Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros











Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
JACC Cardiovasc Interv ; 9(13): 1374-83, 2016 07 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27388826

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess predictors of adverse 1-week outcomes and determine the effect of left atrial appendage (LAA) morphology following LAA closure (LAAC) with Amplatzer devices. BACKGROUND: Percutaneous LAAC is a valuable treatment option for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation. Determinants of procedural safety events with Amplatzer occluders are not well established, and the possibly interrelating effect of LAA anatomy is unknown. METHODS: Between 2009 and 2014, 500 consecutive patients with atrial fibrillation ineligible or at high risk for oral anticoagulation underwent LAAC using Amplatzer devices. Procedure- and device-related major adverse events (MAEs) were defined as the composite of death, stroke, major or life-threatening bleeding, serious pericardial effusion, device embolization, major access-site vascular complication, or need for cardiovascular surgery within 7 days following the intervention. RESULTS: Patients (mean age 73.9 ± 10.1 years) were treated with Amplatzer Cardiac Plug (n = 408 [82%]) or Amulet (n = 92 [18%]) devices. Early procedural success was 97.8%, and MAEs occurred in 29 patients (5.8%). Independent predictors of MAEs included device repositioning (odds ratio: 9.13; 95% confidence interval: 2.85 to 33.54; p < 0.001) and left ventricular ejection fraction <30% (odds ratio: 4.08; 95% confidence interval: 1.49 to 11.20; p = 0.006), with no effect of device type or size. Angiographic LAA morphology, characterized as cauliflower (33%), cactus (32%), windsock (20%), or chicken wing (15%), was not associated with procedural success (p = 0.51) or the occurrence of MAEs (p = 0.78). CONCLUSIONS: In this nonrandomized study, procedural success of LAAC using Amplatzer devices was high. MAEs within 7 days were predicted by patient- and procedure-related factors. Although LAA morphology displayed substantial heterogeneity, outcomes were comparable across the spectrum of LAA anatomies.


Asunto(s)
Apéndice Atrial , Fibrilación Atrial/terapia , Cateterismo Cardíaco/instrumentación , Dispositivo Oclusor Septal , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Apéndice Atrial/diagnóstico por imagen , Apéndice Atrial/fisiopatología , Fibrilación Atrial/diagnóstico , Fibrilación Atrial/fisiopatología , Función del Atrio Izquierdo , Cateterismo Cardíaco/efectos adversos , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Angiografía Coronaria , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Oportunidad Relativa , Diseño de Prótesis , Sistema de Registros , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Volumen Sistólico , Suiza , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Función Ventricular Izquierda
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA