[Percutaneous cholecystostomy in multi-field hospital]. / Chreskozhnaya kholetsistostomiya v mnogoprofil'nom statsionare.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the indications, technical features and results of percutaneous cholecystostomy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective single-center study of the results of percutaneous cholecystostomy over 13-year period was carried out. The indications for surgery, technical features and outcomes were studied. RESULTS: The indications for percutaneous cholecystostomy were acute cholecystitis in 40 (63.5%) cases and obstructive jaundice in 23 (36.5%) cases. In acute cholecystitis, cholecystectomy was denied due to severe acute and decompensated chronic diseases. In case of obstructive jaundice, cholecystostomy was preferred if other methods of biliary decompression were impossible. Drainage with locking thread was used in 44 (69.8%) patients. A total of 13 (21.3%) cases of drainage migration were noted. Incidence of migration of catheters with locking threads was 13.6%, without locking threads - 41.2% (p=0.033). Subsequent cholecystectomy was performed in 10 (15.9%) patients. In case of obstructive jaundice, cholecystostomy did not lead to destructive cholecystitis in any case. Six patients with acute cholecystitis had progressive gallbladder destruction. Overall postoperative in-hospital mortality was 36.5% (n=23). Mortality in the group of acute cholecystitis was 32.5% (n=13), in the group of obstructive jaundice - 43.5% (n=10). Mortality was higher in acute cholecystitis Grade III (75.0%) compared to Grade II (21.9%; p=0.008). CONCLUSION: Cholecystostomy is a rare (reserve) intervention. Locking thread significantly reduces the incidence of migration of cholecystostomy catheter. Progressive gallbladder destruction required cholecystectomy in 15% of cases. Treatment of patients with acute cholecystitis depends on physical status and comorbidities.

THE ANALYSIS OF REASONS OF FAILURES TRANSPAPILLARY METHODS OF TREATMENT OF OBSTRUCTIVE JAUNDICE OF CANCEROUS GENESIS.

AIM OF THE STUDY: To analyze the reasons of failed transpapillary interventions in malignant obstructive jaundice. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Single-center retrospective study of results of treatment of patients with malignant obstructive jaundice, in which an attempt of transpapillary endoscopic decompression (n=433) was done. We analyzed cases of clinical and technical failure (n=89) of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), demanded antegrade biliary drainage. RESULTS: Analysis of cases of technical failure of endoscopic transpapillary decompression revealed following causes: inability to reach major duodenal papilla (MDP) due to stenosis of the gastric outlet - 10 (11.2%); inability to visualize MDP - 3 (3.4%); unsuccessful cannulation of the common bile duct - 26 (29.2%); high biliary stricture - 20 (22.5%); tumor proliferation in the area of MDP - 10 (11.2%); previously performed Billroth-2 gastrectomy - 5 (5.6%). Clinical failure of transpapillary stenting was detected in 15 (16.9%) patients. CONCLUSION: Transpapillary intervention in malignant obstructive jaundice had technical success rate 82.9%, with clinical failure in 20.6% of patients. High biliary stricture was significantly more frequent in group of failed ERCP (X²=47.448, p<0.001) in comparison to the group of successful transpapillary decompression (n=8; 5.2%). Frequency of failed endoscopic biliary decompression in patients,with previous Billroth-2 gastrectomy was significantly greater than in successful ERCP group (n=1; 0.29%, p=0.002). Despite this, impaired gastroduodenal anatomy and high biliary strictures are not a contraindication for endoscopic transpapillary decompression. Failed ERCP was associated with higher mortality (X2=4.574; p=0.032). Unit providing treatment of patients with malignant obstructive jaundice should have alternative methods of biliary drainage.