Analysis of satisfaction and surgical outcomes of a major ambulatory surgery program for penile implant. / Análisis de satisfacción y resultados quirúrgicos de un programa de cirugía mayor ambulatoria para el implante de prótesis de pene.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Penile prosthesis (PP) surgery is performed in many institutions as an inpatient procedure. We have recently initiated a major ambulatory surgery (MAS) program, thus reducing the hospital stay. The objective of this study was to assess the feasibility, complications and satisfaction of the implantation of outpatient surgery PP program in our hospital. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective observational study evaluating the results and satisfaction of PP implanted as an outpatient procedure in Bellvitge University Hospital during 2018. RESULTS: During 2018 we implanted 49 PP: 27 (55%) inpatient surgeries vs. 22 (45%) outpatient surgeries. Of these 22, 2 (9%) were second implants. All patients underwent both general anesthesia and crural, proximal dorsal nerve and transversus abdominis plane block (TAP). Complication rates between inpatient and outpatient procedures were similar, 2 (7%) and 1 (5%), respectively, without reporting infections or requiring PP removal. Postoperatively, a satisfaction telephone survey was conducted in 19 (86%) patients: 16 (84%) considered the time of hospital stay as appropriate, 15 (79%) would have preferred to be operated again in an outpatient care setting and 15 (79%) would recommend it. The patients' main concerns were related to being at home with no medical assistance at home and about coming back the next day for drainage removal. All patients reported well-controlled pain without requiring opioid intake in any case. CONCLUSIONS: In our series, PP implantation in an ambulatory care setting is feasible and safe. Although there are some aspects that should be improved, the program showed acceptable satisfaction rates and an adequate postoperative pain control, neither raising the administration of opioids, nor increasing complications and re-admission rates.

Simultaneous bilateral percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Effectiveness and safety. / Nefrolitotomía percutánea bilateral simultánea: Eficacia y seguridad".

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of simultaneous bilateral percutaneous nephrolithotomy performed in patients affected with bilateral renal calculi. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a prospective study from September 2012 to November 2016. Patients diagnosed of bilateral kidney stones with abdominal CT scan were included. Surgical technique prone position, renal puncture guided by fluoroscopy and tract dilation up to 24Ch. We reviewed demographic and stone characteristics, stone free rate, clinical success, complications and follow-up. RESULTS: During the study period, 732 percutaneous nephrolithotomies were performed. Eighteen patients were included (36 renal units, 2.5%), 13 men and 5 women, with a median age of 58 years and an interquartile range (IQR) of 40-66. Median stone burden was 228mm2 (IQR 134-389); median operative time, 150minutes (IQR 97-180); and median hospital stay, 5 days (IQR 5-15). Stone free rate was 80%. Residual calculi were encountered in 8 renal units (22.2%) and required other complementary techniques for their complete tesolution 4 external shockwave lithotripsies, one open ureterolithotomy, 2 ureteroscopies and one second look. Major complications included 4 cases of severe hemorrhage managed with angiographic embolization. The median follow-up was 36 months (range 26-46). CONCLUSIONS: Simultaneous bilateral percutaneous nephrolithotomy is an effective and safe procedure in patients affected with bilateral renal calculi. It is a surgical challenge that should be performed in selected patients and in centers with experience.