Cardiovascular Risk Following Conversion to Belatacept From a Calcineurin Inhibitor in Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Rationale & Objective: In kidney transplant recipients (KTRs), a belatacept-based immunosuppressive regimen is associated with beneficial effects on cardiovascular (CV) risk factors compared with calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-based regimens. Our objective was to compare the calculated CV risk between belatacept and CNI (predominantly tacrolimus) treatments using a validated model developed for KTRs. Study Design: Prospective, randomized, open-label, parallel-group, investigator-initiated, international multicenter trial. Setting & Participants: KTRs aged 18-80 years with a stable graft function (estimated glomerular filtration rate > 20 mL/min/1.73 m2), 3-60 months after transplantation, treated with tacrolimus or cyclosporine A, were eligible for inclusion. Intervention: Continuation with a CNI-based regimen or switch to belatacept for 12 months. Outcomes: Comparison of the change in the estimated 7-year risk of major adverse CV events and all-cause mortality, changes in traditional markers of CV health, as well as measures of arterial stiffness. Results: Among the 105 KTRs randomized, we found no differences between the treatment groups in the predicted risk for major adverse CV events or mortality. Diastolic blood pressure, measured both centrally by using a SphygmoCor device and peripherally, was lower after the belatacept treatment than after the CNI treatment. The mean changes in traditional cardiovascular (CV) risk factors, including kidney transplant function, were otherwise similar in both the treatment groups. The belatacept group had 4 acute rejection episodes; 2 were severe rejections, of which 1 led to graft loss. Limitations: The heterogeneous baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate and time from transplantation to trial enrollment in the participants. A limited study duration of 1 year. Conclusions: We found no effects on the calculated CV risk by switching to the belatacept treatment. Participants in the belatacept group had not only lower central and peripheral diastolic blood pressure but also a higher rejection rate. Funding: The trial has received a financial grant from Bristol-Myers Squibb. Trial Registration: EudraCT no. 2013-001178-20.

Treatment of iron deficiency in patients with chronic kidney disease: A prospective observational study of iron isomaltoside (NIMO Scandinavia)
.

AIMS: Iron deficiency is common in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Appropriate iron substitution is critical and intravenous iron is an established therapy for these patients. The objective of this study was to assess treatment routine, -effectiveness, and safety of iron isomaltoside (Monofer®, Pharma-cosmos A/S, Holbaek, Denmark) in CKD patients in clinical practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a prospective observational study conducted in predialysis CKD patients treated with iron isomaltoside according to the product label and to routine clinical care. RESULTS: The study included 108 patients with predialysis CKD: 22 were in stage 2 - 3, 41 in stage 4, and 45 in stage 5. The mean (standard deviation) age was 67 (15) years, and 55% of patients were male. The majority of patients (65%) received one iron isomaltoside treatment. In patients with a baseline Hb < 10 g/dL, the mean dose of iron isomaltoside in the study was lower than the estimated total iron requirement (567 mg versus 921 mg). A treatment response of Hb ≥ 1 g/dL was achieved in 16/28 (57%) of patients, and the mean post-treatment Hb level was 10.5 g/dL. The probability of retreatment did not correlate with dose, but no dose administered was > 1,000 mg. There were no serious adverse drug reactions. One non-serious adverse drug reaction - injection site discoloration - was reported, and the patient had an uneventful recovery. CONCLUSION: Iron isomaltoside shows a good effectiveness and safety profile in predialysis CKD patients. However, some patients did not receive adequate iron doses to allow for optimal correction of their iron deficiency anemia.

Hemorheological and hemodynamic changes in predialysis patients after normalization of hemoglobin with epoetin-alpha.

OBJECTIVE: Changes in blood viscosity and total peripheral resistance may contribute to increased blood pressure during partial correction of renal anemia with erythropoietin. An increase in hemoglobin level is followed by decreases in cardiac output and left ventricular mass. We examined how normalization of hemoglobin in predialysis patients affects both hemorheological and hemodynamic variables. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twelve moderately anemic predialysis patients (hemoglobin 115.9+/-7.8 g/l) received epoetin-alpha with the aim of achieving a normal hemoglobin level (135-160 g/l). Hemorheological variables were measured using rotational viscometry. Cardiac index was determined by means of Doppler echocardiography. RESULTS: After 48 weeks, the hematocrit level had increased from 37.9%+/-3.0% to 47.0%+/-3.1% (p<0.0001). Blood viscosity increased from 3.84+/-0.33 to 4.59+/-0.4 mPa x s (p<0.001). Blood viscosity standardized to a hematocrit level of 45% and a plasma viscosity of 1.31 mPa x s did not change. Plasma viscosity, erythrocyte aggregation tendency and erythrocyte fluidity remained unchanged. The cardiac index decreased from 2.64+/-0.57 to 2.19+/-0.72 l/min/m(2) (p<0.05). The total peripheral resistance index increased from 3270+/-985 to 4013+/-1046 (dyn x s/cm(5))m(2) (p<0.05). Blood pressure remained constant, but the amount of antihypertensive medication used increased by 30%. CONCLUSIONS: Hemoglobin normalization in predialysis patients raised blood viscosity and total peripheral resistance due to an increase in hematocrit level, without other consistent hemorheological changes. Antihypertensive therapy had to be increased in many patients to maintain an acceptable blood pressure. The cardiac index was reduced, which may have prevented further development of left ventricular hypertrophy.

Effect of switching from subcutaneous to intravenous administration of epoetin-alpha in haemodialysis patients: results from a Swedish multicentre survey.

OBJECTIVE: In 2002, many haemodialysis patients were switched from subcutaneous (s.c.) to intravenous (i.v.) administration of epoetin-alpha following reports of antibody formation and development of pure red-cell aplasia in patients treated via the s.c. route. We evaluated the possible effect of this change in the route of administration on haemoglobin (Hb) levels and epoetin-alpha requirements. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This retrospective survey involved 223 haemodialysis patients from 25 Swedish centres. Variables were recorded before and after a mean period of 213 days (range 89-297 days) after the change in the route of administration. RESULTS: The mean epoetin-alpha do had to be increased from 159+/-104 to 185+/-122 U/kg/week (p<0.0001) to maintain a constant Hb level (121+/-12 vs 120+/-11 g/l). Plasma ferritin, albumin, C-reactive protein, iron, iron transferrin saturation and body mass index remained constant. The relative increase in epoetin-alpha dose was negatively correlated with the s.c. dose prior to the switch (R=-0.3; p<0.0001), with the most pronounced dose increases occurring in patients who received a low s.c. dose. CONCLUSIONS: A switch from s.c. to i.v. administration of epoetin-alpha in haemodialysis patients was accompanied by an increase in the mean dose requirement of 15%. This increase may be less pronounced in patients receiving high s.c. doses prior to the switch.

Reduced hemodialysis adequacy after hemoglobin normalization with epoetin.

BACKGROUND: Increased hemoglobin (Hb) levels and higher blood viscosity could reduce hemodialyzer clearance. We examined hemodialysis (HD) adequacy after treatment with epoetin alfa aimed at normalizing Hb levels. METHODS: Thirty-three HD patients were randomly allocated to achieve a normal Hb level (135-160 g/L) or a subnormal (control) Hb level of 90-120 g/L. HD adequacy was assessed by Kt/V measurement. RESULTS: In the 24 evaluable patients, Hb levels reached 144 +/- 11 g/L in the normal Hb group (n=10) and 109 +/- 10 g/L in the subnormal group (n=14). Single-pool Kt/V decreased from 1.25 +/- 0.19 to 1.15 +/- 0.13 (p<0.01) in the normal Hb group, but remained constant in the subnormal group (1.26 +/- 0.26 and 1.26 +/- 0.28). CONCLUSIONS: Normalization of Hb with epoetin alfa in HD patients resulted in a slight but statistically significant reduction in Kt/V. Therefore, when Hb is normalized, an increased dialysis dose could be necessary to maintain dialysis adequacy.

A randomized controlled trial of haemoglobin normalization with epoetin alfa in pre-dialysis and dialysis patients.

BACKGROUND: Partial correction of renal anaemia with erythropoietin improves quality of life (QoL). We aimed to examine if normalization of haemoglobin with epoetin alfa in pre-dialysis and dialysis patients further improves QoL and is safe. METHODS: 416 Scandinavian patients with renal anaemia [pre-dialysis, haemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis patients] were randomized to reach a normal haemoglobin of 135-160 g/l (n=216) or a subnormal haemoglobin of 90-120 g/l (n=200) with or without epoetin alfa. Study duration was 48-76 weeks. QoL was measured using Kidney Disease Questionnaires in 253 Swedish dialysis patients. Safety was examined in all patients. RESULTS: QoL improved, measured as a decrease in physical symptoms (P=0.02), fatigue (P=0.05), depression (P=0.01) and frustration (P=0.05) in the Swedish dialysis patients when haemoglobin was normalized. In pre-dialysis patients, diastolic blood pressure was higher in the normal compared with the subnormal haemoglobin group after 48 weeks. However, the progression rate of chronic renal failure was comparable. In the normal haemoglobin group (N-Hb), 51% had at least one serious adverse event compared with 49% in the subnormal haemoglobin group (S-Hb) (P=0.32). The incidence of thrombovascular events and vascular access thrombosis in HD patients did not differ. The mortality rate was 13.4% in the N-Hb group and 13.5% in the S-Hb group (P=0.98). Mortality decreased with increasing mean haemoglobin in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Normalization of haemoglobin improved QoL in the subgroup of dialysis patients, appears to be safe and can be considered in many patients with end-stage renal disease.