Structural, Functional, and Electrical Remodeling of the Atria With Reduced Cardiorespiratory Fitness: Implications for AF.

BACKGROUND: Reduced cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) is an independent risk factor for the progression of atrial fibrillation (AF). We hypothesized that reduced CRF is associated with structural, functional, and electrical remodeling of the left atrium. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to correlate objectively assessed CRF with functional and electrical left atrial (LA) parameters using invasive and noninvasive assessments. METHODS: Consecutive patients with symptomatic AF undergoing catheter ablation were recruited. CRF was objectively quantified pre-ablation by using cardiopulmonary exercise testing. Using peak oxygen consumption, participants were classified as preserved CRF (>20 mL/kg/min) or reduced CRF (<20 mL/kg/min). LA stiffness was assessed invasively with hemodynamic monitoring and imaging during high-volume LA saline infusion. LA stiffness was calculated as ΔLA diameter/ΔLA pressure over the course of the infusion. LA function was assessed with echocardiographic measures of LA emptying fraction and LA strain. Electrical remodeling was assessed by using high-density electroanatomical maps for LA voltage and conduction. RESULTS: In total, 100 participants were recruited; 43 had reduced CRF and 57 had preserved CRF. Patients with reduced CRF displayed elevated LA stiffness (P = 0.004), reduced LA emptying fraction (P = 0.006), and reduced LA reservoir strain (P < 0.001). Reduced CRF was also associated with reduced LA voltage (P = 0.039) with greater heterogeneity (P = 0.027) and conduction slowing (P = 0.04) with greater conduction heterogeneity (P = 0.02). On multivariable analysis, peak oxygen consumption was independently associated with LA stiffness (P = 0.003) and LA conduction velocities (P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Reduced CRF in patients with AF is independently associated with worse LA disease involving functional and electrical changes. Improving CRF may be a target for restoring LA function in AF.

Utility and Validity of the HFA-PEFF and H2FPEF Scores in Patients With Symptomatic Atrial Fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) represents a significant clinical challenge. Two diagnostic scoring tools have been developed to aid the noninvasive diagnosis of HFpEF: the HFA-PEFF (Heart Failure Association Pre-test assessment, Echocardiography and natriuretic peptide, Functional testing, Final etiology) and the H2FPEF scoring systems. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of these 2 scoring tools for the diagnosis of HFpEF against a gold standard of invasive evaluation in a cohort of patients with AF. METHODS: The authors recruited consecutive patients with symptomatic AF and preserved ejection fraction who were scheduled for an AF ablation procedure. Gold-standard invasive diagnosis of HFpEF was performed at the AF ablation procedure using mean left atrial pressure at rest and following infusion of 500 mL fluid. Each participant was scored according to the noninvasive HFA-PEFF and H2FPEF scoring systems. Sensitivity and specificity analyses were performed to assess the accuracy of these scoring systems in diagnosing HFpEF. RESULTS: In total, 120 participants were recruited. HFpEF was diagnosed invasively in 88 (73.3%) participants, whereas 32 (26.7%) had no HFpEF. Using the HFA-PEFF score, 38 (31.7%) participants had a high probability of HFpEF and 82 (68.3%) had low/intermediate probability of HFpEF. Using the H2FPEF tool, 72 (60%) participants had a high probability of HFpEF and 48 (40%) had intermediate probability. A high HFA-PEFF (≥5 points) score could diagnose HFpEF with a sensitivity of 40% and a specificity of 91%, and a high H2FPEF score (≥6 points) could diagnose HFpEF with a sensitivity of 69% and specificity of 66%. Overall diagnostic accuracy was similar using both tools (AUC: 0.663 vs 0.707, respectively; P = 0.636). CONCLUSIONS: Against a gold standard of invasively diagnosed HFpEF, the HFA-PEFF and H2FPEF scores demonstrate only moderate accuracy in patients with AF and should be utilized with caution in this cohort of patients. (Characterising Left Atrial Function and Compliance in Atrial Fibrillation; ACTRN12620000639921).

Exercise echocardiography to assess left atrial function in patients with symptomatic AF.

Background: Left atrial (LA) function contributes to the augmentation of cardiac output during exercise. However, LA response to exercise in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) is unknown. We explored the LA mechanical response to exercise and the association between LA dysfunction and exercise intolerance. Methods: We recruited consecutive patients with symptomatic AF and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Participants underwent exercise echocardiography and cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET). Two-dimensional and speckle-tracking echocardiography were performed to assess LA function at rest and during exercise. Participants were grouped according to presenting rhythm (AF vs sinus rhythm). The relationship between LA function and cardiorespiratory fitness in patients maintaining SR was assessed using linear regression. Results: Of 177 consecutive symptomatic AF patients awaiting AF ablation, 105 met inclusion criteria; 31 (29.5 %) presented in AF whilst 74 (70.5 %) presented in SR. Patients in SR augmented LA function from rest to exercise, increasing LA emptying fraction (LAEF) and LA reservoir strain. In contrast, patients in AF demonstrated reduced LAEF and reservoir strain at rest, with failure to augment either parameter during exercise. This was associated with reduced VO2Peak compared to those in SR (18.4 ± 5.6 vs 22.5 ± 7.7 ml/kg/min, p = 0.003). In patients maintaining SR, LAEF and reservoir strain at rest and during exercise were associated with VO2Peak, independent of LV function. Conclusion: The maintenance of SR in patients with AF is associated with greater LA reservoir function at rest and greater augmentation with exercise compared to patients in AF. In patients in SR, reduced LA function is associated with reduced exercise tolerance, independent of LV function.

Identification of Subclinical Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction in Patients With Symptomatic Atrial Fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) commonly coexist. We hypothesize that patients with symptomatic AF but without overt clinical HF commonly exhibit subclinical HFpEF according to established hemodynamic criteria. OBJECTIVES: The authors sought to use invasive hemodynamics to investigate the prevalence and implications of subclinical HFpEF in AF ablation patients. METHODS: Consecutive symptomatic AF ablation patients were prospectively recruited. Diagnosis of subclinical HFpEF was undertaken by invasive assessment of left atrial pressure (LAP). Participants had HFpEF if the baseline mean LAP was >15 mm Hg and early HFpEF if the mean LAP was >15 mm Hg after a 500-mL fluid challenge. LA compliance was assessed invasively by monitoring the LAP and LA diameter during direct LA infusion of 15 mL/kg normal saline. LA compliance was calculated as Δ LA diameter/ΔLAP. LA cardiomyopathy was further studied with exercise echocardiography and electrophysiology study. Functional impact was evaluated using cardiopulmonary exercise testing and the AF Symptom Severity questionnaire. RESULTS: Of 120 participants, 57 (47.5%) had HFpEF, 31 (25.8%) had early HFpEF, and 32 (26.7%) had no HFpEF. Both HFpEF and early HFpEF were associated with lower LA compliance compared with those without HFpEF (P < 0.001). Participants with HFpEF and early HFpEF also displayed decreased LA emptying fraction (P = 0.004), decreased LA voltage (P = 0.001), decreased VO2peak (P < 0.001), and increased AF symptom burden (P = 0.002) compared with those without HFpEF. CONCLUSIONS: Subclinical HFpEF is common in AF ablation patients and is characterized by a LA cardiomyopathy, decreased cardiopulmonary reserve and increased symptom burden. The diagnosis of HFpEF may identify patients with AF with the potential to benefit from novel HFpEF therapies. (Characterising Left Atrial Function and Compliance in Atrial Fibrillation; ACTRN12620000639921).

Incident Atrial Fibrillation in Relation to Ventilatory Parameters: A Prospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of data on the association between respiratory function and atrial fibrillation (AF). This study aimed to assess the relationship between forced expiratory volume (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), and FEV1/FVC and incident AF. METHODS: We performed an analysis of prospectively collected data from the UK Biobank. We included all participants with available spirometry and excluded those with prior AF. Incident AF was ascertained through hospitalisation and death records, and dose-response associations were assessed by means of multivariable Cox regression analysis with adjustment for known AF risk factors. RESULTS: We studied 348,219 white individuals (54.1% female) with a median age of 58.1 years (interquartile range [IQR] 50.8-63.5 years). Over a median follow-up time of 11.5 years (IQR 11.0-12.6 years), a total of 18,188 incident AF events occurred. After standardisation to sex, age, and height, the risk of AF consistently increased with decreasing FEV1 percentage predicted, FEV1 z score, and FVC z score. The risk of AF linearly increased with decreasing FEV1/FVC ratio, and those that had airway obstruction as defined by FEV1/FVC ratio < 0.70 had a 23% greater risk of incident AF (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.23, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.19-1.28) compared with those without airway obstruction. Patients with known chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and asthma were at 40% (aHR 1.40, 95% CI 1.29-1.51) and 17% (aHR 1.17, 95% CI 1.12-1.22) increased risk of incident AF respectively. CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that reduced ventilatory function is associated with increased risk of AF independently from age, sex, smoking, and other known AF risk factors.

Anemia and iron deficiency in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac tachyarrhythmia and has a rising global prevalence. Given the increasing burden of AF-related symptoms and complications, new approaches to management are required. Anemia and iron deficiency are common conditions in patients with AF. Furthermore, emerging evidence suggests that the presence of anemia may be associated with worse outcome in these patients. The role of anemia and iron deficiency has been extensively explored in other cardiovascular states, such as heart failure and ischemic heart disease. In particular, the role of iron repletion amongst patients with heart failure is now an established treatment modality. However, despite the strong bidirectional inter-relationship between AF and heart failure, the implications of anemia and iron-deficiency in AF have been scarcely studied. This area is of mechanistic and clinical relevance given the potential that treatment of these conditions may improve symptoms and prognosis in the increasing number of individuals with AF. In this review, we summarise the current published literature on anemia and iron deficiency in patients with AF. We discuss AF complications such as stroke, bleeding, and heart failure, in addition to AF-related symptoms such as exercise intolerance, and the potential impact of anemia and iron deficiency on these. Finally, we summarize current research gaps on anemia, iron deficiency, and AF, and underscore potential research directions.

Rationale and design of the IRON-AF study: a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled study to assess the effect of intravenous ferric carboxymaltose in patients with atrial fibrillation and iron deficiency.

INTRODUCTION: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with significantly impaired quality-of-life. Iron deficiency (ID) is prevalent in patients with AF. Correction of ID in other patient populations with intravenous iron supplementation has been shown to be a safe, convenient and effective way of improving exercise tolerance, fatigue and quality-of-life. The IRON-AF (Effect of Iron Repletion in Atrial Fibrillation) study is designed to assess the effect of iron repletion with intravenous ferric carboxymaltose in patients with AF and ID. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The IRON-AF study is a double-blind, randomised controlled trial that will recruit at least 84 patients with AF and ID. Patients will be randomised to receive infusions of either ferric carboxymaltose or placebo, given in repletion and then maintenance doses. The study will have follow-up visits at weeks 4, 8 and 12. The primary endpoint is change in peak oxygen uptake from baseline to week 12, as measured by cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) on a cycle ergometer. Secondary endpoints include changes in quality-of-life and AF disease burden scores, blood parameters, other CPET parameters, transthoracic echocardiogram parameters, 6-minute walk test distance, 7-day Holter/Event monitor burden of AF, health resource utilisation and mortality. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study protocol has been approved by the Central Adelaide Local Health Network Human Research Ethics Committee, Australia. The results of this study will be disseminated through publications in peer-reviewed journals and conference presentations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12620000285954).

Outcomes of persistent and long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation ablation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Aims: Several techniques have been utilized for the ablation of persistent (P) and long-standing persistent (LsP) atrial fibrillation (AF); however, the best approach of substrate ablation remains poorly defined. This study aims to examine the impact of ablation approach on outcomes associated with P or LsP AF ablation by conducting a meta-analysis and regression on contemporary literature. Methods and results: A systematic literature review was conducted up to 29 July 2015 for scientific literature reporting on outcomes associated with P or LsP AF ablation. One hundred and thirteen studies reported outcomes in a total of 18 657 patients undergoing various ablation approaches for the treatment of P-LsP AF between 2001 and 2015. The point efficacy estimate of a single-AF ablation procedure without the use of anti-arrhythmic drugs was 43% (95% CI; 39-47%). Multiple procedures and/or the use of anti-arrhythmic drugs increase success to 69% (95% CI; 66-71%). Meta-regression revealed that ablation technique (P < 0.001) and left atrial size (P = 0.02) were predictive of single procedure, drug-free success. The addition of extra-pulmonary substrate approaches was associated with declining efficacy when compared to a pulmonary vein ablation alone. Conclusion: The efficacy of a single-AF ablation procedure for P or LsP AF is 43%; however, can be increased to 69% with the use of multiple procedures and/or anti-arrhythmic drugs. Current literature supports the finding that pulmonary vein antrum ablation/isolation is at least equivalently efficacious to other contemporary P-LsP ablation strategies.