Association Between Preoperative Cannabis Use and Increased Rate of Revision Surgery Following Spinal Fusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

The use of cannabis as a method of chronic pain relief has skyrocketed since its legalization in states across the United States. Clinicians currently have a limited scope regarding the effectiveness of marijuana on surgical procedures. This systematic review aims to determine the effect of current cannabis use on the rate of failure of spinal fusions and overall surgical outcomes. A systematic review was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. PubMed, Embase, and Scopus were searched, identifying studies assessing spinal fusion with reported preoperative cannabis use. Outcomes of interest included reoperation due to fusion failure or pseudoarthrosis with a follow-up time of at least six months. Subgroups of cervical fusions alone and lumbar fusions alone were also analyzed. Certainty in evidence and bias was assessed using the GRADE criteria and ROBINS-I tool (PROSPERO #CRD42023463548). Four studies met the inclusion criteria, with a total of 788 patients (188 in the cannabis user group and 600 in the non-user group). The rate of revision surgery among cannabis users was higher than that in non-users for all spinal fusions (RR: 3.58, 95% CI: 1.67 to 7.66, p = 0.001). For cervical fusions alone, there remained a higher rate of revision surgery for cannabis users compared to non-users (RR: 4.47, 95% CI: 1.93 to 10.36, p = 0.0005). For lumbar fusions alone, there was no difference in the rates of revision surgery between cannabis users and non-users (RR: 1.21, 95% CI: 0.28 to 7.73, p = 0.79). Cannabis use was shown to be associated with a higher rate of pseudoarthrosis revisions in spinal fusions on meta-analysis. On subgroup stratification by spine region, cannabis use remained associated with pseudoarthrosis revisions on cervical fusions alone but not lumbar fusions alone. Further research with larger, randomized studies is required to fully elucidate the relationship between cannabis use and fusion, both in general and by spinal region.

Navigating the Neurosurgery Match Process: Insights from the National Resident Matching Program - Program Director Surveys.

OBJECTIVE: Neurosurgery is one of the most competitive specialties and navigating the match process is often challenging for aspiring applicants. Here, we analyze insights from the National Resident Matching Program (NRMP) Program Director Surveys, illustrating evolving trends in applicant selection for interviews and for the ranking process, and providing a comparison with other specialties. METHODS: We evaluated seven surveys administered from 2012 to 2022. Six biennial surveys reported on factors influencing interview and ranking processes, while all seven surveys included data about the program director (PD)'s attitude towards USMLE test scores. RESULTS: The response rate of PDs decreased over the years. The most cited for interviews included specialty-specific recommendation letters (95%), USMLE Step 1 scores (91%), and interest in research (78%). A recent decline in emphasis on USMLE Step 1 scores coincided with a growing reliance on USMLE Step 2 scores. Award in basic science held significant esteem to a subset of programs. Personal characteristics dominated for ranking, with faculty interaction (89%), interpersonal skills (89%), and house staff interaction (85%) being the most important. Yet, PDs reported a difficulty in assessing interpersonal skills through virtual interviews. CONCLUSION: Our analysis revealed the pervasive importance of specialized endorsements and academic achievements when screening applicants for the interview process. A shift in emphasis towards the USMLE step 2 became apparent. Personal characteristics, on the other hand, seemed crucial to make a match and rank high among the pool of interviewed applicants. We uncovered difficulties in assessing these characteristics through virtual interviews.

Surgical management of spinal metastases from primary thyroid carcinoma: Demographics, clinical characteristics, and treatment outcomes - A retrospective analysis.

