Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 111
Filtrar
1.
CMAJ Open ; 9(3): E841-E847, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34493550

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Patient navigation is a complex intervention that has garnered substantial interest and investment across Canada. We conducted an environmental scan to understand the landscape of patient navigation programs within the health care system in Alberta, Canada. METHODS: We included patient navigation programs within Alberta Health Services (AHS) and Alberta's Primary Care Networks (PCNs). Key informants were asked in October 2016 to identify existing programs and their corresponding program contacts. These program contacts were invited to complete a telephone-based survey from October 2016 to July 2017, to provide program descriptions and eligibility criteria, and to identify gaps in navigation. Programs were included if they engaged patients on an individual basis, and either facilitated continuity of care or promoted patient and family empowerment. We tabulated results and calculated summary statistics for program characteristics. RESULTS: Ninety-five potentially eligible programs were identified by key informants. The response rate to the study survey was 73% (n = 69). After excluding programs not meeting inclusion criteria, we included a total of 58 programs in the study: 43 AHS programs and 15 PCN programs. Nearly all programs (93%, n = 54) delivered navigation via an individual acting as a navigator. A minority of programs also included nonnavigator components, such as Web-based resources (7%, n = 4) and process or structural changes to facilitate navigation (22%, n = 13). Certain patient subgroups were particularly well-served by patient navigation; these included patients with cancer, substance use disorders or mental health concerns, and pediatric patients. Gaps identified in navigation fell under 4 domains: awareness, resources, geographic distribution and integration. INTERPRETATION: Patient navigation programs are common and have extended beyond cancer care, from which the construct originated; however, gaps include a lack of awareness and inequitable access to the programs. These findings will be of interest to those developing and implementing patient navigation interventions in Alberta and other jurisdictions.


Asunto(s)
Atención a la Salud , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Navegación de Pacientes , Participación del Paciente/métodos , Atención Primaria de Salud , Alberta/epidemiología , Continuidad de la Atención al Paciente/organización & administración , Atención a la Salud/organización & administración , Atención a la Salud/normas , Humanos , Evaluación de Necesidades , Navegación de Pacientes/métodos , Navegación de Pacientes/organización & administración , Navegación de Pacientes/normas , Atención Primaria de Salud/métodos , Atención Primaria de Salud/organización & administración , Atención Primaria de Salud/normas , Desarrollo de Programa , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud/métodos , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud/normas , Mejoramiento de la Calidad
2.
Transl Behav Med ; 11(2): 642-652, 2021 03 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32145022

RESUMEN

Poor health behaviors (e.g., smoking, poor diet, and physical inactivity) are major risk factors for noncommunicable chronic diseases (NCDs). Evidence supporting traditional advice-giving approaches to promote behavior change is weak or short lived. Training physicians to improve their behavior change counseling/communication skills is important, yet the evidence for the efficacy and acceptability of existing training programs is lacking and there is little consensus on the core competencies that physicians should master in the context of NCD management. The purpose of this study is to generate an acceptable, evidence-based, stakeholder-informed list of the core communication competencies that physicians should master in the context of NCD management. Using a modified Delphi process for consensus achievement, international behavior change experts, physicians, and allied health care professionals completed four phases of research, including eight rounds of online surveys and in-person meetings over 2 years (n = 13-17 participated in Phases I, III, and IV and n = 39-46 in Phase II). Eleven core communication competencies were identified: reflective listening, expressing empathy, demonstrating acceptance, tolerance, and respect, responding to resistance, (not) negatively judging or blaming, (not) expressing hostility or impatience, eliciting "change-talk"/evocation, (not) being argumentative or confrontational, setting goals, being collaborative, and providing information neutrally. These competencies were used to define a unified approach for conducting behavior change counseling in medical settings: Motivational Communication. The results may be used to inform and standardize physician training in behavior change counseling and communication skills to reduce morbidity and mortality related to poor health behaviors in the context of NCD prevention and management.


Asunto(s)
Competencia Clínica , Médicos , Comunicación , Consenso , Técnica Delphi , Humanos
3.
Front Public Health ; 8: 553434, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33330306

RESUMEN

Professional sporting teams may be well-positioned to act as promoters of health behaviors given their fixture within a community, and association with physical activity, nutrition, and other healthy behaviors. Over 4 years, the Calgary Flames Sport and Entertainment Corporation in conjunction with local health promotion professionals, delivered a health promotion event to the public, The Calgary Flames Health Training Camp (FHTC) in Calgary, Alberta, Canada. The purpose of these annual events has been to inspire and encourage healthy behavior uptake and adherence. A description of the FHTC over each of 4 years (2015-2018), lessons learned, and some evaluative work done alongside the event on 2 of the 4 years. In 2017, self-report surveys were administered to event attendees to assess current health status including physical activity, socio-cognitive variables, health information preference, and intention to make healthful behavior change based on event attendance. Biometric data was collected including blood pressure, height, weight, and resting heart rate. Evaluations of the four consecutive events showed that the Calgary Flames Sport and Entertainment Corporation has an ability to attract substantial numbers of the general public to attend FHTC events. Self-report measures from 2017 suggest that already-active populations may be most interested in attending however, the events do appear to inspire attendees to consider behavioral changes for health. The events helped to identify individuals with health risks requiring medical attention but has not yet resulted in known behavior changes. Positive community health impacts may arise from collaboration between health promoters and professional sporting organizations.


