Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 64
Filtrar
5.
J Headache Pain ; 17: 5, 2015.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26857820

RESUMEN

The diagnosis of primary headache disorders is clinical and based on the diagnostic criteria of the International Headache Society (ICHD-3-beta). However several brain conditions may mimic primary headache disorders and laboratory investigation may be needed. This necessity occurs when the treating physician doubts for the primary origin of headache. Features that represent a warning for a possible underlying disorder causing the headache are new onset headache, change in previously stable headache pattern, headache that abruptly reaches the peak level, headache that changes with posture, headache awakening the patient, or precipitated by physical activity or Valsalva manoeuvre, first onset of headache ≥50 years of age, neurological symptoms or signs, trauma, fever, seizures, history of malignancy, history of HIV or active infections, and prior history of stroke or intracranial bleeding. All national headache societies and the European Headache Alliance invited to review and comment the consensus before the final draft. The consensus recommends brain MRI for the case of migraine with aura that persists on one side or in brainstem aura. Persistent aura without infarction and migrainous infarction require brain MRI, MRA and MRV. Brain MRI with detailed study of the pituitary area and cavernous sinus, is recommended for all TACs. For primary cough headache, exercise headache, headache associated with sexual activity, thunderclap headache and hypnic headache apart from brain MRI additional tests may be required. Because there is little and no good evidence the committee constructed a consensus based on the opinion of experts, and should be treated as imperfect.


Asunto(s)
Cefaleas Primarias/diagnóstico , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Consenso , Humanos , Neuroimagen , Examen Físico
8.
Int J Stroke ; 7(4): 354-60, 2012 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22103798

RESUMEN

RATIONALE: High-grade carotid artery stenosis is present in 6-8% of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Many cardiovascular surgeons advocate staged or synchronous carotid endarterectomy to reduce the high perioperative and long-term risk of stroke associated with multivessel disease. However, no randomized trial has assessed whether a combined synchronous or staged carotid endarterectomy confers any benefit compared with isolated coronary artery bypass grafting in these patients. AIMS: The objective of this study is to compare the safety and efficacy of isolated coronary artery bypass grafting vs. synchronous coronary artery bypass grafting and carotid endarterectomy in patients with asymptomatic high-grade carotid artery stenosis. DESIGN: Coronary Artery Bypass graft surgery in patients with Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis (CABACS) is a randomized, controlled, open, multicenter, group sequential trial with two parallel arms and outcome adjudication by blinded observers. Patients with asymptomatic high-grade carotid stenosis scheduled for elective coronary artery bypass grafting will be assigned to either isolated coronary artery bypass grafting or synchronous coronary artery bypass grafting and carotid endarterectomy by 1 : 1 block-stratified randomization with three different stratification factors (age, gender, modified Rankin scale). STUDY: The trial started in December 2010 aiming at recruiting 1160 patients in 25 to 30 German cardiovascular centers. The composite primary efficacy end point is the number of strokes and deaths from any cause (whatever occurs first) within 30 days after operation. A 4·5% absolute difference (4% compared to 8·5%) in the 30-day rate of the above end points can be detected with >80% power. OUTCOMES: The results of this trial are expected to provide a basis for defining an evidence-based standard and will have a wide impact on managing this disease.


Asunto(s)
Estenosis Carotídea/cirugía , Puente de Arteria Coronaria/métodos , Endarterectomía Carotidea/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Isquemia Encefálica/etiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Proyectos de Investigación , Accidente Cerebrovascular/etiología , Resultado del Tratamiento
9.
Ophthalmologe ; 108(12): 1120-6, 2011 Dec.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22130681

RESUMEN

Head and facial pain are common in neurological practice and the pain often arises in the orbit or is referred into the eye. This is due to the autonomic innervation of the eye and orbit. There are acute and chronic pain syndromes. This review gives an overview of the differential diagnosis and treatment. Idiopathic headache syndromes, such as migraine and cluster headache are the most frequent and are often debilitating conditions. Trigemino-autonomic cephalalgias (SUNCT and SUNA) have to be taken into account, as well as trigeminal neuralgia. Trigemino-autonomic headache after eye operations can be puzzling and often responds well to triptans. Every new facial pain not fitting these categories must be considered symptomatic and a thorough investigation is mandatory including magnetic resonance imaging. Infiltrative and neoplastic conditions frequently lead to orbital pain. As a differential diagnosis Tolosa-Hunt syndrome and Raeder syndrome are inflammatory conditions sometimes mimicking neoplasms. Infections, such as herpes zoster ophthalmicus are extremely painful and require rapid therapy. It is important to consider carotid artery dissection as a cause for acute eye and neck pain in conjunction with Horner's syndrome and bear in mind that vascular oculomotor palsy is often painful. All of the above named conditions should be diagnosed by a neurologist with special experience in pain syndromes and many require an interdisciplinary approach.


