Incidence, treatment and outcomes of coronary artery dissection during percutaneous coronary intervention.

BACKGROUND: Coronary artery dissection is a feared and potentially life-threatening complication of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS: We examined the clinical, angiographic, and procedural characteristics, and outcomes of coronary dissection at a tertiary care institution. RESULTS: Between 2014 and 2019, unplanned coronary dissection occurred in 141 of 10,278 PCIs (1.4%). Median patient age was 68 (60, 78) years, 68% were men, and 83% had hypertension. The prevalence of diabetes (29%), and prior PCI (37%) was high. Most target vessels were significantly diseased: 48% had moderate/severe tortuosity and 62% had moderate/severe calcification. The most common cause of dissection was guidewire advancement (30%), followed by stenting (22%), balloon angioplasty (20%), and guide-catheter engagement (18%). TIMI flow was 0 in 33% and 1-2 in 41% of cases. Intravascular imaging was used in 17% of the cases. Stenting was used to treat the dissection in 73% of patients. There was no consequence of dissection in 43% of patients. Technical and procedural success was 65% and 55%, respectively. In-hospital major adverse cardiovascular events occurred in 23% of patients: 13 (9%) had an acute myocardial infarction (MI), 3 (2%) had emergency coronary artery bypass graft surgery, and 10 (7%) died. During a mean follow up of 1612 days, 28 (20%) patients died, and the rate of target lesion revascularization was 11.3% (n=16). CONCLUSION: Coronary artery dissection is an infrequent complication of PCI, but is associated with adverse clinical outcomes, such as death and acute MI.

Early surgery or conservative management for asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis: Meta-analysis of RECOVERY and AVATAR.

The standard practice for management for asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis with a normal left ventricular systolic function is conservative management with a few exceptions. This practice is challenged by two recent randomized controlled trials (RCT). All the prior data is observational. We performed a meta-analysis of these 2 RCTs to determine if early surgical aortic valve replacement in this patient population is beneficial compared with the standard conservative therapy.

Coaptation Reserve Predicts Optimal Reduction in Mitral Regurgitation and Long-Term Survival With Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair.

BACKGROUND: Although transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) is effective and safe, there is a need for better prediction of optimal outcomes. We aimed to determine predictors of optimal reduction in mitral regurgitation (MR) and survival with TEER. METHODS: We examined mitral anatomy and its change with TEER on outcomes in 183 patients (age, 82 [77-87] years; 53% women). Coaptation reserve was measured as the distance of continuous apposition of the A2 and P2 leaflet segments in 2-dimensional apical long-axis imaging at the site of the predominant jet of MR. Augmentation in coaptation was measured as the total amount of leaflet insertion. Addressable coaptation area was calculated using the physical boundaries of the TEER device. RESULTS: Coaptation reserve, its augmentation, and addressable coaptation area were strong predictors of MR reduction (all P<0.001), as well as heart failure hospitalization and death. For patients with either mild or no residual MR, median values for coaptation reserve, its augmentation, and addressable coaptation area were 3.7 (2.8-4.5) mm, 7.3 (5.2-9.5) mm, and 59.0 (48.0-71.8) mm2, respectively. Receiver operating characteristic analyses determined the best values for optimal MR reduction as a coaptation reserve of >3.0 mm (P<0.001), addressable coaptation area of ≥52 mm2 (P<0.001), and coaptation augmentation of ≥4.7 mm (P<0.001). These values were associated with greater 2-year survival free of all-cause mortality and persisting even in analyses restricted to those with mild or no residual MR after TEER. CONCLUSIONS: Coaptation reserve and its augmentation are simple, independent parameters that predict optimal MR reduction and better survival in patients undergoing TEER. These findings may have implications for patient selection and expanded use of the therapy.

Clinical Outcomes of Mitral Valve Disease With Mitral Annular Calcification.

