PITUITARY EVALUATION IN PATIENTS WITH LOW PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate pituitary function in men with a low screening prostate-specific antigen (PSA) of ≤0.1 ng/mL and test the hypothesis that low PSA is associated with hypogonadism alone or other hormone deficiency. METHODS: This was a case-control study evaluating the rates of hypogonadism and low insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-1 in a cohort of men with low or normal screening PSA level. Sixty-four men >40 years old without known prostate disease were divided into a low-PSA group (PSA ≤0.1 ng/mL) and normal-PSA group (PSA 1 to 4 ng/mL). Hormonal evaluation included total testosterone, prolactin, luteinizing hormone, follicle-stimulating hormone, IGF-1, growth hormone, thyroid-stimulating hormone, free thyroxine, morning cortisol, and adrenocorticotropic hormone. The difference between each patient's observed IGF-1 and the IGF-1 age-specific lower limit was calculated. The odds ratios (ORs) for having hypogonadism and associated 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test. RESULTS: The rate of hypogonadism was significantly higher in the low-PSA group (n = 44) compared with the normal-PSA control group (n = 20) (45.5% vs. 15.0%; OR, 4.7; 95% CI, 1.2 to 18.4; P = .027). The total testosterone in the low-PSA group was significantly lower compared with the control group (181.7 ng/dL vs. 263.7 ng/dL; P = .008). IGF-1 values were below their lower bound in 18.6% of subjects in the low-PSA group, compared with 0% in the control group. CONCLUSION: Men with low PSA have significantly higher rates of hypogonadism and low IGF-1 compared with those with normal PSA. In such men, we recommend hormonal evaluation to exclude associated pituitary dysfunction. ABBREVIATIONS: BMI = body mass index; GH = growth hormone; IGF-1 = insulin-like growth factor 1; MRI = magnetic resonance imaging; PSA = prostate-specific antigen; T2DM = type 2 diabetes mellitus; VA-NWIHCS = VA-Nebraska Western Iowa Health Care System.

Who Is Ordering MRIs in Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer Patients?

The role of MRI in the workup of newly diagnosed breast cancer patients remains controversial. Breast MRI detects additional disease, but this has not translated into improved outcomes. In light of a dramatic rise in MRI use, we investigated patterns of MRI ordering for newly diagnosed breast cancer. All newly diagnosed breast cancer cases presenting for surgical management to a specialized breast center from 2011 to 2013 were reviewed. Patients who had an MRI ordered by their operating surgeon were compared with those who had an MRI completed previously. Of 1037 patients, 504 (49%) with newly diagnosed breast cancer underwent MRI as part of their preoperative evaluation. Variables associated with MRI use included commercial insurance, increased breast density, genetic testing, mamographically occult disease, and lobular pathology. Of women who presented to our center with an MRI already completed, 63 per cent were ordered by a primary care provider. Of the 504 patients, 233 (44%) who had an MRI underwent an additional biopsy, and 166 (33%) had a resultant change in management. There was no significant difference in MRI-directed change in patient care depending on ordering provider. Further research is needed to develop evidence-based guidelines for preoperative MRI evaluation to optimize patient outcomes.

Robotic Single-Site and Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery in Gynecology: Clinical Outcomes and Cost Analysis of a Matched Case-Control Study.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To assess the clinical outcomes and costs associated with robotic single-site (RSS) surgery compared with those of conventional laparoscopy (CL) in gynecology. DESIGN: Retrospective case-control study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2). SETTING: University-affiliated community hospital. PATIENTS: Female patients undergoing RSS or CL gynecologic procedures. INTERVENTIONS: Comparison of consecutive RSS gynecologic procedures (cases) undertaken between October 2013 and March 2014 with matched CL procedures (controls) completed during the same time period by the same surgeon. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Patient demographic data, operative data, and hospital financial data were abstracted from the electronic charts and financial systems. An incremental cost analysis based on the use of disposable equipment was performed. Total hospital charges were determined for matched RSS cases vs CL cases. RSS surgery was completed in 25 out of 33 attempts; 3 cases were aborted before docking, and 5 were converted to a multisite surgery. There were no intraoperative complications or conversions to laparotomy. The completed cases included 11 adnexal cases and 14 hysterectomies, 3 of which included pelvic lymph node dissection. Compared with the CL group, total operative times were higher in the RSS group; however, there were no significant between-group differences in estimated blood loss, length of hospital stay, or complication rates. Disposable equipment cost per case, direct costs, and total hospital charges were evaluated. RSS was associated with an increased disposable cost per case of $248 to $378, depending on the method used for vaginal cuff closure. The average total hospital charges for matched outpatient adnexal surgery were $15,450 for the CL controls and $18,585 for the RSS cases (p < .001), and the average total hospital charges for matched outpatient benign hysterectomy were $14,623 for the CL controls and $21,412 for the RSS cases (p < .001). CONCLUSION: Although RSS surgery and CL have comparable clinical outcomes in selected patients, RSS surgery remains associated with increased incremental disposable cost per case and total hospital charges. Careful case selection and judicious use of equipment are necessary to maximize cost-effectiveness in RSS gynecologic surgery.

Does Better Specimen Orientation and a Simplified Grading System Promote More Reliable Histologic Interpretation of Serrated Colon Polyps in the Community Practice Setting? Results of a Nationwide Study.

INTRODUCTION: Colonoscopic surveillance guidelines for serrated polyps (SPs) are predicated upon the histologic characteristics of the index polyp. However, discrimination between SP subtypes [hyperplastic polyps vs. sessile serrated adenoma/polyps (SSA/P)] is often unreliable. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We studied the impact of (1) a novel tissue orientation method, performed in the endoscopy laboratory, whereby polyps are flattened in a small paper envelope immediately after resection (modified protocol); and (2) 2012 consensus-modified criteria (CM-2012). These interventions were compared with conventional tissue-handling protocol (CP) and traditional 2008 World Health Organization criteria (WHO). Twenty blinded community pathologists from around the United States scored 100, independent, 0.5 to 2.0 cm, proximal colonic SPs randomly selected from a 2-site tissue section archive. We compared interobserver agreement and diagnostic grading. RESULTS: Interobserver agreement was higher using CM-2012 than WHO criteria (absolute agreement: 13% vs. 4%, P<0.01; 75% agreement: 54% vs. 38%, P<0.01). Interobserver agreement was higher with the modified protocol than with CP (WHO absolute agreement: 6% vs. 2%, P>0.05; WHO 75% agreement: 46% vs. 30%, P>0.05, and CM-2012 absolute agreement: 20% vs. 6%, P=0.07; CM-2012 75% agreement: 66% vs. 42%, P=0.03). Compared with WHO, use of CM-2012 criteria resulted in fewer diagnoses of "indeterminate"; more diagnoses of SSA/P (P<0.01); and "upgraded" the diagnosis from hyperplastic polyps to SSA/P in approximately 7% of cases. These observations were independent of polyp size, patient gender, and study site. CONCLUSIONS: Simple enhancements to postresection SP handling and diagnostic criteria markedly improve interobserver agreement of SP diagnosis among nongastrointestinal community pathologists. This finding, if confirmed, has important implications for SP colonoscopy surveillance guidelines.

Safety, feasibility and learning curve of robotic single-site surgery in gynecology.

BACKGROUND: Robotic single-site (RSS) surgery has emerged as a novel minimally invasive approach in gynecology. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of consecutive RSS gynecologic procedures undertaken between October 2013 and March 2014. RESULTS: The 25 RSS completed cases consisted of 11 adnexal and 14 hysterectomy cases of which three included pelvic lymphadenectomies. Mean age, body mass index and estimated blood loss were 51 years, 25 kg/m(2) , 30 mL in the adnexal group, respectively, and 58 years, 27 kg/m(2) , 96 mL in the hysterectomy group, respectively. Mean console time was 20 and 45 min and mean total operative time was 56 and 93 min in adnexal and hysterectomy cases, respectively. The CUSUM method identified two learning phases with significant reduction in console time after the 7th adnexal case and the 5th hysterectomy. CONCLUSION: When performed by advanced minimally invasive surgeons and in appropriately selected patients, RSS surgery is feasible and safe. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Randomized controlled double-blind trial of transversus abdominis plane block versus trocar site infiltration in gynecologic laparoscopy.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to determine whether transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block reduces postoperative pain when compared with trocar site infiltration of bupivacaine in gynecological laparoscopy. STUDY DESIGN: This was a prospective, randomized, double-blinded clinical trial using patients as their own controls. Women undergoing gynecologic laparoscopy using a 4-port symmetrical technique were randomly assigned to right- or left-sided TAP block using 30 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine with epinephrine. Two cohorts of patients were studied. Cohort 1 consisted of anesthesiologist-administered ultrasound-guided TAP block. Cohort 2 consisted of surgeon-administered laparoscopic-guided TAP block. In both cohorts, contralateral port sites were infiltrated with an equal amount of bupivacaine in divided doses. All patients received intraoperative acetaminophen and ketorolac. Postoperative abdominal pain was assessed at 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18, 24, and 48 hours on the block and contralateral sides, before and after palpation, using the 10 point visual analog scale. A 2 point difference in the reported pain scores was considered clinically meaningful. RESULTS: Eighty-eight patients were eligible for statistical analysis: 45 and 43 patients in cohorts 1 and 2, respectively. In both cohorts, most patients reported equal pain on the block side and local side. In cohort 1, there was a statistically significant difference in mean reported pain scores at 2 hours and across time favoring the ultrasound-guided block; however, this did not reach clinical significance. There was no statistically significant difference found at all other time points or when pain scores were objectively assessed after palpation of the incisions. When comparing laparoscopic-guided block with local infiltration, there was no statistically significant difference in reported mean pain scores at all time points or after palpation. CONCLUSION: As part of this multimodal analgesic regimen, neither block method provided a significant clinical benefit compared with trocar site bupivacaine infiltration.

Total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus da Vinci robotic hysterectomy: is using the robot beneficial?

OBJECTIVE: To compare the outcomes of total laparoscopic to robotic approach for hysterectomy and all indicated procedures after controlling for surgeon and other confounding factors. METHODS: Retrospective chart review of all consecutive cases of total laparoscopic and da Vinci robotic hysterectomies between August 2007 and July 2009 by two gynecologic oncology surgeons. Our primary outcome measure was operative procedure time. Secondary measures included complications, conversion to laparotomy, estimated blood loss and length of hospital stay. A mixed model with a random intercept was applied to control for surgeon and other confounders. Wilcoxon rank-sum, chi-square and Fisher's exact tests were used for the statistical analysis. RESULTS: The 124 patients included in the study consisted of 77 total laparoscopic hysterectomies and 47 robotic hysterectomies. Both groups had similar baseline characteristics, indications for surgery and additional procedures performed. The difference between the mean operative procedure time for the total laparoscopic hysterectomy group (111.4 minutes) and the robotic hysterectomy group (150.8 minutes) was statistically significant (p=0.0001) despite the fact that the specimens obtained in the total laparoscopic hysterectomy group were significantly larger (125 g vs. 94 g, p=0.002). The robotic hysterectomy group had statistically less estimated blood loss than the total laparoscopic hysterectomy group (131.5 mL vs. 207.7 mL, p=0.0105) however no patients required a blood transfusion in either group. Both groups had a comparable rate of conversion to laparotomy, intraoperative complications, and length of hospital stay. CONCLUSION: Total laparoscopic hysterectomy can be performed safely and in less operative time compared to robotic hysterectomy when performed by trained surgeons.