Objective: Metastatic spinal tumors represent a rare but concerning complication of primary thyroid carcinoma. We identified demographics, metastatic features, outcomes, and treatment strategies for these tumors in our institutional cohort. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients surgically treated for spinal metastases of primary thyroid carcinoma. Demographics, tumor characteristics, and treatment modalities were collected. The functional outcomes were quantified using Nurik, Modified Rankin, and Karnofsky Scores. Results: Twelve patients were identified who underwent 17 surgeries for resection of spinal metastases. The primary thyroid tumor pathologies included papillary (4/12), follicular (6/12), and Hurthle cell (2/12) subtypes. The average number of spinal metastases was 2.5. Of the primary tumor subtypes, follicular tumors averaged 2.8 metastases at the highest and Hurthle cell tumors averaged 2.0 spinal metastases at the lowest. Five patients (41.7%) underwent preoperative embolization for their spinal metastases. Seven patients (58.3%) received postoperative radiation. There was no significant difference in progression-free survival between patients receiving surgery with adjuvant radiation and surgery alone (P = 0.0773). Five patients (41.7%) experienced postoperative complications. Two patients (16.7%) succumbed to disease progression and two patients (16.7%) experienced tumor recurrence following resection. Postsurgical mean Nurik scores decreased 0.54 points, mean Modified Rankin scores decreased 0.48 points, and mean Karnofsky scores increased 4.8 points. Conclusion: Surgery presents as an important treatment modality in the management of spinal metastases from thyroid cancer. Further work is needed to understand the predictive factors for survival and outcomes following treatment.

The demographic, clinical, and management differences between traumatic dens fracture patients with and without simultaneous atlas fractures.

Introduction: Atlas fractures often accompany traumatic dens fractures, but existing literature on the management of simultaneous atlantoaxial fractures is limited. Methods: We examined all patients with traumatic dens fractures at our institution between 2008 and 2018. We used multivariable logistic regression and ordinal logistic regression to identify factors independently associated with presentation with a simultaneous atlas fracture, as well myelopathy severity, fracture nonunion, and selection for surgery. Results: Two hundred and eighty-two patients with traumatic dens fractures without subaxial fractures were identified, including 65 (22.8%) with simultaneous atlas fractures. The distribution of injury mechanisms differed between groups (χ2 P = 0.0360). On multivariable logistic regression, dens nonunion was positively associated with type II fractures (odds ratio [OR] = 2.00, P = 0.038) and negatively associated with having surgery (OR = 0.52, P = 0.049), but not with having a C1 fracture (P = 0.3673). Worse myelopathy severity on presentation was associated with having a severe injury severity score (OR = 102.3, P < 0.001) and older age (OR = 1.28, P = 0.002), but not with having an atlas fracture (P = 0.2446). Having a simultaneous atlas fracture was associated with older age (OR = 1.29, P = 0.024) and dens fracture angulation (OR = 2.62, P = 0.004). Among patients who underwent surgery, C1/C2 posterior fusion was the most common procedure, and having a simultaneous atlas fracture was associated with selection for occipitocervical fusion (OCF) (OR = 14.35, P = 0.010). Conclusions: Among patients with traumatic dens, patients who have simultaneous atlas fractures are a distinct subpopulation with respect to age, mechanism of injury, fracture morphology, and management. Traumatic dens fractures with simultaneous atlas fractures are independently associated with selection for OCF rather than posterior cervical fusion alone.

Assessing the Accessibility, Engagement, and Value of the Virtual Global Spine Conference as an Educational Platform for Spine: A Three-Year Review.

INTRODUCTION: The Coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic ushered a paradigm shift in medical education, accelerating the transition to virtual learning in select cases. The Virtual Global Spine Conference (VGSC), launched at the height of the pandemic, is a testament to this evolution, providing an independent educational series for spine care professionals worldwide. This study assesses VGSC's 3-year performance, focusing on accessibility, engagement, and educational value. METHODOLOGY: Through retrospective data analysis from April 2020 to August 2023, we examined our social media metrics to measure VGSC's reach and impact. RESULTS: Over the study period, VGSC's webinars successfully attracted 2337 unique participants, maintaining an average attendance of 47 individuals per session. The YouTube channel demonstrated significant growth, amassing over 2693 subscribers and releasing 168 videos. These videos collectively garnered 112,208 views and 15,823.3 hours of watch time. Viewer demographics reveal a predominant age group of 35-44 years, representing 56.81% of the audience, closely followed by the 25-34 age group at 40.2%. Male participants constituted 78.95% of the subscriber base. Geographically, the viewership primarily originates from the United States, with India, Canada, South Korea, and the United Kingdom also contributing substantial audience numbers. The VGSC's presence on the "X account" has grown to 2882 followers, significantly enlarging the digital community and fostering increased engagement. CONCLUSIONS: The VGSC has demonstrated significant value as a virtual educational tool in spine education. Its diverse content and ease of access will likely enable it to drive value well into the post-pandemic years. Maintaining and expanding engagement, beyond North America in particular, remains a priority.

Chemoprophylactic Anticoagulation After Spine Surgery Does Not Increase Epidural Hematoma Risk: A Propensity-matched Analysis.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: To calculate the magnitude of any increased risk of epidural hematoma (EDH) associated with chemoprophylactic anticoagulation (chemoprophylaxis), if any. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Chemoprophylaxis for the prevention of venous thromboembolic events may be associated with an increased risk of EDH after spine surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 6869 consecutive spine surgeries performed at our institution were identified, and clinical and demographic data were collected. We identified cases in which symptomatic EDHs were evacuated within 30 days postoperatively. Patients receiving chemoprophylaxis and controls were matched using K-nearest neighbor propensity score matching to calculate the effect of anticoagulation on the rate of postoperative EDH. RESULTS: After propensity score matching, 1071 patients who received chemoprophylaxis were matched to 1585 controls. Propensity scores were well balanced between populations (Rubin B=20.6, Rubin R=1.05), and an 89.6% reduction in bias was achieved, with a remaining mean bias of 3.2%. The effect of chemoprophylaxis on EDH was insignificant ( P =0.294). Symptomatic EDH was independently associated with having a transfusion [odds ratio (OR)=7.30 (1.15, 46.20), P =0.035], having thoracic-level surgery [OR=41.19 (3.75, 452.4), P =0.002], and increasing body mass index [OR=1.44 (1.04, 1.98), P =0.028] but was not associated with chemoprophylaxis. Five out of 13 patients who developed EDH (38.5%) were receiving some form of anticoagulation, including 1 patient on therapeutic anticoagulation, 1 concurrently on aspirin and chemoprophylaxis, and 2 who were also found to have developed thrombocytopenia postoperatively. The median time on anticoagulation before EDH was 8.1 days. A higher proportion of patients who developed EDH also developed venous thromboembolic events than the general population [38.5% vs. 2.4%, OR=25.34 (9.226, 79.68), P <0.0001], and 1 EDH patient died from pulmonary embolism while off chemoprophylaxis. CONCLUSIONS: Chemoprophylactic anticoagulation did not cause an increase in the rate of spinal EDH in our patient population.

Using machine learning and big data for the prediction of venous thromboembolic events after spine surgery: A single-center retrospective analysis of multiple models on a cohort of 6869 patients.

Objective: Venous thromboembolic event (VTE) after spine surgery is a rare but potentially devastating complication. With the advent of machine learning, an opportunity exists for more accurate prediction of such events to aid in prevention and treatment. Methods: Seven models were screened using 108 database variables and 62 preoperative variables. These models included deep neural network (DNN), DNN with synthetic minority oversampling technique (SMOTE), logistic regression, ridge regression, lasso regression, simple linear regression, and gradient boosting classifier. Relevant metrics were compared between each model. The top four models were selected based on area under the receiver operator curve; these models included DNN with SMOTE, linear regression, lasso regression, and ridge regression. Separate random sampling of each model was performed 1000 additional independent times using a randomly generated training/testing distribution. Variable weights and magnitudes were analyzed after sampling. Results: Using all patient-related variables, DNN using SMOTE was the top-performing model in predicting postoperative VTE after spinal surgery (area under the curve [AUC] =0.904), followed by lasso regression (AUC = 0.894), ridge regression (AUC = 0.873), and linear regression (AUC = 0.864). When analyzing a subset of only preoperative variables, the top-performing models were lasso regression (AUC = 0.865) and DNN with SMOTE (AUC = 0.864), both of which outperform any currently published models. Main model contributions relied heavily on variables associated with history of thromboembolic events, length of surgical/anesthetic time, and use of postoperative chemoprophylaxis. Conclusions: The current study provides promise toward machine learning methods geared toward predicting postoperative complications after spine surgery. Further study is needed in order to best quantify and model real-world risk for such events.

Outcome Reporting in Spine Surgery: A Review of Historical and Emerging Trends.

The general objectives of spine surgery are to alleviate pain, restore neurologic function, and prevent or treat spinal deformities or instability. The accumulating expanse of outcome measures has allowed us to more objectively quantify these variables and, therefore, gauge the success of treatments, ultimately improving the quality of the delivered health care. It has become increasingly evident that spinal conditions and their accompanying interventions affect all aspects of a patient's life, including their physical, mental, emotional, and social well-being. This underscores the challenge of creating clinically relevant and accurate outcome measures in spine care, and the reason why there is a growing recognition of the importance of subjective measures such as patient-reported outcome measures, that consider a patients' health-related quality of life. Subjective measures provide valuable insights into patient experiences and perceptions of treatment outcomes, whereas objective measures provide a reproducible glimpse into key radiographic and clinical parameters that are associated with a successful outcome. In this narrative review, we provide a detailed analysis of the most common subjective and objective outcome measures employed in spine surgery, with a special focus on their current role as well as the possible future of outcome reporting.

Traumatic Dens Fracture Patients Comprise Distinct Subpopulations Distinguished by Differences in Age, Sex, Injury Mechanism and Severity, and Outcome.

BACKGROUND: Dens fractures are an increasingly common injury, yet their epidemiology and its implications remain underexamined. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed all traumatic dens fracture patients managed at our institution over a 10-year period, examining demographic, clinical, and outcomes data. Patient subsets were compared across these parameters. RESULTS: Among 303 traumatic dens fracture patients, we observed a bimodal age distribution with a strong goodness of fit centered at age 22.3 ± 5.7 (R = 0.8781) and at 77.7 ± 13.9 (R = 0.9686). A population pyramid demonstrated a bimodal distribution among male patients, but not female patients, which was confirmed with a strong goodness of fit for male patient subpopulations age <35 (R = 0.9791) and age ≥35 (R = 0.8843), but a weaker fit for a second female subpopulation age <35. Both age groups were equally likely to undergo surgery. Patients younger than age 35 were more likely to be male (82.4% vs. 46.9%, odds ratio [OR] = 5.29 [1.54, 17.57], P = 0.0052), have motor vehicle collision as their mechanism of injury (64.7% vs. 14.1%, OR = 11.18 [3.77, 31.77], P < 0.0001), and to have a severe trauma injury severity score (17.6% vs. 2.9%, OR = 7.23 [1.88, 28.88], P = 0.0198). Nevertheless, patients age <35 were less likely to have fracture nonunion at follow (18.2% vs. 53.7%, OR = 0.19 [0.041, 0.76], P = 0.0288). CONCLUSIONS: The dens fracture patient population comprises 2 subpopulations, distinguished by differences in age, sex, injury mechanism and severity, and outcome, with male dens fracture patients demonstrating a bimodal age distribution. Young, male patients were more likely to have high-energy injury mechanisms leading to severe trauma, yet were less likely to have fracture nonunion at follow-up.

Surgery Decreases Nonunion, Myelopathy, and Mortality for Patients With Traumatic Odontoid Fractures: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Existing literature suggests that surgical intervention for odontoid fractures is beneficial but often does not control for known confounding factors. OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of surgical fixation on myelopathy, fracture nonunion, and mortality after traumatic odontoid fractures. METHODS: We analyzed all traumatic odontoid fractures managed at our institution between 2010 and 2020. Ordinal multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with myelopathy severity at follow-up. Propensity score analysis was used to test the treatment effect of surgery on nonunion and mortality. RESULTS: Three hundred and three patients with traumatic odontoid fracture were identified, of whom 21.6% underwent surgical stabilization. After propensity score matching, populations were well balanced across all analyses (Rubin's B < 25.0, 0.5 < Rubin's R < 2.0). Controlling for age and fracture angulation, type, comminution, and displacement, the overall rate of nonunion was lower in the surgical group (39.7% vs 57.3%, average treatment effect [ATE] = -0.153 [-0.279, -0.028], P = .017). Controlling for age, sex, Nurick score, Charlson Comorbidity Index, Injury Severity Score, and selection for intensive care unit admission, the mortality rate was lower for the surgical group at 30 days (1.7% vs 13.8%, ATE = -0.101 [-0.172, -0.030], P = .005) and at 1 year was 7.0% vs 23.7%, ATE = -0.099 [-0.181, -0.017], P = .018. Cox proportional hazards analysis also demonstrated a mortality benefit for surgery (hazard ratio = 0.587 [0.426, 0.799], P = .0009). Patients who underwent surgery were less likely to have worse myelopathy scores at follow-up (odds ratio = 0.48 [0.25, 0.93], P = .029). CONCLUSION: Surgical stabilization is associated with better myelopathy scores at follow-up and causes lower rates of fracture nonunion, 30-day mortality, and 1-year mortality.

Functional Anatomy and Biomechanics of the Craniovertebral Junction.

The craniovertebral junction (CVJ) involves the atlas, axis, and occiput along with the atlanto-occipital and atlantoaxial joints. The anatomy and neural and vascular anatomy of the junction render the CVJ unique. Specialists treating disorders that affect the CVJ must appreciate its intricate anatomy and should be well versed in its biomechanics. This first article in a three-article series provides an overview of the functional anatomy and biomechanics of the CVJ.

Outpatient telemedicine in neurosurgery: 15,677 consecutive encounters in a comparative analysis of its effectiveness and impact on the surgical conversion rate.

OBJECTIVE: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has necessitated the use of telehealth visits (THVs). The effects on neurosurgical practice have not been well characterized, especially concerning new-patient THVs. Therefore, the authors of this study reviewed their institution's experience with outpatient clinic visits and THVs from before the COVID-19 pandemic to the present to focus on clinical metrics, rates of surgery, and the effects of implementing THVs in order to better understand their implications for clinical practice as more data emerge over time. METHODS: The authors reviewed 15,677 consecutive new outpatient in-person visits (IPVs), THVs, and neurosurgical procedures/cases proceeding from their institution between 2018 and 2022 for trends and associations related to THVs. RESULTS: Among spine patients, there was no difference in the proportion of encounters that led to surgery (surgical conversion rate) between THVs and IPVs (p = 0.49). Among cranial patients, THVs were negatively associated with conversion (OR 0.73, p = 0.03). On average, patients using THVs lived further from the hospital (p < 0.001); however, the patient catchment area appeared unchanged. The median distance to the hospital among THV patients was counterbalanced by a decreased distance for spine patients pursing IPVs (p < 0.001), with no significant change to case volume. There was no change in distance to the hospital among cranial patients. For both cranial and spine patients, surgical conversion was more likely among those who lived a great distance from the hospital if their initial encounter was an IPV (p = 0.007 and < 0.001, respectively). However, there was no relationship between distance from the hospital and surgical conversion among THV patients (p = 0.565). The availability of THVs did not significantly affect follow-up time (p = 0.837). For new patients at IPVs, there was no difference in time to the operating room between cranial and spine cases; for new patients at THVs, however, time to the operating room was significantly faster for cranial cases than for spine cases (p = 0.0018). CONCLUSIONS: Compared to IPVs, THVs lead to decreased surgical conversion for cranial patients but not spine patients. THVs do not appear to increase the catchment area. For patients who live far from the hospital, an IPV is associated with surgical conversion. Surgical conversion is faster following cranial THVs than after spine THVs. THVs did not increase the duration of follow-up.

Impact of Postoperative Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy on Survival of Patients with Spinal Metastases in the Context of Additional Systemic Adjuvant Therapy.

BACKGROUND: Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has been established as a safe and effective treatment modality for control of long-term pain and tumor growth. However, few studies have investigated the efficacy of postoperative SBRT versus conventional external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) in extending survival within the context of systemic therapy. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of patients who underwent surgery for spinal metastasis at our institution was conducted. Demographic, treatment, and outcome data were collected. SBRT was compared with EBRT and non-SBRT, and analyses were stratified by whether patients received systemic therapy. Survival analysis was conducted using propensity score matching. RESULTS: Bivariate analysis in the nonsystemic therapy group revealed longer survival with SBRT compared with EBRT and non-SBRT. Further analysis also showed that primary cancer type and preoperative mRS significantly affected survival. Within patients who received systemic therapy, overall median survival for patients receiving SBRT was 22.7 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 12.1-52.3) versus 16.1 months (95% CI 12.7-44.0; P = 0.28) for patients who received EBRT and 16.1 months (95% CI: 12.2-21.9; P = 0.07) for patients without SBRT. Within patients who did not receive systemic therapy, overall median survival for patients with SBRT was 62.1 months (95% CI 18.1-unknown) versus 5.3 months (95% CI 2.8-unknown; P = 0.08) for patients with EBRT and 6.9 months (95% CI 5.0-45.6; P = 0.02) for patients without SBRT. CONCLUSIONS: In patients who do not receive systemic therapy, treatment with postoperative SBRT may increase survival time compared with patients not receiving SBRT.

Advances, Challenges, and Future Directions in the Management of Craniovertebral Junction Pathologies.

In this third article in a 3-article series on the craniocervical junction, we define the terms "basilar impression," "cranial settling," "basilar invagination," and "platybasia," noting that these terms are often used interchangeably but represent distinct entities. We then provide examples that represent these pathologies and treatment paradigms. Finally, we discuss the challenges and future direction in the craniovertebral junction surgery space.

An Approach to Managing Disorders Affecting the Craniovertebral Junction.

The craniovertebral junction (CVJ), or the "first junction," can be affected by a variety of pathological states. Some of these conditions could represent a gray area in that they can be treated by general neurosurgeons or such specialists as skull base or spinal surgeons. However, some conditions are best managed with a multidisciplinary approach. The importance of in-depth knowledge of the anatomy and biomechanics of this junction cannot be overemphasized. Identifying what represents clinical stability or instability is key to successful diagnosis and, hence, treatment. In this report, the second in a 3-article series, we describe our approach to managing CVJ pathologies in a case-based fashion to illustrate key concepts.

Analysis of socioeconomic and demographic factors on post-treatment outcomes for metastatic spinal tumors.

OBJECTIVE: Sociodemographic factors may play a role in incidence and treatment of metastatic spinal tumors, as there is a delay in diagnosis and increased incidence of relevant primaries. There has yet to be a detailed analysis of the impact of sociodemographic factors on surgical outcomes for spinal metastases. We sought to examine the influence of socioeconomic factors on outcomes for patients with metastatic spinal tumors. METHODS: Two hundred and sixty-three patients who underwent surgery for metastatic spinal tumors were identified. Sociodemographic characteristics were then collected and assigned to patients based on their ZIP code. The Chi-square test and the Mann-Whitney-U test were used for binary and continuous variables, respectively. Multivariate regression models were also used to control for age, smoking status, body mass index, and Charlson Comorbidity Index. RESULTS: Males had significantly lower rates of post-treatment complication compared to females (22.7 % vs 39.3 %, p = 0.0052), and those in high educational attainment ZIP codes had significantly shorter length of stay (LOS) compared to low educational attainment ZIP codes (9.3 days vs 12.2 days, p = 0.0058). Multivariate regression revealed that living in a high percentage white ZIP code and being male significantly decreased risk of post-treatment complication by 19 % (p = 0.042) and 14 % (p = 0.032), respectively. Living in a high educational attainment ZIP code decreased LOS by 3 days (p = 0.019). CONCLUSIONS: Males had significantly lower rates of post-treatment complication. Patients in high percentage white areas also had decreased rate of post-treatment complications. Patients living in areas with high educational attainment had shorter length of stay.

Development and Internal Validation of the Postoperative Analgesic Intake Needs Score: A Predictive Model for Post-Operative Narcotic Requirement after Spine Surgery.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective Cohort. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to develop a clinical tool to pre-operatively risk-stratify patients undergoing spine surgery based on their likelihood to have high postoperative analgesic requirements. METHODS: A total of 1199 consecutive patients undergoing elective spine surgery over a 2-year period at a single center were included. Patients not requiring inpatient admission, those who received epidural analgesia, those who had two surgeries at separate sites under one anesthesia event, and those with a length of stay greater than 10 days were excluded. The remaining 860 patients were divided into a derivation and validation cohort. Pre-operative factors were collected by review of the electronic medical record. Total postoperative inpatient opioid intake requirements were converted into morphine milligram equivalents to standardize postoperative analgesic requirements. RESULTS: The postoperative analgesic intake needs (PAIN) score was developed after the following predictor variables were identified: age, race, history of depression/anxiety, smoking status, active pre-operative benzodiazepine use and pre-operative opioid use, and surgical type. Patients were risk-stratified based on their score with the high-risk group being more likely to have high opioid consumption postoperatively compared to the moderate and low-risk groups in both the derivation and validation cohorts. CONCLUSION: The PAIN Score is a pre-operative clinical tool for patients undergoing spine surgery to risk stratify them based on their likelihood for high analgesic requirements. The information can be used to individualize a multi-modal analgesic regimen rather than utilizing a "one-size fits all" approach.

Chemoprophylactic Anticoagulation Following Lumbar Surgery Significantly Reduces Thromboembolic Events After Instrumented Fusions, Not Decompressions.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. OBJECTIVE: To quantify any reduction in venous thromboembolic events (VTEs) caused by chemoprophylaxis among lumbar surgery patients. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Chemoprophylactic anticoagulation (chemoprophylaxis) is used to prevent VTE after lumbar surgery. However, the treatment effect of chemoprophylaxis has not been reported among spine surgery patients, as conventional statistical methods preclude such inferences. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 1243 consecutive lumbar fusions and 1433 noninstrumented lumbar decompressions performed at our institution over a six-year period were identified, and clinical and demographic data were collected, including on VTE events within 30 days postoperatively. Instrumented lumbar fusions and noninstrumented lumbar surgeries were analyzed separately. Patients who were given chemoprophylaxis (treatment) and controls were matched according to known VTE risk factors, including age, body mass index, sex, diabetes, chronic kidney disease, history of VTE, estimated blood loss, length of surgery, transfusion, whether surgery was staged, and whether surgery used an anterior approach. K-nearest neighbor propensity score matching was performed, and the treatment effect of chemoprophylaxis was calculated. RESULTS: Unadjusted, there was no difference in the rate of VTE between treatment and controls in either population. Baseline clinical and demographic characteristics differed significantly between treatment and control groups. In all, 575 lumbar fusion patients and 435 noninstrumented lumbar decompression patients were successfully propensity score matched, yielding balanced models (Rubin B <25, 0.560% reduction in known bias for both populations. The treatment effect of chemoprophylaxis after lumbar fusion in our patient population was a reduction in VTE incidence from 9.4% to 4.2% ( P <0.05), and propensity score adjusted regression confirmed a reduced odds of VTE with chemoprophylaxis (odds ratio=0.37, P =0.035). The treatment effect was not significant for noninstrumented lumbar decompression patients. CONCLUSION: Among patients undergoing instrumented lumbar fusions, chemoprophylactic anticoagulation causes a significant reduction in VTE, but causes no significant reduction among patients undergoing noninstrumented lumbar decompression.

Atlas fractures with and without simultaneous dens fractures differ with respect to clinical, demographic, and management characteristics.

