group localized along the IMA, proximal to the origin of the left colic artery. D3 lymph nodes were dissected using laparoscopic radical resection, and then examined using pathological approach. Intra-operative and post-operative data were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: In CN group, black-dyed DLNs were easily found under laparoscopy; the median number of DLNs was 3 (range 1-9). In CL group, the median number of DLNs was 0 (range 0-3). Consistency between intra-operative DLNs and post-operative station 253 nodes were confirmed by pathological examination. Significant higher number of DLNs in station 253 nodes (2.91 ± 2.47 vs 0.58 ± 0.75, p < 0.001), number of station 251 nodes (12.85 ± 8.99 vs 8.09 ± 5.85, p = 0.014), number of station 253 nodes (5.21 ± 5.26 vs 3.15 ± 2.32, p = 0.045), and the number of total lymph nodes (24.06 ± 13.20 vs 16.21 ± 9.09, p = 0.007) were found in the CN group compared to CL group. CONCLUSIONS: Carbon nanoparticles are useful for identifying DLNs in station 253 LNs around IMA in RC. It is not necessary to perform D3 lymph node dissection if there are no intra-operative DLNs metastases in RC.