Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros











Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys ; 82(2): 863-70, 2012 Feb 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21398048

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To evaluate diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI) for response prediction before and response assessment during and early after preoperative radiochemotherapy (RCT) for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Twenty patients receiving RCT for LARC underwent MRI including DWI before RCT, after 10-15 fractions and 1 to 2 weeks before surgery. Tumor volume and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC; b-values: 0-1000 s/mm(2)) were determined at all time points. Pretreatment tumor ADC and volume, tumor ADC change (∆ADC), and volume change (∆V) between pretreatment and follow-up examinations were compared with histopathologic findings after total mesorectal excision (pathologic complete response [pCR] vs. no pCR, ypT0-2 vs. ypT3-4, T-downstaging or not). The discriminatory capability of pretreatment tumor ADC and volume, ∆ADC, and ∆V for the detection of pCR was compared with receiver operating characteristics analysis. RESULTS: Pretreatment ADC was significantly lower in patients with pCR compared with patients without (in mm(2)/s: 0.94 ± 0.12 × 10(-3) vs. 1.19 ± 0.22 × 10(-3), p = 0.003), yielding a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 86% for detection of pCR. The volume reduction during and after RCT was significantly higher in patients with pCR compared with patients without (in %: ΔV(during): -62 ± 16 vs. -33 ± 16, respectively, p = 0.015; and ΔV(post): -86 ± 12 vs. -60 ± 21, p = 0.012), yielding a sensitivity of 83% and specificity of 71% for the ΔV(during) and, respectively, 83% and 86% for the ΔV(post). The ∆ADC during (ΔADC(during)) and after RCT (ΔADC(post)) showed a significantly higher value in patients with pCR compared with patients without (in %: ΔADC(during): 72 ± 14 vs. 16 ± 12, p = 0.0006; and ΔADC(post): 88 ± 35 vs. 26 ± 19, p = 0.0011), yielding a sensitivity and specificity of 100% for the ΔADC(during) and, respectively, 100% and 93% for the ΔADC(post). CONCLUSIONS: These initial findings indicate that DWI, using pretreatment ADC, ΔADC(during), and ΔADC(post) may be useful for prediction and early assessment of pathologic response to preoperative RCT of LARC, with higher accuracy than volumetric measurements.


Asunto(s)
Quimioradioterapia Adyuvante/métodos , Imagen de Difusión por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Neoplasias del Recto/terapia , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antimetabolitos Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Fraccionamiento de la Dosis de Radiación , Femenino , Fluorouracilo/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Compuestos Organoplatinos/administración & dosificación , Oxaliplatino , Periodo Preoperatorio , Curva ROC , Neoplasias del Recto/metabolismo , Neoplasias del Recto/patología , Recto/cirugía , Inducción de Remisión/métodos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Carga Tumoral/efectos de la radiación
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA