Endosonography and endosonography guided needle aspiration for left adrenal gland assessment in lung cancer patients - 10 years' experience.

INTRODUCTION: Lung cancer patients (LCP) require invasive evaluation of left adrenal glands (LAG) if distant metastases (M1b/1c) are suspected in CT or PET-CT. Only few studies showed utility of endosonography and particularly EUS-b-FNA as minimally invasive endoscopic method of LAG analysis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective study of consecutive LCP was conducted in two pulmonology centers between January 2010 and December 2019. Records of complete endosonographic staging with use of single ultrasound bronchoscope or two scopes were overviewed. The analysis included cases of enlarged LAG (body size or limbs > 10 mm) examined and sampled by EUS-b-FNA or EUS-FNA. RESULTS: 142 of 2596 LCP staged by complete endosonography (M: 88, F: 54 mean age 64.7) had enlarged LAG, which were biopsied by conventional EUS-FNA (52) and/or by EUS-b-FNA (90). Strong correlation with gland diameter (P < 0.001) was observed. The incidence of LAG metastases in analyzed group was 52.1% (74/142) and regarding histology: SCLC 76.9% (10/13), adenocarcinoma 66.7% (44/66), NSCLC 56.3% (9/16) and SCC 17.5% (7/40). A specificity and PPV for both methods were 100%. A sensitivity, accuracy and NPV for EUS-FNA were 91.7%, 96.2%, 93.3% and for EUS-b-FNA 88%, 93.3% and 87%, respectively and no significant differences for both methods were noted (P = 0.62, 0.44, 0.35). No severe complications afterall biopsies were observed. A six months clinical follow up included all negative LCP with enlarged LAG. CONCLUSIONS: After our study EUS-b-FNA seems to be a reasonable method of choice for LAG assesssment in LCP.

Usefulness of combined endobronchial and endoscopic ultrasound-guided needle aspiration in the diagnosis of sarcoidosis: a prospective multicenter trial.

INTRODUCTION: Needle biopsy of enlarged lymph nodes is an accepted method for the diagnostic workup of sarcoidosis, but the optimal endosonography­guided approach is yet to be determined. OBJECTIVES: The aim of our study was to assess the relative diagnostic yield of combined ultrasound­guided needle aspiration (CUS­b­NA), which includes endobronchial ultrasound­guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS­TBNA) with endoscopic ultrasound fine­needle aspiration (EUS­b­FNA), as well as the role of the cell block (CB) technique and lymph node localization in the diagnostic workup of sarcoidosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a prospective multicenter study including consecutive patients with clinical suspicion of stage I or II sarcoidosis. CUS­b­NA with smears and CB technique were performed in the whole study group. If a biopsy result was not conclusive, an invasive diagnostic workup and a 6-month follow­up were scheduled. RESULTS: Out of 77 screened patients, 54 signed written consent and 50 were enrolled for the final analysis. The overall sensitivity of EBUS­TBNA, EUS­b­FNA, and CUS­b­NA was 76.6%, 70.2%, and 91.7%, respectively. There were no differences between EBUS­TBNA and EUS­b­FNA (P = 0.52) but CUS­b­NA had a higher diagnostic yield (P = 0.005 and P = 0.001, respectively). Adding the CB method to smear technique (P = 0.008) and biopsy of the subcarinal lymph nodes increased the diagnostic yield (P = 0.001).  Conclusions: The diagnostic yield of CUS­b­NA is higher than that of endosonographic techniques alone in the diagnostic workup of stage I and II sarcoidosis. The preparation of cytological material including CB and the choice of the subcarinal lymph node station for the biopsy increase the diagnostic efficacy.

Transbronchial lung cryobiopsy guided by radial mini-probe endobronchial ultrasound in interstitial lung diseases - a multicenter prospective study.

INTRODUCTION: Transbronchial lung cryobiopsy (TBLC) is commonly used in diagnosing interstitial lung diseases (ILDs). Ageneral anesthesia with endotracheal intubation, balloon blockers and fluoroscopy control is the most common modality. Simplifying the procedure without decreasing it's safety could result in wider use. Prospective, observational study was conducted in three Polish pulmonology centers to evaluate safety and diagnostic yield of TBLC under conscious sedation, without intubation and bronchial blockers and with radial-EBUS guidance instead of fluoroscopy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In patients suspected of ILD, in accordance with high resolution computer tomography (HRCT) selected lung segments were examined with radial-EBUS mini probe without aguide sheath. If the lung infiltrations were visible this locations were preferred. If not, specimens were taken from two different segments of the same lobe. Two to five biopsies with freezing time 5-8 seconds were performed. Moreover ultrasound examination was used to avoid injury of lung vessels. RESULTS: From March 2017 to September 2019 - 114 patients (M: 59, F: 55) of mean (SD) age 54 (14) years were included to the study on the basis of medical history and HRCT. Histopathology was conclusive in 90 (79%) patients and included 16 different diagnoses (sarcoidosis, EAA, COP predominantly). 24 inconclusive biopsies of unclassifiable pulmonary fibrosis were followed up. Complications included five cases (4.4%) of pneumothorax requiring achest tube drainage and aminor and moderate bleeding in few cases. There was no need for use of balloon bronchial blockers. CONCLUSIONS: TBLC under conscious sedation guided by radial EBUS mini-probe is novel, reasonable and safe technique for histological diagnosis of ILDs.

[Advances in endoscopic diagnosis of sarcoidosis]. / Postepy w endoskopowej diagnostyce sarkoidozy.

