Shorter bevacizumab infusions do not increase the incidence of proteinuria and hypertension.

BACKGROUND: A previous study has shown that shorter bevacizumab infusions (0.5 mg/kg/min) can be safely administered without increasing the risk of infusion-related hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs). However, the risk of proteinuria and hypertension in patients receiving shorter infusions of bevacizumab is undetermined. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a multicenter, prospective, observational study in patients receiving <10 mg/kg of bevacizumab infused over 0.5 mg/kg/min. Patients were observed until discontinuation of bevacizumab for progression of cancer or toxicity. The incidence of hypertension and proteinuria was compared with a prior cohort of patients who had received standard duration infusions of bevacizumab. RESULTS: Sixty-three patients received a total of 392 doses of shorter bevacizumab infusions. Nineteen (30.2%) patients experienced proteinuria while receiving bevacizumab. Out of 19 patients, 13 had grade 1 and 6 had grade 2 proteinuria. None of the patients experienced grade 3 or 4 proteinuria. Hypertension was reported in 32 (50.8%) patients receiving bevacizumab. Twelve (19%) patients developed grade 3 or greater hypertension on bevacizumab. The incidence of proteinuria and hypertension was 38.3% and 56.6%, respectively, in patients (N = 120, 1347 infusions) receiving standard duration infusions of bevacizumab. CONCLUSIONS: Shorter bevacizumab infusions (0.5 mg/kg/min) do not increase the risk of proteinuria and hypertension.

A randomized trial assessing the utility of a test-dose program with taxanes.

OBJECTIVE: Taxanes are commonly used anticancer agents with a potential of producing an allergic or hypersensitivity reaction (HSR). We performed a randomized study to evaluate the value of a test dose given prior to the full dose of either paclitaxel or docetaxel. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned to either the administration of the full dose or to the prior administration of a 1 mg intravenous test dose of either paclitaxel or docetaxel. The primary endpoints were severity of the HSR and the cost of drug wastage due to a HSR. RESULTS: Two hundred and eighteen patients were randomized from three different treatment sites. The overall incidence of HSR was 6.5% and there was no significant difference in the incidence of HSR in either group. The mean HSR severity grade was 2.8 for patients without a test dose and 2.3 for those receiving a test dose. There was, however, a reduction in the wastage of taxane in the test dose arm. Wastage avoided in the test dose arm was $1573 per patient who had a HSR and $104 per patient treated with a taxane. CONCLUSION: Although a test dose may not reduce the severity of a HSR with the administration of a taxane, it does reduce the cost associated with drug wastage.

A phase II trial of 6-hydroxymethylacylfulvene (MGI-114, irofulven) in patients with advanced non-small cell cancer previously treated with chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: To test the efficacy and safety of the novel antitumor agent MGI-114 (NSC 683863) in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) previously treated with chemotherapy. METHODS: A two-stage accrual design was used to ensure detection of a true response rate of at least 20% with a type I error of .04. Eligible patients received 11 mg/m2 daily for five consecutive days. Cycles were repeated every 28 days. RESULTS: Fifteen patients received a total of 34 cycles of MGI-114. All patients had a performance status of 0 or 1. Eleven patients had previously received carboplatin and paclitaxel +/- radiation. Two patients had received cisplatin and CPT-11, one patient had received weekly paclitaxel, and one patient had received carboplatin and docetaxel. None of the first 15 patients enrolled experienced objective tumor response, and the study was closed. Forty percent of patients developed > or = grade 2 thrombocytopenia. Grade 3 nausea and > or = grade 2 vomiting were observed in 40% and 47% of patients respectively. Thirty-three percent of patients experienced > or = grade 2 fatigue. CONCLUSIONS: MGI-114, at this dose and schedule, does not have significant activity as second line therapy for patients with advanced NSCLC.

A randomized Phase II trial in patients with carcinoma of an unknown primary site.