The prevalence of mitral valve disease with mitral annular calcification (MAC) and its clinical outcomes remain uncertain. This study sought to evaluate the prevalence of significant mitral disease due to MAC, and the impact of intervention on the clinical outcomes in these patients. All patients who underwent transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) between January 2014 and December 2015 in our health care system were reviewed and identified for having MAC with significant mitral valve disease (i.e., either≥moderate mitral regurgitation (MR) or mitral stenosis (MS)). The primary endpoints of the study were all-cause mortality and a composite outcome of mortality or heart failure hospitalization at 3-year follow-up. Of 41,136 patients who underwent TTE, MAC was identified in 2,855 (6.9%) patients, including 434 (1.1% of total) patients who had significant MR and/or MS (median age [IQR], 80 [73 to 87] years; 63% women). MAC predominately involved the posterior annulus (95%), with the majority having calcification of both trigones (55%), the leaflets (71%), and circumferential involvement (67%). During 3-year follow-up, 59 (14%) patients underwent surgical or transcatheter MV intervention. Patients who did not undergo mitral intervention had higher all-cause mortality (HR 2.80, 95% CI 1.60 to 4.92; p <0.001) and a greater risk of the composite outcome (HR 1.43, 1.00 to 2.04; p = 0.05) than those treated. Survival at 3-year follow-up was markedly greater in those with mitral intervention (78% vs 50%; p <0.001). This survival benefit remained after multivariable adjustment. In conclusion, MAC affects approximately % of patients who undergo echocardiography. Those with significant mitral valve disease due to any degree of MAC have poor survival, which may be ameliorated with transcatheter or surgical intervention.

Early outcomes of transcatheter mitral valve replacement with the Tendyne system in severe mitral annular calcification.

BACKGROUND: Treatment of mitral regurgitation (MR) associated with severe mitral annular calcification (MAC) is challenging due to the high risk of fatal atrioventricular groove disruption and significant paravalvular leak. AIMS: The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) with the Tendyne valve (Abbott Structural) in patients with MR and MAC. METHODS: Twenty patients (mean age 78 years; 11 women) who were treated with the Tendyne valve, either compassionate use (CU; closed) or as part of The Feasibility Study of Tendyne in MAC (NCT03539458), had reported outcomes in a median follow-up duration of 368 days. RESULTS: In all patients, a valve was implanted with no procedural mortality and successful hospital discharge. Two embolic events occurred, including one with mesenteric ischaemia and one non-disabling stroke. At 30 days and one year, all-cause mortality occurred in one (5%) and eight patients (40%), respectively. At one year, six patients had been hospitalised for heart failure (30%). There was no prosthetic dysfunction, and MR remained absent in all patients at one year. Clinical improvement, measured by New York Heart Association Functional Class, occurred in 11 of 12 patients who were alive at one year. Among seven survivors with Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) data, mean increase in KCCQ score was 29.9±26.3 at one year with improvement of ≥10 points in five (71.4%) patients. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with MR and severe MAC, TMVR with the Tendyne valve was associated with encouraging acute outcomes, midterm durability, and clinical improvement. Dedicated TMVR therapy may have a future role in these anatomically challenging, high-risk patients.

Relation of Guideline Adherence to Outcomes in Patients With Asymptomatic Severe Primary Mitral Regurgitation.

