Adverse cardiovascular events in rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with JAK inhibitors: An analysis of postmarketing spontaneous safety reports.

OBJECTIVES: The ORAL Surveillance trial, a postmarketing safety clinical trial, found an increased risk of adverse cardiovascular events and venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients treated with Janus Kinase (JAK) inhibitors compared to tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors. However, additional studies yielded mixed results and data on other JAK inhibitors are limited. METHODS: A retrospective, pharmacovigilance study using the FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS) to assess reporting of adverse cardiovascular events following treatment with JAK inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients between January 2015 and June 2023. To identify disproportionately increased reporting, an adjusted reporting odds ratio (adj.ROR) was calculated with a multivariable logistic regression model. RESULTS: We identified safety reports of 75,407 RA patients treated with JAK inhibitors (tofacitinib, n = 52,181; upadacitinib, n = 21,006; baricitinib, n = 2,220) and 303,278 patients treated with biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs; TNF inhibitors, rituximab, and tocilizumab). The mean age was 61.2(±12) and 59.0(±13), respectively; 82 % and 81 % were women. Compared to bDMARDs, JAK inhibitors were associated with an increased reporting of VTE [n = 1,393, adj.ROR=2.11 (1.97-2.25)], stroke [n = 973, adj.ROR=1.25 (1.16-1.34)], ischemic heart disease [IHD, n = 999, adj.ROR=1.23 (1.13-1.33)], peripheral edema [n = 2699, adj.ROR=1.22 (1.17-1.28)], and tachyarrhythmias [n = 370, adj.ROR=1.15 (1.00-1.33)]. Most of the events occurred in the first year after treatment initiation. When different JAK inhibitors were compared, VTE, stroke, and IHD were more frequently reported with upadacitinib and baricitinib than tofacitinib. When stratified by age category, all safety signals were statistically significant in patients aged≤65 years. CONCLUSION: In this global postmarketing study, JAK inhibitors are associated with increased reporting of VTE, stroke, IHD, and tachyarrhythmias. These adverse events were reported following all JAK inhibitors that were studied, suggesting a class effect.

The prevalence of sacroiliitis on abdominal MRI examinations of patients with Takayasu arteritis.

BACKGROUND: Takayasu arteritis (TA), a systemic large-vessel vasculitis, was reported to have high incidence of spondyloarthropathy. PURPOSE: To evaluate the prevalence of inflammatory sacroiliitis in patients with TA that underwent abdominal/pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations as part of their vasculitis work-up. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Consecutive abdominal/pelvic MRI examinations of 34 patients with TA fulfilling the 1990 ACR criteria and 34 age- and gender-matched controls performed between 2008 and 2020 were retrospectively reviewed for the presence sacroiliitis. The presence of active and structural lesions was scored twice (with a one-month interval between reads) by one reader. Structural lesions were also evaluated on computed tomography, when available, and correlated to MRI findings. Clinical data were extracted from the patients' clinical files. MRI scores were compared between the study and control groups and correlated with the clinical data. RESULTS: Sacroiliitis was evident in 11.7% of the TA group examinations compared to 0.3% in the control group (P = 0.6). Participants with TA had significantly more erosions and fat deposition compared to the control group (Study: 0.01/0.03, Control: 0/0, P = 0.03/0.003, respectively). However, mean sacroiliitis score was not significantly different (Study: 1.06, Control: 0.78, P = 0.015). Of the four patients with TA and sacroiliitis, 3 (75%) had a diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). CONCLUSION: Sacroiliitis was detected in 11.7% of abdominal MRI examinations of patients with TA, 75% of which had associated IBD, suggesting that both IBD and sacroiliitis should be routinely screened in the TA population as their presence may influence treatment decisions.

Immune-Mediated Disease Flares or New-Onset Disease in 27 Subjects Following mRNA/DNA SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination.

BACKGROUND: Infectious diseases and vaccines can occasionally cause new-onset or flare of immune-mediated diseases (IMDs). The adjuvanticity of the available SARS-CoV-2 vaccines is based on either TLR-7/8 or TLR-9 agonism, which is distinct from previous vaccines and is a common pathogenic mechanism in IMDs. METHODS: We evaluated IMD flares or new disease onset within 28-days of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination at five large tertiary centres in countries with early vaccination adoption, three in Israel, one in UK, and one in USA. We assessed the pattern of disease expression in terms of autoimmune, autoinflammatory, or mixed disease phenotype and organ system affected. We also evaluated outcomes. FINDINGS: 27 cases included 17 flares and 10 new onset IMDs. 23/27 received the BNT - 162b2 vaccine, 2/27 the mRNA-1273 and 2/27 the ChAdOx1 vaccines. The mean age was 54.4 ± 19.2 years and 55% of cases were female. Among the 27 cases, 21 (78%) had at least one underlying autoimmune/rheumatic disease prior the vaccination. Among those patients with a flare or activation, four episodes occurred after receiving the second-dose and in one patient they occurred both after the first and the second-dose. In those patients with a new onset disease, two occurred after the second-dose and in one patient occurred both after the first (new onset) and second-dose (flare). For either dose, IMDs occurred on average 4 days later. Of the cases, 20/27 (75%) were mild to moderate in severity. Over 80% of cases had excellent resolution of inflammatory features, mostly with the use of corticosteroid therapy. Other immune-mediated conditions included idiopathic pericarditis (n = 2), neurosarcoidosis with small fiber neuropathy (n = 1), demyelination (n = 1), and myasthenia gravis (n = 2). In 22 cases (81.5%), the insurgence of Adverse event following immunization (AEFI)/IMD could not be explained based on the drug received by the patient. In 23 cases (85.2%), AEFI development could not be explained based on the underlying disease/co-morbidities. Only in one case (3.7%), the timing window of the insurgence of the side effect was considered not compatible with the time from vaccine to flare. INTERPRETATION: Despite the high population exposure in the regions served by these centers, IMDs flares or onset temporally-associated with SARS-CoV-2 vaccination appear rare. Most are moderate in severity and responsive to therapy although some severe flares occurred. FUNDING: none.

The PET-CT Radiological Appearance of Facial Cosmetic Injections: A Pitfall in the Evaluation of the Oncological Patient.

BACKGROUND: Facial rejuvenation using different dermal and sub-dermal injectable compounds is a popular cosmetic procedure which may pose a diagnostic dilemma to the radiologist. OBJECTIVES: To describe the appearance of cosmetic facial fillers on PET-CT. METHODS: All PET-CT exams performed between January 2015 and May 2017 in which findings suggestive of prior facial filler procedures was evident and where anamnestic confirmation with the patient was possible were reviewed. RESULTS: We describe five females who had undergone facial filler procedures leading to calcifications around the mouth and nasolabial triangle. CONCLUSIONS: Familiarity with the appearance of such cosmetic procedures on PET-CT is of paramount importance in order to avoid misinterpretation of the findings leading to unnecessary apprehension and work-up.

The effects of smoking and nicotine ingestion on exercise heat tolerance.

BACKGROUND: Smoking has a thermogenic effect and is associated with low physical performance. Nevertheless, a direct, quantitative effect of acute smoking on exercise heat tolerance has not been reported. METHODS: Sixteen healthy young male volunteers, eight cigarette smokers, and eight non-smokers participated in the study. All subjects performed a maximal oxygen consumption test (VO2max) and a standardized heat tolerance test (HTT) after at least 12 h without smoking under the following conditions: no nicotine exposure, 10 min after nicotine exposure (2 mg nicotine lozenge), and 10 min after smoking two cigarettes (0.8 mg nicotine in each cigarette, smokers only). RESULTS: There was no significant effect of nicotine exposure on physiological performance and heat tolerance in the non-smokers group. In the smokers group, cigarette smoking, but not nicotine ingestion, resulted with higher heart rate (by 9±9 bpm) at the end of the HTT (p<0.05). Moreover, both smoking and nicotine ingestion increased smokers' rectal temperature at the end of the HTT (by 0.24±0.16°C and 0.21±0.26°C, respectively, p<0.05) and were associated with higher sweat rate during the HTT (by 0.08±0.07 g/h and 0.06±0.08 g/h, respectively, p<0.05). Heart rate variability (HRV) analysis also revealed a higher LF/HF (low frequency/high frequency) ratio after exposure to nicotine and smoking in the smokers group compared with no exposure (2.13±2.57 and 2.48±2.76, respectively, p<0.05), indicating a higher sympathetic tone. CONCLUSIONS: According to this preliminary study, cigarette smoking and nicotine ingestion increase the physiological strain during a HTT in smokers. Acute smoking may, therefore, increase heat intolerance and the risk to heat injuries.