BACKGROUND: Current therapy for patients with carcinoma of an unknown primary site (CUP) is inadequate. To develop less toxic and more effective therapies for patients with CUP, a multicenter, randomized, Phase II study was conducted. Patients with CUP received either carboplatin and etoposide (CE) or a combination of paclitaxel, 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin (TFL). METHODS: Patients randomized to Arm A received paclitaxel, 175 mg/m(2), intravenously over 3 hours on Day 1 followed by leucovorin, 300 mg, over 30-60 minutes and 5-fluorouracil, 350 mg/m(2), both intravenously on Days 1-3. Patients randomized to Arm B received etoposide, 100 mg/m(2), intravenously on Days 1-3 and carboplatin at an area under the curve of 6 on Day 1 only. The cycles in both treatment arms were repeated every 28 days. Patients were followed for tumor response, survival, and toxicity. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients were enrolled, 32 of whom were evaluable for response. An identical overall response rate of 19% (95% confidence interval, 4-45%) was noted in each treatment arm. The median survival for the entire study population was 194 days. The median survivals observed in Arm A and Arm B were 251 days and 194 days, respectively (P = 0.91 [difference not significant]). Hematologic toxicity on Arm B was considerable with 29% of the patients developing neutropenia and fever. Toxicity on Arm A was modest. CONCLUSIONS: In this randomized Phase II trial, CE and TFL appeared to have modest activity in CUP patients, with response rates similar to those reported with previously described chemotherapy regimens. Toxicity with CE was more severe than expected, although TFL was found to be well tolerated.

Seven-week continuous-infusion paclitaxel concurrent with radiation therapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung and head and neck cancers.

The goal of these National Cancer Institute-sponsored phase I trials is to determine the feasibility, toxicity, and pharmacokinetics of continuous-infusion (24 hr/d, 7 d/wk, 7 weeks total) intravenous paclitaxel combined with standard, curative-intent thoracic radiation therapy (XRT) for previously untreated, locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer and squamous cell cancer of the head and neck (HNSCC). Eligible patients have locally advanced (T4NXM0 or TXN2-3M0) non-small cell lung cancer ineligible for potentially curative surgical resection or locally advanced HNSCC with an expected 5-year survival rate of less than 25%, as well as a good performance status, adequate hematologic, hepatic, and renal function, and no distant metastases. Non-small cell lung cancer patients receive a total tumor dose of 64.8 Gy megavoltage XRT in 7 weeks at 1.8 Gy once daily, 5 d/wk. Patients with HNSCC receive 70 Gy megavoltage XRT in 7 weeks at 2 Gy once daily, 5 d/wk. Paclitaxel is delivered by continuous intravenous infusion starting 48 hours before XRT and continuing for its duration. The dose of paclitaxel is escalated in cohorts of three patients in a standard phase I design. To date, 49 patients have been entered on both studies and 43 are evaluable for toxicity. Paclitaxel dose is currently at the 17 mg/m2/d dose level, with no dose-limiting toxicity thus far. Clinical outcomes suggest significant activity for this combination. This therapy is feasible and has been well-tolerated through current dose levels. Dose escalation is ongoing.

Myasthenia gravis after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation for lymphoblastic lymphoma.

A 31-year-old female with lymphoblastic lymphoma developed myasthenia gravis (MG) 26 months after receiving an allogeneic bone marrow transplant (BMT) from an HLA-identical sister. She presented with classic symptoms and electromyographic evidence of the disorder approximately 2 weeks after electing to abruptly discontinue her immunosuppressive medications. She initially responded to steroids and acetylcholinesterase inhibitors. Her subsequent course has been characterized by episodes of moderately severe weakness that respond to intravenous immunoglobulin and prednisone. This case of post-transplant MG is only the second reported to have occurred in association with BMT for lymphoblastic lymphoma. Potential risk factors for the development of post-transplant MG are discussed including underlying hematological disorder, HLA phenotype, family history of MG, the presence of chronic GVHD, and recent cessation of immune suppression.