Asunto(s)
Técnicas de Diagnóstico Oftalmológico , Dolor Ocular/diagnóstico , Dolor Ocular/etiología , Dolor Facial/complicaciones , Dolor Facial/diagnóstico , Dimensión del Dolor/métodos , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Humanos
10.
Cephalalgia ; 31(5): 520-9, 2011 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21220376

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to field test different chronic migraine (CM) criteria and compare CM epidemiological profiles, which include demographic, personal, and lifestyle characteristics, with high-frequency episodic migraine (HFEM) and low-frequency episodic migraine (LFEM). METHODS: Questionnaires were mailed to a random sample of 18,000 18-65-year-olds in demographically diverse regions of Germany. The epidemiological data for the three classifications of CM, LFEM and HFEM were assessed using descriptive statistics, Pearson Chi-square, and analysis of variance tests. RESULTS: Among 9350 respondents, CM_I was the most restrictive (N = 37, 0.4%), followed by CM_II (N = 45, 0.5%) and CM_III (N = 185, 2.0%). CM groups did not differ in distribution by age, gender, body mass index, education or smoking and alcohol consumption. Compared to those with LFEM and HFEM, those with CM (CM_III) had significantly different epidemiological profiles. CONCLUSIONS: CM prevalence varies by case definition. The epidemiological profiles of the three CM groups are similar but differ significantly from those of HFEM and LFEM. Optimal definitions for clinical practice and epidemiological research require additional field testing.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos Migrañosos/clasificación , Trastornos Migrañosos/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Enfermedad Crónica , Femenino , Alemania/epidemiología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto Joven
13.
Nervenarzt ; 81(4): 463-70, 2010 Apr.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20182856

RESUMEN

Often without sufficient scientific evidence, unconventional methods for migraine treatment are being put forward. Recently a trial using "migraine surgery" has been published. Its design is based on a concept of migraine pathogenesis without any scientific background and includes several severe methodological flaws. In spite of the above, the study is frequently cited in the lay press. The surgical procedure as well as the study are critically discussed.


Asunto(s)
Músculos Faciales/cirugía , Frente/cirugía , Trastornos Migrañosos/fisiopatología , Trastornos Migrañosos/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Toxinas Botulínicas Tipo A/administración & dosificación , Terapia Combinada , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Músculos Faciales/fisiopatología , Femenino , Humanos , Inyecciones Intramusculares , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Síndromes del Dolor Miofascial/fisiopatología , Síndromes del Dolor Miofascial/cirugía , Estudios Prospectivos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Prevención Secundaria , Resultado del Tratamiento , Nervio Trigémino/fisiopatología , Nervio Trigémino/cirugía
14.
Eur J Neurol ; 16(3): 424-6, 2009 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19187261

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Natalizumab has been recommended for the treatment of patients with relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis with insufficient response to interferon-beta (IFN-beta) or glatiramer acetate (GA). METHOD: Prospective, observational study. RESULTS: We found a reduction of the annualized relapse rate from 2.1 under IFN-beta or GA to 0.2 one year after switching to natalizumab. There were 94% fewer gadolinium enhancing lesions with natalizumab. CONCLUSION: Natalizumab reduced short term clinical and MRI activity in second line therapy and efficacy is comparable to first line therapy as demonstrated in the pivotal trials.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Esclerosis Múltiple Recurrente-Remitente/tratamiento farmacológico , Fármacos Neuroprotectores/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/efectos adversos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Encéfalo/patología , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Gadolinio , Acetato de Glatiramer , Humanos , Factores Inmunológicos/uso terapéutico , Interferón beta/uso terapéutico , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Masculino , Esclerosis Múltiple Recurrente-Remitente/patología , Natalizumab , Fármacos Neuroprotectores/efectos adversos , Péptidos/uso terapéutico , Proyectos Piloto , Recurrencia , Resultado del Tratamiento
15.
Eur J Neurol ; 16(2): 262-7, 2009 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19138330