Background: Patients with simultaneous fractures of the atlas and dens have traditionally been managed according to the dens fracture's morphology, but data supporting this practice are limited. Methods: We retrospectively examined all patients with traumatic atlas fractures at our institution between 2008 and 2016. We used multivariable regression and propensity score matching to compare the presentation, management, and outcomes of patients with isolated atlas fractures to patients with simultaneous atlas-dens fractures. Results: Ninety-nine patients were identified. Patients with isolated atlas fractures were younger (61 ± 22 vs. 77 ± 14, P = 0.0003), had lower median Charlson Comorbidity Index (3 vs. 5, P = 0.0005), had better presenting Nurick myelopathy scores (0 vs. 3, P < 0.0001), and had different mechanisms of injury (P = 0.0011). Multivariable regression showed that having a simultaneous atlas-dens fracture was independently associated with older age (odds ratio [OR] =1.59 [1.22, 2.07], P = 0.001), worse presenting myelopathy (OR = 3.10 [2.04, 4.16], P < 0.001), and selection for surgery (OR = 4.91 [1.10, 21.97], P = 0.037). Propensity score matching yielded balanced populations (Rubin's B = 23.3, Rubin's R = 1.96) and showed that the risk of atlas fracture nonunion was no different among isolated atlas fractures compared to simultaneous atlas-dens fractures (P = 0.304). Age was the only variable independently associated with atlas fracture nonunion (OR = 2.39 [1.15, 5.00], P = 0.020), having a simultaneous atlas-dens fracture was not significant (P = 0.2829). Conclusions: Among patients with atlas fractures, simultaneous fractures of the dens occur in older patients and confer an increased risk of myelopathy and requiring surgical stabilization. Controlling for confounders, the risk of atlas fracture nonunion is equivalent for isolated atlas fractures versus simultaneous atlas-dens fractures.

Anterior approach lumbar fusions cause a marked increase in thromboembolic events: Causal inferences from a propensity-matched analysis of 1147 patients.

OBJECTIVE: Anterior lumbar fusions are thought to be associated with elevated venous thromboembolic event (VTE) rates, but the magnitude of this increase in VTE is not well described. The objective of this study was to quantify any increase in VTE caused by anterior approach lumbar fusion. METHODS: 1147 consecutive lumbar fusions performed at our institution over a six-year period were identified, and clinical and demographic data were collected. K-nearest neighbor propensity score matching and propensity score adjusted regression were performed. Patients undergoing anterior versus posterior approach lumbar fusions were matched according to age, body mass index, sex, VTE history, estimated blood loss, length of surgery, transfusion, selection for postoperative intensive care unit (ICU) admission, comorbid disease burden, and use of chemoprophylactic anticoagulation. RESULTS: Anterior approach surgery (OR=4.29, p < 0.001), a history of VTE (OR=8.67, p < 0.001), age (OR=1.53, p = 0.014), length of surgery (OR=1.16, p = 0.044), and selection for postoperative ICU admission (OR=4.60, p = 0.005) were independently associated with VTE on multivariable regression. 1058 anterior or posterior approach fusion patients were matched. After matching, overall bias was reduced by 71.0 %, no covariates remained significantly different between groups, and propensity scores were well balanced between populations (Rubin's B≤0.25, 0.5 ≤Rubin's R≤2.0). Significantly more patients in the anterior group underwent lower extremity duplex ultrasonography (LED) (36.9 % vs. 14.8 %, OR=3.36 [2.38, 4.76], p < 0.0001), and a statistically insignificantly higher proportion of LEDs were positive among patients in the anterior group (23.2 % vs. 13.2 %, OR=1.99 [0.92, 4.25], p = 0.108). After matching, the rate of VTE was 8.6 % for the anterior group and 1.3 % for the posterior group, with anterior approach surgery causing an increase in VTE by 7.2 % (95 % CI [2.28 %, 12.16 %], p = 0.004). CONCLUSION: Among patients undergoing lumbar fusions, anterior approach surgery causes an increase in VTE by 7.2%, which is a multifold increase in the proportion of patients with thromboembolic complications.