Asunto(s)
Conductas Relacionadas con la Salud , Deportes , Alberta , Ejercicio Físico , Promoción de la Salud , Humanos
4.
Am J Gastroenterol ; 115(5): 774-782, 2020 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32167938

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Delayed postpolypectomy bleeding (DPPB) is a relatively common adverse event. Evidence is conflicting on the efficacy of prophylactic clipping to prevent DPPB, and real-world effectiveness data are lacking. We aimed to determine the effectiveness of prophylactic clipping in preventing DPPB in a large screening-related cohort. METHODS: We manually reviewed records of patients who underwent polypectomy from 2008 to 2014 at a screening facility. Endoscopist-, patient- and polyp-related data were collected. The primary outcome was DPPB within 30 days. All unplanned healthcare visits were reviewed; DPPB cases were adjudicated by committee using a criterion-based lexicon. Multivariable logistic regression was performed, yielding adjusted odds ratios (AORs) for the association between clipping and DPPB. Secondary analyses were performed on procedures where one polyp was removed, in addition to propensity score-matched and subgroup analyses. RESULTS: In total, 8,366 colonoscopies involving polypectomy were analyzed, yielding 95 DPPB events. Prophylactic clipping was not associated with reduced DPPB (AOR 1.27; 0.83-1.96). These findings were similar in the single-polyp cohort (n = 3,369, AOR 1.07; 0.50-2.31). In patients with one proximal polyp ≥20 mm removed, there was a nonsignificant AOR with clipping of 0.55 (0.10-2.66). Clipping was not associated with a protective benefit in the propensity score-matched or other subgroup analyses. DISCUSSION: In this large cohort study, prophylactic clipping was not associated with lower DPPB rates. Endoscopists should not routinely use prophylactic clipping in most patients. Additional effectiveness and cost-effectiveness studies are required in patients with proximal lesions ≥20 mm, in whom there may be a role for prophylactic clipping.


Asunto(s)
Pólipos del Colon/cirugía , Colonoscopía , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/prevención & control , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Puntaje de Propensión
5.
BMJ Qual Saf ; 29(3): 209-216, 2020 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31439760

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Administrative data systems are used to identify hospital-based patient safety events; few studies evaluate their accuracy. We assessed the accuracy of a new set of patient safety indicators (PSIs; designed to identify in hospital complications). STUDY DESIGN: Prospectively defined analysis of registry data (1 April 2010-29 February 2016) in a Canadian hospital network. Assignment of complications was by two methods independently. The National Surgical Quality Improvement Programme (NSQIP) database was the clinical reference standard (primary outcome=any in-hospital NSQIP complication); PSI clusters were assigned using International Classification of Disease (ICD-10) codes in the discharge abstract. Our primary analysis assessed the accuracy of any PSI condition compared with any complication in the NSQIP; secondary analysis evaluated accuracy of complication-specific PSIs. PATIENTS: All inpatient surgical cases captured in NSQIP data. ANALYSIS: We assessed the accuracy of PSIs (with NSQIP as reference standard) using positive and negative predictive values (PPV/NPV), as well as positive and negative likelihood ratios (±LR). RESULTS: We identified 12 898 linked episodes of care. Complications were identified by PSIs and NSQIP in 2415 (18.7%) and 2885 (22.4%) episodes, respectively. The presence of any PSI code had a PPV of 0.55 (95% CI 0.53 to 0.57) and NPV of 0.93 (95% CI 0.92 to 0.93); +LR 6.41 (95% CI 6.01 to 6.84) and -LR 0.40 (95% CI 0.37 to 0.42). Subgroup analyses (by surgery type and urgency) showed similar performance. Complication-specific PSIs had high NPVs (95% CI 0.92 to 0.99), but low to moderate PPVs (0.13-0.61). CONCLUSION: Validation of the ICD-10 PSI system suggests applicability as a first screening step, integrated with data from other sources, to produce an adverse event detection pathway that informs learning healthcare systems. However, accuracy was insufficient to directly identify or rule out individual-level complications.


Asunto(s)
Exactitud de los Datos , Clasificación Internacional de Enfermedades , Seguridad del Paciente , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnóstico , Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud/normas , Canadá , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Humanos , Funciones de Verosimilitud , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Estudios Prospectivos , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Sistema de Registros
6.
Qual Life Res ; 28(5): 1365-1376, 2019 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30607784

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Perceived social support is known to be an important predictor of health outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). This study investigates patterns of longitudinal trajectories of patient-reported perceived social support in individuals with ACS. METHODS: Data are from 3013 patients from the Alberta Provincial Project for Outcome Assessment in Coronary Heart Disease registry who had their first cardiac catheterization between 2004 and 2011. Perceived social support was assessed using the 19-item Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey (MOS) 2 weeks, 1 year, and 3 years post catheterization. Group-based trajectory analysis based on longitudinal multiple imputation model was used to identify distinct subgroups of trajectories of perceived social support over a 3-year follow-up period. RESULTS: Three distinct social support trajectory subgroups were identified, namely: "High" social support group (60%), "Intermediate" social support group (30%), and "Low" social support subgroup (10%). Being female (OR = 1.67; 95% CI = [1.18-2.36]), depression (OR = 8.10; 95% CI = [4.27-15.36]) and smoking (OR = 1.70; 95% CI = [1.23-2.35]) were predictors of the differences among these trajectory subgroups. CONCLUSION: Although the majority of ACS patients showed increased or fairly stable trajectories of social support, about 10% of the cohort reported declining social support. These findings can inform targeted psycho-social interventions to improve their perceived social support and health outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Síndrome Coronario Agudo/psicología , Enfermedad Coronaria/psicología , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Calidad de Vida/psicología , Autoinforme , Apoyo Social , Síndrome Coronario Agudo/terapia , Anciano , Alberta , Cateterismo Cardíaco , Estudios de Cohortes , Enfermedad Coronaria/terapia , Depresión/psicología , Trastorno Depresivo/psicología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Percepción , Sistema de Registros
7.
BMJ Qual Saf ; 28(4): 310-316, 2019 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30659062

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The reporting of adverse events (AE) remains an important part of quality improvement in thoracic surgery. The best methodology for AE reporting in surgery is unclear. An AE reporting system using an electronic discharge summary with embedded data collection fields, specifying surgical procedure and complications, was developed. The data are automatically transferred daily to a web-based reporting system. METHODS: We determined the accuracy and sustainability of this electronic real time data collection system (ERD) by comparing the completeness of record capture on procedures and complications with coded discharge data (administrative data), and with the standard of chart audit at two intervals. All surgical procedures performed for 2 consecutive months at initiation (Ti) and 1 year later (T1yr) were audited by an objective trained abstractor. A second abstractor audited 10% of the charts. RESULTS: The ERD captured 71/72 (99%) of charts at Ti and 56/65 (86%) at T1yr. Comparing the presence/absence of complications between ERD and chart audit demonstrated at Ti a high sensitivity and specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) of 95.5%, negative predictive value (NPV) of 93.9% with a kappa of 0.872 (95% CI 0.750 to 0.994), and at T1yr a sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of 100% with a kappa of 1.0 (95% CI 1.0). Comparing the presence/absence of complications between administrative data and chart audit at Ti demonstrated a low sensitivity, high specificity and a kappa of 0.471 (95% CI 0.256 to 0.686), and at T1yr a low sensitivity, high specificity of 85% and a kappa of 0.479 (95% CI 0.245 to 0.714). CONCLUSIONS: We found that the ERD can provide accurate real time AE reporting in thoracic surgery, has advantages over previous reporting methodologies and is an alternative system for surgical clinical teams developing AE reporting systems.


Asunto(s)
Documentación , Registros Electrónicos de Salud , Errores Médicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Torácicos/efectos adversos , Documentación/métodos , Humanos , Errores Médicos/clasificación , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Seguridad del Paciente , Garantía de la Calidad de Atención de Salud , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Administración de la Seguridad
8.
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes ; 11(3): e003661, 2018 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29545392

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) assessment is an important health outcome for measuring the efficacy of treatments and interventions for coronary artery disease (CAD). HRQOL is known to improve over the first year after interventions for CAD, but there is limited knowledge of the changes in HRQOL beyond 1 year. We investigated heterogeneity in long-term trajectories of HRQOL in patients with CAD. METHODS AND RESULTS: Data were obtained from 6226 patients identified from the Alberta Provincial Project for Outcome Assessment in Coronary Heart Disease with at least 1-vessel CAD who underwent their first catheterization between 2006 and 2009. HRQOL was assessed using the Seattle Angina Questionnaire, a 19-item disease-specific measure of HRQOL for patients with CAD. Group-based trajectory analysis was used to identify various subgroups of Seattle Angina Questionnaire trajectories over time while adjusting for missing data through a longitudinal multiple imputation model. Multinomial logistic regression was used to identify the predictors of differences among the identified subgroups. Our analysis revealed significant improvements in HRQOL across all the 5 domains of Seattle Angina Questionnaire overtime for the whole data. Multitrajectory analyses revealed 4 HRQOL trajectory subgroups including high (25.1%), largely increased (32.3%), largely decreased (25.0%), and low (17.6%) trajectories. Age, sex, body mass index, diabetes mellitus, previous history of myocardial infarction, smoking, depression, anxiety, type of treatment received, and perceived social support were significant predictors of differences among these trajectory subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights variations in longitudinal trajectories of HRQOL in patients with CAD. Despite overall improvements in HRQOL, about a quarter of our cohort experienced a significant decline in their HRQOL over the 5-year period. Understanding these HRQOL trajectories may help personalize prognostic information, identify patients and HRQOL domains on which clinical interventions are most beneficial, and support treatment decisions for patients with CAD.


Asunto(s)
Cateterismo Cardíaco , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/diagnóstico , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/terapia , Calidad de Vida , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto , Afecto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Alberta , Cateterismo Cardíaco/efectos adversos , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/fisiopatología , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/psicología , Emociones , Femenino , Estado de Salud , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Sistema de Registros , Factores de Riesgo , Apoyo Social , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
9.
Int J Qual Health Care ; 29(4): 548-556, 2017 Aug 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28934402

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To assess the utility of the proposed World Health Organization (WHO)'s International Classification of Disease (ICD) framework for classifying patient safety events. SETTING: Independent classification of 45 clinical vignettes using a web-based platform. STUDY PARTICIPANTS: The WHO's multi-disciplinary Quality and Safety Topic Advisory Group. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The framework consists of three concepts: harm, cause and mode. We defined a concept as 'classifiable' if more than half of the raters could assign an ICD-11 code for the case. We evaluated reasons why cases were nonclassifiable using a qualitative approach. RESULTS: Harm was classifiable in 31 of 45 cases (69%). Of these, only 20 could be classified according to cause and mode. Classifiable cases were those in which a clear cause and effect relationship existed (e.g. medication administration error). Nonclassifiable cases were those without clear causal attribution (e.g. pressure ulcer). Of the 14 cases in which harm was not evident (31%), only 5 could be classified according to cause and mode and represented potential adverse events. Overall, nine cases (20%) were nonclassifiable using the three-part patient safety framework and contained significant ambiguity in the relationship between healthcare outcome and putative cause. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed framework enabled classification of the majority of patient safety events. Cases in which potentially harmful events did not cause harm were not classifiable; additional code categories within the ICD-11 are one proposal to address this concern. Cases with ambiguity in cause and effect relationship between healthcare processes and outcomes remain difficult to classify.


Asunto(s)
Clasificación Internacional de Enfermedades , Seguridad del Paciente/normas , Organización Mundial de la Salud , Humanos , Errores Médicos/clasificación , Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud
10.
PLoS One ; 12(3): e0173687, 2017.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28319148

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: It is unclear to what extent EUS influences the surgical management of patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. This systematic review sought to determine if EUS evaluation improves the identification of unresectable disease among adults with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, bibliographies of included articles and conference proceedings for studies reporting original data regarding surgical management and/or survival among patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma, from inception to January 7th 2017. Our main outcome was the incremental benefit of EUS for the identification of unresectable disease (IBEUS). The pooled IBEUS were calculated using random effects models. Heterogeneity was explored using stratified meta-analysis and meta-regression. RESULTS: Among 4,903 citations identified, we included 8 cohort studies (study periods from 1992 to 2007) that examined the identification of unresectable disease (n = 795). Random effects meta-analysis suggested that EUS alone identified unresectable disease in 19% of patients (95% confidence interval [CI], 10-33%). Among those studies that considered portal or mesenteric vein invasion as potentially resectable, EUS alone was able to identify unresectable disease in 14% of patients (95% CI 8-24%) after a CT scan was performed. LIMITATIONS: The majority of the included studies were retrospective. CONCLUSIONS: EUS evaluation is associated with increased identification of unresectable disease among adults with pancreatic adenocarcinoma.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/diagnóstico por imagen , Endosonografía/métodos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/diagnóstico por imagen , Adenocarcinoma/cirugía , Adulto , Humanos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirugía
11.
Can J Surg ; 59(4): 268-75, 2016 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27454839

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Following a landmark study showing decreased morbidity and mortality after implementation of the surgical safety checklist (SSC), it has been widely adopted into perioperative policy. We explored the impact of attitudes and beliefs surrounding the SSC on its uptake in Calgary. METHODS: We used qualitative methodology to examine factors influencing SSC use. We performed semistructured interviews based on Rogers' theory of diffusion of innovation. Purposive and snowball sampling were used to identify surgeons, anesthesiologists and operating room nurses from hospitals in Calgary. Data collection and analysis were based on grounded theory. Two individuals jointly analyzed data and achieved consensus on emerging themes. RESULTS: Generated themes included 1) the SSC has brought organization to previous informal perioperative checks, 2) the SSC is most helpful when it is simple, and 3) the 3 current components of the checklist are redundant. The briefing was considered the most important aspect and the debriefing the least important. Initially the SSC was difficult to implement owing to a shift in time management and perioperative culture; however, it has now assimilated into perioperative routine. Finally, though most participants agreed that the SSC might avoid some delays and complications, only a few believe there have been observable improvements to morbidity and mortality. CONCLUSION: Although the SSC has been integrated into perioperative practice in Calgary, participants believe that previous informal checkpoints were able to circumvent most perioperative issues. Although the SSC may help with flow and equipment, participants believe it fails to show a subjective, clinically important improvement.


BACKGROUND: Après une étude charnière ayant montré une baisse de la morbidité et de la mortalité après la mise en oeuvre de la liste de contrôle de la sécurité chirurgicale, cette dernière a été largement intégrée aux politiques périopératoires. Nous avons examiné l'effet des attitudes et des croyances entourant la liste sur son adoption à Calgary. METHODS: À l'aide d'une méthode qualitative, nous nous sommes penchés sur les facteurs influençant l'utilisation de la liste. Pour ce faire, nous avons effectué des entrevues semi-dirigées fondées sur la théorie de la diffusion de l'innovation de Rogers. Nous avons utilisé l'échantillonnage dirigé et le sondage en boule de neige pour cibler des chirurgiens, des anesthésiologistes et des membres du personnel infirmier de salle d'opération des hôpitaux de Calgary. La collecte et l'analyse des données étaient fondées sur la théorie ancrée. Deux personnes ont analysé ensemble les données et se sont entendues sur les thèmes émergents. RESULTS: Voici les principales conclusions dégagées : 1) la liste a permis de structurer les contrôles périopératoires non officiels du passé, 2) la liste est surtout utile quand elle est simple et 3) les 3 composantes actuelles de la liste de contrôle sont redondantes. Le breffage était considéré comme étant l'aspect le plus important et le débreffage, le moins important. Au départ, la liste a été difficile à mettre en oeuvre en raison des changements à apporter à la gestion du temps et à la culture périopératoire; cependant, elle est maintenant bien intégrée dans la routine périopératoire. Enfin, bien que la plupart des participants conviennent que la liste peut éviter des retards et des complications, seuls quelques-uns croient qu'il y a eu une amélioration observable de la morbidité et de la mortalité. CONCLUSION: Si la liste de contrôle de la sécurité chirurgicale a été intégrée dans la pratique périopératoire à Calgary, les participants croient que les points de contrôle non officiels du passé pouvaient prévenir la plupart des problèmes périopératoires. La liste est utile pour ce qui est du processus et de l'équipement, mais les participants croient qu'elle n'apporte pas d'amélioration subjective importante d'un point de vue clinique.


Asunto(s)
Lista de Verificación/normas , Atención Perioperativa/normas , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/normas , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos/normas , Alberta , Investigación sobre Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Investigación Cualitativa
12.
J Am Heart Assoc ; 5(7)2016 07 19.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27436303

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Although patients with kidney disease have potential to benefit from revascularization, they are also at higher risk of complications, which may affect quality of life. METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied a cohort of 8198 adults who underwent coronary angiography in Alberta, between 2004 and 2008, and completed health-related quality-of-life (HR-QOL) surveys. Changes in HR-QOL measures were most favorable among patients who received coronary artery bypass graft (CABG), but did not significantly differ by kidney function within groups of patients who received CABG, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), or medical therapy (P value for interaction between estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] and revascularization status >0.10 for all outcomes). Among those who received CABG, the adjusted mean EuroQol 5 dimensions (EQ-5D) utility score for those with eGFR >90 mL/min per 1.73 m(2) increased by 0.11 (95% CI, 0.09-0.14) and for those with eGFR <30 mL/min per 1.73m(2) by 0.13 (95% CI, 0.05-0.21). The adjusted mean EQ-5D utility score also increased similarly at all levels of eGFR for those who received PCI and for those who received medical management. Mean changes in Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) scores were also similar across all levels of eGFR within each treatment group for the quality of life, angina frequency, angina stability, physical limitations, and treatment satisfaction domains of the SAQ. Among those who received CABG, the adjusted mean SAQ quality of life score for those with eGFR >90 mL/min per 1.73m(2) increased by 22.1 (95% CI, 18.5-25.7) and for those with eGFR <30 mL/min per 1.73m(2) by 14.0 (95% CI, 2.31-25.63). CONCLUSIONS: Changes in HR-QOL do not vary by kidney function among patients selected for CABG, PCI, or medical management of coronary disease.


Asunto(s)
Angina de Pecho/terapia , Puente de Arteria Coronaria , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/terapia , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Calidad de Vida , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/epidemiología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Alberta , Angina de Pecho/epidemiología , Estudios de Cohortes , Comorbilidad , Tratamiento Conservador , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/epidemiología , Femenino , Tasa de Filtración Glomerular , Estado de Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pirenos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Resultado del Tratamiento
13.
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes ; 9(3): 230-8, 2016 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27166209

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Frailty is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular outcomes. However, its trajectory after coronary artery disease treatment is unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: Three hundred seventy-four patients undergoing nonemergent cardiac catheterization followed by treatment (ie, 128 coronary artery bypass graft [CABG], 150 percutaneous coronary intervention [PCI], 96 medical therapy only) were observed for 30 months. A frailty index (FI) score was calculated at baseline (before initial treatment) and 6, 12, and 30 months after treatment. Random-effects models compared FI score trajectories by sex, age, and treatment group. Mean baseline FI scores were 0.170, 0.154, and 0.154 for CABG, PCI, and medical therapy only, respectively. FI scores decreased (improved) 6 months after initial treatment, then increased (worsened) at 12 and 30 months (P<0.001 for differences over time). Women had nonsignificantly higher FI scores than men (P=0.097) but followed the same trajectory (P=0.352 for differences over time). In patients aged ≥75 years, FI scores increased postbaseline for CABG and medical therapy only and after 6 months for PCI patients. Patients <75 years assigned to PCI and CABG experienced a sustained frailty reduction, whereas those assigned to medical therapy only showed stable frailty over the 30-month follow-up period (P value for differences over time by age and treatment group=0.041). CONCLUSIONS: With coronary artery disease treatment, frailty generally follows a U-shaped trajectory, but the pattern may differ by age and treatment. Further investigation is needed to confirm these observations and determine whether patients might benefit from consideration of frailty status.


Asunto(s)
Fármacos Cardiovasculares/uso terapéutico , Puente de Arteria Coronaria , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/terapia , Anciano Frágil , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Alberta , Fármacos Cardiovasculares/efectos adversos , Angiografía Coronaria , Puente de Arteria Coronaria/efectos adversos , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/diagnóstico , Femenino , Evaluación Geriátrica , Humanos , Masculino , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Estudios Prospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores Sexuales , Centros de Atención Terciaria , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
14.
Clin Transl Gastroenterol ; 7: e165, 2016 Apr 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27101004

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: We assessed the association of smoking at diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) on the need for an intestinal resection. METHODS: The Health Improvement Network was used to identify an inception cohort of Crohn's disease (n=1519) and ulcerative colitis (n=3600) patients from 1999-2009. Poisson regression explored temporal trends for the proportion of newly diagnosed IBD patients who never smoked before their diagnosis and the risk of surgery within 3 years of diagnosis. Cox proportional hazard models assessed the association between smoking and surgery, and effect modification was explored for age at diagnosis. RESULTS: The rate of never smokers increased by 3% per year for newly diagnosed Crohn's disease patients (incidence rate ratio (IRR) 1.03; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.02-1.05), but not for ulcerative colitis. The rate of surgery decreased among Crohn's disease patients aged 17-40 years (IRR 0.96; 95% CI: 0.93-0.98), but not for ulcerative colitis. Smoking at diagnosis increased the risk of surgery for Crohn's disease patients diagnosed after the age of 40 (hazard ratio (HR) 2.99; 95% CI: 1.52-5.92), but not for those diagnosed before age 40. Ulcerative colitis patients diagnosed between the ages of 17 and 40 years and who quit smoking before their diagnosis were more likely to undergo a colectomy (ex-smoker vs. never smoker: HR 1.66; 95% CI: 1.04-2.66). The age-specific findings were consistent across sensitivity analyses for Crohn's disease, but not ulcerative colitis. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the association of smoking and surgical resection was dependent on the age at diagnosis of IBD.

15.
BMC Med Res Methodol ; 15: 32, 2015 Apr 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25888346

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Survey research in healthcare is an important tool to collect information about healthcare delivery, service use and overall issues relating to quality of care. Unfortunately, physicians are often a group with low survey response rates and little research has looked at response rates among physician specialists. For these reasons, the purpose of this project was to explore survey response rates among physician specialists in a large metropolitan Canadian city. METHODS: As part of a larger project to look at physician payment plans, an online survey about medical billing practices was distributed to 904 physicians from various medical specialties. The primary method for physicians to complete the survey was via the Internet using a well-known and established survey company (www.surveymonkey.com). Multiple methods were used to encourage survey response such as individual personalized email invitations, multiple reminders, and a draw for three gift certificate prizes were used to increase response rate. Descriptive statistics were used to assess response rates and reasons for non-response. RESULTS: Overall survey response rate was 35.0%. Response rates varied by specialty: Neurology/neurosurgery (46.6%); internal medicine (42.9%); general surgery (29.6%); pediatrics (29.2%); and psychiatry (27.1%). Non-respondents listed lack of time/survey burden as the main reason for not responding to our survey. CONCLUSIONS: Our survey results provide a look into the challenges of collecting healthcare research where response rates to surveys are often low. The findings presented here should help researchers in planning future survey based studies. Findings from this study and others suggest smaller monetary incentives for each individual may be a more appropriate way to increase response rates.


Asunto(s)
Investigación sobre Servicios de Salud/economía , Internet , Médicos/economía , Encuestas y Cuestionarios/economía , Adulto , Canadá , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Femenino , Investigación sobre Servicios de Salud/métodos , Investigación sobre Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Médicos/clasificación , Médicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Mecanismo de Reembolso/economía , Mecanismo de Reembolso/estadística & datos numéricos
16.
Clin Orthop Relat Res ; 473(11): 3431-42, 2015 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25804881

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Although Kaplan-Meier survival analysis is commonly used to estimate the cumulative incidence of revision after joint arthroplasty, it theoretically overestimates the risk of revision in the presence of competing risks (such as death). Because the magnitude of overestimation is not well documented, the potential associated impact on clinical and policy decision-making remains unknown. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We performed a meta-analysis to answer the following questions: (1) To what extent does the Kaplan-Meier method overestimate the cumulative incidence of revision after joint replacement compared with alternative competing-risks methods? (2) Is the extent of overestimation influenced by followup time or rate of competing risks? METHODS: We searched Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, BIOSIS Previews, and Web of Science (1946, 1980, 1980, and 1899, respectively, to October 26, 2013) and included article bibliographies for studies comparing estimated cumulative incidence of revision after hip or knee arthroplasty obtained using both Kaplan-Meier and competing-risks methods. We excluded conference abstracts, unpublished studies, or studies using simulated data sets. Two reviewers independently extracted data and evaluated the quality of reporting of the included studies. Among 1160 abstracts identified, six studies were included in our meta-analysis. The principal reason for the steep attrition (1160 to six) was that the initial search was for studies in any clinical area that compared the cumulative incidence estimated using the Kaplan-Meier versus competing-risks methods for any event (not just the cumulative incidence of hip or knee revision); we did this to minimize the likelihood of missing any relevant studies. We calculated risk ratios (RRs) comparing the cumulative incidence estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method with the competing-risks method for each study and used DerSimonian and Laird random effects models to pool these RRs. Heterogeneity was explored using stratified meta-analyses and metaregression. RESULTS: The pooled cumulative incidence of revision after hip or knee arthroplasty obtained using the Kaplan-Meier method was 1.55 times higher (95% confidence interval, 1.43-1.68; p < 0.001) than that obtained using the competing-risks method. Longer followup times and higher proportions of competing risks were not associated with increases in the amount of overestimation of revision risk by the Kaplan-Meier method (all p > 0.10). This may be due to the small number of studies that met the inclusion criteria and conservative variance approximation. CONCLUSIONS: The Kaplan-Meier method overestimates risk of revision after hip or knee arthroplasty in populations where competing risks (such as death) might preclude the occurrence of the event of interest (revision). Competing-risks methods should be used to more accurately estimate the cumulative incidence of revision when the goal is to plan healthcare services and resource allocation for revisions.


Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/efectos adversos , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla/efectos adversos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/cirugía , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/instrumentación , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla/instrumentación , Prótesis de Cadera , Humanos , Incidencia , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Prótesis de la Rodilla , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnóstico , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Falla de Prótesis , Reoperación , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
17.
CMAJ Open ; 3(4): E406-12, 2015.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27051661

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There are concerns that alternate payment plans for physicians may be associated with erosion of data quality, given that physicians are paid regardless of whether claims are submitted. Our objective was to determine the proportion of claims submitted by physician specialists using fee-for-service and alternative payment plans, and to identify and compare the validity of information coded in physician billing claims submitted by these specialists in Calgary. METHODS: We conducted a survey of physician specialists to determine their plan status and obtained consent to use physicians' claims data from 4 acute care hospitals in Calgary. Inpatient and emergency department services were identified from the Discharge Abstract Database for Alberta (Canadian Institute for Health Information) and the Alberta Ambulatory Care Classification System database. We linked services to claims by Alberta physicians from 2002 to 2009 by using unique patient and physician identifiers. After identifying the proportion of claims submitted, we reviewed inpatient charts to determine the completeness of submissions as defined by positive predictive value. RESULTS: Of 182 physicians who responded to the survey, 94 (51.6%) used fee-for-service plans exclusively and 51 (28.0%) used alternative payment plans exclusively. Overall completeness of physician submissions for claims was 91.8% for physicians using fee-for-service plans and 90.0% for physicians using alternative payment plans. Submission rate varied by medical specialty (surgery: 92.4% for fee for service v. 88.6% for alternative payment; internal medicine: 94.1% v. 91.3%; neurology: 95.1% v. 91.0%; and pediatrics: 95.1% v. 89.3%). Among claims submitted, the physician accuracies for billing of medical conditions were 87.8% for fee-for-service and 85.0% for alternative payment. INTERPRETATION: Overall submission rates and accuracy in recording diagnoses by physicians who used both plans were high. These findings show that the implementation of alternative payment plan programs in Alberta may not have an impact on the quality of physician claims data.

18.
Am J Med ; 128(5): 532-8, 2015 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25541033

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Perioperative hypotension and bradycardia in the surgical patient are associated with adverse outcomes, including stroke. We developed and evaluated a new preoperative risk model in predicting intraoperative hypotension or bradycardia in patients undergoing elective noncardiac surgery. METHODS: Prospective data were collected in 193 patients undergoing elective, noncardiac surgery. Intraoperative hypotension was defined as systolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg for >5 minutes or a 35% decrease in the mean arterial blood pressure. Intraoperative bradycardia was defined as a heart rate of <60 beats/min for >5 minutes. A logistic regression model was developed for predicting intraoperative hypotension or bradycardia with bootstrap validation. Model performance was assessed using area under the receiver operating curves and Hosmer-Lemeshow tests. RESULTS: A total of 127 patients developed hypotension or bradycardia. The average age of participants was 67.6 ± 11.3 years, and 59.1% underwent major surgery. A final 5-item score was developed, including preoperative Heart rate (<60 beats/min), preoperative hypotension (<110/60 mm Hg), Elderly age (>65 years), preoperative renin-Angiotensin blockade (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, or beta-blockers), Revised cardiac risk index (≥3 points), and Type of surgery (major surgery), entitled the "HEART" score. The HEART score was moderately predictive of intraoperative bradycardia or hypotension (odds ratio, 2.51; 95% confidence interval, 1.79-3.53; C-statistic, 0.75). Maximum points on the HEART score were associated with an increased likelihood ratio for intraoperative bradycardia or hypotension (likelihood ratio, +3.64). CONCLUSIONS: The 5-point HEART score was predictive of intraoperative hypotension or bradycardia. These findings suggest a role for using the HEART score to better risk-stratify patients preoperatively and may help guide decisions on perioperative management of blood pressure and heart rate-lowering medications and anesthetic agents.


Asunto(s)
Bradicardia/epidemiología , Técnicas de Apoyo para la Decisión , Hipotensión/epidemiología , Complicaciones Intraoperatorias/epidemiología , Anciano , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Curva ROC , Medición de Riesgo
19.
J Surg Oncol ; 108(6): 348-51, 2013 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24038038

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Evaluation of the management of DCIS poses challenges, as standard breast cancer outcome measures such as mortality do not apply. We have developed quality indicators (QIs) to measure the quality of DCIS treatment in Alberta, Canada. METHODS: A modified Delphi process was used to determine QIs in the treatment of DCIS after review of evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Patients diagnosed with DCIS from 2000 to 2001 (cohort 1) and 2009-2010 (cohort 2) were identified from the Alberta Cancer Registry and QIs were retrospectively abstracted. RESULTS: The expert panel developed eight QIs to assess the overall quality of care for DCIS patients. Five hundred eighty eligible patients were identified in the two cohorts. There was significant improvement in radiation oncology referral, radiation post lumpectomy and complete pathology reporting. Axillary staging significantly increased from 20% (axillary dissection in cohort 1) to 60% (sentinel node biopsy in cohort 2). Other QIs did not differ significantly. CONCLUSIONS: By developing QIs, performance measures for DCIS may assessed and compared over time. Although there have been significant improvements with pathology reporting and radiation oncology assessment and treatment, axillary staging rates are unexpectedly high, necessitating further investigation.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/terapia , Carcinoma Intraductal no Infiltrante/terapia , Técnica Delphi , Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Adulto , Anciano , Alberta , Antineoplásicos Hormonales/administración & dosificación , Biopsia con Aguja Gruesa , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Carcinoma Intraductal no Infiltrante/patología , Femenino , Humanos , Comunicación Interdisciplinaria , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático , Mastectomía Segmentaria , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Radioterapia Adyuvante , Estudios Retrospectivos , Biopsia del Ganglio Linfático Centinela , Análisis de Supervivencia , Tamoxifeno/administración & dosificación
20.
Can J Cardiol ; 29(11): 1454-61, 2013 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23927867

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Marked variation exists concerning the utilization of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). The objective of this study was to examine differences in predictors of mode of revascularization across 3 provincial jurisdictions. METHODS: All patients who underwent PCI and isolated CABG in British Columbia, Alberta, and Nova Scotia between 1996 and 2007 were considered. Age- and sex-standardized rates of PCI and CABG per 100,000 population and PCI to CABG ratios were calculated by year and province. Logistic regression models were constructed to identify independent predictors of mode of revascularization in each province. RESULTS: A total of 32,190 and 69,409 patients underwent CABG and PCI, respectively, during the study period. Significant increases in the age- and sex-adjusted PCI to CABG ratios were observed in all 3 provinces, but these ratios differed between provinces. Across all 3 jurisdictions, female sex and diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome favoured increased PCI vs CABG, and increased age, left main, or 3-vessel disease occurring before myocardial infarction, and diabetes favoured lower PCI vs CABG. After adjusting for clinical and angiographic factors, there remained a significant variation in choice of PCI vs CABG between the 3 provinces over time. CONCLUSIONS: Significant interprovincial variability in PCI to CABG ratios was observed. Though certain patient-related factors predictive of either PCI or CABG were identified, factors beyond clinical presentation played a role in the choice of revascularization approach.


Asunto(s)
Puente de Arteria Coronaria/estadística & datos numéricos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/estadística & datos numéricos , Gobierno Estatal , Síndrome Coronario Agudo/epidemiología , Síndrome Coronario Agudo/terapia , Adulto , Distribución por Edad , Anciano , Canadá/epidemiología , Cardiología , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/epidemiología , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/terapia , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infarto del Miocardio/epidemiología , Infarto del Miocardio/terapia , Distribución por Sexo , Recursos Humanos , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA