Mortality and cardiovascular morbidity associated with haemoglobin levels: a pooled analysis of randomised controlled trials.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Several randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have raised concerns about potential harm associated with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) in chronic kidney disease patients, especially when haemoglobin (Hb) levels above 13 g/dl were targeted. We report the relationship between Hb levels and outcomes in the methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta RCT programme. METHODS: We assessed the association between Hb and a composite end point, as well as its components [all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction (MI) or cerebrovascular events (CVE)], in multiple post hoc analyses of 9 prospective RCTs (3,405 chronic kidney disease patients). Mean Hb levels over time and deviation from target were analysed using a Cox regression model. Time-adjusted average Hb, deviation from target, the last Hb, Hb slope and within-patient Hb variability preceding an event were analysed using a time-dependent Cox model. Hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated. RESULTS: Average Hb <10 g/dl, decrease from stable baseline Hb >1 g/dl, last Hb <10 g/dl, Hb decline >1.5 g/dl/4 weeks and increased Hb variability were associated with a higher risk of the composite end point and all-cause mortality. An increased risk for CVE and MI was found with a last Hb <10 g/dl and with a decrease from baseline >1 g/dl in the preceding month. CONCLUSION: In multiple analyses from a large programme of prospective clinical trials of ESA treatment, risk of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular morbidity risk was consistently higher at Hb <10 g/dl and in patients whose Hb fell below target.

Maintenance treatment of renal anaemia in haemodialysis patients with methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta versus darbepoetin alfa administered monthly: a randomized comparative trial.

BACKGROUND: Several studies with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents claim that maintenance therapy of renal anaemia may be possible at extended dosing intervals; however, few studies were randomized, results varied, and comparisons between agents were absent. We report results of a multi-national, randomized, prospective trial comparing haemoglobin maintenance with methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta and darbepoetin alfa administered once monthly. METHODS: Haemodialysis patients (n = 490) on stable once-weekly intravenous darbepoetin alfa were randomized to methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta once monthly or darbepoetin alfa every 2 weeks for 26 weeks, with dose adjustment for individual haemoglobin target (11-13 g/dL; maximum decrease from baseline 1 g/dL). Subsequently, patients entered a second 26-week period of once-monthly methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta and darbepoetin alfa. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who maintained average haemoglobin ≥10.5 g/dL, with a decrease from baseline ≤1 g/dL, in Weeks 50-53; the secondary endpoint was dose change over time. The trial is registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00394953. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. One hundred and fifty-seven of 245 patients treated with methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta and 99 of 245 patients with darbepoetin alfa met the response definition (64.1% and 40.4%; P < 0.0001). Doses increased by 6.8% with methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta and 58.8% with darbepoetin alfa during once-monthly treatment. Death rates were equal between treatments (5.7%). Most common adverse events included hypertension, procedural hypotension, nasopharyngitis and muscle spasms, with no differences between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta maintained target haemoglobin more successfully than darbepoetin alfa at once-monthly dosing intervals despite dose increases with darbepoetin alfa.

C.E.R.A. once every 4 weeks in patients with chronic kidney disease not on dialysis: The ARCTOS extension study.

C.E.R.A., a continuous erythropoietin receptor activator is approved for the treatment of anemia in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). The ARCTOS (administration of C.E.R.A. in CKD patients to treat anemia with a twice-monthly schedule) phase 3 study demonstrated the efficacy and safety of C.E.R.A. in correcting anemia when administered once every 2 weeks (Q2W) subcutaneously in patients with CKD not on dialysis. We assessed the feasibility and long-term safety of converting patients who responded to treatment with C.E.R.A. Q2W to C.E.R.A. once every 4 weeks (Q4W) during a 24-week extension period. After the core ARCTOS study period (28 weeks), 296 patients entered the 24-week extension period. At week 29, patients who responded to C.E.R.A. Q2W during the core period were rerandomized to receive subcutaneous C.E.R.A. Q2W or Q4W. Patients in the comparator arm could receive darbepoetin alfa once weekly or Q2W. Dosage was adjusted to maintain hemoglobin (Hb) between 11 and 13 g/dL. Mean Hb levels remained stable in all groups, and were comparable at the end of the extension period (mean [standard deviation], C.E.R.A. Q2W, 11.92 [0.90] g/dL; C.E.R.A. Q4W, 11.70 [0.86] g/dL; darbepoetin alfa, 11.89 [0.98] g/dL). Mean within-patient standard deviation values for Hb were also comparable in all groups (0.66, 0.62, and 0.65 g/dL for C.E.R.A. Q2W, C.E.R.A. Q4W and darbepoetin alfa, respectively). All treatments were well tolerated. Subcutaneous C.E.R.A. Q4W is safe and effective in maintaining stable Hb levels in patients with CKD not on dialysis following correction with subcutaneous C.E.R.A. Q2W.