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Prevalence rates of headache in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients varied widely in recent studies. This study aimed to investigate the 1 year prevalence of headache in MS compared with the general population. METHODS: Population-based case-control study in Germany. RESULTS: We included 491 patients with definite MS (68% female, mean age 45.3 years, 63.7% relapsing remitting MS, mean Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) 3.2, 106 treated with interferon-beta, 53 with glatiramer acetate, 271 untreated) and 447 age and gender matched controls. Headache was diagnosed with a validated questionnaire according to the International Headache Society Criteria. Headache prevalence was 56.2% (tension type headache 37.2%, migraine 24.6%). Headache prevalence rates did not differ from controls. Headache was not associated with disability or treatment. Trigeminal neuralgia was found in 6.3% of MS cases. CONCLUSION: Results suggest that headache in MS patients reflects comorbidity in most conditions.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos Migrañosos/epidemiología , Esclerosis Múltiple/complicaciones , Cefalea de Tipo Tensional/epidemiología , Neuralgia del Trigémino/epidemiología , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Acetato de Glatiramer , Humanos , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Interferón beta/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Trastornos Migrañosos/complicaciones , Esclerosis Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Péptidos/uso terapéutico , Prevalencia , Cefalea de Tipo Tensional/complicaciones , Neuralgia del Trigémino/complicaciones
16.
Schmerz ; 23(1): 33-9, 2009 Feb.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18941799

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of anxiety and depression and the influence of headache severity on these illnesses were examined in patients who were part of the managed care of headache in Bavaria. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 181 patients with headache were screened for anxiety and depression with the German version of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-D). Headache severity was evaluated using the Migraine Disability Assessment Questionnaire (MIDAS). Apart from purely descriptive evaluations, Spearman's coefficients of correlation were calculated. RESULTS: Of the patients 22.7% and 44.7% obtained results at or above the limit of the normal range of depression and anxiety, respectively and 19.3% had results at or above the limit of the normal range for both illnesses. There were significant coefficients of correlation between the severity of headache and both anxiety and depression. CONCLUSION: The results confirm the necessity for an interdisciplinary procedure in treating headache patients in order to achieve a successful therapy. Such a treatment can be realised with the concept of managed care.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos de Ansiedad/epidemiología , Trastorno Depresivo/epidemiología , Cefalea/epidemiología , Trastornos Migrañosos/epidemiología , Adulto , Trastornos de Ansiedad/diagnóstico , Trastornos de Ansiedad/psicología , Trastornos de Ansiedad/terapia , Terapia Combinada , Comorbilidad , Estudios Transversales , Trastorno Depresivo/diagnóstico , Trastorno Depresivo/psicología , Trastorno Depresivo/terapia , Evaluación de la Discapacidad , Femenino , Alemania , Cefalea/psicología , Cefalea/terapia , Humanos , Masculino , Tamizaje Masivo , Persona de Mediana Edad , Trastornos Migrañosos/psicología , Trastornos Migrañosos/terapia , Grupo de Atención al Paciente , Inventario de Personalidad , Derivación y Consulta
17.
Zentralbl Neurochir ; 69(2): 76-9, 2008 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18444218

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has become a standard procedure for movement disorders such as Parkinson's disease, essential tremor or dystonia. Recently, deep brain stimulation of the posterior hypothalamus has been shown to be effective in the treatment of drug-resistant chronic cluster headache. METHODS: DBS of the posterior inferior hypothalamus was performed on two patients with chronic cluster headaches, one 55-year-old man with medically intractable chronic cluster headache since 1996, and one 31-year-old woman with a chronic form since 2002. Both patients showed continuous worsening headaches in the last years despite high dose medical treatment. The patients fulfilled the published criteria for DBS in chronic cluster headaches. Electrodes were implanted stereotactically in the ipsilateral posterior hypothalamus according to the published coordinates (2 mm lateral, 3 mm posterior, 5 mm inferior) referenced to the mid-AC-PC line. RESULTS: The intra- and postoperative course was uneventful and postoperative MRI control documented regular position of the DBS electrodes. The current stimulation parameters were at 12 months postoperatively 0 neg., G pos.; 5.5 V; 60 micros; 180 Hz (Case 1) and 0 neg., G pos.; 3.0 V; 60 micros; 185 Hz, at 3 months postoperatively (Case 2). Surgery- or stimulation-related side effects were not observed. Both patients showed initial pain reduction in the first days whereas 12 respectively 3 month follow-up did not show a significant reduction in attack frequency or intensity. CONCLUSION: Deep brain stimulation of the posterior inferior hypothalamus is an experimental procedure and should be restricted to selected therapy-refractory patients and should be performed in centers experienced in patient selection and performance of DBS as well as postoperative pain treatment. A prospective multi-centre study is necessary to evaluate its effectiveness.


Asunto(s)
Cefalalgia Histamínica/terapia , Estimulación Encefálica Profunda , Hipotálamo Posterior/fisiología , Adulto , Enfermedad Crónica , Electrodos Implantados , Electroencefalografía , Femenino , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Masculino , Microelectrodos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pruebas Neuropsicológicas , Procedimientos Neuroquirúrgicos , Dimensión del Dolor , Insuficiencia del Tratamiento
18.
Cephalalgia ; 27(9): 1050-4, 2007 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17680818

RESUMEN

In 1983 Sjaastad published for the first time diagnostic criteria for cervicogenic headache. Until now there have been no prospective studies investigating whether cervical disc prolapse can cause cervicogenic headache. Between July 2002 and July 2003 50 patients with cervical disc prolapse proven by computed tomography, myelography or magnetic resonance imaging were recruited and prospectively followed for 3 months. Patients were asked at different time points about headache and neck pain by questionnaires and structured interviews. These data were collected prior to and 7 and 90 days after surgery for the disc prolapse. Fifty patients with lumbar disc prolapse, matched for age and sex, undergoing surgery were recruited as controls. Headache and neck pain was diagnosed according to International Headache Society (IHS) criteria. Twelve of 50 patients with cervical disc prolapse reported new headache and neck pain. Seven patients (58%) fulfilled the 2004 IHS criteria for cervicogenic headache. Two of 50 patients with lumbar disc prolapse had new headaches. Their headaches did not fulfil the criteria for cervicogenic headache. One week after surgery, 8/12 patients with cervical disc prolapse and headache reported to be pain free. One patient was improved and three were unchanged. Three months after cervical prolapse surgery, seven patients were pain free, three improved and two unchanged. This prospective study shows an association of low cervical prolapse with cervicogenic headache: headache and neck pain improves or disappears in 80% of patients after surgery for the cervical disc prolapse. These results indicate that pain afferents from the lower cervical roots can converge on the cervical trigeminal nucleus and the nucleus caudalis.


Asunto(s)
Discectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Desplazamiento del Disco Intervertebral/epidemiología , Desplazamiento del Disco Intervertebral/cirugía , Cefalea Postraumática/epidemiología , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Causalidad , Vértebras Cervicales/cirugía , Comorbilidad , Femenino , Alemania/epidemiología , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo
19.
Cephalalgia ; 26(5): 506-10, 2006 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16674758

RESUMEN

Patients with functional gastrointestinal disorders frequently report migraine. We aimed to determine the prevalence of idiopathic upper abdominal symptoms in patients with migraine and compare it with a control population of healthy blood donors. We assessed abdominal symptoms using the Bowel Disease Questionnaire in a series of 488 consecutive blood donors without migraine and 99 patients with migraine. Upper abdominal symptoms were reported by 38%[95% confidence interval (CI) 32, 44] of blood donors compared with 81% (67, 91, P<0.001) of migraine patients. Of the blood donors, 23% (18, 28) reported frequent dyspepsia compared with 60% (44, 74, P<0.001) of the migraine patients. Migraine was associated with frequent upper abdominal symptoms (odds ratio 2.7, 95% CI 1.2, 6.1) after adjusting for age, gender, smoking and consumption of analgesics and alcohol. Upper abdominal symptoms are significantly more frequent in patients with migraine compared with healthy controls. The association between migraine and idiopathic upper abdominal symptoms may suggest common pathophysiological mechanisms.


Asunto(s)
Dispepsia/complicaciones , Dispepsia/epidemiología , Trastornos Migrañosos/complicaciones , Adulto , Dispepsia/fisiopatología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Trastornos Migrañosos/fisiopatología , Prevalencia , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA