Dietary intake and major food sources of polyphenols in people with type 2 diabetes: The TOSCA.IT Study.

PURPOSE: Proper evaluation of polyphenols intake at the population level is a necessary step in order to establish possible associations with health outcomes. Available data are limited, and so far no study has been performed in people with diabetes. The aim of this work was to document the intake of polyphenols and their major food sources in a cohort of people with type 2 diabetes and in socio-demographic subgroups. METHODS: We studied 2573 men and women aged 50-75 years. Among others, anthropometry was measured by standard protocol and dietary habits were investigated by food frequency questionnaire (EPIC). The intake of polyphenols was evaluated using US Department of Agriculture and Phenol-Explorer databases. RESULTS: The mean total polyphenol intake was 683.3 ± 5.8 mg/day. Non-alcoholic beverages represented the main food source of dietary polyphenols and provided 35.5% of total polyphenol intake, followed by fruits (23.0%), alcoholic beverages (14.0%), vegetables (12.4%), cereal products and tubers (4.6%), legumes (3.7%) and oils (2.1%); chocolate, cakes and nuts are negligible sources of polyphenols in this cohort. The two most important polyphenol classes contributing to the total intake were flavonoids (47.5%) and phenolic acids (47.4%). Polyphenol intake increased with age and education level and decreased with BMI; furthermore, in the northern regions of Italy, the polyphenol intake was slightly, but significantly higher than in the central or southern regions. CONCLUSIONS: The study documents for the first time the intake of polyphenols and their main food sources in people with diabetes using validated and complete databases of the polyphenol content of food. Compared with published data, collected in people without diabetes, these results suggest a lower intake and a different pattern of intake in people with diabetes.

Uric acid is not an independent predictor of cardiovascular mortality in type 2 diabetes: a population-based study.

OBJECTIVE: Although some studies have suggested that uric acid is a risk factor for mortality, this relationship is still uncertain in people with type 2 diabetes. METHODS: The study base was the population-based cohort of 1540 diabetic subjects (median age 68.9 years) of the Casale Monferrato Study. The role of serum uric acid on 15-years all-cause, cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular mortality was assessed by multivariate Cox proportional hazards modeling. RESULTS: Baseline levels of serum uric acid were negatively correlated with HbA1c, were higher in men and in the elderly and were independently associated with components of the metabolic syndrome. Out of 14,179 person-years, 1000 deaths (514 due to cardiovascular diseases) were observed. Compared to the lower quartile of uric acid, HRs (95% CI) in the upper quartile were 1.47 (1.22-1.76) for all-cause mortality; 1.40 (1.09-1.80) for cardiovascular mortality and 1.50 (1.15-1.96) for non-cardiovascular mortality. In multiple adjusted models, however, HRs were 1.30 (1.06-1.60) for all-cause mortality, 1.13 (0.85-1.50) for cardiovascular mortality and 1.50 (1.11-2.02) for non-cardiovascular mortality (men 1.87, 1.19-2.95; women 1.20, 0.80-1.80); the latter appeared to be due to neoplastic diseases (HR in all combined quartiles vs. lower quartile: both sexes 1.59, 1.05-2.40; men 1.54, 0.83-2.84, women 1.68, 0.95-2.92). CONCLUSIONS: In diabetic people, uric acid is associated with components of the metabolic syndrome but it may not be accounted as an independent risk factor for cardiovascular mortality. The increased all-cause mortality risk with higher levels of uric acid might be due to increased neoplastic mortality and deserves future studies.

Low adherence of General Practitioners to National Cholesterol Education Program guidelines for the management of hyperlipidaemia.

Aim of our study was to assess adherence to the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult-Treatment Panel II (NCEP-ATP II) in patients cared for by General Practitioners (GPs) in an Italian community. The design of the work was cross-sectional cohort study; the base was an unselected cohort of 1,168 patients cared for by GPs and screened at our lipid clinic in 1994-1995 in the Province of Turin (Italy). Blood samples were collected after 12-hr fast to measure plasma levels of total cholesterol, triglycerides, HDL-cholesterol, glucose and thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH). LDL-cholesterol was calculated using Friedewald's formula. In patients with body mass index (BMI) >30 kg/m2, an oral glucose tolerance test was performed. Blood pressure was measured in all patients, and a baseline ECG or a stress test was performed in those with unknown cardiovascular disease (CVD), then they were classified following the NCEP-ATP II criteria. Primary hyperlipidaemia accounted for 86.9% of the cohort with most patients requiring pharmacological treatment; in 34.4% of the patients, LDL-cholesterol values were > or = 6.46 mmol/l (250 mg/dl) and in 23.7% with established CVD, LDL-cholesterol levels were > or = 5.68 mmol/l (220 mg/dl). In only 7.3% of patients the NCEP treatment goals were achieved, with 1.3% among those in secondary prevention. We observed great discrepancies between clinical practice and international recommendations for the management of hyperlipidaemia.