A human melanoma metastasis-suppressor locus maps to 6q16.3-q23.

Loss, deletion or rearrangement along large portions of the long arm (q-arm) of chromosome 6 occurs in >80% of late-stage human melanomas, suggesting that genes controlling malignant characteristics are encoded there. Metastasis, but not tumorigenicity, was completely suppressed in the human melanoma cell line C8161 into which an additional intact chromosome 6 had been introduced by microcell-mediated chromosome transfer. Our objective was to refine the location of a putative metastasis suppressor gene. To do this, we transferred an intact (neo6) and a deletion variant [neo6qdel; neo6(del)(q16.3-q23)] of neomycin-tagged human chromosome 6 into metastatic C8161 subclone 9 (C8161.9) by MMCT. Single cell hybrid clones were selected in G-418 and isolated. Following verification that the hybrids retained the expected regions of chromosome 6 using a panel of polymorphic sequence-tagged sites, the hybrids were tested for tumorigenicity and metastasis in athymic mice. As reported previously, intact, normal chromosome 6 suppressed metastasis whether tumor cells were injected i.v. or into an orthotopic (i.e., intradermal) site. In contrast, metastasis was not suppressed in the neo6qdel hybrids. Tumorigenicity was unaffected in hybrids prepared with either chromosome 6 donor. These data strongly suggest that a human melanoma metastasis suppressor locus maps between 6q16.3-q23 ( approximately 40 cM).

Transfection of constitutively active mitogen-activated protein/extracellular signal-regulated kinase kinase confers tumorigenic and metastatic potentials to NIH3T3 cells.

Cellular growth and differentiation are controlled by multiple extracellular signals, many of which activate extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK)/mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinases. Components of the MAP kinase pathways also cause oncogenic transformation in their constitutively active forms. Moreover, expression of activated ras can confer metastatic potential upon some cells. Activation of MAP kinases requires phosphorylation of both Thr and Tyr in the catalytic domain by a family of dual-specificity kinases, called MEKs (MAP kinase/ERK kinase). MEK1 is activated by phosphorylation at Ser218 and Ser222 by Raf. Mutation of these two sites to acidic residues, specifically [Asp218], [Asp218, Asp222], and [Glu218, Glu222], results in constitutively active MEK1. Using these mutant variants of MEK1, we showed previously that transfection of NIH/3T3 or Swiss 3T3 cells causes morphological transformation and increases growth on soft agar, independent of ERK activity. The transformed cell lines show increased expression of matrix metalloproteinases 2 and 9 and cathepsin L, proteinases that have been implicated in the metastatic process. We tested NIH3T3 cells transfected with the [Asp218] or [Asp218, Asp222] for metastatic potential after i.v. injection into athymic mice. Parental 3T3 cells formed no tumors grossly or histologically. However, all MEK1 mutant transformants formed macroscopic metastases. Thus, like activated Ras, MEK1 can confer both tumorigenic and metastatic potential upon NIH3T3 cells. These results refine the mechanism through which ras could confer tumorigenic and metastatic potential (ie., the critical determinants of tumorigenic and metastatic potential are downstream of MEK1).

Analysis of mechanisms underlying BRMS1 suppression of metastasis.

Introduction of normal, neomycin-tagged human chromosome 11 (neo11) reduces the metastatic capacity of MDA-MB-435 human breast carcinoma cells by 70-90% without affecting tumorigenicity. Differential display comparing MDA-MB-435 and neo11/435 led to the discovery of a human breast carcinoma metastasis suppressor gene, BRMS1, which maps to chromosome 11q13.1-q13.2. Stable transfectants of MDA-MB-435 and MDA-MB-231 breast carcinoma cells with BRMS1 cDNA still form progressively growing, locally invasive tumors when injected in mammary fat pads of athymic mice but exhibit significantly lower metastatic potential (50-90% inhibition) to lungs and regional lymph nodes. To begin elucidating the mechanism(s) of action, we measured the ability of BRMS1 to perturb individual steps of the metastatic cascade modeled in vitro. Consistent differences were not observed for adhesion to extracellular matrix components (laminin, fibronectin, type IV collagen, type I collagen, Matrigel); growth rates in vitro or in vivo; expression of matrix metalloproteinases, heparanase, or invasion. Likewise. BRMS1 expression did not up regulate expression of other metastasis suppressors, such as NM23, Kai1, KiSS1 or E-cadherin. Motility of BRMS1 transfectants was modestly inhibited (30-60%) compared to parental and vector-only transfectants. Ability to grow in soft agar was also decreased in MDA-MB-435 cells by 80-89%, but the decrease for MDA-MB-231 was less (13-15% reduction). Also, transfection and re-expression of BRMS1 restored the ability of human breast carcinoma cells to form functional homotypic gap junctions. Collectively, these data suggest that BRMS1 suppresses metastasis of human breast carcinoma by complex, atypical mechanisms.

Metastasis-suppressed C8161 melanoma cells arrest in lung but fail to proliferate.

The incidence of melanoma continues to increase at a rapid rate. As for most cancers, it is melanoma metastases, rather than the primary malignancy, that is the principal cause of death. We previously showed that the introduction of a normal copy of chromosome 6 into the metastatic human melanoma cell line C8161 suppresses metastasis at a step subsequent to tumor cells entering the bloodstream. To better define the step(s) in metastasis blocked by the addition of chromosome 6 we engineered cells that constitutively express green fluorescent protein (GFP). When these tagged, chromosome 6 hybrid cells were injected intravenously into athymic mice, grossly detectable metastases did not form. However, fluorescence microscopy revealed micro-metastases (single cells or clusters of <10 cells) in the lungs, suggesting that these cells lodged in the lungs but failed to proliferate. Cells isolated from lung up to 60 days post-injection grew in culture and/or formed tumors when injected into the skin, indicating that they were still viable, but dormant. This result implies that the gene(s) on chromosome 6 interfere specifically with growth regulatory response in the lung, but not in the skin. Thus, the gene(s) responsible for metastasis suppression represents a new class of metastasis inhibitors acting at the final stages of the metastatic cascade--that is, affecting the ability of the cells to survive and proliferate at a specific secondary site.

Molecular mechanisms controlling human melanoma progression and metastasis.

Progression from normal melanocyte to metastatic melanoma is a multistep, multigenic process. While relatively easy to conceptualize, the stages of melanoma progression are not necessarily discrete, nor are they unambiguously defined at the morphologic or molecular levels. The ability to stage the lesions more precisely would afford clinicians a greater confidence when designing therapeutic strategies. Unfortunately, a molecular definition of cells at each stage does not yet exist. Toward that end, the purpose of this review is twofold: (1) to highlight recent advances in our understanding of the molecular genetics of human cutaneous melanoma predisposition, and (2) to construct a molecular model of melanoma progression toward metastasis.