Current guidelines empirically recommend serial clinical evaluations for asymptomatic patients with severe mitral regurgitation (MR). However, there is a paucity of data on the effectiveness of such monitoring. This study sought to examine the potential benefit of guideline adherence among asymptomatic patients with severe primary MR. Asymptomatic patients with severe primary MR who had been evaluated in the Allina Health system between January 1, 2012 and May 30, 2018 were examined. The medical records were manually reviewed for demographics, comorbidities, echocardiographic data, subsequent interventions, and clinical outcomes. Patients were grouped according to occurrence of guideline adherence, which was defined as a serial clinical evaluation with echocardiography every 12 ± 1 month until mitral valve surgery, or death. Over the study period, 246 patients (67.3 ± 15.5 years, 61.4% men) with severe, asymptomatic primary MR were identified, including 154 patients (62.6%) with and 92 patients (37.4%) without guideline adherence. Overall, there were no differences in demographics, morbidities, MR severity, or left ventricular function between patient adherence groups. During follow-up (40.9; 21.2, 58.3 months), patients with adherence more frequently had surgery or transcatheter therapy performed (64.3% vs 18.5%; p <0.001) and the time to intervention was earlier (13.6 [3.9-22.7] vs 44.2[25.6-57.3] months; p <0.001). Compared to non-adherent patients, those with guideline adherence had a significantly higher five-year survival free from all-cause mortality (92.0% vs 74.3%, p = 0.002), and freedom from death or hospitalization for heart failure (90.1% vs 69.3%, p = 0.001). Adherent patients also had a significantly better survival free from combined endpoint of death, re-hospitalization for heart failure, myocardial infarction, and stroke (84.5% vs 63.2%, p = 0.002). In patients with asymptomatic severe primary MR, guideline adherence with serial evaluations every 12 months or less is associated with earlier therapy and improved long-term outcomes. These data support educational efforts to promote guideline adherence.

Left Ventricular Remodeling After Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement With Tendyne: New Insights From Computed Tomography.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to describe the anatomic and functional changes in left-sided chambers using computed tomographic angiography (CTA) from baseline to 1 month after transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) with the Tendyne prosthesis. BACKGROUND: Data on changes in left atrial and left ventricular (LV) volumes after TMVR implantation are very limited. METHODS: Patients who underwent TMVR with the Tendyne prosthesis between 2015 and 2018 were analyzed. Changes in LV end-diastolic volume, ejection fraction, LV mass, left atrial volume, and global longitudinal strain were assessed at baseline and 1 month after TMVR using CTA. Specific Tendyne implant characteristics were identified and correlated with remodeling changes. RESULTS: A total of 36 patients (median age 74 years; interquartile range [IQR]: 69 to 78 years; 78% men; 86% with secondary mitral regurgitation) were included in this study. There were significant decreases in LV end-diastolic volume (281 ml [IQR: 210 to 317 ml] vs. 239 ml [IQR: 195 to 291 ml]; p < 0.001), LV ejection fraction (37% [IQR: 31% to 48%] vs. 30% [IQR: 23% to 40%]; p < 0.001), LV mass (126 g [IQR: 96 to 155 g] vs. 116 g [IQR: 92 to 140 g]; p < 0.001), left atrial volume (171 ml [IQR: 133 to 216 ml] vs. 159 ml [IQR: 125 to 201 ml]; p = 0.027), and global longitudinal strain (-11% [IQR: -17% to -8%] vs. -9% [IQR: -12% to -6%]; p < 0.001) from baseline to 1-month follow-up. Favorable LV end-diastolic volume reverse remodeling occurred in the majority (30 of 36 patients [83%]). Closer proximity of the Tendyne apical pad to the true apex (24 mm [IQR: 21 to 29 mm] vs. 35 mm [IQR: 26 to 40 mm]) was predictive of favorable remodeling (p = 0.037). CONCLUSIONS: TMVR with Tendyne results in favorable left-sided chamber remodeling in the majority of patients treated, as detected on CTA at 1 month after implantation. CTA identifies favorable post-TMVR changes, which could be related to specific characteristics of the device implantation.

Percutaneous Mitral Valve Repair With MitraClip in Inoperable Patients With Severe Mitral Regurgitation Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock.

