Prognostic relevance of metabolic syndrome in hypertensive patients at low-to-medium risk.

BACKGROUND: The prognostic impact of metabolic syndrome (MetS) in the hypertensive population at low-medium risk is unknown. In this study, we evaluated the prognostic relevance of MetS in hypertensive patients at low-medium risk. METHODS: The occurrence of nonfatal and fatal cardiac and cerebrovascular events was evaluated in 802 patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension at low-medium risk according to the 2003 World Health Organization/International Society of Hypertension statement on the management of hypertension. Among these patients, 218 (27.2%) had MetS according to a modified National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III (NCEP ATP III) definition (body mass index in place of waist circumference). RESULTS: During follow-up (6.9 +/- 3.1 years; range, 0.5 to 13.1 years, mean +/- SD), 58 first cardiovascular events occurred. The event rates per 100 patient-years in patients without and with MetS were 0.87 and 1.51, respectively. Event-free survival was significantly different between groups (P = .03). After adjustment for several covariates, Cox regression analysis showed that cardiovascular risk was significantly higher in patients with than in patients without MetS (relative risk, 2.64; 95% confidence interval, 1.52 to 4.58; P = .001). Other independent predictors of outcome were age, smoking habit, 24-h systolic BP, and LDL cholesterol. CONCLUSIONS: Hypertensive patients at low-medium risk with MetS are at higher cardiovascular risk than those without MetS. Metabolic syndrome may be a useful tool for clinicians to identify subjects who are at increased risk when traditional assessment may indicate low-medium risk.

Blood pressure variability and cardiovascular risk in treated hypertensive patients.

BACKGROUND: The independent prognostic value of blood pressure (BP) variability in treated hypertension is not yet clear. We investigated the relationship between BP variability, evaluated by noninvasive monitoring, and cardiovascular outcome in treated hypertensive patients. METHODS: The occurrence of fatal and nonfatal cardiovascular events was evaluated in 1472 treated patients. Subjects with the standard deviation of daytime or night-time systolic BP below or above the median of the population were classified as having low or high BP variability. Specifically, 738 and 734 patients had low and high daytime BP variability, respectively, and 739 and 733 subjects had low and high night-time BP variability, respectively. RESULTS: During follow-up (4.88 +/- 2.9 years, range 0.2-11.6 years) there were 119 events. The event rates per 100 patient-years in subjects with low and high BP variability according to daytime BP were 1.18 and 2.01, respectively, and in those with low and high BP variability according to night-time BP were 1.2 and 2.05, respectively. Event-free survival was significantly different between the low and high BP variability groups (P = .006 for both daytime and night-time BP). However, after adjustment for other covariates in a Cox multivariate analysis, the adverse prognostic relevance of high BP variability was no longer detectable, whereas age, smoking habit, LDL cholesterol, diabetes, previous events, LV hypertrophy, and daytime or night-time systolic BP resulted independent predictors of risk. CONCLUSIONS: Increased BP variability is associated with higher incidence of cardiovascular events, but also with other relevant prognostic factors. Indeed, in multivariate analysis the possible adverse prognostic impact of BP variability is no longer evident. Thus, in treated hypertension, BP variability evaluated by noninvasive monitoring is not an independent predictor of outcome.