A diagnosis of pulmonary sarcoidosis is based on the assessment of clinical outcome, radiology findings and detection of noncaseating granulomas in cytology or histology specimens. Cytological material obtained from enlarged lymph nodes and/or histological specimens from bronchial mucosa and lung tissue are examined according to sarcoidosis stage. The most available are standard bronchoscopic methods as conventional transbronchial needle aspiration (cTBNA), endobronchial biopsy (EBB) and transbronchial lung biopsy (TBLB) both performed with use of forceps. The new endoscopic techniques introduced to pulmonary diagnostics are: endobronchial ultrasoundguided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) and endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) or if used by the ultrasound bronchoscope (EUS-b-FNA) and transbronchial lung cryobiopsy (TBLC). Considering a dynamic improvement in cytology assessment techniques (processed as cytology smears and cell blocks) the endoscopic methods with use of fine needle aspiration biopsy of enlarged lymph nodes became a method of choice in sarcoidosis with lymphadenopathy, and published data suggest a higher diagnostic yield when performed under endosonographic guidance. The optimal approach (transbronchial or transesophageal) and the selection of mediastinal lymph node stations considered for biopsy still need evaluation. Also TBLC, successfully used in the diagnosis of other diffuse parenchymal lung diseases, requires more experiences and trials to establish its role in diagnosis of pulmonary sarcoidosis.

Initial Polish experience of Flexible 19 gauge Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration.

INTRODUCTION: EBUS is a well established minimally invasive diagnostic tool for mediastinal and hilar lymphadenopathy. The novel ViziShot Flex 19G needle (Olympus Respiratory America, Redmond, WA, USA) was introduced in 2015 in order to improve loaded scope flexion and to obtain larger tissue samples for analysis. The aims of this study were to assess diagnostic yield of Flex 19G needles and to present endoscopist's feedback about the endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA). MATERIAL AND METHODS: The Flex 19G needles were used in patients with hilar and/or mediastinal adenopathy in two Polish pulmonology centers. Cytology smears and cell blocks (CB) were prepared. The prospective analysis was performed due to collected data. RESULTS: Twenty two selected patients with confirmed adenopathy on chest-CT (mean age 58 ± 12) underwent EBUS-TBNA with use of Flex 19G needles. All procedures occurred to be diagnostic for smears (yield 100%). The malignancy was found in 15 cases (68.2%), and benign adenopathy in 7 (31.8%). In 12 of 14 cases of lung cancer (yield 85.7%) CB were diagnostic for immunohistochemical and molecular staining. After puncturing nodes, especially in hilar position not extensive bleeding was observed. Comparing to standard 21/22G EBUS-TBNA endoscopists underlined better flexion of loaded scope and sample adequacy and found non-significant differences in another biopsy details. CONCLUSIONS: The first Polish experience with use of Flex 19G EBUS-TBNA needle occurs to be similar in performance with standard technique with use of 22/21G needles and presents high diagnostic yield for lung cancer diagnostics, especially when preparing CB. A safety profile of the biopsy is acceptable.

Accurate and safe mediastinal restaging by combined endobronchial and endoscopic ultrasound-guided needle aspiration performed by single ultrasound bronchoscope.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this prospective trial was to assess the diagnostic utility of combined endobronchial (EBUS) and endoscopic (EUS) ultrasound-guided needle aspiration by use of a single ultrasound bronchoscope (CUSb-NA) in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) restaging in patients after induction therapy. METHODS: In a consecutive group of NSCLC patients with pathologically confirmed N2 disease (clinical stage IIIa and IIIb) who underwent induction chemotherapy, CUSb-NA was performed. All of the patients with negative or suspected for metastases (uncertain) diagnosed by endoscopy underwent subsequently transcervical extended mediastinal lymphadenectomy (TEMLA) as a confirmatory test. RESULTS: From January 2009 to December 2012, 106 patients met the inclusion criteria and underwent restaging CUSb-NA under mild sedation, in whom 286 (mean 2.7, range 2-5) lymph node stations were biopsied, 127 (mean 1.2, range 1-3) by EBUS-transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA) and 159 (mean 1.5, range 1-4) by EUS-fine needle aspiration (FNA). The CUSb-NA revealed metastatic lymph node involvement in 37/106 patients (34.9%). In 69 (65.1%) patients with negative and uncertain CUSb-NA in 4 (3.8%) out of them, who underwent subsequent TEMLA metastatic nodes were found in 18 patients (17.0%) and there were single lymph nodes found only in one mediastinal station (minimal N2) in 10 (9.4%) out of them. False-positive results were found in 2 (1.9%) patients. In 9 (8.5%) patients CUSb-NA occurred to be false negative in Stations 2R and 4R (only accessible for EBUS), exclusively in small nodes and in 4 (3.8%) patients in Station 5-not accessible for CUSb-NA. The prevalence of mediastinal lymph node metastases in the present study was 51.9%. Diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, total accuracy, positive predictive value and negative predictive value (NPV) of the restaging CUSb-NA were 67.3% (95% CI [confidence interval]-53-79), 96.0% (95% CI-86-99), 81.0% (95% CI-73-87), 95.0% (95% CI-83-99) and 73.0% (95% CI-61-83), respectively. The sensitivity, accuracy and NPV of CUSb-NA were higher compared with EBUS-TBNA and EUS-FNA alone. No complications of CUSb-NA were observed. CONCLUSIONS: The CUSb-NA is a reasonable and safe technique in mediastinal restaging in NSCLC patients after induction therapy. Following our data, in patients with negative result of CUSb-NA, a surgical restaging of the mediastinum should be considered.