The effect of severe hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetics and haematological response of C.E.R.A.

AIM: To examine the effect of severe hepatic impairment (HI) on the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of the continuous erythropoietin receptor activator, C.E.R.A. METHODS: A non-randomised, multicentre, single-dose, open-label study in patients with HI (n=12) and healthy subjects (n=12). After 2 weeks of screening, participants received a single intravenous dose of C.E.R.A. (200 mug), and were then followed for approximately 8 weeks. The area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) from drug administration to last measurable concentration (AUC(last)), and maximum C.E.R.A. concentration (C(max)) were calculated to assess PK. The baseline-corrected area under the effect curve over 22 days (AUE(corr)) for reticulocyte count was the primary PD parameter. RESULTS: The PK profile was similar in patients and healthy subjects (AUC(last): 6678 vs 6985 ng*h/mL; C(max): 63 vs 75 ng/mL) C.E.R.A. produced a sustained erythropoietic response in bothgroups, with increases in reticulocyte counts peaking 7-9 days post-dose and returning to baseline by Day 22. Although mean AUE(corr) was 64% lower in patients, this may have been an artefact of higher baseline reticulocyte counts. Lower reticulocyte responses in patients did not translate into lower responses for haemoglobin, haematocrit or erythrocytes, suggesting that HI had no clinically relevant effect on the PD of C.E.R.A. C.E.R.A. was well tolerated. Four AEs (none considered drug related) were reported in three patients (mild myocardial ischaemia; mild pyrexia and liver transplant; severe bacterial peritonitis [serious AE]); no AEs were reported in healthy subjects. CONCLUSIONS: Severe HI has no clinically relevant effect on PK parameters or haematological response after single-dose C.E.R.A.

C.E.R.A. corrects anemia in patients with chronic kidney disease not on dialysis: results of a randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: This study examined the efficacy of C.E.R.A., a continuous erythropoietin receptor activator, for correcting anemia in patients who had chronic kidney disease (CKD) and were not on dialysis. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: In this open-label, randomized, parallel-group, Phase III study, 324 adult patients with CKD not on dialysis nor receiving treatment with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive subcutaneous C.E.R.A. once every 2 wk or darbepoetin alfa once weekly during an 18-wk correction period and a 10-wk evaluation period. Thereafter, patients receiving C.E.R.A. were randomly assigned to C.E.R.A. once every 2 wk or once monthly, and patients receiving darbepoetin alfa could receive darbepoetin alfa once weekly or once every 2 wk for a 24-wk extension period. Dosage was adjusted to achieve a hemoglobin (Hb) response and to maintain Hb +/-1 g/dl of the response level and 11 to 13 g/dl. Primary end points were Hb response rate during correction and evaluation and change in Hb concentration between baseline and evaluation. RESULTS: Hb response rates were 97.5% for C.E.R.A. and 96.3% for darbepoetin alfa. Adjusted mean changes in Hb from baseline to evaluation were 2.15 g/dl (C.E.R.A.) and 2.00 g/dl (darbepoetin alfa). Analysis showed that C.E.R.A. once every 2 wk was as effective as darbepoetin alfa once weekly for correcting anemia. Hb levels remained stable in all groups during the extension period. C.E.R.A. and darbepoetin alfa were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Subcutaneous C.E.R.A. once every 2 wk corrects anemia in ESA-naïve patients who are not on dialysis.

Subcutaneous injection pain with C.E.R.A., a continuous erythropoietin receptor activator, compared with darbepoetin alfa.

OBJECTIVE: This study assessed injection site pain following subcutaneous (SC) administration with a continuous erythropoietin receptor activator (C.E.R.A.), compared with darbepoetin alfa in healthy adults. METHODS: In a randomized, placebo-controlled, single-centre, single-blind, three-way crossover study, subjects received one of six treatment sequences (ABC/ACB/BAC/BCA/CBA/CAB) involving SC injection of (A) C.E.R.A. 50 microg, (B) darbepoetin alfa 50 microg, or (C) placebo on days 1, 29, and 57. An initial pilot phase (n = 12) was used to determine the sample size for the confirmatory phase (n = 72), and data were combined for the final analysis (n = 84). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary endpoint was pain on the 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS) immediately after dosing. Secondary endpoints included VAS at 1 hour after dosing and pain on the six-point verbal rating scale (VRS) immediately and at 1 hour after dosing. RESULTS: C.E.R.A. was associated with significantly less pain immediately after SC injection compared with darbepoetin alfa: least squares mean VAS 21.5 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 17.5, 25.5) versus 33.4 (95% CI: 28.4, 38.4) (p < 0.0001). Incidence of pain on the VRS was lower with C.E.R.A. compared with darbepoetin alfa immediately after dosing (p < 0.0001). One hour after administration, most subjects had no VRS pain. A study limitation is the small sample size and the findings need to be confirmed in a large trial of chronic kidney disease patients. CONCLUSIONS: SC injection with C.E.R.A. is significantly less painful than SC darbepoetin alfa in healthy adults. Treatment of anemia in chronic kidney disease with SC injection of C.E.R.A. may provide a lower pain burden compared with darbepoetin alfa.

Efficacy and tolerability of intravenous continuous erythropoietin receptor activator: a 19-week, phase II, multicenter, randomized, open-label, dose-finding study with a 12-month extension phase in patients with chronic renal disease.

BACKGROUND: A continuous erythropoietin receptor activator (C.E.R.A.) is currently in development for the treatment of anemia in patients with chronic renal disease (CRD) receiving or not receiving dialysis treatment. OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to determine the optimal dose and administration schedule for IV C.E.R.A. in patients with CRD previously treated with IV epoetin alfa TIW, and to assess its tolerability profile in these patients. In addition, a 12-month extension phase was used to assess the long-term efficacy and tolerability of C.E.R.A. METHODS: This randomized, open-label, dose-finding study was conducted at 14 study centers across the United States. Male and female patients aged >/=18 years with CRD and CRD-related anemia and receiving treatment with IV epoetin alfa were enrolled. After a 2-week run-in period in which all patients continued to receive their previous epoetin treatment TIW, patients were switched to C.E.R.A. at 1 of 3 doses, determined by multiplying the previous weekly epoetin dose by 1 of 3 ratios (0.25 pg/150 IU, 0.4 pg/150 IU, or 0.6 pg/150 IU). Within each dose group, patients were randomized to 1 of 2 frequency subgroups: QW or Q2W Dose adjustments were not permitted during the first 6 weeks; the total dose during this period was the same for a particular dose group across the frequency subgroups. The primary efficacy parameter was change in hemoglobin (Hb) standardized to a 6-week period between baseline and the point when the patient had a dose change or blood transfusion, thus providing an estimate of Hb change based on starting dose. Following completion of a 19-week core period, patients could enter the 12-month extension period, aiming to maintain Hb concentrations between 11 and 12 g/dL. Adverse events (AEs) were recorded in the patients' case-report forms by the investigators throughout the study. RESULTS: A total of 91 patients entered the core period (mean age, 58 years; 66% male); 10 patients withdrew prematurely during this period (4 owing to AEs and 6 for other reasons). Fifty-three patients continued into the extension period; 22 patients withdrew during this period (6 because of AEs, and 16 for other reasons). There was a significant dose-response effect (P < 0.001) and a significant effect of schedule (P < 0.002) for the primary efficacy end point. Stable Hb concentrations were maintained throughout the study (11-12 g/dL, with a narrow 95% CI). No significant difference between schedules was observed during the extension period, and few dose changes were required (mean, 4 and 2 per patient per year in the QW and Q2W groups, respectively). Nineteen and 22 patients experienced serious AEs during the core and extension periods, respectively, but only 1 event was considered related to study treatment. The most frequent AEs were headache and vomiting during the core study period and dizziness, fatigue, chest pain, and pyrexia during the extension period. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, N C.E.R.A. provided effective maintenance of Hb concentrations in patients receiving dialysis treatment who were switched directly from N epoetin alfa TIW to N C.E.R.A. QW or Q2W C.E.R.A. was generally well tolerated.