BACKGROUND: Severe mitral regurgitation (MR) complicated by cardiogenic shock has high operative mortality. Percutaneous leaflet repair with MitraClip (Abbott Vascular) is a less invasive alternative to surgery. The effectiveness and safety of this approach is unknown. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed procedural characteristics of shock patients with severe MR treated with MitraClip in a tertiary, high-volume program (Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, Minnesota) during 2010-2019. The primary outcome of the study was 30-day survival free of significant MR (grade ≤2). One-year mortality was a secondary outcome. RESULTS: Among 322 patients who underwent MitraClip implantation during the study period, 11 inoperable patients with severe MR and cardiogenic shock were included in this analysis. Mean patient age was 74 ± 11 years and 54% were male. The mechanism of MR was degenerative in 7 patients (63.6%) and functional in 4 patients (36.4%), including 1 post myocardial infarction, 1 with chronic ischemic heart disease, and 2 with end-stage non-ischemic cardiomyopathy. Hemodynamic support with intra-aortic balloon pump was used in 5 patients (45%). The A2-P2 scallop was the more common location for MitraClip insertion, and 27% of patients had >1 clip implanted. Median fluoroscopy time was 18.5 minutes (interquartile range [IQR], 10-22 minutes) and mean postprocedure gradient was 4.5 mm Hg (IQR, 3-5 mm Hg). At 30 days, eight patients (72.7%) were alive with MR grade ≤2. At 1 year, mortality was 66%, and was driven mainly by non-cardiac causes. CONCLUSIONS: Among inoperable patients with severe MR and cardiogenic shock, percutaneous leaflet repair with MitraClip is associated with acceptable short-term effectiveness.

The Impact of Novel X-Ray Systems and X-Ray System Optimization on Patient Radiation Dose Administered During Cardiac Catheterization.

INTRODUCTION: The effect of x-ray system optimization on patient radiation dose has received limited study. METHODS: We analyzed patient radiation dose in 1786 cardiac catheterization procedures (diagnostic coronary angiography and/or percutaneous coronary intervention [PCI]) performed at a single tertiary-care center before and after x-ray system optimization. RESULTS: After optimization, cineangiography dose-area product (DAP) dose was lower in the overall group of patients who underwent diagnostic angiography and/or PCI (1347 µGy•m² [IQR, 645-2345 µGy•m²] vs 1658 µGy•m² [IQR, 640- 2757 µGy•m²]; P=.03), as well as in the diagnostic angiography group (1795 µGy•m² [IQR, 1140-2994 µGy•m²] vs 2356 µGy•m² [IQR, 311-3576 µGy•m²]; P<.01) and PCI group (2152 µGy•m² [IQR, 1338-3477 µGy•m²] vs 2562 µGy•m² [IQR, 1681-3859 µGy•m²]; P=.02). Cineangiography DAP per exposure was also lower in the overall group (143 µGy•m² [IQR, 91-212 µGy•m²] vs 164 µGy•m² [IQR, 106-233 µGy•m²] per exposure; P<.01) and in the diagnostic angiography group (158 µGy•m² [IQR, 102-225 µGy•m²] vs 184 µGy•m² [IQR, 125-271 µGy•m²] per exposure; P<.01). After optimization, cineangiography air kerma (AK) dose (319 mGy [IQR, 197-531 mGy] vs 421 mGy [IQR, 241-600 mGy]; P=.01) and cineangiography AK per exposure (20.7 mGy [IQR, 12.9-29.0 mGy] vs 23.6 mGy [IQR, 14.1-32.9 mGy] per exposure; P=.03) were also lower in the PCI group. There was no significant change in fluoroscopy AK dose after optimization (20.7 mGy [IQR, 12.7-30.1 mGy] vs 20.4 mGy [IQR, 12.8-31.3 mGy] per minute; P=.71) and fluoroscopy DAP dose (156 µGy•m² [IQR, 101-242 µGy•m²] vs 156 µGy•m² [IQR, 102-236 µGy•m²] per minute; P=.91). CONCLUSION: X-ray system optimization was associated with lower cineangiography DAP, but similar fluoroscopy radiation dose.

Impact of the Commercial Introduction of Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair on Mitral Surgical Practice.

Background There has been uncertainty regarding the effect of transcatheter mitral valve repair (TMVr) with MitraClip on cardiac surgical practice. Our aim was to examine the impact of the commercial introduction of TMVr to a comprehensive mitral program. Methods and Results We evaluated 875 patients (aged 69±14 years; 58% men) who underwent transcatheter or mitral surgical procedures over a 6-year period at our institution. Main outcomes were changes in surgical procedural volume after TMVr introduction and short-term mortality for surgical and TMVr procedures. The numbers of patients treated with MitraClip, isolated mitral repair, and any mitral surgery were 249, 292, and 626 patients, respectively. Compared with surgery, patients with MitraClip were older (aged 82±8 versus 64±12 years; P<0.001) and had more severe morbidity. Following the introduction of MitraClip, surgical volumes steadily increased to a rate of 10 (95% CI, 3-7) procedures per year for isolated mitral procedures and 17 (95% CI, 13-20) procedures per year for all mitral surgeries. Both MitraClip and surgical volumes increased at the same rate (P=0.42). In-hospital mortality was 3.2% for MitraClip and 2.1% for all mitral surgeries (P=0.33). At 30 days, survival free of all mortality (P=0.17) and freedom from heart failure rehospitalization (P=0.75) were similar for transcatheter and surgical procedures. Conclusions The commercial introduction of TMVr may be associated with growth in cardiac surgery, without detracting from other therapies, and favorable clinical outcomes for all treated mitral regurgitation patients. These findings demonstrate the potential benefits of complementary therapies in the treatment of patients with mitral regurgitation.

Novel Transcatheter Mitral Valve Prosthesis for Patients With Severe Mitral Annular Calcification.

BACKGROUND: Treatment of mitral regurgitation (MR) in the setting of severe mitral annular calcification (MAC) is challenging due to the high risk for fatal atrioventricular groove disruption and significant paravalvular leak. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to evaluate the potential for transcatheter mitral valve replacement in patients with severe MAC using an anatomically designed mitral prosthesis. METHODS: Nine patients (77 ± 6 years of age; 5 men) were treated with the valve, using transapical delivery performed under general anesthesia and with guidance from transesophageal echocardiography and fluoroscopy. RESULTS: Device implantation was successful with relief of MR in all 9 patients. There were no procedural deaths. In 1 patient, left ventricular outflow tract obstruction occurred due to malrotation of the prosthesis, and successful alcohol septal ablation was performed. During a median follow-up of 12 months (range 1 to 28 months), there was 1 cardiac death, 1 noncardiac death, no other mortality, and no prosthetic dysfunction, and MR remained absent in all treated patients. Rehospitalization for heart failure occurred in 2 patients who did not die subsequently. Clinical improvement with mild or no symptoms occurred in all patients alive at the end of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Transcatheter mitral valve replacement in severe mitral annular calcification with a dedicated prosthesis is feasible and can result in MR relief with symptom improvement. Further evaluation of this approach for these high-risk patients is warranted.

Transcatheter therapy for residual mitral regurgitation after MitraClip therapy.

AIMS: We aimed to examine the effectiveness and the optimal technique for transcatheter therapy for residual mitral regurgitation (MR) after MitraClip therapy with the AMPLATZER Vascular Plug II (AVP-II). METHODS AND RESULTS: Nine patients (mean age, 78±4 years) underwent transcatheter therapy with the AVP-II for residual MR after MitraClip therapy. We examined procedural, in-hospital, and 30-day outcomes. Our technique was successful in all cases, with treatment of different types of residual MR, including paraclip, interclip, and leaflet perforation. MR grade decreased significantly from 4+ to 1+ (p<0.0001), with final residual MR being mild or none in seven patients. Mitral stenosis did not occur with plug placement. The optimal deployment technique for reduction of MR was placement with only one segment on the left atrial side of the mitral valve leaflets (n=8). During clinical follow-up (median 155 days), symptom improvement had occurred in all patients (NYHA class, baseline vs follow-up, 3.2±0.4 vs 2.3±0.8; p=0.01) with mild or no symptoms in six patients. There was no procedural mortality, major adverse event(s), device embolisation, haemolysis or need for cardiac surgery. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with residual MR after MitraClip therapy, this technique may be effective and safe, especially when deployed with only one segment on the left atrial side of the mitral leaflets.

Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement with Tendyne.

Mitral regurgitation is the most commonly occurring valvular heart disease in developed countries. Transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) has emerged as a novel potential therapy for patients with severe mitral valve disease who are unsuitable candidates for conventional surgery or transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral repair. TMVR with the Tendyne prosthesis has shown potential at short-term follow-up to be an effective and safe treatment alternative for high-risk patients with severe mitral valve disease.

Causes and Clinical Outcomes of Patients Who Are Ineligible for Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to gain insight into the causes and outcomes of patients who do not qualify for transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR). BACKGROUND: Despite the increasing availability of TMVR, patients with severe mitral regurgitation may not be eligible. Thus far, no investigation has examined ineligible patients and their clinical outcomes. METHODS: A total of 203 patients (mean age 79 ± 9 years, 48% men) who were ineligible for participation in early feasibility studies of TMVR were examined. RESULTS: The ineligibility rate for TMVR was 89.0%. The most common reasons for TMVR exclusion were excessive frailty (15.3%), severe tricuspid regurgitation (15.3%), and prior aortic valve therapy (14.2%). Mitral anatomic exclusions were present in 15.8%, with severe annular calcification in 7.4%, and risk for left ventricular outflow tract obstruction was notably infrequent (4.4%). Overall, 76 patients (37.4%) did not undergo subsequent commercial surgical or transcatheter mitral therapy. Patients not eligible for TMVR and not treated commercially had high rates of cardiac death (11.8%) and death or heart failure hospitalization (22.4%) at 1 year. These rates were significantly higher than those who underwent surgery (2.4% for cardiac death; p < 0.001; 5.5% for heart failure hospitalization; p = 0.003) and remained worse after excluding patients with excessive frailty or medical futility and in multivariate modeling that adjusted for baseline differences. CONCLUSIONS: Patients ineligible for TMVR and treated medically have poor outcomes. These data and the high rate of TMVR screen failure support the need for therapy iteration as well as development of alternative means of management, with the goal of improving the prognosis of these patients.

Incidence, predictors, management and outcomes of coronary perforations.

OBJECTIVES: We examined the contemporary incidence, types, predictors, angiographic characteristics, management and outcomes of coronary perforation. BACKGROUND: Coronary perforation is a rare, but important, complication of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). There is lack of data on perforations stratified as large and distal vessel perforations. METHODS: Retrospective, observational cohort study of all patients who underwent PCI at a high volume, tertiary hospital between the years 2009 and 2016. Angiograms of all coronary perforation cases were reviewed to determine the mechanism, type, and management of perforation. Risk-adjusted periprocedural complication rates were compared between patients with and without coronary perforation. One-year mortality outcomes of patients with large vessel vs. distal vessel perforation were also examined. RESULTS: Coronary perforation occurred in 68 of 13,339 PCIs (0.51%) performed during the study period: 51 (75%) were large vessel perforations and 17 (25%) distal vessel perforations. Most (67%) large vessel perforations were due to balloon/stent inflation, whereas most (94%) distal vessel perforations were due to guidewire exit. Patients with coronary perforations had significantly higher risk for periprocedural complications (adjusted odds ratio 7.57; 95% CI: 4.22-13.50; P < 0.001). Only one patient with large vessel perforation required emergency cardiac surgery, yet in-hospital mortality was high with both large vessel (7.8%) and distal vessel (11.8%) perforations. CONCLUSIONS: Coronary perforation is an infrequent, but potentially severe PCI complication. Most coronary perforations are large vessel perforations. Although coronary perforations rarely lead to emergency cardiac surgery, both distal vessel and large vessel perforations are associated with high in-hospital mortality, highlighting the importance of prevention.

Prevalence, Trends, and Outcomes of Higher-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Interventions Among Patients Without Acute Coronary Syndromes.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Patients and lesions at a higher procedural risk for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are an understudied population. We examined the frequency, clinical characteristics, and outcomes of higher risk and non-higher risk PCIs at a large tertiary center. METHODS/MATERIALS: The following procedures were considered higher risk: unprotected left main PCI, chronic total occlusion PCI, PCI requiring atherectomy, multivessel PCI, bifurcation PCI, PCI in prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) patients, pre-PCI left ventricular ejection fraction ≤30%, or use of hemodynamic support. RESULTS: Of the 1975 PCIs performed from 6/29/09 to 12/30/2016 in patients without acute coronary syndromes, 1230 (62%) were higher risk. Patients undergoing higher risk PCI were more likely to have a history of CABG, myocardial infarction, PCI, cerebrovascular disease, peripheral arterial disease, or congestive heart failure. Higher risk PCIs required more stents (2.0 vs. 1.0, p < 0.001), and had longer median fluoroscopy times (17.3 vs. 8.5 min, p < 0.001) and higher median contrast doses (160 vs. 120 mL, p < 0.001). In higher risk PCIs, the risks for technical failure and periprocedural complications were 2.9 (95% CI 1.2-7.4) times and 2.2 (95% CI 0.9-5.4) times higher as compared with non-higher risk PCI procedures. CONCLUSIONS: In summary, over half of the PCIs performed in non-acute coronary syndrome patients were higher risk and were associated with lower odds of technical success and higher periprocedural complication rates as compared with non-higher risk PCIs. SUMMARY: We examined the frequency, clinical characteristics, and outcomes of higher risk and non-higher risk PCIs at a large tertiary center. Higher risk PCI was associated with lower odds of technical and procedural success and higher odds of procedural complications as compared with non-higher risk PCI. However, the risk/benefit ratio may still be favorable for many of these higher-risk patients and should be estimated on a case by case basis.

Contemporary Reasons and Clinical Outcomes for Patients With Severe, Symptomatic Aortic Stenosis Not Undergoing Aortic Valve Replacement.

BACKGROUND: Although aortic valve replacement (AVR) can be lifesaving, many patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis do not undergo appropriate therapy. This study sought to examine the characteristics, outcomes, and reasons for not pursuing AVR in a contemporary cohort. METHODS AND RESULTS: We examined 548 patients with severe, symptomatic aortic stenosis not treated with AVR through March 2017. Patients were grouped according to AVR appropriateness based on the presence of medical futility. Demographics, rationale for no AVR therapy, and outcomes were assessed. There were 359 (65.5%) potentially appropriate candidates for AVR and 189 (34.5%) others patients with futility. Among potentially appropriate patients, 62.1% had severe symptoms, 74.4% had not been referred for AVR, and 40.1% were low risk. Patient refusal was common (54.6%), with incorrect symptom assignment or aortic stenosis severity classification accounting for nearly all other explanations. Compared with patients with futility, potentially appropriate AVR patients had lower rates of both referral to cardiology or surgery (85.2% versus 92.6%; P=0.01) and complete heart team evaluations (10.6% versus 17.5%; P=0.02). Palliative consultation occurred in only 124 patients (22.6%) overall and in only 10.0% of those without futility. Overall, the 1-year mortality was 54.7%, with heart failure hospitalization occurring in 19.3%. CONCLUSIONS: In this contemporary study, two-thirds of patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis treated medically were potentially appropriate AVR candidates and had poor outcomes. Most had incomplete heart team evaluations, commonly had severe symptoms or lesion severity misinterpreted, and were not evaluated by palliative care. Given the potential for beneficial outcomes among those untreated, further efforts to address these shortcomings are needed.