Improved metabolism and body composition beyond normal levels following gastric bypass surgery: a longitudinal study.

BACKGROUND: The cardiometabolic risk profile improves following bariatric surgery. However, the degree of improvement in relation to weight-stable control subjects is unknown. OBJECTIVES: To study the differences in cardiometabolic risk profile between formerly obese patients following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) surgery and control subjects. METHODS: Subjects undergoing RYGB and reaching a BMI <30 kg m-2 2 years postsurgery were matched with control subjects regarding age, sex and BMI. The following examinations were performed: insulin sensitivity measured by hyperinsulinaemic-euglycaemic clamp, insulin clearance, homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), lipid profile, inflammatory marker levels, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and subcutaneous adipose tissue cellularity (fat cell size and number). RESULTS: Sixty-nine subjects undergoing RYGB were matched to a control subject. Insulin sensitivity measured by hyperinsulinaemic-euglycaemic clamp, blood pressure, inflammatory status and glucose, triglyceride and HDL cholesterol levels were comparable to values of control subjects. However, HOMA-IR (1.0 ± 0.5 vs. 1.3 ± 0.7, P = 0.005), insulin clearance (0.38 ± 0.08 vs. 0.34 ± 0.08 µL m-2  min-1 , P < 0.0001) and circulating levels of insulin (31 ± 15 vs. 37 ± 17 pmol L-1 , P = 0.008), total cholesterol (4.1 ± 0.7 vs. 4.8 ± 0.9 mmol L-1 , P < 0.0001) and LDL cholesterol (2.1 ± 0.6 vs. 2.9 ± 0.8 mmol L-1 , P < 0.0001) were improved beyond the levels in matched control subjects. Furthermore, formerly obese subjects had higher lean and lower fat mass as well as a more benign type of adipose cellularity (hyperplasia with many small fat cells) compared to control subjects. CONCLUSIONS: Subjects who underwent RYGB and reached a postobese state demonstrated a beneficial body composition, slightly increased insulin sensitivity as indirectly measured by HOMA-IR and higher insulin clearance, lower atherogenic lipid/lipoprotein levels and benign adipocyte morphology compared with control subjects who had never been obese. In line with previous results, our findings may in part explain why RYGB confers long-term protection against metabolic complications.

Adipose tissue morphology predicts improved insulin sensitivity following moderate or pronounced weight loss.

BACKGROUND: Cross-sectional studies show that white adipose tissue hypertrophy (few, large adipocytes), in contrast to hyperplasia (many, small adipocytes), associates with insulin resistance and increased risk of developing type 2 diabetes. We investigated if baseline adipose cellularity could predict improvements in insulin sensitivity following weight loss. METHODS: Plasma samples and subcutaneous abdominal adipose biopsies were examined in 100 overweight or obese individuals before and 10 weeks after a hypocaloric diet (7±3% weight loss) and in 61 obese subjects before and 2 years after gastric by-pass surgery (33±9% weight loss). The degree of adipose tissue hypertrophy or hyperplasia (termed the morphology value) in each individual was calculated on the basis of the relationship between fat cell volume and total fat mass. Insulin sensitivity was determined by homeostasis model assessment-estimated insulin resistance (HOMAIR). RESULTS: In both cohorts at baseline, subjects with hypertrophy displayed significantly higher fasting plasma insulin and HOMAIR values than subjects with hyperplasia (P<0.0001), despite similar total fat mass. Plasma insulin and HOMAIR were normalized in both cohorts following weight loss. The improvement (delta insulin or delta HOMAIR) was more pronounced in individuals with hypertrophy, irrespective of whether adipose morphology was used as a continuous (P=0.0002-0.027) or nominal variable (P=0.002-0.047). Absolute adipocyte size associated (although weaker than morphology) with HOMAIR improvement only in the surgery cohort. Anthropometric measures at baseline (fat mass, body mass index, waist-to-hip ratio or waist circumference) showed no significant association with delta insulin or delta HOMAIR. CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to anthropometric variables or fat cell size, subcutaneous adipose morphology predicts improvement in insulin sensitivity following both moderate and pronounced weight loss in overweight/obese subjects.

Regional variations in the relationship between arterial stiffness and adipocyte volume or number in obese subjects.

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular disease is associated with multiple risk factors including stiff arteries and large adipocytes. Whether the latter two are interrelated is unknown. We aimed to determine whether arterial stiffness is associated with fat cell size and number in subcutaneous or visceral white adipose tissue (WAT). METHODS: A cross-sectional study of 120 obese subjects scheduled for bariatric surgery in whom WAT mass and distribution was assessed by dual-X-ray absorptiometry. Biopsies from visceral (greater omentum) and subcutaneous (abdominal) WAT were obtained to calculate fat cell volume and number. Arterial stiffness was determined as aortic pulse wave velocity (PWV). RESULTS: Visceral adipocyte volume, but not number, was strongly (P<0.0001) and positively correlated with PWV, explaining 20% of the inter-individual variations in this parameter. This relationship remained significant after correction for clinical confounders. PWV correlated positively (r=0.38, P<0.0001) with visceral (but not subcutaneous) WAT mass. Furthermore, PWV was also positively associated with subcutaneous adipocyte volume (r=0.20, P=0.031) and negatively with fat cell number (r=-0.26, P=0.006). However, the relationships between PWV and visceral WAT mass or subcutaneous fat cell size/number became non-significant when controlling for visceral fat cell volume. In a multiple regression analysis to determine the factors that explain variations in PWV, only visceral fat cell volume, age, pulse rate and diastolic blood pressure entered the model, together explaining 42% of the variation in PWV. CONCLUSIONS: Visceral fat cell volume was the only WAT parameter that constituted an independent and significant, positive regressor for arterial stiffness determined by PWV. Although a causal relationship is not established, visceral fat cell volume may explain the well-known correlation between central fat mass, arterial stiffness and cardiovascular risk, at least in severely/morbidly obese subjects.